Abstract
As technology advances, diagnostic tests continue to improve, and each year, we are presented with new alternatives to the standard procedures. Given the plethora of diagnostic alternatives, diagnostic tests must be evaluated to determine their place in the diagnostic armamentarium. Criteria include sensitivity and specificity, positive and negative predictive values, likelihood ratios for positive and negative tests, and receiver operating characteristic curves. The prevalence of disease influences the diagnostic utility of tests, particularly when diseases are rare or very frequent.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Guyatt, G., Drummond, R. Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: A Manual for Evidence-Based Clinical Practice.
Sackett, D. L., Haynes, R. B., Guyatt, G., Tugwell, P. Clinical Epidemiology A Basic Science for Clinical Medicine.
3. Grimes, D., Schulz, K. (2005) Refining clinical diagnosis with likelihood ratios. Lancet 365, 1500–1505.
4. Obuchowski, N. A. (2003) Receiver operating characteristic curves and their use in radiology. Radiology 229, 3–8.
5. Glas, S. G., Lijmer, J. G., Prins, M. H., et al. (2003) The diagnostic odds ratio: A single indicator of test performance. J Clin Epidemiol 56, 1129–1135.
6. Mullherin, S. A., Miller, M. C. (2002) Spectrum bias or spectrum effect? Subgroup variation in diagnostic test evaluation. Ann Int Med 137, 598–602.
7. Knottnerus, J. A., Muris, J. W. (2003) Assessment of the accuracy of diagnostic tests: The cross-sectional study. J Clin Epidemiol 56, 1118–1128.
8. Ransohoff, D. F. (2002) Challenges and opportunities in evaluating diagnostic tests. J Clin Epidiomol 55, 1178–1182.
9. Lord, S. J., Irwig L. E., Simes, R. J. (2006) When is measuring sensitivity and specificity sufficient to evaluate a diagnostic test, and when do we need randomized trials? Ann Int Med 144, 850–855.
10. Obuchowski, N. A. (1998) Sample size calculations in studies of test accuracy. Stat Meth Med Res 7, 371–392.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Humana Press, a part of Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Fardy, J.M. (2008). Evaluation of Diagnostic Tests. In: Barrett, B., Parfrey, P. (eds) Clinical Epidemiology. Methods in Molecular Biology™, vol 473. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-385-1_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-385-1_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press
Print ISBN: 978-1-58829-964-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-59745-385-1
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols