Skip to main content

Trust Metrics in Recommender Systems

  • Chapter
Computing with Social Trust

Part of the book series: Human–Computer Interaction Series ((HCIS))

Abstract

Recommender Systems based on Collaborative Filtering suggest to users items they might like, such as movies, songs, scientific papers, or jokes. Based on the ratings Based on the ratings provided by users about items, they first find users similar to the users receiving the recommendations and then suggest to her items appreciated in past by those like-minded users. However, given the ratable items are many and the ratings provided by each users only a tiny fraction, the step of finding similar users often fails. We propose to replace this step with the use of a trust metric, an algorithm able to propagate trust over the trust network in order to find users that can be trusted by the active user. Items appreciated by these trustworthy users can then be recommended to the active user. An empirical evaluation on a large dataset crawled from Epinions.com shows that Recommender Systems that make use of trust information are the most effective in term of accuracy while preserving a good coverage. This is especially evident on users who provided few ratings, so that trust is able to alleviate the cold start problem and other weaknesses that beset Collaborative Filtering Recommender Systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. P. Resnick and H. Varian. Recommender systems. Communications of the ACM, 40(3):56–58, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. J. Breese, D. Heckerman, and C. Kadie. Empirical analysis of predictive algorithms for collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artifi cial Intelligence, Madison, WI, July 1998. Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. Toffler. Future shock, 1970. Random House, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J.B. Schafer, J. Konstan and J. Riedl. Recommender Systems in E-Commerce. Proceeding of the ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 1999

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. M. P. O’Mahony, N. J. Hurley, and G. C. M. Silvestre. Recommender systems: Attack types and strategies. In Proceedings of the 20th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-05), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA, 9–13, Jul 2005. AAAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  6. S. K. Lam and J. Riedl. Shilling recommender systems for fun and profit. In Proceedings of WWW04, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  7. E. J. Friedman and P. Resnick (2001). The Social Cost of Cheap Pseudonyms. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 10(2):173–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ctv.ca (2004).Amazon glitch outs authors reviewing own books. Retrieved December 28, 2007, from http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/1076990577460_35.

  9. Microformats.org. hreview.Retrieved December 28, 2007, from http://microformats.org/ wiki/hreview.

  10. J. Golbeck. Computing and Applying Trust in Web-based Social Networks. PhD thesis, University of Maryland, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  11. K. Swearingen and R. Sinha. Beyond algorithms: An HCI perspective on recommender systems. in ACM SIGIR 2001 Workshop on Recommender Systems, New Orleans, Lousiana, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  12. J.L. Herlocker, J.A. Konstan, and J. Riedl. Explaining Collaborative Filtering Recommendations. In Proc. of CSCW 2000., 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. Zaslow. If TiVo Thinks You Are Gay, Here’s How to Set It Straight.The Wall Street Journal, 26 November 2002

    Google Scholar 

  14. L. Guernsey. Making Intelligence a Bit Less Artificial. New York Times, 5 January 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  15. B. N. Miller, J. A. Konstan, and J. Riedl. Pocketlens: Toward a personal recommender system. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst., 22(3):437–476, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. N. Wingfield and J. Pereira. Amazon uses faux suggestions to promote new clothing store, December 2002. Wall Street Journal.

    Google Scholar 

  17. P. Massa. A survey of trust use and modeling in current real systems, 2006. Chapter in “Trust in E-Services: Technologies, Practices and Challenges”, Idea Group, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  18. R. Levien. Advogato Trust Metric. PhD thesis, UC Berkeley, USA, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  19. C.-N. Ziegler. Towards Decentralized Recommender Systems. PhD thesis, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Freiburg i.Br., Germany, June 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  20. P. Massa and P. Avesani. Trust metrics on controversial users: balancing between tyranny of the majority and echo chambers, 2007. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  21. L. Page, S. Brin, R. Motwani, and T. Winograd. The pagerank citation ranking: Bringing order to the web.Technical report, Stanford, USA, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  22. P. Massa and P. Avesani. Trust-aware collaborative filtering for recommender systems. In Proc. of Federated Int. Conference On The Move to Meaningful Internet: CoopIS, DOA, ODBASE, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  23. R. Sinha and K. Swearingen. Comparing recommendations made by online systems and friends, 2001. In Proceedings of the DELOS-NSF Workshop on Personalization and Recommender Systems in Digital Libraries. Dublin, Ireland.

    Google Scholar 

  24. J. O’Donovan and B. Smyth. Trust in recommender systems. In IUI ’05: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces, pages 167–174, New York, NY, USA, 2005. ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  25. J. L. Herlocker, J. A. Konstan, L. G. Terveen, and J. T. Riedl. Evaluating collaborative filtering recommender systems. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst., 22(1):5–53, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. J. Herlocker, J. Konstan J., A. Borchers, and J. Riedl.An Algorithmic Framework for Performing Collaborative Filtering. In Proceedings of the 1999 Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Massa, P., Avesani, P. (2009). Trust Metrics in Recommender Systems. In: Golbeck, J. (eds) Computing with Social Trust. Human–Computer Interaction Series. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-356-9_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-356-9_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84800-355-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84800-356-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics