Skip to main content

Living Machines for Bioremediation, Wastewater Treatment, and Water Conservation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Modern Water Resources Engineering

Abstract

This chapter describes the application of Living Machines, which are advanced ecologically engineered systems (AEES), which use natural abilities of living organisms to break down macromolecules and metabolize organic nutrients typically found in wastewater and polluted water bodies. The choice of any natural bioremediation strategy depends upon the nature and characteristics of the environment polluted, the nature of the pollutants, and the availability of the biological agents. This chapter focuses on the application of bioremediation approaches in the remediation of polluted water ecosystems, i.e., rivers, lakes, and estuaries. Fourteen case histories are presented for introduction of practical applications of Living Machine in bioremediation, wastewater treatment, and water reuse. The technology provides opportunities for environmental and water resources education, showcasing its water reuse advantages with broad applications in water shortage areas, such as California, Nevada, and New Mexico.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

PCB:

Polychlorinated biphenyls

PAH:

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons

EPA:

Environmental Protection Agency

BOD:

Biochemical oxygen demand

COD:

Chemical oxygen demand

NAS:

National Academy of Sciences

AEES:

Advanced ecologically engineered systems

SFS:

Surface flow systems

FWS:

Free water surface

EFB:

Ecological fluidized beds

TSS:

Total suspended solids

\( {\mathrm{NH}}_4^{+} \) :

Ammonium

NH3 :

Ammonia

HFR:

Horizontal flow reedbed

VFR:

Vertical flow reedbed

PRS:

Pond and reedbed system

CBOD5 :

Carbonaceous 5-day biochemical oxygen demand

TKN:

Total Kjeldahl nitrogen

\( {\mathrm{NO}}_3^{-} \) :

Nitrate

TN:

Total nitrogen

HRT:

Hydraulic retention time

VOC:

Volatile organic compounds

SBR:

Sequencing batch reactor

UV:

Ultraviolet

TP:

Total phosphorous

References

  1. Gemmell TR, Knowles JC (2000) Utilization of aliphatic compounds by acidophilic heterotrophic bacteria. The potential for bioremediation of acidic wastewaters contaminated with toxic organic compounds and heavy metals. FEMS Microbiol Lett 192:185–190

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Mejáre M, Bülow L (2001) Metal-binding proteins and peptides in bioremediation and phytoremediation of heavy metals. TRENDS in Biotechnol 19(2):67–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Abraham W-R, Nogales B, Golyshin P, Pieper HD, Timmis NK (2002) Polychlorinated biphenyl-degrading microbial communities in soil and sediments. Curr Opin Microbiol 5:246–253

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Samanta KS, Singh VO, Jain KR (2002) TRENDS in Biotechnol 20(6):243–248

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Novotný C, Svobodova K, Erbanova P, Cajthaml T, Kasinath A, Lang E, Šašek V (2004) Ligninolytic fungi in bioremediation: extracellular enzyme production and degradation rate. Soil Biol Biochem 36:1545–1551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) Report (2004) EPA/600/R-04/075 report, Washington DC, 2004

    Google Scholar 

  7. Khan GA (2005) Role of soil microbes in the rhizospheres of plants growing on trace metal contaminated soils in phytoremediation. J Trace Elem Med Biol 18:355–364

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ang LE, Zhao H, Obbard PJ (2005) Recent advances in the bioremediation of persistent organic pollutants via biomolecular engineering. Enzyme Microb Technol 37:487–496

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Thassitou PK, Arvanitoyannis IS (2001) Bioremediation: a novel approach to food waste management. Trends in Food Sci Technol 12:185–196

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Atlas MR, Bartha R (1993) Interactions among microbial populations. In MICROBIAL ECOLOGY: Fundamentals and Applications. The Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company, Inc. pp 37–65

    Google Scholar 

  11. National Academy of Sciences (NAS) (1985) Oil in the sea: fates and effects. National Academic Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zhu X, Venosa DA, Suidan TM (2004) Literature review on the use of commercial bioremediation agents for cleanup of oil-contaminated estuarine environments. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Report, EPA/600/R-04/075, Washington DC, pp 1–5

    Google Scholar 

  13. U.S. EPA (1996) A Series of Fact Sheets on Nonpoint Source (NPS) Pollution. EPA841-F-96-004, Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  14. U.S. EPA (2000) The Quality of Our Nation’s Waters: A Summary of National Water Quality Inventory: 1998 Report to Congress. EPA841-S-00-001, Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  15. Editor (2012) Introduction to greenhouse-wetland treatment systems; http://www.oberlin.edu/faculty. Oberlin College, Oberlin, OH

  16. Chen P, Brum M (1995) Ecological waste treatment: Hope in nature: In Peace and Environment News, March Issue

    Google Scholar 

  17. Todd J, Brown EJG, Wells E (2003) Ecological design applied. Ecol Eng 20:420–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mistch JW, Jorgensen ES (2003) Ecological engineering: A field whose time has come. Ecol Eng 20:363–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Odum HT (1989) Ecological engineering and self-organization. In: Mitsch WJ, Jørgensen SE (eds) Ecological engineering: An introduction to ecotechnology. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, pp 79–101

    Google Scholar 

  20. Todd J (1997) Ecological design, living machines and purification of waters. In: Kilbert CJ, Wilson A (eds) Reshaping the built environments; ecology, ethics and economics. pp 133–149

    Google Scholar 

  21. Todd J, Josephson B (1996) The design of living technologies for waste treatment. Ecol Eng 6:109–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ehrlich KF, Cantin MC, Horsfall FL (1989) Bioaugmentation: biotechnology for improving aquacultural production and environmental protection. In: Murray K (ed) Aquaculture engineering technologies for the future. Inst. Chem. Eng. UK Symposium Ser. No. 111, pp 329–341

    Google Scholar 

  23. Margulis L, Schwartz KV (1988) Five Kingdoms; An Illustrated Guide to the Phyla of Life on Earth. W.H. Freeman, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  24. Odum HT (1971) Environment, power and society. Wiley Interscience, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  25. Gray NJ (1989) Biology of wastewater treatment. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  26. Curds CR, Hawkes HA (eds) (1975) Ecological aspects of used water treatment, vol 1. Academic, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  27. Curds CR, Hawkes HA (eds) (1983) Ecological aspects of used water treatment, vol 2. Academic, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  28. Barlocher F, Arsuffi TL, Newell SY (1989) Digestive enzymes of the saltmarsh periwinkle Littorina irrorata (Mollusca: Gastropoda). Oecologia 80:39–43

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Hawkins A, Bayne B (1992) Physiological interrelations and the regulation of production. In: Gosling E (ed) The mussel mytilus: Ecology, physiology, genetics and culture. Developments in Aquaculture and Fisheries Science, vol 25. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  30. Karnaukhov VN (1979) The role of filtrator molluscs rich in carotenoid in the self cleaning of fresh waters. Symp Biol Hung 19:151–167

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. U.S. EPA (2004) Constructed Treatment Wetlands: Wetland Resources: EPA843-F-03-013, Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  32. U.S. EPA (1993) Constructed Treatment Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment and Wildlife Habitat: EPA832-R-93-005, Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  33. U.S. EPA (2000) Guiding Principles for Constructed Treatment Wetlands: Providing for Water Quality and Wildlife Habitat: EPA843-B-03-003, Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  34. Living Technologies Ltd; (2013) http://www.ltluk.com/lake_restorers.html)

  35. Bergen SD, Bolton SM, Fridley JL (2001) Design principles for ecological engineering. Ecol Eng 18:201–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. U.S. EPA (2002) Wastewater Technology Fact Sheet: The Living Machine; Office of Water EPA 832-F-02-025, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  37. Horsley W, Hegemann I (1991) Hydrogeologic investigation for groundwater discharge permit application. Report to the Town of Harwich, MA, p 43

    Google Scholar 

  38. K.V. Associates Inc., IEP Inc. (199) Shallow pond diagnostic and feasibility study. Report to the Town of Barnstable, MA, pp 113

    Google Scholar 

  39. Wang LK, Pereira NC, Hung YT (eds) (2009) Biological treatment processes. Humana, Totowa, NJ, USA

    Google Scholar 

  40. Wang LK, Hung YT, Shammas NK (eds) (2009) Advanced biological treatment processes. Humana, Totowa, NJ, USA

    Google Scholar 

  41. Todd NJ, Todd J (1994) From eco-cities to living machines: Principles of ecological design. North Atlantic Books, Berkeley, p 197

    Google Scholar 

  42. Editor (2010) Living machine opens up acres for responsible development. Faulkner County Business Journal, December 2010

    Google Scholar 

  43. Editor (2010) Old Trail School selects natural, on-site living machine system over traditional central wastewater treatment. Living Machines, Worrell Water Technologies, LLC. Charlottesville, VA, USA. www.worrellwater.com

  44. Editor (2010). Living machine system selected for federal green building at the second busiest commercial land port of entry on the US-Mexico border, Living Machines, Worrell Water Technologies, LLC. Charlottesville, VA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  45. Editor (2011) U.S. Marine Corps installs living machine system at San Diego Training Base. Living Machines, Worrell Water Technologies, LLC. Charlottesville, VA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  46. Editor (2011) San Francisco Public Utilities Commission selects living machine system for water recycling water savings in new green office building. Living Machines, Worrell Water Technologies, LLC. Charlottesville, VA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  47. Elizabeth L (ed) (2000) Ecological Schoolyards: Design Guidelines, New Village Journal. Architects/Designers/Planners for Social Responsibility. Berkeley, CA: Issue 3, May 2002, pp 74–77

    Google Scholar 

  48. Editor (2012) Ecological Wastewater Treatment: An Artificial Ecosystem. www.darrowschool.org/media_library/living_machine.pdf

  49. Editor (2012) The Esalen Institute, Big Sur, California. Living Machines, Worrell Water Technologies, LLC. Charlottesville, VA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  50. Editor (2012) Guilford County Northern Middle and High Schools, Greensboro, North Carolina. Living Machines, Worrell Water Technologies, LLC. Charlottesville, VA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  51. Editor (2012) Las Vegas Regional animal Campus, Las Vegas, Nevada. Living Machines, Worrell Water Technologies, LLC. Charlottesville, VA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  52. Editor (2012) Port of Portland, Portland, Oregon. Living Machines, Worrell Water Technologies, LLC. Charlottesville, VA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  53. Editor (2012) Living Machine Projects. Living Machines, Worrell Water Technologies, LLC. Charlottesville, VA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  54. Editor (2012) El Monte Sagrado Resort, Taos, New Mexico. Living Machines, Worrell Water Technologies, LLC. Charlottesville, VA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  55. Presidents Council on Sustainable Development (1996) Eco-industrial park workshop proceedings, Cape Charles, Virginia, 17–18 Oct 1996, pp 141

    Google Scholar 

  56. Yan J, Ma S (1991) The function of ecological engineering in environmental conservation with some case studies from China. In: Etnier C, Guterstam B (eds) Proceedings of the international conference on the ecological engineering for wastewater treatment, Stensund Folk College, Sweden. Gothenburg, Sweden, pp 80–94, 24–28 Mar 1991

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hung, YT., Hawumba, J.F., Wang, L.K. (2014). Living Machines for Bioremediation, Wastewater Treatment, and Water Conservation. In: Wang, L., Yang, C. (eds) Modern Water Resources Engineering. Handbook of Environmental Engineering, vol 15. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-595-8_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-595-8_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-62703-594-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-62703-595-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics