Skip to main content

System Dynamics and Its Contribution to Economics and Economic Modeling

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
System Dynamics

Part of the book series: Encyclopedia of Complexity and Systems Science Series ((ECSSS))

  • Originally published in

Glossary

Feedback:

Feedback is the transmission and return of information about the amount of “stuff” (information or material) that has accumulated in a system’s stocks. Information travels from a stock back to its flow(s), either directly or indirectly, creating a feedback loop. When the return of this information reinforces the behavior of the stocks residing within the loop, the loop is said to be positive. Positive loops are responsible for the growth (or decline) of systems over time.

Negative feedback loops represent goal seeking behavior in complex systems. When a negative loop detects a gap between the amount of “stuff” (information or material) in a system’s stock and the desired amount of “stuff,” it initiates corrective action. If this corrective action is not significantly delayed by one or more additional stocks, the amount of “stuff” in the stock will smoothly adjust to its goal. If the corrective action is delayed by one or more additional stocks, however, the amount of...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 649.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

Primary Literature

  • Atkinson G (2004) Common ground for institutional economics and system dynamics modeling. Syst Dyn Rev 20(4):275–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlas Y (1989) Multiple tests for validation of system dynamics type of simulation models. Eur J Oper Res 42(1):59–87

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Berger S (2008) Circular cumulative causation (CCC) á la Myrdal and Kapp – political institutionalism for minimizing social costs. J Econ Issues 42(2):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergh J, Nijkamp P (1991) Aggregate dynamic economic-ecological models for sustainable development. Environ Plan A 23:1409–1428

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiddaman T (1997) Feedback complexity in integrated climate-economy models. Ph.D. dissertation, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Available from http://www.systemdynamics.org/

  • Fiddaman T (2002) Exploring policy options with a behavioral climate-economy model. Syst Dyn Rev 18(2):243–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrester J (1956) Dynamic models of economic systems and industrial organizations. System dynamics group memo D-0. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Available from http://www.systemdynamics.org/

  • Forrester J (1961) Industrial dynamics. Pegasus Communications, Inc., Waltham

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrester J (1968) Principles of systems. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrester J (1969) Urban Dynamics. Pegasus Communications, Inc., Waltham

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrester J (1971) World dynamics. Pegasus Communications, Inc., Waltham

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrester N (1973) The life cycle of economic development. Wright-Allen Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrester J (1975) Counterintuitive behavior of social systems. In: Forrester J (ed) Collected papers of Jay W. Forrester. Pegasus communications, Inc., Waltham, pp 211–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrester J (1980) Information sources for modeling the National Economy. J Am Stat Assoc 75(371):555–567

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrester N (1982) A dynamic synthesis of basic macroeconomic theory: implications for stabilization policy analysis, Ph.D. dissertation, Alfred P. Sloan school of management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Available from http://www.systemdynamics.org/

  • Forrester J (1985) ‘The’ model versus a modeling ‘Process’. Syst Dyn Rev 1(1 and 2):133–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrester J (2003) Economic theory for the new millennium. In: Eberlein R, Diker V, Langer R, Rowe J (eds) Proceedings of the twenty-first annual conference of the system dynamics society. Available from http://www.systemdynamics.org/

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrester J, Senge P (1980) Tests for building confidence in system dynamics models. In: Legasto AA Jr, Forrester JW, Lyneis JM (eds) TIMS studies in the management sciences: system dynamics, vol 14. North Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, pp 209–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrester J, Low G, Mass N (1974) The debate on world dynamics: a response to Nordhaus. Policy Sci 5:169–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Godley W, Lavoie M (2012) Monetary economics: an integrated approach to credit, money, income, production and wealth. Palgrave Macmillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham A (1980) Parameter estimation in system dynamics modeling. In: Randers J (ed) Elements of the system dynamics method. Pegasus Communications, Inc., Waltham, pp 143–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberger M, Crenson M, Crissey B (1976) Models in the policy process: public decision making in the computer era. Russell Sage Foundation, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton M (1980) Estimating lengths and orders of delays in system dynamics models. In: Randers J (ed) Elements of the system dynamics method. Pegasus Communications, Inc., Waltham, pp 162–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilbroner R (1980) The worldly philosophers, 5th edn. Simon & Schuster, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks J (1950) A contribution to the theory of the trade cycle. Oxford University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Homer J (1987) Homer J. A diffusion model with application to evolving medical technologies. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 31(3):197–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Keen S (1995) Finance and economic breakdown: modeling Minsky’s financial instability hypothesis. J Post Keynesian Econ 17:607–635

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreutzer W, Garrett M (2000) Business dynamics: systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. Irwin- McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Low G (1980) The multiplier-accelerator model of business cycles interpreted from a system dynamics perspective. In: Randers J (ed) Elements of the system dynamics method. Pegasus Communications, Inc., Waltham, pp 76–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Mashayekhi A, Vakili K, Foroughi H, Hadavandi M (2006) Supply demand world: an interactive learning environment for teaching microeconomics. In: Grosler A, Rouwette A, Langer R, Rowe J, Yanni J (eds) Proceedings of the of the twenty-fourth international conference of the system dynamics Society. Available at http://www.systemdynamics.org/

    Google Scholar 

  • Mass N (1974) Readings in urban dynamics: volume I. Wright-Allen Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Mass N (1975) Economic cycles: an analysis of the underlying causes. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadows D (1970) Dynamics of commodity production cycles. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadows D, Meadows D, Randers J, Behrens W III (1972) The limits to growth: a report for the Club of Rome’s project on the predicament of mankind. Universe Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadows D, Meadows D, Randers J (1992) Beyond the limits: confronting global collapse, envisioning a sustainable future. Chelsea Green Publishing, White River Junction

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadows D, Meadows D, Randers J (2002) Limits to growth: the 30-year update. Chelsea Green Publishing, White River Junction

    Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Institute (2007) Introduction and purpose of threshold 21. http://www.millennium-institute.org/resources/elibrary/papers/T21Overview.pdf

  • Moxnes E (1992) Positive feedback economics and the competition between ‘hard’ and ‘soft’ energy supplies. J Sci Ind Res 51:257–265

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng T, Wright M (2007) Introducing the MONIAC: an early and innovative economic model, Reserve Bank of New Zealand. Bulletin 70(4):46–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordhaus W (1972) World dynamics: measurement without data. Econ J 83(332):1156–1183

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordhaus W (1992a) The “DICE” model: background and structure of a dynamic integrated climate-economy model of the economics of global warming. Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics at Yale University, Discussion Paper No. 1009

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordhaus W (1992b) Lethal model 2: the limits to growth revisited. Brook Pap Econ Act 2:1–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Paich M (1985) Generic structures. Syst Dyn Rev 1(1 and 2):126–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Paich M (1994) Managing the global commons. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson D (1975) Hypothesis, estimation, and validation of dynamic social models – energy demand modeling. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Electrical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Available from http://www.systemdynamics.org/

  • Peterson D (1980) Statistical tools for system dynamics. In: Randers J (ed) Elements of the system dynamics method. Pegasus Communications, Inc., Waltham, pp 226–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips W (1950) Mechanical models in economic dynamics. Economica (67):283–305

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips W (1954) Stabilization policy in a closed economy. Econ J 64(254):290–323

    Google Scholar 

  • Radzicki M (1988) Institutional dynamics: an extension of the institutionalist approach to socioeconomic analysis. J Econ Issues 22(3):633–665

    Google Scholar 

  • Radzicki M (1990) Methodologia Oeconomiae et Systematis Dynamis. Syst Dyn Rev 6(2):123–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Radzicki M (1997) Introduction to system dynamics. Free web-based system dynamics tutorial. Available at https://www.systemdynamics.org/tips

  • Radzicki M (2003) Mr. Hamilton, Mr. Forrester and a foundation for evolutionary economics. J Econ Issues 37(1):133–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Radzicki M (2007) Institutional economics, post Keynesian economics, and system dynamics: three strands of a heterodox economics braid. In: Harvey J, Garnett R (eds) The future of heterodox economics. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor

    Google Scholar 

  • Radzicki M (2020, forthcoming) Behavioral expectation formation and the knife edge: another look at Harrod. In: Cavana R, Dangerfield B, Pavlov O, Wheat D (eds) Feedback economics. Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Radzicki M, Sterman J (1994) Evolutionary economics and system dynamics. In: Englund R (ed) Evolutionary concepts in contemporary economics. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, pp 61–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson G, Pugh A (1981) Introduction to system dynamics modeling with DYNAMO. Pegasus Communications, Inc., Waltham

    Google Scholar 

  • Richmond B (1985) Conversing with a classic thinker: an illustration from economics. Users guide to STELLA. Chapter 7. High Performance Systems, Inc., Lyme, pp 75–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryzhenkov A (2007) Controlling employment, profitability and proved non-renewable reserves in a theoretical model of the U.S. economy. In: Sterman J, Oliva R, Langer R, Rowe J, Yanni J (eds) Proceedings of the of the twenty-fifth international conference of the system dynamics society. Available at http://www.systemdynamics.org/

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder W, Sweeney R, Alfeld L (1975) Readings in urban dynamics, vol II. Wright-Allen Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge P (1980) A system dynamics approach to investment function formulation and testing. Socio Econ Plan Sci 14:269–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Solow R (1956) A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Q J Econ 70:65–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterman J (1981) The energy transition and the economy: a system dynamics approach, Ph.D. dissertation, Alfred P. Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Available at http://www.systemdynamics.org/

  • Sterman J (1985) A behavioral model of the economic long wave. J Econ Behav Organ 6:17–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterman J (1988) A Skeptic’s guide to computer models. In: L Grant (ed) Foresight and national decisions. University Press of America, Lanham, pp 133–169; Revised and reprinted In: Barney G, Kreutzer W, Garrett M (1991) Managing a nation. Westview Press, Boulder, pp 209–2e30

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterman (2000) Business dynamics: Systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. The McGraw-Hill Companies, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolwijk J (1980) Comment on ‘information sources for modeling the National Economy’ by Jay W. Forrester. J Am Stat Assoc 75(371):569–572

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber L (2007) Understanding recent developments in growth theory. In: Sterman J, Oliva R, Langer R, Rowe J, Yanni J (eds) Proceedings of the twenty-fifth international conference of the system dynamics society. Available at http://www.systemdynamics.org/

  • Wheat D (2007a) The feedback method: a system dynamics approach to teaching macroeconomics. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Bergen, Bergen. https://bora.uib.no/handle/1956/2239

  • Wheat D (2007b) The feedback method of teaching macroeconomics: is it effective? Syst Dyn Rev 23(4):391–413

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheat D (2017) Teaching endogenous money with systems thinking and simulation tools. Int J Pluralism Econ Educ 8(3):219–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilber C, Harrison R (1978) The methodological basis of institutional economics: pattern model, storytelling, and holism. J Econ Issues 12(1):61–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamaguchi K (2017) Money and macroeconomic dynamics: accounting system dynamics approach. Japan Futures Research Center, Awaji Island

    Google Scholar 

  • Zellner A (1980) Comment on ‘information sources for modeling the National Economy’ by Jay W. Forrester. J Am Stat Assoc 75(371):567–569

    Google Scholar 

Books and Reviews

  • Alfeld L, Graham A (1976) Introduction to urban dynamics. Wright-Allen Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyneis J (1980) Corporate planning and policy design: a system dynamics approach. PA consulting, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadows D, Meadows D (1973) Toward global equilibrium: collected papers. Wright-Allen Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadows D, Robinson J (1985) The electronic Oracle: computer models and social decisions. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadows D, Behrens W III, Meadows D, Naill R, Randers J, Zahn E (1974) Dynamics of growth in a finite world. Wright-Allen Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Myrdal G (1968) Asian Drama: an inquiry into the poverty of nations. Pantheon, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson G (1999) Feedback thought in social science and systems theory. Pegasus Communications, Inc., Waltham

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael J. Radzicki .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Radzicki, M.J. (2020). System Dynamics and Its Contribution to Economics and Economic Modeling. In: Dangerfield, B. (eds) System Dynamics. Encyclopedia of Complexity and Systems Science Series. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-8790-0_539

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics