Skip to main content

Biofortification of Maize with Provitamin A Carotenoids

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Carotenoids and Human Health

Abstract

Biofortification, or the breeding of staple food crops to increase their micronutrient density, is widely viewed as a valuable strategy for sustainably improving the nutritional status of some malnourished populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    “A staple food is one that is eaten regularly and in such quantities as to constitute the dominant part of the diet and supply a major proportion of energy and nutrient needs” (FAO, 1995).

  2. 2.

    HarvestPlus is a special or “challenge” program established by the Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research (CGIAR) to address the global problems of vitamin A, iron, and zinc malnutrition through biofortification of staple food crops. See www.harvestplus.org

  3. 3.

    CIMMYT is a non-profit research for development institute, dedicated to sustainably increasing the productivity of wheat and maize systems to ensure global food security and alleviate poverty. See www.cimmyt.org

  4. 4.

    Haplotypes are short DNA blocks or segments that are transmitted together from one generation to another and that exhibit variation among individuals. Functional haplotypes are often associated with differences in expression of a trait, such as content of provitamin A carotenoids in maize.

References

  1. WHO. Global prevalence of vitamin A deficiency in populations at risk 1995–2005. WHO Global Database on Vitamin A Deficiency. World Health Organization, Geneva. http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/micronutrients/vitamin_a_deficiency/9789241598019/en/. Accessed 4 Nov 2011.

  2. Nuss ET, Tanumihardjo SA. Maize: a paramount staple crop in the context of global nutrition. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2010;9:417–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Atlin GN, Palacios N, Babu R, Das B, Twumasi-Afriyie S, Friesen DK, DeGroote H, Vivek B, Pixley KV. Quality protein maize: progress and prospects. Plant Breed Rev. 2011;34:83–130.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Pfeiffer WH, McClafferty B. HarvestPlus: breeding crops for better nutrition. Crop Sci. 2007;47:S88–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Graham RD, Welch RM, Bouis HE. Addressing micronutrient malnutrition through enhancing the nutritional quality of staple foods: principles, perspectives and knowledge gaps. Adv Agron. 2001;70:77–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hotz C, McClafferty B. From harvest to health: challenges for developing biofortified staple foods and determining their impacts on micronutrient status. Food Nutr Bull. 2007;28:S271–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bouis HE, Welch RM. Biofortification—a sustainable agricultural strategy for reducing micronutrient malnutrition in the global South. Crop Sci. 2010;50:S20–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Qaim M, Stein AJ, Meenakshi JV. Economics of biofortification. Agric Econ. 2007;37(S1):119–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Copenhagen Consensus. 2008. www.copenhagenconsensus.com/Home.aspx. Accessed 5 Nov 2011.

  10. Bhagwati J, Bourgignon F, Kydland FE, Mundell R, North DC, Schelling TC, Smith VL, Stokey NL. Expert panel ranking. In: Lomborg B, editor. Global crises, global solutions. 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2009. p. 605–8.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ortiz-Monasterio JI, Palacios-Rojas N, Meng E, Pixley K, Trethowan R, Peña RJ. Enhancing the mineral and vitamin content of wheat and maize through plant breeding. J Cereal Sci. 2007;46:293–307.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Harjes C, Rocheford T, Bai L, Brutnell T, Bermudez-Kandiannis C, Sowinski S, Stapleton A, Vallabhaneni R, Williams M, Wurtzel E, Yan J, Buckler E. Natural genetic variation in lycopene epsilon cyclase tapped for maize biofortification. Science. 2008;319:330–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Yan J, Bermudez-Kandianis CB, Harjes CE, Bai L, Kim E, Yang X, Skinner D, Fu Z, Mitchell S, Li Q, Salas-Fernandez M, Zaharieva M, Babu R, Fu Y, Palacios N, Li J, DellaPenna D, Brutnell T, Buckler E, Warburton M, Rocheford T. Rare genetic variation at Zea mays crtRB1 increases β-carotene in maize grain. Nat Genet. 2010;42:322–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kurilich A, Juvik J. Quantification of carotenoid and tocopherol antioxidants in Zea mays. J Agric Food Chem. 1999;47:1948–55.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Menkir A, Liu W, White W, Maziya-Dixon B, Rocheford T. Carotenoid diversity in tropical-adapted yellow maize inbred lines. Food Chem. 2008;109:521–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kimura M, Rodriguez-Amaya DB. Sources of errors in the quantitative analysis of food carotenoids by HPLC. Arch Latinoam Nutr. 1999;49:58S–66.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lozano-Alejo N, Vazquez-Carrillo G, Pixley K, Palacios-Rojas N. Effects of snack preparation by nixtamalization and frying on carotenoid profiles of Mexican maize landraces and hybrids. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol. 2007;8:385–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Berardo N, Mazzinelli G, Valotti P, Lagianna P, Redaelli R. Characterization of maize germplasm for the chemical composition of the grain. J Agric Food Chem. 2009;57:2378–84.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Howe JA, Tanumihardjo SA. Carotenoid-biofortified maize maintains adequate vitamin A status in Mongolian gerbils. J Nutr. 2006;136:2562–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Giuliano G, Tavazza R, Diretto G, Beyer P, Taylor MA. Metabolic engineering of carotenoid biosynthesis in plants. Trends Biotechnol. 2008;26:139–45.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. FAOSTAT. CountrySTAT. An integrated system for national food and agriculture statistics. http://www.countrystat.org. Accessed 3 May 2011.

