Abstract
For years, the STEAM movement has been touted by businesses, universities, and even governments as a way to move beyond focusing on single disciplines such as science but instead toward multiple modes of problem-solving and viewpoints (Connor AM, Karmokar S, Whittington C. International Journal of Engineering Pedagog 5(2):37–47, 2015). However, STEAM education in the K-12 setting is still relatively new, which has led to a limited conceptual understanding of how to conceptualize, design, or enact STEAM education (Kim & Park, The effect of STEAM education on elementary school student’s creativity improvement. In Kim T, Stoica A, Fang W, Vasilakos T, Villalba J, Arnett K,… Kang B (eds), Computer applications for security, control and system engineering. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 115–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35264-5_16, 2012). This limited understanding often leads teachers to use existing STEM models and attempt to “add-on” experiences with the arts or humanities (Henriksen D, DeSchryver M, Mishra P, Deep-Play Research Group, TechTrends 59:5, 2015). In response, the authors have spent the last 3 years conducting a longitudinal study exploring how STEAM teaching practices are enacted in a variety of settings in the southeast of the United States in order to understand teachers’ implementation strategies (Herro D, Quigley C, Prof Dev Educ, 1–23, 2016a, On the Horizon 24:190–204, 2016b; Quigley C, Herro D, J Sci Educ Technol 25:410–426, 2016; Quigley, Herro, & Jamil. 2017). Based on a qualitative study examining classroom observations, teachers’ reflective journals during STEAM implementation, and focus-group teacher interviews, this chapter will highlight vignettes of these classrooms including elementary and secondary school examples as well as discipline-focused STEAM examples. The goal of this chapter is to inform teacher educators and provide support to teachers who are attempting to implement this transdisciplinary approach to learning.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahn, C. (2015). EcoScience+ art initiative: Designing a new paradigm for college education, scholarship, and service. The STEAM Journal, 2(1), 11.
Arthur, M. B., Hall, D. T., & Lawrence, B. S. (Eds.). (1989). Handbook of career theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Asghar, A., Ellington, R., Rice, E., Johnson, F., & Prime, G. M. (2012). Supporting STEM education in secondary science contexts. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 6(2), 4.
Baillee, C., & Catalano, G. (2009). Engineering and society: Working towards social justice [synthesis lectures on engineers, technology and society series]. San Rafael, CA: Morgan & Claypool.
Barrows, H. S. (1996). Problem-based learning in medicine and beyond: A brief overview. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1996(68), 3–12.
Bequette, J. W., & Bequette, M. B. (2012). A place for art and design education in the STEM conversation. Art Education, 65(2), 40–47.
Bernstein, J. H. (2015). Transdisciplinarity: A review of its origins, development, and current issues. Journal of Research Practice, 11(1), 1.
Berry III, R., Reed, P., Ritz, J., Lin, C., Hsiung, S., & Frazier, W. (2004). STEM initiatives: Stimulating students to improve science and mathematics achievement. The Technology Teacher, 64(4), 23–30.
Bowen, G. M., Roth, W. M., & McGinn, M. K. (1999). Interpretations of graphs by university biology students and practicing scientists: Toward a social practice view of scientific representation practices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(9), 1020–1043.
Checkland, P. (2002). Systems thinking, systems practice; soft systems methodology: A 30-year retrospective. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Connor, A. M., Karmokar, S., & Whittington, C. (2015). From STEM to STEAM: Strategies for enhancing engineering & technology education. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, 5(2), 37-47.
Cnor, A. M., Karmokar, S., & Whittington, C. (2015). From STEM to STEAM: Strategies for enhancing engineering & technology education. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogies, 5(2), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v5i2.4458
Collin, A. (2009). Multidisciplinary, interdisciplinary, and transdisciplinary collaboration: Implications for vocational psychology. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance, 9(2), 101–110.
Colliver, J. A. (2000). Effectiveness of problem-based learning curricula: Research and theory. Academic Medicine, 75(3), 259–266.
Crawford, B. A. (2000). Embracing the essence of inquiry: New roles for science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(9), 916–937.
Delaney, M. (2014). Schools shift from STEM to STEAM. Edtech, April 2, 1–4. http://www.edtechmagazine.com/k12/article/2014/04/schools-shift-stem-steam.
Dewey, J. (1980). Art as experience (1934). ALA Booklist, 30, 272.
Galand, B., Bourgeois, E., & Frenay, M. (2005). The impact of a PBL curriculum on students’ motivation and self-regulation. Cashiers de Recherche en Education et Formation, 37, 1–13.
Galliot, A., Greens, R., Seddon, P., Wilson, M., & Woodham, J. (2011). Bridging STEM to STEAM: Trans-disciplinary research. Centre for Research & Development, Research News, 28, 20–23. Retrieved from http://arts.brighton.ac.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/43989/Research-News-28-on-line.pdf
Gettings, M. (2016). Putting it all together: STEAM, PBL, scientific method, and the studio habits of mind. Art Education, 69(4), 10–11.
Gibbs, P. (2015). Transdisciplinarity as epistemology, ontology or principles of practical judgment. In P. Gibbs (Ed.), Transdisciplinary professional learning and practice (pp. 151–164). London: Springer International Publishing.
Guyotte, K. W., Sochacka, N. W., Costantino, T. E., Walther, J., & Kellam, N. N. (2014). STEAM as social practice: Cultivating creativity in transdisciplinary spaces. Art Education, 67(6), 12-19.
Guyotte, K., Sochacka, N., Costantino, T., Walther, J., & Kellam, N. (2015). STEAM as social practice: Cultivating creativity in transdisciplinary spaces. Art Education, 67(6), 12–19.
Henriksen, D. (2014). Full STEAM ahead: Creativity in excellent STEM teaching practices. The STEAM journal, 1(2), 15.
Henriksen, D., DeSchryver, M., Mishra, P., & Deep-Play Research Group. (2015). Rethinking technology & creativity in the 21st century transform and transcend: Synthesis as a trans-disciplinary approach to thinking and learning. TechTrends, 59(4), 5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-015-0863-9
Herro, D., & Quigley, C. (2016a). Exploring teachers’ perspectives of STEAM teaching: Implications for practice. Professional Development in Education, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2016.1205507.
Herro, D., & Quigley, C. (2016b). Innovating with STEAM in middle school classrooms: Remixing education. On the Horizon, 24(3), 190–204.
Jolly, A. (2014). STEM vs. STEAM: Do the arts belong. Education Week, 18.
Kaufman, D., Moss, D., Osborn, T. (2003). Beyond the boundaries: A transdisciplinary approach to learning and teaching.
Kim, Y., & Park, N. (2012). The effect of STEAM education on elementary school student’s creativity improvement. In T. Kim, A. Stoica, W. Fang, T. Vasilakos, J. Villalba, K. Arnett, et al. (Eds.), Computer applications for security, control and system engineering (pp. 115–121). Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35264-5_16
Land, M. H. (2013). Full STEAM ahead: The benefits of integrating the arts into STEM. Procedia Computer Science, 20, 547–552.
Lattuca, L. R. (2003). Creating interdisciplinarity: Grounded definitions from college and university faculty. History of Intellectual Culture, 3(1), 1–20.
Liao, C. (2016). From interdisciplinary to transdisciplinary: An arts-integrated approach to STEAM education. Art Education, 69(6), 44–49.
Maeda, J. (2013). STEM + Art = Steam. The STEAM Journal, 1(1), 34.
Mallon, W. T., & Bunton, S. A. (2005). The functions of centers and institutes in academic biomedical research. Analysis in Brief, 5, 1–2.
Nanni-Messegee, L., & Murphy, T. B. (2013). Putting theatre arts to the test: Student performance that Goes beyond STEM and STEAM. Inquiry: The Journal of the Virginia Community Colleges, 18(1), 6.
Nicolescu, B., & Ertas, A. (2013). Transdisciplinary theory and practice. Creskill: Hampton Press.
Norman, G. R., & Schmidt, H. G. (1992). The psychological basis of problem-based learning: A review of the evidence. Academic Medicine, 67(9), 557–565.
Padurean, A., & Cheveresan, C. T. (2004). Transdisciplinarity in education. EDUCA IA-PLUS Journal Plus Education, 127.
Pohl, C. (2005). Transdisciplinary collaboration in environmental research. Futures, 37(10), 1159–1178.
Poulson, S. (2014). Sparking student interest in STEM by bringing industry experts into the classroom. Retrieved from http://www.newschools.org/news/sparking-student-interest-in-stem-by-bringing-industry-experts-into-the-classroom/.
Quigley, C. F., & Herro, D. (2016). “Finding the joy in the unknown”: Implementation of STEAM teaching practices in middle school science and math classrooms. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(3), 410–426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9602-z
Quigley, C. F., Harrington, J., Herro, D. (2017a). Moving beyond just adding “A” to STEM: Arts as expression. Science Scope. In press.
Quigley, C. F., Herro, D., & Jamil, F. (2017b) STEAM: Conceptual model for transdisciplinary learning. School Science and Mathematics. In press.
Quigley, C. F., Herro, D., & Jamil, F. M. (2017). Developing a conceptual model of STEAM teaching practices. School Science and Mathematics, 117(1–2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12201
Roth, W.-M., & McGinn, M. K. (1998). Inscriptions: Toward a theory of representing as social practice. Review of Educational Research, 68(1), 135–159.
Schummer, J. (2004). Interdisciplinary issues in nanoscale research. In D. Baird, A. Nordmann, & J. Schummer (Eds.), Discovering the nanoscale (pp. 9–20). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
Slatin, C., Galizzi, M., Melillo, K. D., Mawn, B., & Phase in Healthcare Team. (2004). Conducting interdisciplinary research to promote healthy and safe employment in health care: Promises and pitfalls. Public Health Reports, 119, 60–72.
Son, Y., Jung, S., Kwon, S., Kim, H., & Kim, D. (2012). Analysis of prospective and in-service teachers’awareness of steam convergent education. Journal of Humanities & Social Science, 13(1), 255–284.
South Carolina Social Department of Education. (2011). South Carolina social studies standards. Columbia: State or province government publication.
Stepien, W., & Gallagher, S. (1993). Problem-based learning: As authentic as it gets. Educational Leadership, 50, 25–25.
Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. San Francisco: Wiley.
Vernon, D. T. (1995). Attitudes and opinions of faculty tutors about problem-based learning. Academic Medicine, 70(3), 216–223.
Vernon, D. T., & Blake, R. L. (1993). Does problem-based learning work? A meta-analysis of evaluative research. Academic Medicine, 68(7), 550–563.
Wang, H. H., Moore, T. J., Roehrig, G. H., & Park, M. S. (2011). STEM integration: Teacher perceptions and practice. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 1(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284314636
Watson, A. D. (2015). Design thinking for life. Art Education, 68(3), 12–18.
Wood, D. F. (2003). Problem based learning. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 326(7384), 328.
Yackman, G. (2007). STE@M education. Retrieved from http://steamedu.com
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Quigley, C.F., Herro, D., Baker, A. (2019). Moving Toward Transdisciplinary Instruction: A Longitudinal Examination of STEAM Teaching Practices. In: Khine, M.S., Areepattamannil, S. (eds) STEAM Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04003-1_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04003-1_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-04002-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-04003-1
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)