The very basic tenet of medicine is that a treatment is given if the treatment's benefits far outweigh the risks. In the previous chapter, both benefit and risk factors for meningioma surgery were described and reviewed. To briefly reiterate, the risk factors associated with outcome following meningioma surgery include the following: patient's preoperative co-morbidity (C), tumor location (L), patient's age (A), tumor size (S), and the symptoms/signs (S) caused by the tumor. Additionally, a history of prior surgery and radiation were also found to be significant risk factors. The benefit factors, which are largely conceptual and difficult to quantify, include alteration of the natural history, with a chance to cure when Simpson grade 1 resection is performed, and reversal or improvement of neurologic signs and symptoms. Tumor size and neurologic signs/ symptoms, although significant risk factors, simultaneously represent only two benefit factors in meningioma surgery. The larger the tumor, the greater is the potential benefit for the patient following surgery. Similarly, when patients present with neurologic symptoms or deficits, there is potential for reversal, improvement, or stabilization of symptoms following surgery. The more severe or reversible the symptoms or deficits are, the greater the benefit would be for the patient. Based on the previous chapter's data relating to the factors influencing outcome following meningioma surgery, we aimed to develop a novel and simple standardized guideline to help select patients for meningioma surgery. Following the basic principle of medicine described above, this scale simply weighs and assesses the risks and benefits of surgery for an individual patient with meningioma.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Owens WD, Felts JA, Spitznagel EL Jr. ASA physical status classification. Anesthesiology 1978;49:239–43.
Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet 1974;2:81–4.
Spetzler RF, Marin NA. A proposed grading system for arteriove-nous malformations. J Neurosurg 1986;65:476–83.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag London Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lee, J.H., Sade, B. (2009). The Novel “CLASS” Algorithmic Scale for Patient Selection in Meningioma Surgery. In: Lee, J.H. (eds) Meningiomas. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-784-8_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-784-8_20
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-84882-910-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-784-8
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)