Skip to main content

Crime and Shame: Reflections and Culture-Specific Insights

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Bright Side of Shame

Abstract

Shame and shaming are highly important aspects of the study of crime, crime sciences and criminal and restorative justice. This chapter takes selected aspects into account and presents the state-of-the-art in research and practice regarding four questions: (1) How are experiences of shame, crime and criminal behaviour related? (2) What effect does shaming (sanctions) have in criminal law and regulatory systems? (3) What is reintegrative shaming in the context of crime and criminal justice and how does it impact on crime? (4) How does culture impact on the topics of shame and shaming in the context of criminal law, justice and criminal (risky) behaviour? The chapter concludes by presenting questions for reflections on crime and shame with regard to (1) individuals and groups, (2) family members, relatives and friends affected by criminal behaviour/offender behaviour and (3) professionals (such as therapists, psychologists, mediators, lawyers) working with criminals, offenders and lawbreakers in the context of crime and shame.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Restorative justice focuses on crime less as a violation of the law, legal processes, and punishment of the offender, but rather on the emphasis that crime harms individuals as well as the community and therefore needs to include the promotion of accountability and repair (Garland, 2001). The focus is here on the violation of the individual and the community, not as much on the state. Therefore offenders are encouraged to take responsibility and action to repair harm (Braithwaite, 1989).

References

  • Ahmed, E., Harris, N., Braithwaite, J., & Braithwaite, V. (2001). Shame management through reintegration. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumer, E. P., Wright, R., Kristinsdottir, K., & Gunnlaugsson, H. (2002). Crime, shame, and recidivism. The case of Iceland. The British Journal of Criminology, 42(1), 40–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, J. (1989). Crime, shame and reintegration. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, J. (2000). Shame and criminal justice. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 42(3), 281–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Condry, R. (2007). Families shamed: The consequences of crime for relatives of serious offenders. Cullompton, UK: Willan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dearing, R. L., Stuewig, J., & Tangney, J. P. (2005). On the importance of distinguishing shame from guilt: Relations to problematic alcohol and drug use. Addictive Behaviors, 30, 1392–1404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garland, D. (2001). The culture of control: Crime and social order in contemporary society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, L. M. (2015). Trending now: The use of social media websites in public shaming punishments. American Criminal Law Review, 52, 415–451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvard Law Review Association. (2003). Shame, stigma, and crime. Evaluating the efficacy of shaming sanctions. Harvard Law review, 116(7), 2186–2207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, N. (2017). Shame in regulatory systems. In P. Drahos (Ed.), Regulatory theory. Foundations and applications. Acton: Australian National University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, C.-H. (2017). Shame—“A soul feeding emotion”: Archetypal work and the transformation of the shadow of shame in a group development process. In E. Vanderheiden & C.-H. Mayer (Eds.), The value of shame—Exploring a health resource in cultural contexts (pp. 277–302). Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, C.-H., Viviers, R., & Tonelli, L. (2017). ‘The fact that she just looked at me…’ Narrations on shame in South African workplaces. South African Journal of Industrial Psychology SA Tydskrif vir Bedryfsielkunde, 43(1), a1385. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v43i0.1385.

  • Murphy, K., & Harris, N. (2007). Shaming, shame and recidivism. British Journal of Criminology, 47, 900–917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reutter, D. (2015). For shame! Public shaming sentences on the rise. Prison Legal News, February 4, 2015. Retrieved from https://www.prisonlegalnews.org/news/2015/feb/4/shame-public-shaming-sentences-rise/.

  • Stuewig, J., Tangney, J. P., Kendall, S., Folk, J. B., Reinsmith Meyer, C., & Daring, R. L. (2015). Children’s pronemess to shame and guilt predict risky and legal behaviours in young adulthood. Child Psychiatry of Human Development, 46(2), 217–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stuewig, J., Tangney, J. P., Mashek, D., Forkner, P., & Dearing, R. L. (2009). The moral emotions, alcohol dependence, and HIV risk behavior in an incarcerated sample. Substance Use and Misuse, 44(4), 449–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stuewig, J., Tangney, J. P., Heigel, C., Harty, L., & McCloskey, L. (2010). Shaming, blaming, and maiming: Functional links among the moral emotions, externalization of blame, and aggression. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 91–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tangney, J. P. (1993). Shame and guilt. In C. G. Costello (Ed.), Symptoms of depression (pp. 161–180). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tangney, J. P., & Dearing, R. (2002). Shame and guilt. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tangney, J. P., Stuewig, J., & Hafez, L. (2011). Shame, guilt and remorse: Implications for offender populations. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry Psychology, 22(5), 706–723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tangney, J. P., Wagner, P. E., Hill-Barlow, D., Marschall, D. E., & Gramzow, R. (1996). Relation of shame and guilt to constructive versus destructive responses to anger across the lifespan. Journal of Personal Social Psychology, 70, 797–809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tibbetts, S. G. (1997). Shame and rational choice in offending decisions. Criminal Justice & Behavior, 24, 234–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tibbetts, S. G. (2003). Self-conscious emotions and criminal offending. Psychological Reports, 93, 101–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanderheiden, E., & Mayer, C.-H. (2017). The value of shame. Exploring a health resource in cultural contexts. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zehr, H. (1990). Changing lenses: A new focus for criminal justice. Scottsdale, PA: Herald Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claude-Hélène Mayer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mayer, CH. (2019). Crime and Shame: Reflections and Culture-Specific Insights. In: Mayer, CH., Vanderheiden, E. (eds) The Bright Side of Shame. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13409-9_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics