Skip to main content

Reliability and Validity of Postural Evaluations with Kinect v2 Sensor Ergonomic Evaluation System

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information and Communication Technologies of Ecuador (TIC.EC) (TICEC 2018)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 884))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Postural evaluations are becoming a priority in a world where occupational diseases derivatives from ergonomic situations are progressively common with serious consequences. This document proposes a semi-automatic ergonomic evaluation system with Kinect V2, which use the RULA method. It makes possible the discovery of conditions with postural risk and reduces errors in the estimating the evaluators’ measurements due to lack of experience, expertise and handling of measurement instruments. Reducing the ergonomic evaluation time, compared to the direct postural evaluation method at a low cost. In a controlled environment, 30 participants with homogeneous characteristics are evaluated their postural work, using a direct method (goniometer) and a non-invasive (Kinect V2) method, to then compared the statistically results using the coefficient of correlation named Cohen’s Kappa and vagueness type A. The final RULA scores issued by the direct method of postural evaluation and the proposed system are correlated. The uncertainty results established in the angular measurements on the arm, forearm, wrist, trunk and neck were respectively (±0.36°, ±0.22°, ±0.59°, ±0.27° and ±0.28°). A Cohen’s Kappa correlation coefficient of 0.953 was obtained, which means an almost perfect correlation between the evaluations of both systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Geraldo AP (2015) Ergonomía y Antropometría Aplicada con Criterios Ergonómicos en Puestos de Trabajo en un Grupo de Trabajadoras del Subsector de Autopartes en Bogotá, D.C. Colombia. Rev Repub 135–150

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jesús M, Rojo F, Canga A, Ferrer AP, José P, Quintana MF (2000) Manual Básico de Prevención de Riesgos Laborales: Higiene industrial. Seguridad y Ergonomía. Imprenta Firma, S. A., Mieres

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cursoforum S.L.U: Riesgos Ergonómicos y Medidas Preventivas en las Empresas Lideradas por Jóvenes Empresarios., Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  4. Agencia Europea para la Seguridad y la Salud en el Trabajo: Introducción a los trastornos musculoesqueléticos de origen laboral - Salud y seguridad en el trabajo - EU-OSHA,https://osha.europa.eu/es/tools-and-publications/publications/factsheets/71/view

  5. Asensio-Cuesta S, Bastante-Ceca J, Diego-Más JA (2012) Evaluación Ergonómica de los Puestos de Trabajo. Paraninfo, SA, Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  6. David GC (2005) Ergonomic methods for assessing exposure to risk factors for work-related musculoskeletal disorders. Occup Med (Chic. Ill) 55:190–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Manghisi VM, Uva AE, Fiorentino M, Bevilacqua V, Trotta GF, Monno G (2017) Real time RULA assessment using Kinect v2 sensor. Appl Ergon 65:481–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lite AS, García García M, Ángel M, Del Campo M (2007) Métodos de evaluación y herramientas aplicadas al diseño y optimización ergonómica de puestos de trabajo

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dockrell S, O’Grady E, Bennett K, Mullarkey C, Mc Connell R, Ruddy R, Twomey S, Flannery C (2012) An investigation of the reliability of Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA) as a method of assessment of children’s computing posture. Appl Ergon 43:632–636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rodríguez-Ruíz Y, Guevara-Velasco C (2010) Empleo de los Métodos ERIN y RULA en la Evaluación Ergonómica de Estaciones de Trabajo. Ing Ind 32:19–27

    Google Scholar 

  11. Garrido-Castro JL (2014) Diferencias en el análisis cinemático 2D/3D de los parámetros utilizados para la evaluación del pedaleo en el ciclismo. XXXVII Congr. LA Soc. Ibérica Biomecánica Y Biomater. pp 3–4

    Google Scholar 

  12. Alabbasi H, Gradinaru A, Moldoveanu F, Moldoveanu A (2015) Human motion tracking & evaluation using Kinect V2 sensor. In: 2015 E-Health and Bioengineering Conference (EHB). IEEE, pp 1–4

    Google Scholar 

  13. FLores-Bazán, R.: Análisis de la relación entre ergonomía, calidad de vida y eficiencia de la producción en la industria maquiladora de Tamaulipas. México, DF. In: ANFECA (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Teschke K, Trask C, Johnson P, Chow Y, Village J, Koehoorn M (2009) Measuring posture for epidemiology: Comparing inclinometry, observations and self-reports. Ergonomics 52:1067–1078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. María V. Posturas de Trabajo: Evaluación del Riesgo, http://www.insht.es/MusculoEsqueleticos/Contenidos/Formacion divulgacion/material didactico/Posturas trabajo.pdf

  16. Plantard P, Auvinet E, Pierres A-S, Multon F (2015) Pose estimation with a kinect for ergonomic studies: evaluation of the accuracy using a Virtual Mannequin. Sensors 15:1785–1803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Greene RL, Azari DP, Hu YH, Radwin RG (2017) Visualizing stressful aspects of repetitive motion tasks and opportunities for ergonomic improvements using computer vision. Appl Ergon 65:461–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Spielholz P, Silverstein B, Morgan M, Checkoway H, Kaufman J (2001) Comparison of self-report, video observation and direct measurement methods for upper extremity musculoskeletal disorder physical risk factors. Ergonomics 44:588–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Clark RA, Pua Y-H, Fortin K, Ritchie C, Webster KE, Denehy L, Bryant AL (2012) Validity of the Microsoft Kinect for assessment of postural control. Gait Posture. 36:372–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. McAtamney L, Nigel Corlett E (1993) RULA: a survey method for the investigation of work-related upper limb disorders. Appl Ergon 24:91–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Dutta T (2012) Evaluation of the KinectTM sensor for 3-D kinematic measurement in the workplace. Appl Ergon 43:645–649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Alba-Martín R (2016) Fiabilidad y validez de las mediciones en hombro y codo: análisis de una aplicación de Android y un goniómetro. Rehabilitacion 50:71–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Marino C, Vargas J, Aldas C, Morales L, Toasa R (2018) Non-invasive monitoring environment: Toward solutions for assessing postures at work. In: 2018 13th Iberian conference on information systems and technologies (CISTI). IEEE, pp 1–4

    Google Scholar 

  24. Diego-Más JA. Evaluación postural mediante el método RULA. https://www.ergonautas.upv.es/metodos/rula/rula-ayuda.php

  25. Hipp J, Hill C, Hall M (2007) Evaluación de datos de medición Guía para la Expresión de la Incertidumbre de Medida

    Google Scholar 

  26. Martin Bland J, Altman D (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 327:307–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Escamilla Esquivel A (2000) Metrología y sus aplicaciones. Larousse - Grupo Editorial Patria

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thanks to the Technical University of Ambato (UTA) for financing the project ‘‘System of Evaluation of Postural Risk Using Kinect 2.0 in the activity of Cutting of the Production of Footwear for the CALTU Ambato”, for the support to develop this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Mariño .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Mariño, C., Santana, R., Vargas, J., Morales, L., Cisneros, L. (2019). Reliability and Validity of Postural Evaluations with Kinect v2 Sensor Ergonomic Evaluation System. In: Botto-Tobar, M., Barba-Maggi, L., González-Huerta, J., Villacrés-Cevallos, P., S. Gómez, O., Uvidia-Fassler, M. (eds) Information and Communication Technologies of Ecuador (TIC.EC). TICEC 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 884. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02828-2_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics