Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Rapid Methods for Detection of MRSA in Clinical Specimens

  • Protocol
  • First Online:
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) Protocols

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Biology ((MIMB,volume 1085))

Abstract

Antimicrobial susceptibility test methods such as disk diffusion, broth microdilution, and oxacillin screen plate require 24 h of incubation after having the organism growing in pure culture. Rapid and accurate identification of MRSA isolates is essential not only for patient care, but also for effective infection control programs to limit the spread of MRSA. In the last few years, several commercial rapid tests for detection of MRSA directly from nasal swabs and blood cultures have been developed for use in clinical laboratories. Real-time PCR and other molecular tests are gaining popularity as MRSA screening tests to identify patients who are candidates for contact precaution at the time of admission decreasing the risk for nosocomial transmission. These new methodologies have the advantage of a lower turnaround time than that of traditional culture and susceptibility testing and they are capable of detecting MRSA directly from nasal or wound swabs allowing rapid identification of colonized or infected patients. In addition, molecular methods able to detect and differentiate S. aureus and MRSA (SA/MRSA) directly from blood cultures are becoming a useful tool for rapid detection of bacteremia caused by MSSA and MRSA. This review focuses on the procedures for performing testing using rapid methods currently available for detection of MRSA directly from clinical specimens.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Protocol
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Cunningham R, Jenks P, Northwood J et al (2007) Effect on MRSA transmission of rapid PCR testing of patients admitted to critical care. J Hosp Infect 65:24–28

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Jog S, Cunningham R, Cooper S et al (2008) Impact of preoperative screening for meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus by real-time polymerase chain reaction in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. J Hosp Infect 69:124–130

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Polisena J, Chen S, Cimon K et al (2011) Clinical effectiveness of rapid tests for methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in hospitalized patients: a systematic review. BMC Infect Dis 11:336

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. French GL (2009) Methods for screening for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carriage. Clin Micro Infect 15(Suppl 7):10–16

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Paule SM, Pasquariello AC, Hacek DM et al (2004) Direct detection of Staphylococcus aureus from adult and neonate nasal swab specimens using real-time polymerase chain reaction. J Mol Diagn 6:191–196

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Warren DK, Liao RS, Merz LR et al (2004) Detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus directly from nasal swab specimens by a real-time PCR assay. J Clin Microbiol 42:5578–5581

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Harbarth S, Hawkey PM, Tenover F et al (2011) Update on screening and clinical diagnosis of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Int J Antimicrob Agents 37:110–117

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Paule SM, Pasquariello AC, Thomson RB Jr et al (2005) Real-time PCR can rapidly detect methicilin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus directly from positive blood culture bottles. Am J Clin Pathol 124:404–407

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bressler AM, Williams T, Culler EE et al (2005) Correlation of penicillin Binding protein 2a detection with oxacillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus and discovery of a novel penicillin binding protein 2a mutation. J Clin Microbiol 43:4541–4544

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kohner P, Uhl J, Kolbert C et al (1999) Comparison of susceptibility testing methods with mecA gene analysis for determining oxacillin (methicillin) resistance in clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative Staphylococcus spp. J Clin Microbiol 37:2952–2961

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Stegger M, Andersen PS, Kearns A et al (2012) Rapid detection, differentiation and typing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus harbouring either mecA or the new mecA homologue mecA(LGA251). Clin Microbiol Infect 18:395–400

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wendt C, Havill NL, Chapin KC et al (2010) Evaluation of a new selective medium, BD BBL CHROMagar MRSA II, for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in different specimens. J Clin Microbiol 48:2223–2237

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Nonhoff C, Denis O, Brenner A et al (2009) Comparison of three chromogenic media and enrichment broth media for the detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from mucocutaneous screening specimens: comparison of MRSA chromogenic media. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 28:363–369

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Denys GA, Renzi PB, Koch KM et al (2012) Three way comparison of BBL CHROMagar MRSA II, MRSA select, and spectra MRSA for the detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in nasal surveillance cultures. J Clin Microbiol. doi:10.1128/JCM.02022-12

