Skip to main content

Digital Lean Manufacture (DLM): A New Management Methodology for Production Operations Integration

  • Conference paper
Collaborative Product and Service Life Cycle Management for a Sustainable World

Part of the book series: Advanced Concurrent Engineering ((ACENG))

Abstract

A methodology for the systematic integration of digital manufacuring is presented through Digital Lean Manufacturing (DLM). DLM offers a new management methodology for production operations integration that achieves vertical and horizontal integration of process, tools and systemic manufacturing effort. Vertical integration was achieved through the hierarchical structuring of effort according to business process, integrated crossfunctional manufacturing processes, specific manufacturing activity and knowledge capture. Horizontal integration was achieved through the mapping of processes within functional swimlanes and through the specific activity mapping of the Digital, Lean and Manufacturing functions in particular. Validation elements have also been presented in this initial positioning of DLM as new and novel management methodology for production operations integration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

7 References

  1. Singh, V., (1997), “Systems Integration — Coping with legacy systems”; 8/1, pp 24–28.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Freedman, S, (1999), “An overview of fully integrated digital manufacturing technology”; Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Olds, L, (1997), “Integration of Cost Modeling and Business Simulation into Conceptual Launch Vehicle Design”; Paper No. AIAA 97-3911.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Klem, B, (2008), “article”, Automotive Manufacturing Solutions, January/February Edition.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dassault Systèmes Press Conference (2002), “Delmia Solutions for the Airbus A380”; Fellbach, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Boeing (2005), Journal of Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology, “Boeing deploys Dassault Systèmes update to digital tools for 787 global team”; 77/6.

    Google Scholar 

  7. CIMData (2003), “The Benefits of Digital Manufacturing”; White Paper; [Accessed from http://www.cimdata.com].

    Google Scholar 

  8. CimData & Dr Michael Grieves (2006); “Digital Manufacturing in PLM Environments”; White Paper; [Accessed from http://www.cimdata.com].

    Google Scholar 

  9. La Rocca, G., Krakers, L, and van Tooren, MJL, (2002), “Development of an ICAD Generative Model for Aircraft Design, Analysis and Optimisation”; 13th IIUG conference, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Oliver, N. (1999). Rational choice or leap of faith: The creation and defence of a management orthodoxy, University of Cambridge Working Paper Series, February.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fiegenbaum, A.V. (1983). Total Quality Control, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Myers, K., N. Zumel and P. Garcia (1999). Automated capture of rationale for the detailed design process. Proceedings of the 11th Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence (IAAI99), AAAI Press, Menlo Park, CA, USA, 876–883.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Stalk, G.J. and Hout, T.M. (1990). Competing Against Time, The Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hammer, M. and Champy, J. (1995). Reengineering the Corporation, Nicholas Brealey Publishing, London.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dettner, H.W. (1997). Goldratt’s Theory of Constraints: A Systems Approach to Continuous Improvement, ASQC Press, Milwaukee, WI.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Goldratt, E.M. and Cox, J. (1993). The Goal, 2nd edition, Gower, Aldershot.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Suri, R. (1998). Quick Response Manufacturing: A Companywide Approach to Reducing Leadtimes, Productivity Press, Portland, Oregon.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Christopher, M., Harrison, A. and van Hoek, R. (1999). Creating the agile supply chain: Issues and challenges, Proceedings of the International Symposium on Logistics, Florence, July.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Naylor, B., Naim, M. and Berry, D. (1999). Leagility: Integrating the lean and agile manufacturing paradigms in the total supply chain, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 62, pp.107–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Womack, J.P., Jones, D.T. and Roos, D. (1990). The Machine that Changed the World, Rawson Associates, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Womack, J.P. and Jones, D.T. (1996). Lean Thinking: Banish Waste and Create Wealth in Your Corporation, Simon & Schuster, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Towill, D.R. (1999). Management theory: Is it of any practical use? Or, how does a fad become a paradigm, Engineering Management Journal, June, pp.111–122.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Foresight Manufacturing 2020 Panel (2000), UK Manufacturing: We Can Make It Better, DTI, 2000, pp. 4 (www.foresight.gov.uk/manu2020).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Monden, Y. (1983). The Toyota Production System, Productivity Press, Portland.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ohno, T. (1988). The Toyota Production System: Beyond Large-Scale Production, Productivity Press, Portland.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hall, R.W. (1983). Zero Inventories, McGraw Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Schonberger, R. (1982). Japanese Manufacturing Techniques: Nine Hidden Lessons in Simplicity, The Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Krafcik, J.F. (1988). Triumph of the lean production system, Sloan Management Review, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp.41–52.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lewis, M.A. and Slack, N. (2003). An introduction to general themes and specific issues, In: M.A. Lewis and N. Slack (Eds), Operations Management: Critical Perspectives in Management, Routeledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Naim, M. (1997). The book that changed the world, Manufacturing Engineer, February, pp. 13–16.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Liker, J. (2004). The Toyota Way, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Spear, S. and Bowen, H.K. (1999). Decoding the DNA of the Toyota Production System, Harvard Business Review, Sept–Oct, pp.97–106.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Hirano, H. (1992). Putting 5S to Work: A Practical Step-by-Step Approach, PHP Institute Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Shingo, S. (1985). A Revolution in Manufacturing: The SMED System, Productivity Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Imai, M. (1986). Kaizen: The Key to Japan’s Competitive Success, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Hines, P. and Rich, N. (1997). The seven value stream mapping tools, International Journal of Operations and Production Management, Vol.17, No.1, pp. 47–64.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Kobayashi, I. (1995). 20 Keys to Workplace Improvement, Productivity Press, Portland, Oregon.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Rother, M. and Shook, J. (1998). Learning to See: Value Stream Mapping to Create Value and Eliminate Muda, The Lean Enterprise Institute, Brookline, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Hines, P., Holweg, M. and Rich, N. (2004). Learning to evolve: A review of contemporary lean thinking, International Journal of Operations and Production Management, Vol. 24, No. 10, pp. 994–1011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Holweg, M. (2006). The genealogy of lean production, Journal of Operations Management, Pending Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Francis, M. (2006). Incremental NPD cycle time performance: The UK FMCG industry, Cardiff University Innovative Manufacturing Research Centre Working Paper Series, Cardiff, No. WP10.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Curran, R., Butterfield, J., Collins, R., Castagne, S., Jin, Y., Francis, M., Darlington, J., and R. Burke. (2007). Digital Lean Manufacture (DLM) for Competitive Advantage, Proceedings of AIAA ATIO’07 Conference, Belfast

    Google Scholar 

  43. National Research Council (2004), National Research Council Committee On Bridging Design and Manufacturing.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Delmia User Conference (2004), General Address.

    Google Scholar 

  45. AeIGT (2004), National Aerospace Technology Strategy Implementation Report.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Service Support Solutions, 2007, EPSRC-BAE SYSTEMS Research Programme.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Winstanley, G. (1991). Artificial intelligence in engineering. John Wiley & Sons, West Sussex, UK.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  48. Schreiber, G., H. Akkermans, R. Anjewierden, N. Shadbolt, W. Van de velde, and B. Wielinga (2000). Knowledge engineering and management: the CommonKADS methodology. A Bradford Book, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Bailey, J., R. Roy, R. Harris, and A. Tanner (2000). Cutting tool design knowledge capture. In: Industrial Knowledge Management-A Micro Level Approach, edited by R. Roy, Springer-Verlag, London, ISBN 1-85233-339-1, 393–411.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Adesola, B., R. Roy, and S. Thornton. (2000). Xpat: a tool for manufacturing knowledge elicitation. In: Industrial Knowledge Management: A Micro-level Approach, edited by Roy, R., Springer, London, 449–476.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Hoffman, R., R. Shadbolt, M. Burton, and G. Klein. (1995). Eliciting knowledge from experts: a methodological analysis. Organisational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 62:129–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Shadbolt, N. and N. Milton (1999). From knowledge engineering to knowledge management. British Journal of Management, 10:309–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Spradley, J. (1980). Participant observation. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Cooke, N. (1994). Varieties of knowledge elicitation techniques. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 41(6):801–849.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  55. Rush, C (2002), Formalisation and Reuse of Cost Engineering Knowledge, PhD Thesis, Cranfield University.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Meyer, M., and J. Booker (1991). Eliciting and analysing expert judgement: a practical guide. Academic Press, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Meyer, C. (1993). Fast Cycle Time: How to Align Purpose, Strategy and Structure for Speed, Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Butterfield, J, Curran, R, Watson, G, Craig, C, Raghunathan, S, Collins, R, Edgar, T, Higgins, C, Burke, R, Kelly, P, and Gibson, C, (2007), “Use of digital manufacture to improve operator learning in aerospace assembly.” Proceedings of AIAA ATIO’07 Conference, Belfast, AIAA 2007-78565.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Curran, R, Kundu, A, Raghunathan, S, and D Eakin (2002). “Costing Tools for Decision Making within Integrated Aerospace Design”, Journal of Concurrent Engineering Research, 9(4), 327–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Curran, R, Raghunathan, S and M Price (2005). A Review of Aircraft Cost Modeling and Genetic Causal Approach, Progress in Aerospace Sciences Journal, Vol. 40, No 8, 487–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Curran, R, M. Price, S. Raghunathan, E. Benard, S. Crosby, S. Castagne and P. Mawhinney, (2005), Integrating Aircraft Cost Modeling into Conceptual Design, Journal of Concurrent Engineering: Research and applications, Sage Publications, Vol. 13, No. 4, 321–330.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Curran, R, A. K. Kundu, J. M. Wright, S. Crosby, M. Price, S. Raghunathan, E. Benard, (2006), Modeling of aircraft manufacturing cost at the concept stage, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Pages 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this paper

Cite this paper

Curran, R., Collins, R., Poots, G., Edgar, T., Higgins, C., Butterfield, J. (2008). Digital Lean Manufacture (DLM): A New Management Methodology for Production Operations Integration. In: Curran, R., Chou, SY., Trappey, A. (eds) Collaborative Product and Service Life Cycle Management for a Sustainable World. Advanced Concurrent Engineering. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-972-1_52

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-972-1_52

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84800-971-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84800-972-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics