Abstract
Recent NATO reports highlight the rapid progress being made in the development of autonomous underwater systems. In contrast, national reports indicate that their benefits are not being fully realized in a timely manner in operational scenarios. One approach to improve NATO’s adoption of these systems is to provide guidance in the NATO concept development and experimentation process specially aimed at articulating autonomous system behaviors and allowing efficient experimentation with their capabilities. This position paper reviews the latest techniques and approaches for articulating and testing autonomous system capabilities in industry, academia and within NATOs national militaries. Discussed techniques focus on encouraging and developing understanding and trust in the commander and operator stakeholder communities as well improving the efficiency of autonomous system testing. Potential future guidance and the structure of these activities within the existing NATO CD&E framework are presented for further discussion.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Dyndal, G.L., Berntsen, T.A., Redse-Johansen, S.: Autonomous military drones: no longer science fiction. NATO Review Magazine, Oslo, Norway (2017)
Williams, A.P., Scharre, P.D.: Autonomous Systems - Issues for Defence Policy Makers. NATO Headquarters SACT, Norfolk (2015)
Yuh, J.: Design and control of autonomous underwater robots: a survey. Auton. Robot. 8(1), 7–24 (2000)
de Nijs, H.: Concept development and experimentation policy and process. HQ SACT, Norfolk, USA (2010)
Boulanin, V., Verbruggen, M.: Mapping the Development of Autonomy in Weapon Systems. Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, Stockholm (2017)
NATO: NATO concept development and experimentation (CD&E) process. North Atlantic Military Committee (2010)
van der Wiel, W., et. al.: Concept maturity levels bringing structure to the CD&E process. In: Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation and Education Conference, Orlando, USA (2010)
NATO: The NATO Alternative Analysis Handbook, 2nd edn. NATO, Brussels (2017)
Software V&V Working Group: IEEE STD 1012-2012 - IEEE Standard for System and Software Verification and Validation. IEEE (2012)
Pecheur, C.: Verification and Validation of Autonomy Software at NASA. NASA Ames Research Center, USA (2000)
Schumann, J., Visser, W.: Autonomy software: V&V challenges and charecteristics. In: IEEE Aerospace Conference, Big Sky, USA (2006)
Hodicky, J., Prochazka, D.: Challenges in the implementation of autonomous systems into the battlefield. In: 6th International Conference on Military Technologies, Brno, CZE (2017)
Callow, G., Watson, G., Kalawsky, R.: System modelling for run-time verification and validation of autonomous systems. In: Conference in Systems of Systems Engineering, Loughborough, UK (2010)
Defence Science Board: The Role of Autonomy in DoD Systems. Office of the Under Secretary of Defence for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics, Washington, USA (2012)
Tremori, A., et al.: A verification, validation and accreditation process for autonomous interoperable systems. In: Mazal, J. (ed.) MESAS 2017. LNCS, vol. 10756, pp. 314–323. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76072-8_22
Palmer, G., Selwyn, A., Zwillinger, D.: The “Trust V”: building and measuring trust in autonomous systems. In: Mittu, R., Sofge, D., Wagner, A., Lawless, W.F. (eds.) Robust Intelligence and Trust in Autonomous Systems, pp. 55–77. Springer, Boston, MA (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7668-0_4
Helle, P., Schamai, W., Strobel, C.: Testing of autonomous systems - challenges and current state-of-the-art. In: INCOSE International Symposium, Edinburg, UK (2016)
Hodicky, J.: Autonomous systems operationalization gaps overcome by modelling and simulation. In: Hodicky, J. (ed.) MESAS 2016. LNCS, vol. 9991, pp. 40–47. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47605-6_4
Thompson, M.: Testing the intelligence of unmanned autonomous systems. Int. Test Eval. Assoc. 29, 380–387 (2008)
Ahner, D.K., Parson, C.R.: Workshop report: test and evaluation of autonomous systems. USA Department of Defense, Washington D.C., USA (2016)
Heitmeyer, C.K., Leonard, E.I.: Obtaining trust on autonomous systems: tool for formal model synthesis and validation. In: Workshop on Formal Methods in Software Engineering, Florence, Italy (2015)
Heitmeyer, C.L., Archer, M., Bharadwaj, R., Jeffords, R.D.: Tools for constructing requirements specifications: the SCR toolset at the age of 10. Comput. Syst. Sci. Eng. 20(1), 19–35 (2005)
Knexus: eBotworks. http://www.knexusresearch.com
Phon, D.N.E., Ali, M.B., Halim, N.D.A.: Collaborative augmented reality in education: a review. In: International Conference in Teaching and Learning in Computing and Engineering, Kuching, Malaysia (2014)
Carruth, D.W.: Virtual reality for education and workforce training. In: International Conference on Emerging eLearning Technologies and Applications, Stary Smokovec, Slovakia (2017)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 NATO
About this paper
Cite this paper
Mansfield, T., Caamaño Sobrino, P., Carrera Viñas, A., Maglione, G.L., Been, R., Tremori, A. (2019). Approaches to Realize the Potential of Autonomous Underwater Systems in Concept Development and Experimentation. In: Mazal, J. (eds) Modelling and Simulation for Autonomous Systems. MESAS 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11472. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14984-0_46
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14984-0_46
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-14983-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-14984-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)