Skip to main content

Institutions and the Process of Industrialisation: Towards a Theory of Social Capability Development

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Development Economics

Abstract

Institutions were at the foundation of development economics, when it was first established as a separate branch of economics. Indeed, one important impetus behind the emergence of development economics was the recognition that developing countries have socio-economic institutions that are different from the ones that exist in the industrialised countries. The chapter provides a long term analytical perspective on the theory of institutions in economic development—from old institutionalism to new institutional economies—and critically assess todays’ mainstream view on institutions and economic development. Specifically, we engage with four main analytical issues, that is, (i) the definition of institutions, (ii) the conceptualisation of the role of institutions, (iii) the theory of the relationship between institutions and economic development, and (iv) the theory of economic development. Building on this critical review, the chapter then highlights the importance of focusing on the variety of types, forms and functions that institutions have taken historically, and even more critically on their collective nature. In this respect, we build on Abramovitz’s concept of social capability understood as “tenacious societal characteristics” embedded in productive organisations, as well as a variety of political, commercial, industrial and financial institutions. The chapter develops the idea of social capability by analysing and providing historical examples of six specific types of institutions and their role—forms and functions—in the industrialisation process. The institutional taxonomy includes six types of institutions: (i) institutions of production, (ii) institutions of productive capabilities development, (iii) institutions of corporate governance, (iv) institutions of industrial financing, (v) institutions of industrial change and restructuring and (vi) institutions of macroeconomic management for industrialisation. The chapter concludes by emphasising the importance of developing productive capabilities, not just at the individual or the firm level but also at the sectoral and social level, in the process of economic development, and especially industrialisation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Insights from Classical and Marxist economics, in contrast, were used much more by early development economists—Albert Hirschman, Simon Kuznets, Arthur Lewis and Michal Kalecki being the best examples—because their theories were based on the institutions of early capitalism, which were much more similar to those that existed in developing countries in the 1940s and the 1950s.

  2. 2.

    The other important work is La Porta et al. (2008).

  3. 3.

    The other important works are Acemoglu et al. (2005) and Acemoglu and Robinson (2012).

  4. 4.

    However, the DB index has often been criticised for being partial, not least by the former chief economist of the World Bank, Paul Romer, who, while he was in the job, argued that a former director in charge of the index manipulated it, so that Chile would rank lower than otherwise, in an apparent attempt to hurt the left-leaning government of Michelle Bachelet (Source: https://www.wsj.com/articles/world-bank-unfairly-influenced-its-own-competitiveness-rankings-1515797620).

  5. 5.

    The evaluation by the Independent Evaluation Group (IEG) of the World Bank has expressed a strong reservation about the ‘governance’ components of the CPIA (IEG 2010).

  6. 6.

    This thought is behind the extraordinary claim that “the most important contributions to the study of institutions and development have nothing to do with … issues like legal systems, state-owned enterprises, financial regulation and corporate governance to corruption and political systems” (Keefer 2011: 547). Also note the emphasis on institutional function (security of property rights) over institutional forms.

  7. 7.

    Moreover, in measuring the quality of private property rights, the focus is on the protection of property holders against ‘appropriation’ by the government, when a lot of appropriation happens by other private-sector agents (van Noor 2018).

  8. 8.

    Notable exceptions can be found in the work of Elinor Ostrom on governing the commons (for which she received—the only female winner—Nobel Prize in Economics), as well as contributions by Masahiko Aoki and Yujiro Hayami on the role of communities alongside markets in economics development (see Ostrom 1990; Aoki and Hayami 2001).

  9. 9.

    As highlighted by Gregory Tassey (2005: 103), basic science is a public good, while “the fact that specific elements of an industrial technology are quasi-public goods means that their efficient development over the entire life cycle requires a mixture of public and private funding, distributed according to the magnitude and duration of various market barriers”.

  10. 10.

    With the spreading of international trade, institutions in charge of developing, certifying and enforcing technical standards have acquired a central role. Standards play an important role in technological innovation activities, especially with the increasing complexity of product and their product system features.

  11. 11.

    This has enabled the Wallenberg family in Sweden to have controlling stakes in companies whose collective capitalisation accounts for around 50 per cent of Stockholm stock exchange.

  12. 12.

    The German financial infrastructure also includes the German Bank for Settlements (AG) and an articulated multi-layered system of public saving banks and credit cooperatives working with SMEs.

References

  • Abramovitz, M. (1986). Catching up, forging ahead, and falling behind. Journal of Economic History, 46, 385–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abramovitz, M. (1995). The elements of social capability. In Social capability and long-term economic growth (B. H. Koo & D. H. Perkins, Trans., pp. 19–47). Basingstoke/London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. (2012). Why nations fail – The origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. London/New York: Penguin Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J. (2001). The colonial origins of comparative development: An empirical investigation. American Economic Review, 91(5), 1369–1401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J. (2005). Institutions as the fundamental cause of long-run growth. In P. Aghion & S. Durlauf (Eds.), Handbook of economic growth. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andreoni, A. (2014). Structural learning: Embedding discoveries and the dynamics of production. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 29, 58–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andreoni, A. (2015). On manufacturing development under resources constraints. In M. Baranzini, C. Rotondi, & R. Scazzieri (Eds.), Resources, production and structural dynamics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andreoni, A. (2016). Varieties of industrial policy: Models, packages and transformation cycles. In A. Noman & J. Stiglitz (Eds.), Efficiency, finance and varieties of industrial policy (pp. 245–305). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andreoni, A. (2018). The architecture and dynamics of industrial ecosystems: Diversification and innovative industrial renewal in Emilia Romagna. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 42, 1613–1642. forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andreoni, A., & Chang, H-J. (2014). Agricultural policy and the role of intermediate institutions in production capabilities transformation: Fundacion Chile and Embrapa in action, to be presented at the DRUID Annual Conference, Copenhagen, Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andreoni, A., & Chang, H.-J. (2017). Bringing production and employment back into development. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 10, 173–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andreoni, A., & Scazzieri, R. (2014). Triggers of change: Structural trajectories and production dynamics. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 38(6), 1391–1408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andreoni, A., Frattini, F., & Prodi, G. (2017). Structural cycles and industrial policy alignment: The private-public nexus in the Emilian packaging valley. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 41(3), 881–904.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andreoni, A., Chang, H.-J., & Estevez. (2019). New global rules, policy space and quality of growth in Africa. In A. Noman & J. Stiglitz (Eds.), Quality of growth in Africa. New York: Columbia University Press. forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aoki, M. (2001). Toward a comparative institutional analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aoki, M., & Hayami, Y. (Eds.). (2001). Communities and markets in economic development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aron, J. (2000). Growth and institutions: A review of the evidence. The World Bank Research Observer, 15(1), 99–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, H.-J. (2001). Intellectual property rights and economic development – Historical lessons and emerging issues. Journal of Human Development, 2(2), 287–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, H.-J. (2002). Breaking the mould – An institutionalist political economy alternative to the neo-Liberal theory of the market and the state. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 26(5), 539–560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, H.-J. (Ed.). (2007a). Institutional change and economic development. Tokyo/London: United Nations University Press/Anthem Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, H.-J. (2007b). Understanding the relationship between institutions and economic development. In H.-J. Chang (Ed.), Institutional change and economic development. Tokyo/London: United Nations University Press/Anthem Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, H.-J. (2007c). Bad samaritans. London/New York: Random House/Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, H.-J. (2010). Hamlet without the prince of Denmark: How development has disappeared from Today’s “development” discourse. In S. Khan & J. Christiansen (Eds.), Towards new developmentalism: Market as means rather than master. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, H.-J. (2011). Institutions and economic development: Theory, policy, and history. Journal of Institutional Economics, 7(4), 473–498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, H.-J. (2018). The rise and fall (?) of ABP (anything but policy) discourse in development economics. In A. Ghosh Dastidar, R. Malhotra, & V. Suneja (Eds.), Economic theory and policy amidst global discontent – Essays in honour of Deepak Nayyar. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, H.-J., & Evans, P. (2005). The role of institutions in economic change. In G. Dymski & S. Da Paula (Eds.), Reimagining growth. London: Zed Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, H-J., & Rowthorn, R. (1995). Role of the state in economic change: Entrepreneurship and conflict management (co-author: Bob Rowthorn). In H-J. Chang & B. Rowthorn (Eds.), The role of the state in economic change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cimoli, M., Dosi, G., & Stiglitz, J. (Eds.). (2009). Industrial policy and development. The political economy of capabilities accumulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4(16), 386–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, J. (2007). Central banks as agents of economic development. In H.-J. Chang (Ed.), Institutional change and economic development. Tokyo/London: United Nations University Press/Anthem Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1976; 1st edition in 1965). Institutional aspects of peasant economies: An analytical view. In N. Georgescu-Roegen (Ed.), Energy and economic myths – Institutional and analytical economic essays. New York/Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerschenkron, A. (1962). Economic backwardness in historical perspective. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harriss, J., Hunter, J., & Lewis, C. M. (Eds.). (1995). The new institutional economics and third world development. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, G. (2000). Structures and institutions: Reflections on institutionalism, structuration theory and critical realism. Mimeo, The Business School, University of Hertfordshire.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, G. (2006). What are institutions? Journal of Economic Issues, 40(1), 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, G. (2009). On the institutional foundation of law: The insufficiency of custom and private ordering. Journal of Economic Issues, 43(1), 143–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hope, C., & Chang, H-J. (2018). The political economy of structural transformation. Mimeo, Centre of Development Studies, University of Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • IEG (Independent Evaluation Group of the World Bank). (2010). The World Bank’s country policy and institutional assessment – An evaluation. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapur, D., & Webber, R. (2000). Governance-related conditionalities of the IFIs (G-24 discussion paper series, no. 6). Geneva: UNCTAD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Zoido-Lobaton, P. (1999). Governance matters (Policy research working paper no. 2196). Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keefer, P. (2011). Institutions really don’t matter for development? A response to Chang. Journal of Institutional Economics, 7(4), 543–547.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitching, G. (1982). Development and underdevelopment in historical perspective: Populism. In Nationalism and industrialisation. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuznets, S. (1966). Modern economic growth: Rate, structure and spread. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuznets, S. (1968). Towards a theory of economic growth. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • La Porta, R., F Lopez de Silanes, Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1997). Legal determinants of external finance. Journal of Finance, 52(3), 1131–1150.

    Google Scholar 

  • La Porta, R., F Lopez de Silanes, & Shleifer, A. (2008). The economic consequences of legal origins. Journal of Economic Literature, 46(2), 285–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langlois, R. (Ed.). (1986). Economics as a process. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langlois, R. (1998). Capabilities and the theory of the firm. In N. Foss & B. Loasby (Eds.), Economic organization, capabilities and coordination. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazonick, W. (2009). Sustainable prosperity in the new economy? Kalamazoo: UPJOHN Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazonick, W. (2014) Profits without prosperity, Harvard Business Review, September, 46–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddison, A. (1989). The world economy in the 20th century. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J., & Simon, H. (1958). Organizations. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaels, R. (2009). Comparative law by numbers? – Legal origins thesis, Doing Business reports, and the silence of traditional comparative law. American Journal of Comparative Law, 57(4), 765–795.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D. (1994). Economic performance through tie. American Economic Review, 84(3), 359–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D. (1995). The new institutional economics and third world development. In J. Harriss, J. Hunter, & C. M. Lewis (Eds.), The new institutional economics and third world development. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D. (2005). Understanding the process of economic change. Princeton/Oxford: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, E. T. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piore, M., & Sabel, C. (1984). The second industrial divide. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, G. B. (1972). The organisation of industry. Economic Journal, 82(3), 883–896.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. (1983). Reason in human affairs. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, A. (1971). Take-overs: Their relevance to the stock market and the theory of the firm. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, A. (2003). Competition, corporate governance and selection in emerging markets. Economic Journal, 113, F443–F464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spraos, J. (1983). Inequalising trade? Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. (2007). Making globalization work. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tassey, G. (2005). Underinvestment in public good technologies. Journal of Technology Transfer, 30, 89–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Noor, S. (2018). Checks and balances, private property rights and economic development: What the data really tells us. Mimeo, Centre of Development Studies, University of Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veblen, T. B. (1899). The theory of the leisure class: An economic study in the evolution of institutions. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2002). World development report 2002. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2017). World development report 2017. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ha-Joon Chang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Chang, HJ., Andreoni, A. (2019). Institutions and the Process of Industrialisation: Towards a Theory of Social Capability Development. In: Nissanke, M., Ocampo, J.A. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Development Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14000-7_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14000-7_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-13999-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-14000-7

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics