Skip to main content

Primary Repair for Delayed Recognition of Esophageal Perforation

  • Chapter
Difficult Decisions in Thoracic Surgery

Abstract

Delayed recognition of esophageal perforation occurs due to the rarity of this problem and the protean manifestations of its presentation. The great majority of reports indicate delayed diagnosis of a perforated esophagus leads to more morbidity and mortality and greater length of stay when compared to those diagnosed less than 24 hours after perforation. Earlier reports and recommendations suggested that late recognition of an esophageal perforation mandated treatment other than primary repair. Grillo was one of the first to promote the concept of primary repair even in patients who were diagnosed late with an esophageal perforation. Most recent reports confirm the safety and efficacy of primary repair regardless of time of perforation. No randomized clinical trials have been performed of treatment options in esophageal perforations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brinster CJ, Singhal S, Lee L, et al. Evolving options in the management of esophageal perforation. Ann Thorac Surg 2004;77:1475–1483.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Grillo HC, Wilkens EW. Esophageal repair following late diagnosis of intrathoracic perforation. Ann Thorac Surg 1975;20:387–399.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Salo JA, Isolauri JO, Heikkila LJ, et al. Management of delayed esophageal perforation with mediastinal sepsis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1993;106:1088–1091.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ohri SK, Liakakos TA, Pathi V, et al. Primary repair of iatrogenic thoracic esophageal perforation and Boerhaaves syndrome. Ann Thorac Surg 1993;55:603–606.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wright CD, Mathisen DJ, Wain JC, et al. Reinforced primary repair of thoracic esophageal perforation. Ann Thorac Surg 1995;60:245–249.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Whyte RI, Iannettoni MD, Orringer MB. Intrathoracic esophageal perforation. The merit of primary repair. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1995;109:140–146.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang N, Razzouk AJ, Safavi A, et al. Delayed primary repair of intrathoracic esophageal perforation: Is it safe? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996;111:114–122.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lawrence DR, Ohri SK, Moxon RE, et al. Primary esophageal repair for Boerhaaves syndrome. Ann Thorac Surg 1999;67:818–820.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Port JL, Kent MS, Korst RJ, et al. Thoracic esophageal perforations; a decade of experience. Ann Thorac Surg 2003;75:1071–1074.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jougon J, Mc Bride T, Delcambre F, et al. Primary repair for Boerhaaves syndrome what ever the free interval between perforation and treatment. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2004;25:475–479.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Richardson JD. Management of esophageal perforations: the value of aggressive surgical treatment. Am J Surg 2005;190:161–165.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Attar S, Hankins JR, Suter CM, et al. Esophageal perforation: a theraputic challenge. Ann Thorac Surg 1990;50:45–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Orringer MB, Stirling MC. Esophagectomy for esophageal disruption. Ann Thorac Surg 1990;49:35–43.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gupta NM, Kaman L. Personal management of 57 consecutive patients with esophageal perforation. Am J Surg 2004;187:58–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Altorjay A, Kiss J, Voros A, et al. Nonoperative management of esophageal perforations. Is it justified? Ann Surg 1997;225:415–421.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hasan S, Jilaihawi AN, Prakash D. Conservative management of iatrogenic oesophageal perforations-a viable option. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2005;28:7–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Vogel SB, Rout WR, Martin TD, et al. Esophageal perforation in adults. Aggressive, conservative treatment lowers morbidity and mortality. Ann Surg 2005;241:1016–1023.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gelbmann CM, Ratiu NL, Rath HC, et al. Use of self-expandable plastic stents for the treatment of esophageal perforations and symptomatic anastomotic leaks. Endoscopy 2004;36:695–699.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ferri L, Lee JKT, Law S, et al. Management of spontaneous perforation of esophageal cancer with covered self expanding metallic stents. Dis Esophagus 2005;18:67–69.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wright, C.D. (2007). Primary Repair for Delayed Recognition of Esophageal Perforation. In: Ferguson, M.K. (eds) Difficult Decisions in Thoracic Surgery. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-474-8_37

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-474-8_37

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84628-384-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-474-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics