Abstract
There is a desire for an integrated tool to measure the impact of military clothing and equipment on mobility, lethality and survivability. This study was a first step to develop such a test platform. Twenty Soldiers executed the test in three levels of encumbrance. Mobility was measured via obstacle completion timing. Lethality tasks included static and dynamic shooting engagements, with traditional marksmanship measures and cognitive decision-making. Quantification of body exposure and exposure to threat time comprised survivability measures. Preliminary results indicated that as encumbrance increased, mobility, lethality and survivability were altered. Obstacle completion times increased, marksmanship precision and vertical stability during the static elements improved, and shooting efficiency and threat elimination during the dynamic elements decreased. By expanding on this methodology, we create additional capabilities for the US Army and our international partners. Lessons learned from this study will allow for improvements to the test platform as it is developed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Department of the US Army. https://admin.govexec.com/media/untitled.pdf
Brainerd, S.T., Bruno, R.S.: Human factors evaluation of a prototype load-carrying system (Tech. Memo 15-85). Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD: U.S. Army Human Engineering Laboratory (1985)
LaFiandra, M., Lynch, S., Frykman, P., Harman, E., Ramos, H., Mello, R.: A comparison of two commercial off the shelf backpacks to the Modular Lightweight Load Carrying Equipment (MOLLE) in biomechanics, metabolic cost and performance (Tech. Rep. T03-15). U.S. Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine, Natick, MA (2003)
Brewster, F.W.: Technical memorandum: observation report for the load effects assessment program – army (LEAP-A) pilot evaluation, 1–12 December 2014. Maneuver Battle Lab, Fort Benning, GA (2014)
Tack, D., Kelly, A., Richter, M., Bray-Miner, J.: Preliminary Results of MC-LEAP Testing of U.S. Marine Combat Load Order Configurations. U.S Marine Corps Systems Command, Quantico, VA (2012)
Bray-Miners, J., Kelly, A.: CAN-LEAP summary of results—Fall 2012 experimentation series (Tech Memo). Defence Research and Development Canada, Toronto, CA (2013)
Dutton, B., Stryker, T.: Soldier load benchmark evaluation. Battle Lab Project Number 0338. Fort Benning, GA (2015)
Batty, J.M., Coyne, M.E., DeSimone, L.L., Mitchell, K.B., Bensel, C.K.: Evaluation of weight effects on a soldier physical readiness test course. In: Proceedings of the 2016 American Biomechanics Society. Raleigh, NC (2016)
Mitchell, K.B., Batty, J.M., Coyne, M.E., DeSimone, L.L., Choi, H.J., Gregorczyk, K.N., Bensel, C.K.: Impact of weight on military mission oriented obstacle course performance. Poster presentation at the 7th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics, Orlando, FL (2016)
Bensel, C.K.: Soldier performance and functionality: Impact of chemical protective clothing. Mil. Psychol. 9(4), 287–302 (1997)
Carbone, P.D., Carlton, S.D., Stierli, M., Orr, R.M.: The impact of load carriage on the marksmanship of the tactical police officer: a pilot study. J. Aust. Strength Cond. 22(2), 50–57 (2014)
Johnson, R.F., Kobrick, J.L.: Effects of wearing chemical protective clothing on rifle marksmanship and on sensory and psychomotor tasks. Mil. Psychol. 9(4), 301–314 (1997)
Johnson, R.F., McMenemy, D.J., Dauphinee, D.T.: Rifle marksmanship with three types of combat clothing. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 34th Annual Meeting, pp. 1529–1532 (1990)
Brown, S.A.T, McNamara, J.A., Choi, H.J., Mitchell, K.B.: Assessment of a marksmanship simulator as a tool for clothing and individual equipment evaluation. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 60th Annual Meeting, pp. 1424–1428 (2016)
Crowley, J.C., Hallmark, B.W., Shanley, M.G., Sollinger, J.M.: Changing the Army’s Weapon Training Strategies to Meet Operational Requirements More Efficiently and Effectively. Rand Arroyo Center, Santa Monica (2014)
Hagman, J.D., Smith, M.D.: Weapon zeroing with the laser marksmanship training system (LMTS). Research report no. 1744. U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, Alexandria, VA (1999)
Schendel, J.D., Heller, F.H., Finley, D.L., Hawley, J.K.: Use of weaponeer marksmanship trainer in predicting M16A1 rifle qualification performance. Hum. Factors 27(3), 313–325 (1985)
Torre, J.P., Maxey, J.L., Piper, S.: Live fire and simulator marksmanship performance with the M16A1 rifle. Study 1. A validation of the artificial intelligence direct fire weapons research test bed, vol. 1. Main Report. Advanced Technology Inc, Orlando, FL (1987)
McNamara, J., Choi, H.J., Brown, S.A.T., Mitchell, K.: Evaluating the effects of clothing and individual equipment on marksmanship performance using a novel five target methodology. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 60th Annual Meeting, pp. 2043–2047 (2016)
Choi, H.J., Mitchell, K.B., Garlie, T., McNamara, J., Hennessy, E., Carson, J.: Effects of body armor fit on marksmanship performance. In: Advances in Physical Ergonomics and Human Factors, pp. 341–354 (2016)
Brown, S.A.T, McNamara, J., Mitchell, K.B.: Dynamic marksmanship: a novel methodology to evaluate the effects of clothing and individual equipment on mission performance. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 61th Annual Meeting, pp. 2020–2024 (2017)
Hasselquist, L., Eddy, M.D., Mitchell, K.B., Brown, S.A., McNamara, J., Hancock, C.L., Caruso, C.: Assessing the impact of clothing and individual equipment (CIE) on soldier physical, biomechanical, and cognitive performance part 1: test methodology (No. NATICK/TR-18/004). Army Natick Soldier Research Development and Engineering Center, Natick, MA (2018)
Brown, S.T., McNamara, J.A., Mitchell, K.B., Eddy, M.D.: Development of a building clearing methodology for the assessment of soldier. J. Sci. Med. Sport 20, S67 (2017)
Mitchell, K.B., Choi, H.J., Garlie, T.N.: Anthropometry and range of motion of the encumbered soldier (No. NATICK/TR-17/010). Army Natick Soldier Research Development and Engineering Center, Natick, MA (2017)
Green, D.M., Swets, J.A.: Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics. Wiley, New York (1996)
Stanislaw, H., Todorov, N.: Calculation of signal detection theory measures. Behav. Res. Methods, instrum. Comput. 31(1), 137–149 (1999)
Taverniers, J., De Boeck, P.: Force-on-Force handgun practice: an intra-individual exploration of stress effects, biomarker regulation, and behavioral changes. Hum. Factors 56(2), 403–413 (2014)
Acknowledgments
This research was funded by Combat Capabilities Development Command Soldier Center (CCDC Soldier Center) research program 16-159 and Program Executive Office (PEO) Soldier Project Director Soldier System Integration (PD SS&I). The authors would like to acknowledge the data collection and support team that assisted in the execution of this study from Aberdeen Test Center and CCDC Soldier Center’s Biomechanics and Human Factors Teams. Most importantly, the authors would like to acknowledge the Soldiers who participated in this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Brown, S.A.T., Mitchell, K.B. (2020). Preliminary Development of an Integrated Mobility, Lethality, and Survivability Soldier Performance Testing Platform. In: Nunes, I. (eds) Advances in Human Factors and Systems Interaction. AHFE 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 959. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20040-4_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20040-4_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-20039-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-20040-4
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)