  22. Bechoff A, Dhuique-Mayer C, Dornier M, Tomlins K, Boulanger R, Dufour D, Westby A. Relationship between the kinetics of β-carotene degradation and formation of norisoprenoids in the storage of dried sweet potato chips. Food Chem. 2010;121:348–57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Rodriguez-Amaya D, Nutti M, de Carvalho JL. Carotenoids of sweet potato, cassava and maize and their use in bread and flour fortification. In: Patel VB, Preedy VR, Watson RR, editors. Flour and breads and their fortification in health and disease prevention. London: Academic Press, Elsevier; 2011. p. 301–11.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Bechoff A, Westby A, Owori C, Menya G, Dhuique-Mayer C, Dofour D, Tomlins K. Effect of drying and storage on the degradation of total carotenoids in orange-fleshed sweet potato cultivars. J Sci Food Agric. 2010;90:622–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Goldman M, Horev B, Saguy I. Decolorization of β-carotene in model systems simulating dehydrated foods. Mechanism and kinetic principles. J Food Sci. 1983;48:751–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Aman R, Schieber A, Carle R. Effects of heating and illumination on trans-cis isomerization and degradation of β-carotene and lutein in isolated spinach chloroplasts. J Agric Food Chem. 2005;53:9512–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Ilg A, Beyer P, Al-Babili S. Characterization of the rice carotenoid cleavage dioxygenase 1 reveals a novel route for geranial biosynthesis. FEBS J. 2009;276:736–47.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Burt A, Grainger C, Young C, Shelp B, Lee E. Impact of postharvest handling on carotenoid concentration and composition in high-carotenoid maize (Zea mays L.) kernels. J Agric Food Chem. 2010;58:8286–92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Li S, Tayie F, Young M, Rocheford T, White W. Retention of provitamin A carotenoids in high β-carotene maize (Zea mays) during traditional African household processing. J Agric Food Chem. 2007;55:10744–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Rodriguez-Amaya DB. Carotenoids and food preparation: the retention of provitamin A carotenoids in prepared, processed, and stored foods. Arlington: Opportunities for Micronutrient Intervention (OMNI); 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Muzhingi T, Langyintuo A, Malaba L, Banziger M. Consumer acceptability of yellow maize products in Zimbabwe. Food Policy. 2008;33:352–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Tayie FA, White WS. Effects of traditional African maize processing on the carotenoid contents of beta-carotene-rich yellow maize. Fam Consum Sci Res J. 2005;34:180–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kean EG, Hamaker BR, Ferruzzi MG. Carotenoid bioaccesibility from whole grain and degermed maize meal products. J Agric Food Chem. 2008;56:9918–26.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Olson JA. Absorption, transport and metabolism of carotenoids in humans. Pure Appl Chem. 1994;66:1011–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Institute of Medicine. Dietary reference intakes for vitamin A, vitamin K, arsenic, boron, chromium, copper, iodine, iron, manganese, molybdenum, nickel, silicon, vanadium, and zinc. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001. p. 65–126.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Tanumihardjo SA, Palacios N, Pixley KV. Provitamin A carotenoid bioavailability: what really matters? Int J Vitam Nutr Res. 2010;80:336–50.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Lee CM, Lederman JD, Hofmann NE, Erdman Jr JW. The Mongolian gerbil (Meriones unguiculatus) is an appropriate animal for evaluation of the conversion of carotene to vitamin A. J Nutr. 1998;128:280–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Howe JA, Tanumihardjo SA. Evaluation of analytical methods for carotenoid extraction from biofortified maize (Zea mays sp.). J Agric Food Chem. 2006;54:7992–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Li S, Nugroho A, Rocheford T, White WS. Vitamin A equivalence of the β-carotene in β-carotene biofortified maize porridge consumed by women. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010;92:1105–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Muzhingi T, Gadaga TH, Siwela AH, Grusak MA, Russell RM, Tang G. Yellow maize with high β-carotene is an effective source of vitamin A in healthy Zimbabwean men. Am J Clin Nutr. 2011;94:510–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Davis CR, Howe JA, Rocheford TR, Tanumihardjo SA. The xanthophyll composition of biofortified maize (Zea mays sp.) does not influence the bioefficacy of provitamin A carotenoids in Mongolian gerbils (Meriones unguiculatus). J Agric Food Chem. 2008;56:6745–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Munoz EC, Rosado JL, Lopez P, Furr HC, Allen LH. Iron and zinc supplementation improves indicators of vitamin A status of Mexican preschoolers. Am J Clin Nutr. 2000;71:789–94.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Garcia-Casal MN. Carotenoids increase iron absorption from cereal-based food in the human. Nutr Res. 2006;26:340–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Cauvain SP, Young LS. The ICC handbook of cereals, flour, dough and product testing. Lancaster, PA: DEStech Publications, Inc.; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Brown IL. High amylose starches-new development in human nutrition. Nutr Soc Aust. 1994;18:33–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Morris ML. Assessing the benefits of international maize breeding research: an overview of the global maize impacts study. In: Pingali PL, editor. CIMMYT 1999-2000 world maize facts and trends. Meeting world maize needs: technological opportunities and priorities for the public sector. Mexico, DF: CIMMYT; 2001. p. 25–34.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Pixley K, Fuentes M, Badstue L, Bergvinson D. Participatory plant breeding: science or dogma? Chapter 15. In: Chopra VL, Sharma RP, Bhat SR, Prasanna BM, editors. Search for new genes. New Delhi: Academic Foundation; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Snapp S. Mother and baby trials: a novel trial design being tried out in Malawi. In: TARGET, the Newsletter of the Soil Fertility Research Network for Maize-Based Cropping Systems in Malawi and Zimbabwe. 1999 Jan;17:8

    Google Scholar 

  49. Bänziger M, De Meyer J. Collaborative maize variety development for stress-prone environments in southern Africa. In: Cleveland DA, Soleri D, editors. Farmers, scientists and plant breeding. Wallingford, UK: CAB International; 2002. p. 269–96.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  50. Low JW, Arimond M, Osman N, Cunguara B, Zano F, Tschirley D. Ensuring the supply of and creating demand for a biofortified crop with a visible trait: lessons learned from the introduction of orange-fleshed sweet potato in drought-prone areas of Mozambique. Food Nutr Bull. 2007;28:S258–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Tschirley DL, Santos AP. Who eats yellow maize? Preliminary results of a survey of consumer maize preferences in Maputo, Mozambique. In: International Development Working Paper 53. Michigan, USA: Michigan State University; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Rubey LR, Ward W, Tschirley D. Maize research priorities: the role of consumer preferences. In: Byerlee D, Eicher C, editors. Africa’s Emerging maize revolution. Colorado: Lynne Eienner Publishers; 1997. p. 145–56.

    Google Scholar 

  53. De Groote H, Chege Kimenju S. Comparing consumer preferences for color and nutritional quality in maize: application of a semi-double-bound logistic model on urban consumers in Kenya. Food Policy. 2008;33:362–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Stevens R, Winter-Nelson A. Consumer acceptance of pro-vitamin A biofortified maize in Maputo, Mozambique. Food Policy. 2008;33:341–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Meenakshi JV, Banerji A, Manyong V, Tomlins K, Hamukwala P, Zulu R, Mungoma C. Consumer acceptance of provitamin A orange maize in rural Zambia. HarvestPlus Working Paper No. 4. 2010. http://www.dfid.gov.uk/r4d/PDF/Outputs/Misc_Crop/HarvestPlus_Working_paper_4.pdf. Accessed 4 Aug 2011.

  56. Burke WJ, Hichaambwa M, Banda D, Jayne TS. The cost of maize production by small scale farmers in Zambia. Working Paper No. 50. http://www.aec.msu.edu/fs2/zambia/wp50.pdf. Accessed 31 Mar 2011.

  57. Kuteya A, Kabwe S, Beaver M, Chapoto A, Burke B, Mason N, Weber M. Statistical report on categorization of rural cropping households in Zambia: Section III. Household-Level Demographics and Population Location. Working Paper No.51-3. Food Security Research Project Lusaka, Zambia Draft, Mar 2011. http://www.aec.msu.edu/fs2/zambia/wp51/wp51_Section_III.pdf. Accessed 4 Aug 2011.

  58. Langyintuo AS, Mwangi W, Diallo AO, MacRobert J, Dixon J, Bänziger M. An analysis of the bottlenecks affecting the production and deployment of maize seed in eastern and southern Africa. 2008. http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/51713/2/Seeds-paper-2009-uploaded.pdf. Accessed 4 Aug 2011.

  59. La Rovere R, Kostandini G, Abdoulaye T, Dixon J, Mwangi W, Guo Z, Bänziger M. Potential impact of investments in drought tolerant maize in Africa. 2010. http://www.mtnforum.org/en/content/potential-impact-investments-drought-tolerant-maize-africa. Accessed 4 Aug 2011.

  60. Simfukwe M. FANRPAN: relief seed trade study-Zambia. Mwalimu Simfukwe. 2006 Sep 1. Discussion Document. Food Agriculture, and Natural Resources Policy Analysis Network. http://www.fanrpan.org/documents/d00202/Zambia_Seed_Trade_Simfukwe_Sept2006.pdf. Accessed 4 Nov 2011.

  61. DellaPenna D, Pogson B. Vitamin synthesis in plants: tocopherols and carotenoids. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2006;57:711–38.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Hirschberg J, Cohen M, Harker M, Lotan T, Mann V, Pecker I. Molecular genetics of the carotenoid biosynthesis pathway in plants and algae. Pure Appl Chem. 1997;69:2151–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Just BJ, Santos CAF, Fonseca MEN, Boiteux LS, Oloizia BB, Simon PW. Carotenoid biosynthesis structural genes in carrot (Daucus carota): isolation, sequence-characterization, single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers and genome mapping. Theor Appl Genet. 2007;114:693–704.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Paine JA, Shipton CA, Chaggar S, Howells RM, Kennedy MJ, Vernon G, Wright SY, Hinchliffe E, Adams JL, Silverstone AL, Drake R. Improving the nutritional value of golden rice through increased pro-vitamin A content. Nat Biotechnol. 2005;23:482–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Pixley KV. Hybrid and open-pollinated varieties in modern agriculture. Chapter 17. In: Lamkey KR, Lee M, editors. Plant breeding: the Arnel R. Hallauer international symposium. IA, USA: Blackwell Publishing Professional; 2006. p. 234–50.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kevin Pixley Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Annex: An Introduction to Plant Breeding

Annex: An Introduction to Plant Breeding

Plant breeding is the science and art of modifying plants to better serve our needs or preferences. All plant breeding begins with identifying or creating genetic variation for the trait(s) of interest, followed by selecting those variants that are most desirable. If variation is extensive, and the trait is highly heritable, a term that quantifies the degree to which offspring resemble their parents, or the reliability with which parents’ characteristics can be expected to be reproduced in their offspring, then progress from plant breeding for that trait will likely be relatively fast and simple to achieve. Maize grain color varies and an ear may have kernels segregating for shades of yellow and orange. Deep yellow or orange kernels can be selected, planted, and expected to produce plants with ears that have kernels with deeper yellow or orange than the parental ear. This process would be largely an art, and would likely result over time in increasing the total concentration of carotenoids in the grain. Provitamin A carotenoids, however, cannot be visually distinguished, and selection for color, without relying on laboratory analysis is unlikely to result in maize biofortified with provitamin A.

The heritability of a trait is affected by several factors, including the number of genes involved in determining the expression of the trait, and the extent to which different growing environments alter the effect of each gene determining the trait. In general, the more genes involved, the less heritable the trait will be; simply put, the more complicated the trait, the less reliably we can predict its value based on that of its parents. Similarly, the more sensitive a trait’s expression is to variation in environmental conditions, for example heat, drought or acidic soils, the lower its heritability tends to be. The carotenoid biosynthetic pathway has been well-characterized (see, for example, 20, 6163) and involves more than a dozen crucial genes, each of which has multiple forms, variants or alleles, capable of acting singly or in combination with other genes within or outside the pathway, resulting in different final carotenoid profiles and concentrations in the maize kernels. The huge numbers of possible combinations of alleles among the genes of the carotenoid biosynthetic pathway represent opportunities for plant breeders to select combinations that increase individual carotenoid concentrations, or the total provitamin A concentration in grain.

Recurrent Selection

The simplest form of plant breeding is like an accelerated version of natural selection, which through hundreds of generations rids a population of unfit individuals and gradually exaggerates the fitness-enhancing traits of the ever-more-prevalent surviving types. In plant breeding, we might begin with a landrace or a popular variety of maize, and implement a cyclic process of evaluating the provitamin A concentration of a hundred or more individuals or families, selecting and inter-mating (or allowing them to intermate) only those with highest provitamin A concentration, again planting the new progeny generation, and repeating the process until we are satisfied with the average provitamin A concentration of the improved variety. This approach will only be successful if there was adequate variation for provitamin A concentration among the individuals of the original landrace or variety, and if provitamin A concentration is sufficiently heritable to allow progress from selection. Unfortunately, we have found that although provitamin A concentration is heritable, most yellow maize populations have insufficient variation for provitamin A concentration to allow us to reach nutritionally meaningful levels within an acceptable number of years.

Inbred Line and Hybrid Development

Most modern varieties of maize are hybrids, formed by crossing two parents to form a variety that has the best characteristics from each parent, and is therefore superior to both of them. Much of the effort in maize breeding is devoted to a painstaking process of identifying very unique pairs of parents that complement each other exceptionally well when producing offspring (the hybrid). Our primary interest is enhanced provitamin A concentration, but to be successful, a hybrid must also be high yielding, disease resistant, produce tasty grain, and have many more essential and desirable attributes. The effort is only useful if, once we create the outstanding hybrid, we are able to produce sufficient seed of it to plant many thousands of hectares year after year.

Maize is ideally suited for making hybrids because its female flowers (each maize kernel originates as a flower) are separate from its male flowers (contained in the tassel, at the top of the plant). By covering the young ear (with a small bag called a shoot bag) before any silks emerge from the tip of the ear leaves, breeders can pollinate the flowers of that ear with pollen collected from a tassel on the same plant or another plant. Pollinating an ear with pollen from the same plant, called self-pollination, results in a 50 % reduction in allelic variation, and repeated self-pollination for several generations results in an inbred line, which is genetically uniform, having for all genes only one, the same allele, on each chromosome. Inbred lines are pure breeding because self-pollinating them reproduces exactly the same line, which is a crucial feature for enabling hybrid varieties; once we develop pure lines and identify the specific combination of inbred lines that makes an excellent hybrid, we can produce the exact same hybrid over and over and over again, making seed available to many farmers for planting on large land areas during many years.

Several crucial activities are conducted during the process of self-pollinating maize plants to develop inbred lines for use in hybrid varieties. Highly heritable traits, such as resistance to many diseases, are evaluated for all lines, and only those with an acceptable level of resistance are self-pollinated, while all others—usually the vast majority—are discarded. Other traits, including grain yield in hybrid combination, are not highly heritable and breeders form experimental hybrids in parallel with the repeated self-pollination process. The hybrids are evaluated in multilocation trials and only the best hybrids, performing as well or better than commercial hybrid checks included in the trials, are selected. Breeders use the hybrid trial data to discard the vast majority of lines that are being self-pollinated in the parallel process of developing inbred lines. Plant breeding is thus a numbers game, and it is commonly said that only one of a million maize lines in a breeding program succeeds to be used in a commercial hybrid. Needless to say, a commercially successful inbred line is extremely valuable.

Commercial inbred lines, and elite lines that were nearly, but not quite good enough to become commercial lines, are used extensively as parents in crosses (usually with other elite or commercial lines) that are used to develop new inbred lines by repeating the long process of repeated self-pollination while selecting for all important traits. This process of elite or commercial line development, followed by their use in new breeding crosses to initiate new line development is indeed a variant of recurrent selection (described above).

Sometimes breeders wish to improve traits for which there is not sufficient or any useful variation among the elite and commercial lines. This has been the case for provitamin A carotenoid concentration, for which most commercial lines have <2 μg/g. Maize with 15 or 20 μg/g may only be found among landraces held in germplasm banks, or among lines from distant ecologies, and such sources of the desired trait (provitamin A in this case) must be used in breeding crosses despite their many defects which they will transmit to the offspring of these crosses. In such cases, the cross of elite line with source line is often back-crossed to the elite line one or more times in a process during which progeny with the desired trait are selected after each back-cross and prior to performing the additional back-cross. Back-cross breeding results in lines that are very similar to the elite parent, but have incorporated the desired trait(s) from the source parent. Back-cross breeding has been an important strategy in developing provitamin A biofortified maize.

Genetically Modified, or Transgenic Lines and Varieties

Transgenes are no different from any other genes, except that they originate from a different species. All the breeding methods described above rely on combining genes (or alleles of genes) from one parent with those of the other parent to achieve in the offspring the desired values for traits of interest, such as provitamin A concentration. Back-cross breeding is a less-preferred strategy, when the desired trait cannot be found in elite or commercial lines. For some traits, however, the desired values may not exist in the crop species of interest, and it may be possible to transgenically introduce these alleles or genes from another species. In making golden rice, for example, inserting a gene from maize (phytoene synthase) resulted in rice with 30 μg/g of β-carotene [64], whereas common rice varieties have no β-carotene. Transgenic strategies have not been used in developing provitamin A biofortified maize, because the natural genetic variation in maize is sufficient to achieve the target of 15 μg/g of provitamin A carotenoids.

Open-Pollinated Varieties

Not all improved and biofortified varieties will be hybrids. About 30 % of improved varieties, and about 50 % of all maize grown in sub-Saharan Africa are open-pollinated varieties (OPVs). An OPV differs in many ways from a commercial hybrid (see Pixley [65] for a discussion of advantages and disadvantages of hybrids relative to OPVs), but an OPV can be conceptualized as a hybrid with many parents, which may or may not be inbred lines. Some excellent OPVs have been created by inter-mating as few as five or six, or as many as 30 or more elite inbred lines. We are using this approach to develop and test OPVs that could be used as provitamin A biofortified varieties. As you might expect, it is easier to find two lines that make an excellent hybrid than to find 6–30 lines that form an equally good OPV (think that for every trait there will always be one or more “weak links” bringing down the overall performance of the OPV), so hybrids almost always out-perform OPVs. However, OPVs have the distinct advantage that farmers can save harvested grain for use as seed in several subsequent seasons, without much reduction in performance of the crop; by contrast, using harvested grain of hybrid varieties as seed generally results in important loss of performance, which is why farmers typically purchase new seed of hybrids each time they plant.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pixley, K., Rojas, N.P., Babu, R., Mutale, R., Surles, R., Simpungwe, E. (2013). Biofortification of Maize with Provitamin A Carotenoids. In: Tanumihardjo, S. (eds) Carotenoids and Human Health. Nutrition and Health. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-203-2_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-203-2_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-62703-202-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-62703-203-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics