Abstract
The central notion of conflict in drama is well-acknowledged but not properly formalized. Computational models of conflict tend to target one specific type of conflict and consequently lose the global point of view on the story. Using a model of dramatic structure, this article specifies a number of conflict types within a unified model and proposes an algorithm to automatically extract all conflicts within a narrative structure. The algorithm is then tested on a storyworld that shows as many as 31 coexisting conflicts. Finally, a cluster analysis on these conflicts is performed, showing that in the considered case, conflicts can be reduced to three main “conflict groups.”
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Our translation.
- 2.
Each relation needs to connect to nodes of the type specified for this type of relation.
- 3.
The symmetric difference between two sets is the union of the two sets, without the intersection.
References
Barber, H., Kudenko, D.: Dynamic generation of dilemma-based interactive narratives. In: Proceedings of Third Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment – AIIDE, pp. 2–7. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (2007)
Battaglino, C., Damiano, R., Torino, U.: A character model with moral emotions: preliminary evaluation. In: Finlayson, M.A., Meister, J.C., Bruneau, E.G. (eds.) 5th Workshop on Computational Models of Narrative (CMN 2014), pp. 24–41. OASICS (2014)
Benabbou, A., Lourdeaux, D., Lenne, D.: Dynamic generation of dilemmas in virtual learning environments for non-technical skills training. In: Wang, Y., Howard, N., Widrow, B., Plataniotis, Y., Zadeh, L.A. (eds.) IEEE 15th International Conference on Cognitive Informatics & Cognitive Computing (ICCI*CC), pp. 231–234. IEEE (2016)
Cavazza, M., Charles, F., Mead, S.J.: Generation of humorous situations in cartoons through plan-based formalisations. In: Nijholt, A., Stock, O., Dix, A., Morkes, J. (eds.) ACM CHI-2003 Workshop: Humor Modeling in the Interface. University of Twente, Twente (2003)
Egri, L.: The Art of Dramatic Writing. Simon & Shuster, New York (1946)
Field, S.: Screenplay – The Foundations of Screenwriting. Dell Publishing, New York (1984)
Greimas, A.J.: Sémantique structurale. Presses universitaires de France, Paris (1966)
Harmon, S.: An expressive dilemma generation model for players and artificial agents. In: The Twelfth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment (AIIDE-2016), pp. 176–182 (2016)
Lavandier, Y.: La dramaturgie. Le clown et l’enfant, Cergy, France (1997)
Lévi-Strauss, C.: Anthropologie Structurale. Plon, Paris (1958)
Mateas, M., Stern, A.: Façade. http://games.softpedia.com/get/Freeware-Games/Facade.shtml
McKee, R.: Story: Substance, Structure, Style, and the Principles of Screenwriting. Harper Collins, New York (1997)
Nichols, B.: Ideology and the image. Indiana University Press, Bloomington (1981)
Polti, G.: Les trente-six situations dramatiques. Mercure de France, Paris (1903)
Saillenfest, A.: Modélisation Cognitive de la Pertinence Narrative en vue de l’Évaluation et de la Génération de Récits. Télécom ParisTech (2015)
Seger, L.: Making a Good Script Great. Samuel French Trade, Hollywood (1989)
Souriau, E.: Les deux cent mille Situations dramatiques. Flammarion, Paris (1950)
Szilas, N.: A computational model of an intelligent narrator for interactive narratives. Appl. Artif. Intell. 21(8), 753–801 (2007)
Szilas, N.: Modeling and representing dramatic situations as paradoxical structures. Digit. Scholarsh. Humanit. 32, 2 (2017)
Szilas, N.: Structural Analysis of the Aesop’s Fables. http://tecfalabs.unige.ch/mediawiki-narrative/index.php/Aesop’s_Fables
Szilas, N., Estupiñán, S., Richle, U.: Qualifying and quantifying interestingness in dramatic situations. In: Nack, F., Gordon, A.S. (eds.) ICIDS 2016. LNCS, vol. 10045, pp. 336–347. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48279-8_30
Truby, J.: Anatomy of Story. Faber and Faber, New York (2007)
Vale, E.: The Technique of Screenplay Writing. Grosset & Dunlap, New York (1973)
Ware, S.G., Young, R.M.: CPOCL: a narrative planner supporting conflict. In: Proceedings of the Seventh AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment, pp. 97–102. AAAI Press, Palo Alto (2011)
Nothing For Dinner. http://nothingfordinner.org
Acknowledgements
This research has been supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation under grant No. 159605 (Fine-grained Evaluation of the Interactive Narrative Experience).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Szilas, N., Estupiñán, S., Richle, U. (2018). Automatic Detection of Conflicts in Complex Narrative Structures. In: Rouse, R., Koenitz, H., Haahr, M. (eds) Interactive Storytelling. ICIDS 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11318. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04028-4_49
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04028-4_49
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-04027-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-04028-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)