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bischof LJ, Lapsley L, Fontecchio K et al (2009) Comparison of chromogenic media to BD GeneOhm methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) PCR for detection of MRSA in nasal swabs. J Clin Microbiol 47:2281–2283

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Peterson JF, Riebe KM, Hall GS et al (2010) Spectra MRSA, a new chromogenic agar medium to screen for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol 48:215–219

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Wassenberg MWM, Kluytmans JAJW, Box ATA et al (2010) Rapid screening of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus using PCR and chromogenic agar: a prospective study to evaluate costs and effects. Clin Microbiol Infect 16:1754–1761

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Paule SM, Mehta M, Hacek DM et al (2009) Chromogenic media vs real-time PCR for nasal surveillance of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: impact on detection of MRSA-positive persons. Am J Clin Pathol 131:532–539

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Blanc DS, Basset P, Nahimana-Tessemo I et al (2011) High proportion of wrongly identified methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carriers by use of a rapid commercial PCR assay due to presence of staphylococcal cassette chromosome element lacking the mecA gene. J Clin Microbiol 49:722–724

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Snyder JW, Munier GK, Johnson CL (2010) Comparison of the BD GeneOhm methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) PCR assay to culture by use of BBL CHROMagar MRSA for detection of MRSA in nasal surveillance cultures from intensive care unit patients. J Clin Microbiol 48:1305–1309

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wong H, Louie L, Lo RY et al (2010) Characterization of Staphylococcus aureus isolates with a partial or complete absence of staphylococcal cassette chromosome elements. J Clin Microbiol 48:3525–3531

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Stamper PD, Louie L, Wong H et al (2011) Genotypic and phenotypic characterization of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus isolates misidentified as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus by the BD GeneOhm MRSA assay. J Clin Microbiol 49:1240–1244

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Palavecino E. (2010). Make the move to molecular diagnostics. MLO Med Lab Obs 42, 10, 12, 14

    Google Scholar 

  24. Food and Drug Administration. Medical devices databases. Cepheid Xpert SA Nasal Complete Assay. 510 (k) Substantial equivalence determination decision summary assay and instrument combination template. http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/reviews/K100822.pdf. Accessed 20 Oct 2012

  25. Food and Drug Administration. Medical devices databases. BD GeneOhm MRSA ACP Assay. 510 (k) Summary. http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf9/K093346.pdf. Accessed 22 Oct 2012

  26. Food and Drug Administration. Medical devices databases. BD MAX MRSA Assay. 510 (k) Summary. http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf12/K120138.pdf. Accessed 22 Oct 2012

  27. Food and Drug Administration. Medical devices databases. Light Cycler MRSA Advanced Test. 510 (k) Summary. http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/K093346.pdf. Accessed 20 Oct 2012

  28. Food and Drug Administration. Medical devices databases. NucliSENS EasyQ MRSA. 510 (k) Summary. http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf10/K102740.pdf. Accessed 20 Oct 2012

  29. Food and Drug Administration. Medical devices databases. BD Diagnostics, BD GeneOhm StaphSR. 510 (k) Summary. http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf7/K071026.pdf. Accessed 22 Oct 2012

  30. Food and Drug Administration. Cepheid Xpert MRSA/SA Blood Culture Assay. 510 (k) Summary. http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf10/K101879.pdf. Accessed 22 Oct 2012

  31. Food and Drug Administration. Nanosphere. Verigene gram-positive blood culture nucleic acid test (BC-GP). 510 (k) Summary. http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf12/K122514.pdf. Accessed 25 Nov 2012

  32. Wolk DM, Picton E, Johnson D et al (2009) Multicenter evaluation of the Cepheid Xpert methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) test as rapid screening method for detection of MRSA in nares. J Clin Microbiol 47:758–764

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Rossney AS, Herra CM, Brennan GI et al (2008) Evaluation of Xpert methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) assay using the GeneXpert real-time PCR platform for rapid detection of MRSA from screening specimens. J Clin Microbiol 46:3285–3290

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Laurent C, Bogaerts P, Schoevaerdts D et al (2010) Evaluation of the Xpert MRSA assay for rapid detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from nares swabs of geriatric hospitalized patients and failure to detect a specific SCCmec type IV variant. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 29:995–1002

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Lucke K, Hombach M, Hug M et al (2010) Rapid detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in diverse clinical specimens by the BD GeneOhm MRSA assay and comparison with culture. J Clin Microbiol 48:981–984

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Hombach M, Pfyffer GE, Roos M et al (2010) Detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in specimens from various body sites: performance characteristics of the BD GeneOhm MRSA assay, the Xpert MRSA assay, and broth-enriched culture in an area with a low prevalence of MRSA infections. J Clin Microbiol 48:3882–3897

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Patel PA, Ledeboer NA, Ginocchio CC et al (2011) Performance of the BD GeneOhm MRSA achromopeptidase assay for real-time PCR detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in nasal specimens. J Clin Microbiol 49:2266–2268

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Bartels MD, Boye K, Rhode SM (2009) A common variant of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec type IVa in isolates from Copenhagen, Denmark, is not detected by the BD GeneOhm methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus assay. J Clin Microbiol 47:1524–1527

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Dalpke AH, Hofko M, Zimmermann S (2012) Comparison of the BD MAX methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) assay and the BD GeneOhm MRSA Achromopeptidase Assay with direct- and enriched-culture techniques using clinical specimens for detection of MRSA. J Clin Microbiol 50:3365–3367

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Peterson LR, Liesenfeld O, Woods CW et al (2010) Multicenter evaluation of the LightCycler methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) advanced test as a rapid method for detection of MRSA in nasal surveillance swabs. J Clin Microbiol 48:1661–1666

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Shumoski S. NucliSENS EasyQ MRSA (2011). Improved design and robust performance in a rapid molecular screening assay. BioMerieux Connection Newsletter. September 2011. Pages 2–4

    Google Scholar 

  42. Snyder JW, Munier GK, Heckman SA et al (2009) Failure of the BD GeneOhm StaphSR assay for direct detection of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus isolates in positive blood cultures collected in the United States. J Clin Microbiol 47:3747–3748

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Spencer DH, Sellenriek P, Burnharn CA (2011) Validation and Implementation of the GeneXpert MRSA/SA blood culture assay in a pediatric setting. Am J Clin Pathol 136:690–694

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Kelley PG, Grabsch EA, Farrell J et al (2011) Evaluation the Xpert™ MRSA/SA Blood Culture assay for the detection of Staphylococcus aureus including strains with reduced vancomycin susceptibility from blood culture specimens. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 70:404–407

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Parta M, Goebel M, Matloobi M et al (2009) Identification of methicillin-resistant or methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus in blood cultures and wound swabs by GeneXpert. J Clin Microbiol 47:1609–1610

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Food and Drug Administration. Cepheid Xpert MRSA/SA Blood Culture Assay for Use with the GeneXpert Dx System. Class I Recall. 2010. http://www.fda.gov/Safety/MedWatch/SafetyInformation/SafetyAlertsforHumanMedicalProducts/ucm218038.htm Accessed 20 Oct 2012

  47. Nanosphere. Verigene Clinical Microbiology Tests. Verigene gram-positive blood culture. http://www.nanosphere.us/product/gram-positive-blood-cultures. Accessed 16 Nov 2012

Download references

Acknowledgments

I thank Carlos A. Fasola for helpful editorial suggestions to the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pathology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA

    Elizabeth L. Palavecino

Authors
  1. Elizabeth L. Palavecino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Dept. Veterinary & Biomedical Sciences, University of Minnesota College of Veterinary Medicine, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA

    Yinduo Ji

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this protocol

Cite this protocol

Palavecino, E.L. (2014). Rapid Methods for Detection of MRSA in Clinical Specimens. In: Ji, Y. (eds) Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) Protocols. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1085. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-664-1_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-664-1_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-62703-663-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-62703-664-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation