Skip to main content

Introducing the Common Non-Functional Ontology

  • Conference paper
Enterprise Interoperability II

Abstract

Enterprise systems interoperability is impeded by the lack of a cohesive, integrated perspective on non-functional aspects (NFA). We propose to respond to the fragmentation in NFA research by supporting a shared, common understanding. For this purpose:- first, we propose a common NFA ontology, which generalizes and integrates the different non-functional aspects under a common top-level ontology. Second, we introduce a series of specialized ontologies on specific non-functional aspects, such as trust, risk, privacy, threat and misuse. By fostering a consensual and shared view of the non-functional aspects domain, we aim to move closer to enhancing semantic enterprise interoperability. This shared perspective on what non-functional aspects are and how they relate to the other ‘functional’ aspects of enterprise systems, is the key towards enterprise interoperability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. INTEROP-NoE Task Group 7. Roadmap for tg7: Interoperability challenges of trust, confidence, security and policies, 2005. URL http://interop-noe.org/backoffice/deliv/DTG7.1/.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. De Nicola and M. Missikoff. A proposal for a unified process for ontology building: Upon. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Volume 3588, Pages 655–664. Springer Verlag, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. Fernandez, A. Gomez-Perez, and N. Juristo. Methontology: From ontological art towards ontological engineering. In Proceedings of Symposium on Ontological Engineering of AAAI Stanford, California, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Object Management Group. Business motivation model (bmm) specification. draft adopted specification 2006-07-01. http://www.omg.org/docs/dtc/06-07-01.pdf, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  5. TR. Gruber. Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing. In Presented at the Padua workshop on Formal Ontology, March 1993, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  6. N. Guarino. Formal ontology and information systems. In Proceedings of Formal Ontology and Information Systems(FOIS 1998), pp-3–15. IOS Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. Herrmann and B. Paech. Quality misuse. In Workshop on Requirements Engineering for Software Quality (RFSQ), Foundations of Software Quality, pp 193–199. Essener Informatik Berichte, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. Herrmann, J. Rueckert, and B. Paech. Exploring the interoperability of web services using moqare. In Proceedings of First International Workshop on Interoperability Solutions to Trust, Security, Policies and QoS for Enhanced Enterprise Systems(IS-TSPQ), 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  9. I. Jacobson, G. Booch, and J. Rumbaugh. The Unified Software Development Process. Addison Wesley, USA, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  10. V. Kabilan and P. Johanesson. Semantic representation of contract knowledge using multi-tier contract ontology. In Proceedings of Semantic Web and Databases workshop, (SWDB 2003), 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  11. V. Kabilan and H. Weigand. Value-model based risk assessment and contract drafting. In Proceedings of First International Workshop on Interoperability Solutions to Trust, Security, Policies and QoS for Enhanced Enterprise Systems(IS-TSPQ), 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  12. D. Harrison McKnight and Norman L. Chervany. Trust and distrust definitions: One bite at a time. In Trust in Cyber-societies: Integrating the human and artificial perspectives, volume LNCS 2246/2001, pages 27–54. Springer-Verlag, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  13. N. Noy and DL. McGuiness. Ontology development 101: A guide to creating your first ontology. Technical report, Stanford University, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Working Party on Information Security OECD and Privacy. Privacy online: policy and practical guidance. Technical report, OECD, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sini Ruohomaa and Lea Kutvonen. Trust management survey. In Proceedings of the iTrust 3rd International Conference on Trust Management, 23–26, May, 2005, Rocquencourt, France, pages 77–92. Springer-Verlag, LNCS 3477/2005, May 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  16. European Union. Directive 95/46/ec. The Official Journal of The European Communities, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  17. M. Uschold and M. Gruninger. Ontologies principles, methods and applications. The Knowledge Engineering Re-view 11(2): 93–136, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lea Viljanen. Towards an ontology of trust. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Trust, Privacy and Security in Digital Business (Trust-Bus’05), 2005.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kabilan, V. et al. (2007). Introducing the Common Non-Functional Ontology. In: Gonçalves, R.J., Müller, J.P., Mertins, K., Zelm, M. (eds) Enterprise Interoperability II. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-858-6_71

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-858-6_71

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84628-857-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-858-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics