Skip to main content

Factors of Reproducibility of Anhedonia Induction in a Chronic Stress Depression Model in Mice

  • Protocol
  • First Online:
Mood and Anxiety Related Phenotypes in Mice

Part of the book series: Neuromethods ((NM,volume 42))

Abstract

Despite overall extensive use of various chronic stress models in mice during the past decades, the reproducibility of induction of anhedonia and a depressive-like syndrome with this method remains to be dissatisfying. Generally, this is related to problems of stable induction of a depressive-like state (according to a selected criterion) and limitations of behavioral methods detecting depressive-like state in animals. Here, we focus on the first part of the problem. A number of evidences suggest that in mice, the ability of different chronic stress protocols to evoke a depressive-like syndrome and anhedonia, defined by a decrease in sucrose preference, depends on the stress impact of the stress procedure. Data obtained in C57BL/6 strain show that anhedonia could be induced with chronic stress procedures of such intensity and duration, which result in a reduction of body weight. Though, chronic stress protocols, which do not cause a loss of body mass, evoke other behavioral effects in mice, as for instance, increased scores of anxiety and locomotion. In C57BL/6 mice, these behavioral changes occur also with anhedonia-inducing stress regimens. They appear in stressed individuals both susceptible and resilient to depressive-like changes, i.e., without relation to a presence of anhedonia and depressive-like syndrome. Together, these data, first, suggest that behavioral effects induced by chronic stress should be interpreted with a caution while attempting to model depressive symptoms in mice. Chronic stress can evoke general “non-specific” behavioral changes that do not imply an induction of a depressive-like phenotype in rodents. Second, obtained findings led to consider the control over a stress load during the chronic stress experiment as a reasonable approach of ensuring the reproducibility with induction of anhedonia and depressive-like syndrome in mice. The data on inter-batch fluctuation of behavioral traits and stress-response, generally described in laboratory mice, further suggest an importance of a control/moderation of the stress load, with either above-proposed or other validated criteria. We propose a reduction of weekly evaluated body weight and immediate after-stress hypoactivity as criteria of stress load, optimal for anhedonia induction, in C57BL/6 mice. Thus, adjustment of a stress procedure to the characteristics of behavioral stress response observed in a tested batch of animals, instead of using once-defined stress protocol could be a reasonable strategy while aiming at higher reproducibility with chronic stress depression paradigms in mice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Protocol
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Auriacombe M, Reneric JP, Le Moal M. Animal models of anhedonia. Psychopharmacol 1997;134:337–48.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. McArthur R, Borsini F. Animal models of depression in drug discovery: a historical perspective. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2006;84:436–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Newport DJ, Stowe ZN, Nemeroff CB. Parental depression: animal models of an adverse life event. Am J Psychiatry 2002;159:1265–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kessler RC, Akiskal HS, Ames M, et al. Considering the costs of bipolar depression. Behav Health 2007;27:45–7.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Willner P. Chronic mild stress (CMS) revisited: consistency and behavioural-neurobiological concordance in the effects of CMS. Neuropsych 2005;52:90–110.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Van den Hove D, Blanco C, Aendekerk B, et al. Prenatal restraint stress and long-term affective consequences. Dev Neurosci 2005;27:313–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Michelsen KA, van den Hove DL, Schmitz C, et al. Prenatal stress and subsequent exposure to chronic mild stress influence dendritic spine density and morphology in the rat medial prefrontal cortex. BMC Neurosci 2007;8:107.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hamilton M. Development of a rating scale for primary depressive illness. Br J Soc Clin Psychol 1967;6: 278–96.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Klein DF. Endogenomorphic depression. A conceptual and terminological revision. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1974;31:447–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kessler RC, Chiu WT, Demler O, et al. Prevalence, severity and comorbidity of 12-month DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2005;62:617–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Anisman H and Matheson K. Stress, depression and anhedonia: caveats concerning animal models. Neurosci Biochem Rev 2005;29:525–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Strekalova T. Optimization of the chronic stress depression model in C57 BL/6 mice: evidences for improved validity. In: “Behavioral models in stress research”. Eds. Kalueff A. & LaPorte J. Nova Science Publishers, NY, USA. 2008;111–57.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Katz RJ. Animal models and human depressive disorders. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 1981;5:231–46.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Katz RJ. Animal model of depression: pharmacological sensitivity of a hedonic deficit. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 1982;16: 965–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Willner P, Towell A, Sampson D et al. Reduction of sucrose preference by chronic unpredictable mild stress, and its restoration by a tricyclic antidepressant. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1987;93:358–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Willner P. Validity, reliability and utility of the chronic mild stress model of depression: a 10-year review and evaluation. Psychopharmacology 1997;134:319–29.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Moreau JL, Jenck F, Martin JR, et al. Antidepressant treatment prevents chronic unpredictable mild stress-induced anhedonia as assessed by ventral tegmentum self-stimulation behavior in rats. Eur Neuropsychopharm 1992;2: 43–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Pucilowski O, Overstreet DH, Rezvani AH, et al. Chronic mild stress-induced anhedonia: greater effect in a genetic rat model of depression. Physiol Behav 1993;54:1215–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Papp M, Nalepa I, Vetulani J. Reversal by imipramine on serotonergic and beta-adrenergic receptor binding in a chronic mild stress model of depression. Eur J Pharmacol 1994;261:141–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Von Frijtag JC, Reijmers LG, Van der Harst JE, et al. Defeat followed by individual housing results in long-term impaired reward- and cognition-related behaviours in rats. Behav Brain Res 2000;117:137–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Harkin A, Houlihan DD, Kelly JP. Reduction in preference for saccharin by repeated unpredictable stress in mice and its prevention by imipramine. J Psychopharm 2002;16:115–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ducottet C and Belzung C. Correlations between behaviours in the elevated plus-maze and sensitivity to unpredictable subchronic mild stress: evidence from inbred strains of mice. Behav Brain Res 2005;156:153–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Gronli J, Murison R, Fiske E, et al. Effects of chronic mild stress on sexual behavior, locomotor activity and consumption of sucrose and saccharine solutions. Physiol Behav 2005;84:571–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Baker SL, Kentner AC, Konkle AT, et al. Behavioral and physiological effects of chronic mild stress in female rats. Physiol Behav 2006;87:314–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Jayatissa MN, Bisgaard C, Tingstrom A, et al. Hippocampal cytogenesis correlates to escitalopram-mediated recovery in a chronic mild stress rat model of depression. Neuropsychopharm 2006;31:2395–404.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Krishnan V, Han MH, Graham DL, et al. Molecular adaptations underlying susceptibility and resistance to social defeat in brain reward regions. Cell 2007;131:391–404.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Gould TD and Gottesman II. Psychiatric endophenotypes and the development of valid animal models. Genes Brain Behav 2006;2:113–9.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Jacobson LH and Cryan JF. Feeling strained? Influence of genetic background on depression-related behavior in mice: a review. Behav Genet. 2007;37:171–213.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Weiss JM and Simson PG. Depression in an animal model: focus on the locus ceruleus. Ciba Found Symp 1986;123:191–215.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Cabib S. What is mild in mild stress? Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1997;134:344–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Harris RB, Zhou J, Youngblood BD, et al. Failure to change exploration or saccharin preference in rats exposed to chronic mild stress. Physiol Behav 1997;63:91–100.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Nestler EJ, Gould E, Manji H, et al. Preclinical models: Status of basic research in depression. Biol Psychiatry 2002;52:503–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Strekalova T, Spanagel R, Bartsch D, et al. Stress-induced anhedonia in mice is associated with deficits in forced swimming and exploration. Neuropsychopharm 2004;11:2007–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Strekalova T, Gorenkova N, Schunk E, et al. Selective effects of citalopram in the mouse model of stress-induced anhedonia with control effects for chronic stress. Behav Pharm 2006;17:271–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Strekalova T, Spanagel R, Dolgov O, et al. Stress-induced hyperlocomotion as a confounding factor in anxiety and depression models in mice. Behav Pharm 2005; 16:171–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Freeman MP, Freeman SA, McElroy SL. The comorbidity of bipolar and anxiety disorders: prevalence, psychobiology, and treatment issues. J Affect Disord 2002;68:1–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Cryan JF, Markou A, Lucki I. Assessing antidepressant activity in rodents: recent developments and future needs. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2002;23:238–45.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. De Boer SF, Van der Gugten J, Slangen JL. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 1991;1:13–9. Effects of chlordiazepoxide, flumazenil and DMCM on plasma catecholamine and corticosterone concentrations in rats.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Meerlo P, Sgoifo A, De Boer SF, et al. Long-lasting consequences of a social conflict in rats: behavior during the interaction predicts subsequent changes in daily rhythms of heart rate, temperature, and activity. Behav Neurosci 1999;6:1283–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. El Yacoubi M, Vaugeois JM. Genetic rodent models of depression. Curr Opin Pharmacol 2007;7:3–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Strekalova TV. The characteristics of the defensive behavior of rats in accordance with their resistance to emotional stress. Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova 1995;45:420–422.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Holmes A, le Guisquet AM, Vogel E, et al. Early life genetic, epigenetic and environmental factors shaping emotionality in rodents Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2005;29:1335–1346.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Hyman SE. How mice cope with stressful social situations. Cell 2007;131:232–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Macrì S, Pasquali P, Bonsignore LT, et al. Moderate neonatal stress decreases within-group variation in behavioral, immune and HPA responses in adult mice. PLoS ONE 2007;2:e1015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Jakovcevski M, Schachner M, Morellini F. Individual variability in the stress response of C57BL/6 J male mice correlates with trait anxiety. Genes Brain Behav 2008;2:35–43.

    Google Scholar 

  46. de la Iglesia HO, Meyer J, Schwartz WJ. Using Per gene expression to search for photoperiodic oscillators in the hamster suprachiasmatic nucleus.Brain Res Mol Brain Res 2004;127:121–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Bozinovic F, Muñoz JL, Cruz-Neto AP. Intraspecific variability in the basal metabolic rate: testing the food habits hypothesis. Physiol Biochem Zool 2007;80:452–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Retana-Marquez S, Bonilla-Jaime H, Vazquez-Palacios G, et al. Changes in masculine sexual behavior, corticosterone and testosterone in response to acute and chronic stress in male rats. Horm Behav 2003; 44:327–37.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Klenerova V, Jurcovicova J, Kaminsky O, et al. Combined restraint and cold stress in rats: effects on memory processing in passive avoidance task and on plasma levels of ACTH and corticosterone. Behav Brain Res 2003;142:143–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Qui BS, Mei QB, Liu L, Tchou-Wong KM. Effects of nitric oxide on gastric ulceration induced by nicotine and cold-restraint stress. World J Gastroenterol 2004;10:594–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Profs. Raymond Cespuglio and Peter Gruss, Drs. Oleg Dolgov, Barbara Maier, Careen Schroeter, and Martti Valilla for their contribution. Material used in the introduction and Figs. 9.2 and 9.3 (adapted from Strekalova T. Optimization of the chronic stress depression model in C57 BL/6 mice: evidences for improved validity. 2008 In: “Behavioral models in stress research. Volume I”. Eds. Kalueff A. and LaPorte J. pp. 111–157) is reproduced accordingly to the permission of Nova Science Publishers, NY, USA. Material shown in Fig. 9.4 is presented as significantly modified graphic representation of the data, partly published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Behavioral Pharmacology, Strekalova T, Gorenkova N, Schunk E, Dolgov O, Bartsch D. “Selective effects of citalopram in the mouse model of stress-induced anhedonia with control effects for chronic stress”. 2006;17:271–287.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Humana Press, a part of Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this protocol

Cite this protocol

Strekalova, T., Steinbusch, H. (2009). Factors of Reproducibility of Anhedonia Induction in a Chronic Stress Depression Model in Mice. In: Gould, T. (eds) Mood and Anxiety Related Phenotypes in Mice. Neuromethods, vol 42. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60761-303-9_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60761-303-9_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-60761-302-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-60761-303-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics