Skip to main content

The Novel “CLASS” Algorithmic Scale for Patient Selection in Meningioma Surgery

  • Chapter
Meningiomas

The very basic tenet of medicine is that a treatment is given if the treatment's benefits far outweigh the risks. In the previous chapter, both benefit and risk factors for meningioma surgery were described and reviewed. To briefly reiterate, the risk factors associated with outcome following meningioma surgery include the following: patient's preoperative co-morbidity (C), tumor location (L), patient's age (A), tumor size (S), and the symptoms/signs (S) caused by the tumor. Additionally, a history of prior surgery and radiation were also found to be significant risk factors. The benefit factors, which are largely conceptual and difficult to quantify, include alteration of the natural history, with a chance to cure when Simpson grade 1 resection is performed, and reversal or improvement of neurologic signs and symptoms. Tumor size and neurologic signs/ symptoms, although significant risk factors, simultaneously represent only two benefit factors in meningioma surgery. The larger the tumor, the greater is the potential benefit for the patient following surgery. Similarly, when patients present with neurologic symptoms or deficits, there is potential for reversal, improvement, or stabilization of symptoms following surgery. The more severe or reversible the symptoms or deficits are, the greater the benefit would be for the patient. Based on the previous chapter's data relating to the factors influencing outcome following meningioma surgery, we aimed to develop a novel and simple standardized guideline to help select patients for meningioma surgery. Following the basic principle of medicine described above, this scale simply weighs and assesses the risks and benefits of surgery for an individual patient with meningioma.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Owens WD, Felts JA, Spitznagel EL Jr. ASA physical status classification. Anesthesiology 1978;49:239–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet 1974;2:81–4.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Spetzler RF, Marin NA. A proposed grading system for arteriove-nous malformations. J Neurosurg 1986;65:476–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lee, J.H., Sade, B. (2009). The Novel “CLASS” Algorithmic Scale for Patient Selection in Meningioma Surgery. In: Lee, J.H. (eds) Meningiomas. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-784-8_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-784-8_20

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84882-910-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-784-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics