Skip to main content

Prevention of Perineal Trauma

  • Chapter
Perineal and Anal Sphincter Trauma

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. DeLancey JO, Kearney R, Chou Q, Speights S, Binno S. The appearance of levator ani muscle abnormalities in magnetic resonance images after vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2003;101(1):46–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hewson SA, Hodnett ED, Saigal S, Willan AR. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group. Lancet 2000; 356(9239):1375–83.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sleep J, Grant A, Garcia J, Elbourne D, Spencer J, Chalmers I. West Berkshire perineal management trial. BMJ 1984;289:587–90.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hannah ME, Whyte H, Hannah WJ et al. Maternal outcomes at 2 years after planned cesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: the international randomized Term Breech Trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;191(3): 917–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hofmeyr GJ, Hannah ME. Planned caesarean section for term breech delivery (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2004. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hall MH, Bewley S. Maternal mortality and mode of delivery. Lancet 1999;354:776.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sultan AH, Stanton SL. Preserving the pelvic fl oor and perineum during childbirth – elective caesarean section? Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1996;103(8): 731–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Clarke SL, Koongins PP, Phelan JP. Placenta praevia, accreta and prior cesarean section. Obstet Gynecol 1985;89:89–92.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Labrecque M, Marcoux S, Pinault JJ, Laroche C, Martin S. Prevention of perineal trauma by perineal massage during pregnancy: a pilot study. Birth 1994;21(1):20–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Labrecque M, Eason E, Marcoux S et al. Randomized controlled trial of prevention of perineal trauma by perineal massage during pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;180(3 Pt 1):593–600.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Shipman MK, Boniface DR, Tefft ME, McGlohry F. Antenatal perineal massage and subsequent perineal outcomes: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997;104:787–91.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Labrecque M, Eason E, Marcoux S. Randomized trial of perineal massage during pregnancy: perineal symptoms three months after delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;182(1 Pt 1):76–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Labrecque M, Eason E, Marcoux S. Women’s views on the practice of prenatal perineal massage. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2001;108(5):499–504.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Harvey MA. Pelvic fl oor exercises during and after pregnancy: a systematic review of their role in preventing pelvic fl oor dysfunction. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2003;25:487–98.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hay-Smith J, Herbison P, Morkved S. Physical therapies for prevention of urinary and faecal incontinence in adults (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2004. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cluett ER, Nikodem VC, McCandlish RE, Burns EE. Immersion in water in pregnancy, labour and birth (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane Library, Issue 2, 2004. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Eason E, Labrecque M, Wells G, Feldman P. Preventing perineal trauma during childbirth: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 2000;95(3):464–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Gupta JK, Brayshaw EM, Lilford RJ. An experiment of squatting birth. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1989;30:217–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Gardosi J, Sylvester S, B-Lynch C. Alternative positions in the second stage of labour: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1989;96: 1290–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Gupta JK, Hofmeyr GJ. Position for women during second stage of labour (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2004. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Downe S, Gerrett D, Renfrew MJ. A prospective randomised trial on the effect of position in the passive second stage of labour on birth outcome in nulliparous women using epidural analgesia. Midwifery 2004;20:157–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Howell CJ. Epidural versus non-epidural analgesia for pain relief in labour (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2004. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Robinson JN, Norwitz ER, Cohen AP, Mcelrath TF, Leiberman ES. Epidural analgesia and third- or fourth-degree lacerations in nulliparas. Obstet Gynecol 1999;94(259):262.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lieberman E, O’Donoghue C. Unintended effects of epidural analgesia during labor: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;186:S31–S68.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Fraser WD, Marcoux S, Krauss I, Douglas J, Goulet C, Boulvain M. Multicenter, randomised trial, controlled trial of delayed pushing for nulliparous women in second stage of labor with continuous epidural. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 182:1165–72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Fitzpatrick M, Harkin R, Mcquillan K, O’Brien C, O’Connell PR, O’Herlihy C. A randomised clinical trial comparing the effects of delayed versus immediate pushing with epidural analgesia on mode of delivery and faecal incontinence. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2002;109:1359–65.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Parnell C, Langhoff-Roos J, Iversen R, Damgaard P. Pushing method in the expulsive phase of labor. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1993;72:31–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Thomson AM. Pushing techniques in the second stage of labour. J Adv Nursing 1993;18:171–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. DeLee JB. The prophylactic forceps operation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1920;1:34–44.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Yancey MK, Herpolsheimer A, Jordan GD, Benson WL, Brady K. Maternal and neonatal effects of outlet forceps delivery compared with spontaneous vaginal delivery in term pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 1991;78:646–50.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Pomeroy RH. Shall we cut and reconstruct the perineum for every primipara? Am J Obstet 1918; 78:211–19.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Carroli G, Belizan J. Episiotomy for vaginal birth (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2004. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Klein MC, Gauthier RJ, Jorgensen SH et al. Does episiotomy prevent perineal trauma and pelvic fl oor relaxation? Online J Curr Clin Trials 1992;1: Doc No 10.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Sleep J, Grant A. West Berkshire management trial: three year follow-up. BMJ 1987;295:749–51.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Coats PM, Chan KK, Wilkins M, Beard RJ. A comparison between midline and mediolateral episiotomies. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1980;87:408–12.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Harrison RF, Brennan M, North PM, Reed JV, Wickham EA. Is routine episiotomy necessary? BMJ 1984;288:1971–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. House MJ, Cario G, Jones MH. Episiotomy and the perineum: a random controlled trial. J Obstet Gynaecol 1986;7:107–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Argentine Episiotomy Trial Collaborative Group. Routine vs selective episiotomy: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 1993;42:1517–18.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Stamp G, Kruzins G, Crowther C. Perineal massage in labour and prevention of perineal trauma: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2001;322:1277– 80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. McCandlish R, Bowler U, van Asten H et al. A randomised controlled trial of care of the perineum during second stage of normal labour. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1998;105:1262–72.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Goodell W. Management of the perineum during labour. Am J Med Sciences 1871;61:53–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Fitzpatrick M, Behan M, O’Connell PR, O’Herlihy C. Randomised clinical trial to assess anal sphincter function following forceps or vacuum assisted vaginal delivery. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2003;110: 424–9.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Weerasekera DS, Premaratne S. A randomised prospective trial of the obstetric forceps versus vacuum extraction using defi ned criteria. J Obstet Gynaecol 2002;22(4):344–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Johanson RB, Rice C, Doyle M. A randomised prospective study comparing the new vacuum extractor policy with forceps delivery. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1993;100:524–30.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Bofi ll JA, Rust OA, Schorr SJ et al. A randomized prospective trial of the obstetric forceps versus the M-cup vacuum extractor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;175(5):1325–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Sultan AH, Johanson RB, Carter JE. Occult anal sphincter trauma following randomized forceps and vacuum delivery. Int J Gynecol Obstet 1998;61: 113–19.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. RCOG Audit Committee. Effective procedures in obstetrics suitable for audit. Manchester: RCOG, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Johanson RB, Menon V. Vacuum extraction versus forceps for assisted vaginal delivery (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2004. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Demissie K, Rhoads GG, Smulian JC et al. Operative vaginal delivery and neonatal and infant adverse outcomes: population based retrospective analysis. BMJ 2004;329:20–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Johanson RB, Heycock E, Carter J, Sultan AH, Walklate K, Jones PW. Maternal and child health after assisted vaginal delivery: fi ve-year follow up of a randomised controlled study comparing forceps and ventouse. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1999; 106:544–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Ritgen G. Ueber sein Dammschutzverfahren. Monatschrift fur Geburtskunde 1855;6:21.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Myles MF. Textbook for midwives, 9th edn. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Dewees WB. Relaxation and management of the perineum during parturition. JAMA 1889;13: 804–8.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Floud E. Protecting the perineum in childbirth 2: risk of laceration. Br J Midwifery 1994;2:306–10.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CN, Bartram CI. Third degree obstetric anal sphincter tears: risk factors and outcome of primary repair. BMJ 1994; 308:887–91.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Fitzpatrick M, McQuillan K, O’Herlihy C. Infl uence of persistent occiput posterior position on delivery outcome. Obstet Gynecol 2001;98(6):1027–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Harkin R, Fitzpatrick M, O’Connell PR, O’Herlihy C. Anal sphincter disruption at vaginal delivery: is recurrence predictable? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2003;109(2):149–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Fynes M, Donnelly V, Behan M, O’Connell PR, O’Herlihy C. Effect of second vaginal delivery on anorectal physiology and faecal incontinence: a prospective study. Lancet 1999;354:983–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Eason E, Labrecque M, Marcoux S, Mondor M. Anal incontinence after childbirth. CMAJ 2002;166(3): 326–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. MacArthur C, Bick DE, Keighley MRB. Faecal incontinence after childbirth. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997;104:46–50.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Farrell S, Allen VM, Baskett TF. Anal incontinence in primiparas. JSOGC 2001;23:321–6.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Martin S, Labrecque M, Marcoux S, Berube S, Lemieux F, Pinault J-J. The association between perineal trauma and spontaneous perineal tears. J Fam Pract 2001;50:333–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Payne TN, Carey JC, Rayburn WF. Prior third- or fourth-degree perineal tears and recurrence risks. Int J Gynecol Obstet 1999;64:55–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Peleg D, Kennedy CM, Merrill D, Zlatnik FJ. Risk of repetition of a severe perineal laceration. Obstet Gynecol 1999;93(6):1021–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Deering SH, Carlson N, Stitely M, Allaire AD, Satin AJ. Perineal body length and lacerations at delivery. J Reprod Med 2004;49:306–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hodnett ED et al. Outcomes at 3 months after planned cesarean vs planned vaginal delivery for breech presentation at term: the international randomized Term Breech Trial. JAMA 2002; 287(14):1822–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Thakar, R., Eason, E. (2009). Prevention of Perineal Trauma. In: Sultan, A.H., Thakar, R., Fenner, D.E. (eds) Perineal and Anal Sphincter Trauma. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-503-5_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-503-5_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-85233-926-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-503-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics