Abstract
Traditional systems for digital assistance in manual assembly, e.g. optical displays at the work place, are inherently suboptimal for providing efficient and ergonomically feasible worker guidance. The display of sequential instructions does not offer an increase in productivity beyond a certain degree. Little situational support and the resulting deterministic guidance lead to a reduced acceptance by the worker. A solution to this discrepancy is seen in adaptive and cognitive systems of worker guidance. In this context, the paper presents a process model for adaptively generating assembly instructions. It is part of an integrated framework for human worker observation and guidance based on state charts.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
7 References
Mataric, M.J., 1998, Behavior-based robotics as tool for synthesis of artificial behavior and analysis of natural behavior, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2:82–87.
Putzer, H., Onken, R., 2003, COSA-A generic cognitive system architecture based on a cognitive model of human behavior, Cognition, Technology & Work, 5:140–151.
Hoc, J.M., 2001, Towards a cognitive approach to human-machine cooperation in dynamic situations, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 54: 509–540.
Shalin, V.L., 2005, The roles of humans and computers in distributed planning for dynamic domains, Cognition, Technology & Work, 7:198–211.
Kammüller, M, 2006, Synchrone Produktion im Werkzeugbau, Münchener Kolloquium, Utz, Munich, 103–108.
Thaler, K., 1993, Regelbasierte Verfahren zur Montageablaufplanung in der Serienfertigung, Springer, Berlin.
Längle, T., Wörn, H., 2001, Human-Robot Cooperation Using Multi-Agent-Systems, Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems 32/2:143–160.
Reiners, D., Stricker, S., Klinker, G., Müller, S., 1999, Augmented Reality for Construction Tasks: Doorlock Assembly. Augmented Reality Placing Artificial Objects in Real Scenes, Natick, MA, 47–60.
Haringer, M., Regenbrecht, H., 2002, A Pragmatic Approach to Augmented Reality Authoring, Proc of the International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, Darmstadt, 237.
Patron, C., 2004, Konzept für den Einsatz von Augmented Reality in der Montageplanung, Utz, Munich.
Hammond, K.R., 2000, Judgments under stress, Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
Speed, A., Forsythe, J.C., 2002, Human emulation technology to aid the warfighter: Advances in computational augmentation of human cognition, Whitepaper, Sandia National Laboratories.
Deutsch, J.A., Deutsch, D., 1963, Attention: some theoretical considerations, Psychological Review, 70:80–90.
Leiden, K., Laughery, K.R., Keller, J., French, J., Warwick, W., Wood, S.D., 2001, A Review of Human Performance Models for the Prediction of Human Error. NASA, System-Wide Accident Prevention Program, Ames Research Center.
Neufeld, R.W.J., 1999, Dynamic Differentials of stress and coping, Psychological Review, 106:385–397.
Reinhart, G., Patron, C., 2003, Integrating Augmented Reality in the Assembly Domain-Fundamentals, Benefits and Applications, Annals of CIRP 52/1:5–8.
Tang, A., Owen C., Biocca, F., Mou, W., 2003, Comparative Effectiveness of Augmented Reality in Object Assembly, Proc of the SIGCHI Conference on Human factors in computing systems, Ft. Lauderdale, FL, 73–80.
Dopping-Hepenstal, L.L., 1981, Head-up displays: The integrity of flight information, IEEE Proc Part F, Communication, Radar and Signal Processing 128/7: 440–442.
Yeh, M., Wickens, C.D., 2000, Attention and Trust Biases in the Design of Augmented Reality Displays, Technical report, Aviation Research Lab.
Livingston, M.A., 2005, Evaluating Human Factors in Augmented Reality Systems, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 25/6:6–9.
Roberto, T., 1996, On-line Planar Graph Embedding, Journal of Algorithms, 21/2:201–239.
Black, P.E. (ed.), 2004, Dictionary of Algorithms and Data Structures, U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD.
Wallhoff, F., Ablaßmeier, M., Bannat, A., Buchta, S., Rauschert, A., Rigoll, G., Wiesbeck, M., 2007, Adaptive Human-Machine Interfaces in Cognitive Production Environments, Proc of the International Conference on Multimedia & Expo, Beijing, China, 2246–2249.
Stork, S., Stößel, C., Müller, H. J., Wiesbeck, M., Zaeh, M. F.; Schubö, A., 2007, A Neuroergonomic Approach for the Investigation of Cognitive Processes in Interactive Assembly Environments, Proc of the 16th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, Jeju Island, Korea.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer-Verlag London Limited
About this paper
Cite this paper
Zaeh, M.F., Wiesbeck, M. (2008). A Model for Adaptively Generating Assembly Instructions Using State-based Graphs. In: Mitsuishi, M., Ueda, K., Kimura, F. (eds) Manufacturing Systems and Technologies for the New Frontier. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-267-8_39
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-267-8_39
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-84800-266-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-84800-267-8
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)