Skip to main content

Development of Inclusive Education in England: Impact on Children with Special Educational Needs and Disabilities

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook on Promoting Social Justice in Education

Abstract

This chapter considers a historical account of the development of inclusion in England and the changes made to the education of children with SEND since the 1940s. The chapter details the development of inclusive education, the complexity of defining inclusion, and what inclusion has come to mean in current practice. This historical account is considered alongside the development and dominance of the standards agenda. In considering inclusion in this manner, the original intentions of its agenda are questioned against the practical implementation of inclusive education in current practice. The chapter concludes by proposing that significant progress has not been made with inclusion because it has not been possible to accommodate it within the competing political agendas replete in England’s education system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 899.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 1,099.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adnett, N., & Davies, P. (2005). Competition between or within schools? Re-assessing school choice. Education Economics, 13(1), 109–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allan, J. (2003). Productive pedagogies and the challenge of inclusion. British Journal of Special Education, 30(4), 175–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allan, J. (2008). Rethinking inclusive education – The philosophers of difference in practice. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, D. (2005). Reinventing ‘inclusion’: New Labour and the cultural politics of special education. Oxford Review of Education, 31(1), 135–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avramidis, E., Bayliss, P., & Burden, R. (2000). A survey into mainstream teachers’ attitudes towards the inclusion of children with special educational needs in the ordinary school in one local education authority. Educational Psychology, 20(2), 191–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avramidis, E., & Norwich, B. (2002). Teachers’ attitudes towards integration/inclusion: A review of the literature. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 17(2), 129–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banks, O. (1981). Faces of feminism: A study of feminism as a social movement. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton, L. (1997). Inclusive education: Romantic, subversive or realistic? International Journal of Inclusive Education, 1(3), 231–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton, L. (2003). Inclusive education and teacher education: A basis for hope or a discourse of delusion? Inaugural Professorial Lecture, London Institute of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batterson, C. (1999). The changing politics of primary education. Education 3-13, 27(3), 61–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bines, H. (2000). Inclusive standards? Current developments in policy for special educational needs in England and Wales. Oxford Review of Education, 26(1), 21–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bobbitt, P. (2002). The shield of Achilles, war, peace and the course of history. London, England: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, T., & Ainscow, M. (2004). Index for inclusion: Developing learning, participation and play, in early years and childcare. Bristol, UK: CSIE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, T., Ainscow, M., Black-Hawkins, K., Vaughan, M., & Shaw, L. (2000). Index for inclusion. Developing learning and participation in schools. Bristol, UK: Centre for Studies on Inclusive Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Z. (2013). ‘We just have to get on with it’: Inclusive teaching in a standards driven system. Retrieved from https://wlv.openrepository.com/bitstream/handle/2436/311413/Brown%20PhD%20thesis.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

  • Callaghan, J. (2009). British Labour’s turn to socialism in 1931. Journal of Political Ideologies, 14(2), 115–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chia, R. (1995). From modern to postmodern organisational analysis. Organisation Studies, 16(4), 579–604. https://doi.org/10.1177/017084069501600406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chitty, C. (2002). Understanding schools and schooling. London, England: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chitty, C. (2008). The UK National Curriculum: An historical perspective. Forum, 50(3), 343–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chitty, C. (2009). Education policy in Britain (2nd ed.). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cigman, R. (2008). A question of universality: Inclusive education and the principle of respect. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 41(4), 775–793.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clough, P. (1998). Managing inclusive education. From policy to experience. London, England: Sage. 31–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clough, P. (2000). Routes to inclusion. In P. Clough & J. Corbett (Eds.), Theories of inclusive education. A student’s guide. London, England: Paul Chapman’s Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, B. (2005). ‘Good faith and effort?’ Perspectives on educational inclusion. Disability and Society, 20(3), 331–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, C., & Hancock, R. (2002). The inclusion quality mark. Croydon, UK: Creative Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, J. (2001). Supporting inclusive education: A connective pedagogy. London, England: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Education (DfE) (2010). The importance of teaching: head teachers and teachers to drive school improvement. [online] http://www.education.gov.uk/inthenews/inthenews/a0068667/importance-of-teaching. [accessed 5th March 2019].

  • Department for Education (DfE) (2011). Support and aspiration: a new approach to special educational needs and disability. [online] http://www.educationengland.org.uk/documents/pdfs/2011-green-paper-sen.pdf [accessed 5th March 2019].

  • Department for Education. (2012a). Education bill received Royal Assent. Retrieved from http://www.education.gov.uk/inthenews/inthenews/a00200186/education-bill-receives-royal-assent

  • Department for Education. (2012b). National curriculum review launched. Retrieved from http://www.education.gov.uk/inthenews/inthenews/a0073149/national-curriculum-review-launched

  • Department for Education. (2013). The National Curriculum in England. Key Stages 1 and 2 framework document. Retrieved from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/425601/PRIMARY_national_curriculum.pdf.

  • Department for Education and Employment (1997). Excellence For All Children: Meeting Special Educational Needs. London: DfEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Education and Employment (DfEE). (1998). Meeting special educational needs: A programme for action. London, England: DfEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Education and Science [DFES]. (2001). Special Educational Needs Code of Practice. http://www.teachernet.gov.uk/_doc/3724/SENCodeOfPractice.pdf

  • Department for Education and Skills (DfES). (2004). Five-year strategy for children and learners. Norwich, UK: HM Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1998). Limited Inc. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DfE and DoH. (2014). SEND code of practice: 0 to 25 years. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/send-code-of-practice-0-to-25

  • DFES. (2004). Removing barriers to achievement: The Government’s strategy for SEN. Retrieved from https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130404091106/https://www.education.gov.uk/publications/RSG/publicationDetail/Page1/DfES%200117%202004

  • Farrell, M. (2010). Debating special education. Oxon, UK: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Frederickson, N., & Cline, T. (2002). Special educational needs, inclusion and diversity: A textbook. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulcher, G. (1989). Disabling policies? A comparative approach to education policy and disability. Lewes, UK: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galloway, D., Armstrong, D., & Tomlinson, D. (1994). The assessment of special educational needs: Whose problem? Harlow, UK: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galloway, D., & Edwards, A. (1991). Primary school teaching and educational psychology. London, England: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamarnikow, E., & Green, A. (2003). Social justice, identity formation and social capital: Social diversification policy under New Labour. In C. Vincent (Ed.), Social justice, education and identity. London, England: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, R., & Clay, J. (2008). Reforming teachers and uncompromising ‘standards’: Implications for social injustice in schools. Forum, 50(1), 103–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glazzard, J. (2013). A critical interrogation of the contemporary discourses associated with inclusive education in England. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 13(3), 182–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glazzard, J. (2014). From integration to inclusive education in England: Illuminating the issues through a life history account. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 9(1), 107–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, S. (2006). Teachers under siege. Trentham, Australia: Stoke-on-Trent.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgs, G., Bellin, W., Farrell, S., & White, S. (1998). Educational attainment and social disadvantage: Contextualizing school league tables. Regional Studies, 31(8), 775–789.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodkinson, A. (2005). Conceptions and misconceptions of inclusive education: A critical examination of final year teacher trainees’ knowledge and understanding of inclusion. Research in Education, 73(1), 15–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodkinson, A. (2011). Inclusion: A defining definition? Power and Education, 3(2), 179–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodkinson, A. (2012a). Inclusion ‘All present and correct?’ A critical analysis of New Labour’s inclusive education policy in England. The Journal of Critical Education Policy Studies, 11(4), 242–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodkinson, A. (2012b). Illusionary inclusion- what went wrong with New Labour’s landmark educational policy? British Journal of Special Education, 3(9), 4–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodkinson, A., & Devarakonda, C. (2009). Conceptions of inclusion and inclusive education: A critical examination of the perspectives and practices of teachers in India. Research in Education, 82(1), 85–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodkinson, A., & Devarakonda, C. (2011). Conceptions of inclusion and inclusive education: A critical examination of the perspectives and practices of teachers in England. Educationalfutures, 3(1), 52–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodkinson, A., & Vickerman, P. (2009). Key issues in special educational needs and inclusion. London, England: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodkinson, A., & Vickerman, P. (2016). Inclusion: Defining definitions. In Z. Brown (Ed.), Inclusive education: Perspectives on pedagogy, policy and practice. Oxon, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C., & Symeonidou, S. (2017). The Hare and the Tortoise: A comparative review of the drive towards inclusive education policies in England and Cyprus. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 21(7), 775–789.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, J., Jenkin, M., & Lord, S. (2006). Developing effective teacher performance. London, England: Paul Chapman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kailin, J. (2002). Antiracist education: From theory to practice. Oxford, UK: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kavanagh, D. (1987). Thatcherism and British politics: The end of consensus? Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawton, D. (1992). Education and politics in the 1990s: Conflict or consensus. London, England: Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitas, R. (1998). The inclusive society? Social exclusion and New Labour. London, England: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, C. (2008). Removing barriers to achievement: A strategy for inclusion or exclusion? International Journal of Inclusive Education, 12(2), 221–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, M. (2000). Incurably human. London, England: Working Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Northway, R. (1997). Integration and inclusion: Illusion or progress in services for disabled people? Social Policy and Administration, 31(2), 157–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nutbrown, C., & Clough, P. (2006). Inclusion in the early years. London, England: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ofsted (Office for Standards in Education). (2000). Evaluating educational inclusion: Guidance for inspectors and schools. London, England: Office for Standards in Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, C. (1998). The New Governance of Education: The conservatives and education 1988–1997. Oxford Review of Education, 24(1), 131–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quicke, J. (1988). The ‘New Right’ and education. British Journal of Educational Studies, 36(1), 5–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rustemier, S. (2002). Social and educational justice: The human rights framework for inclusion. Bristol, UK: Centre for Studies on Inclusive Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sikes, P., Lawson, H., & Parker, M. (2007). Voices on: Teachers and teaching assistants talk about inclusion. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 11(3), 355–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slee, R. (2001). ‘Inclusion in practice’: Does practice make perfect. Educational Review, 53(2), 113–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slee, R., & Allan, J. (2001). Excluding the included: A reconsideration of inclusive education. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 11(2), 173–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stobart, G. (2001). The validity of National Curriculum Assessment. British Journal of Educational Studies, 49(1), 26–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strain, M., & Simkins, T. (2008). Continuity, change and educational reform – Questioning the legacy of the Education Reform Act 1988. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 36(2), 155–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, G., & Vaughan, M. (2004). Inclusive education: Readings and reflections. Maidenhead, UK: Open University.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (1994). The Salamanca statement and framework for action. Madrid, Spain: UNESCO/Ministry of Education and Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan, M. (2002). Milestones on the road to inclusion 1970–2002. Inclusion week. Retrieved from http://inclusion.uwe.ac.uk/inclusionweek/articles/milestones.htm

  • Warnock, M. (2005). Special educational needs: A new look. London, England: Philosophy of Education Society of Great Britain, Impact Series N11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitty, G. (2002), Making Sense of Education Policy. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitty, G. (2008), Twenty years of progress? Educational Management Administration and Leadership. Journal of In-Service Education, 26(2), 281–295

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, C. (2013). Spaces and places for disrupting thinking about inclusive education in Hard Times. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 16(5–6), 551–565.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, E. (2006). Preparing new teachers for inclusive schools and classrooms. Support for Learning, 21(2), 85–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yarker, P. (2006). A Kind of Twilight: How do teachers of English at Key Stage 3 respond to the requirement to prepare their students for SATS? Forum, 48(3), 247–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Žižek, S. (2009). In defense of lost causes. London, England: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zeta Williams-Brown .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Williams-Brown, Z., Hodkinson, A. (2020). Development of Inclusive Education in England: Impact on Children with Special Educational Needs and Disabilities. In: Papa, R. (eds) Handbook on Promoting Social Justice in Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14625-2_151

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics