Skip to main content

Methylation-Sensitive Representational Difference Analysis (MS-RDA)

  • Protocol
DNA Methylation

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Biology ((MIMB,volume 507))

Abstract

Methylation-sensitive representational difference analysis (MS-RDA) is a genome subtraction method that isolates DNA fragments differentially methylated between two genomes. It can be performed in any organism, even in those for which no microarray products are available. An important characteristic of MS-RDA is that it enriches unmethylated CpG-rich regions of the genome (amplicon), most of which are unique sequences. DNA fragments differentially methylated between two DNA samples will be present in one amplicon, but not in the other. The difference can be identified by RDA. Most technical difficulties reside in the RDA procedure, and many fine techniques are necessary for a successful application of this powerful technology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Protocol
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ushijima, T., Morimura, K., Hosoya, Y., et al. (1997) Establishment of methylation-sensitive representational difference analysis and isolation of hypo- and hypermethylated genomic fragments in mouse liver tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94, 2284–2289.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kaneda, A., Takai, D., Kaminishi, M., et al. (2003) Methylation-sensitive representational difference analysis and its application to cancer research. Ann NY Acad Sci 983, 131–141.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ushijima, T. (2005) Detection and interpretation of altered methylation patterns in cancer cells. Nat Rev Cancer 5, 223–231.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Takai, D., Yagi, Y., Wakazono, K., et al. (2001) Silencing of HTR1B and reduced expression of EDN1 in human lung cancers, revealed by methylation-sensitive representational difference analysis. Oncogene 20, 7505–7513.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kaneda, A., Kaminishi, M., Nakanishi, Y., et al. (2002) Reduced expression of the insulin-induced protein 1 and p41 Arp2/3 complex genes in human gastric cancers. Int J Cancer 100, 57–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Miyamoto, K., Asada, K., Fukutomi, T., et al. (2003) Methylation-associated silencing of heparan sulfate d-glucosaminyl 3-O-sulfotransferase-2 (3-OST-2) in human breast, colon, lung and pancreatic cancers. Oncogene 22, 274–280.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Miyamoto, K., Fukutomi, T., Akashi-Tanaka, S., et al. (2005) Identification of 20 genes aberrantly methylated in human breast cancers. Int J Cancer 116, 407–414.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hagihara, A., Miyamoto, K., Furuta, J., et al. (2004) Identification of 27 5′ CpG islands aberrantly methylated and 13 genes silenced in human pancreatic cancers. Oncogene 23, 8705–8710.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Abe, M., Ohira, M., Kaneda, A., et al. (2005) CpG island methylator phenotype is a strong determinant of poor prognosis in neuroblastomas. Cancer Res 65, 828–834.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Furuta, J., Nobeyama, Y., Umebayashi, Y., et al. (2006) Silencing of peroxiredoxin 2 and aberrant methylation of 33 CpG islands in putative promoter regions in human malignant melanomas. Cancer Res 66, 6080–6086.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kaneda, A., Wakazono, K., Tsukamoto, T., et al. (2004) Lysyl oxidase is a tumor suppressor gene inactivated by methylation and loss of heterozygosity in human gastric cancers. Cancer Res 64, 6410–6415.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Abe, M., Westermann, F., Nakagawara, A., et al. (2007) Marked and independent prognostic significance of the CpG island methylator phenotype in neuroblastomas. Cancer Lett 247, 253–258.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lisitsyn, N., Lisitsyn, N., Wigler, M. (1993) Cloning the differences between two complex genomes. Science 259, 946–951.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Henke, W., Herdel, K., Jung, K., et al. (1997) Betaine improves the PCR amplification of GC-rich DNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 25, 3957–3958.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The protocol is improved through the support of a Grant-in-Aid for the Third-Term Comprehensive Cancer Control Strategy from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Humana Press, a part of Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this protocol

Cite this protocol

Ushijima, T., Yamashita, S. (2009). Methylation-Sensitive Representational Difference Analysis (MS-RDA). In: Tost, J. (eds) DNA Methylation. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 507. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-522-0_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-522-0_10

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-934115-61-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-59745-522-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics