Abstract
Oncogene-induced senescence (OIS) is a highly dynamic process, involving several different effector mechanisms, the multitude and combination of which likely determines the quality of the phenotype (Pérez-Mancera et al., Nat Rev Cancer 14:547–558, 2014). Autophagy, a cellular degradation process, has been proposed to be one of these senescence effectors, although its functional relevance seems highly context dependent (Hoare et al., Semin Cancer Biol 21:397–404, 2011). A number of methods for monitoring autophagy are available, and several excellent protocols have been published in this journal (Klionsky et al., Autophagy 8:445–544, 2012; Tooze et al., Methods Mol Biol 1270:155–165, 2015; Tabata et al., Methods Mol Biol 931:449–466, 2013; Young and Tooze, Methods Mol Biol 445:147–157, 2008). The same principles apply to models of OIS in culture. Thus, in this chapter, we describe how to generate OIS cells using human diploid fibroblasts (HDFs), the best-characterized cell model of OIS, and how to detect autophagy, particularly focusing on immunofluorescence methods.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Pérez-Mancera PA, Young ARJ, Narita M (2014) Inside and out: the activities of senescence in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 14:547–558. doi:10.1038/nrc3773
Hoare M, Young ARJ, Narita M (2011) Autophagy in cancer: having your cake and eating it. Semin Cancer Biol 21:397–404. doi:10.1016/j.semcancer.2011.09.004
Salama R, Sadaie M, Hoare M, Narita M (2014) Cellular senescence and its effector programs. Genes Dev 28:99–114. doi:10.1101/gad.235184.113
Coppé J-P, Desprez P-Y, Krtolica A, Campisi J (2010) The senescence-associated secretory phenotype: the dark side of tumor suppression. Annu Rev Pathol Mech Dis 5:99–118. doi:10.1146/annurev-pathol-121808-102144
Kuilman T, Peeper DS (2009) Senescence-messaging secretome: SMS-ing cellular stress. Nat Rev Cancer 9:81–94. doi:10.1038/nrc2560
Lamb CA, Yoshimori T, Tooze SA (2013) The autophagosome: origins unknown, biogenesis complex. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 14:759–774. doi:10.1038/nrm3696
Klionsky DJ, Abdelmohsen K, Abe A et al (2016) Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition). Autophagy 12(1):1–222. doi:10.1080/15548627.2015.1100356
Tooze SA, Dooley HC, Jefferies HBJ et al (2015) Assessing mammalian autophagy. Methods Mol Biol 1270:155–165. doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-2309-0_12
Tabata K, Hayashi-Nishino M, Noda T et al (2013) Morphological analysis of autophagy. Methods Mol Biol 931:449–466. doi:10.1007/978-1-62703-056-4_23
Young A, Tooze S (2008) Protein trafficking into autophagosomes. Methods Mol Biol 445:147–157. doi:10.1007/978-1-59745-157-4_10
Mizushima N, Levine B, Cuervo AM, Klionsky DJ (2008) Autophagy fights disease through cellular self-digestion. Nature 451:1069–1075. doi:10.1038/nature06639
Johansen T, Lamark T (2011) Selective autophagy mediated by autophagic adapter proteins. Autophagy 7:279–296. doi:10.4161/auto.7.3.14487
Katsuragi Y, Ichimura Y, Komatsu M (2015) p62/SQSTM1 functions as a signaling hub and an autophagy adaptor. FEBS J. doi:10.1111/febs.13540
Young ARJ, Narita M, Ferreira M et al (2009) Autophagy mediates the mitotic senescence transition. Genes Dev 23:798–803. doi:10.1101/gad.519709
Narita M, Young ARJ, Arakawa S et al (2011) Spatial coupling of mTOR and autophagy augments secretory phenotypes. Science 332:966–970. doi:10.1126/science.1205407
Kang C, Xu Q, Martin TD et al (2015) The DNA damage response induces inflammation and senescence by inhibiting autophagy of GATA4. Science 349:aaa5612. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa5612
Laberge R-M, Sun Y, Orjalo AV et al (2015) MTOR regulates the pro-tumorigenic senescence-associated secretory phenotype by promoting IL1A translation. Nat Cell Biol 17:1049–1061. doi:10.1038/ncb3195
Herranz N, Gallage S, Mellone M et al (2015) mTOR regulates MAPKAPK2 translation to control the senescence-associated secretory phenotype. Nat Cell Biol 17:1205–1217. doi:10.1038/ncb3225
Bar-Peled L, Sabatini DM (2014) Regulation of mTORC1 by amino acids. Trends Cell Biol 24:400–406. doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2014.03.003
Yu L, Mcphee CK, Zheng L et al (2010) Termination of autophagy and reformation of lysosomes regulated by mTOR. Nature 465:942–946. doi:10.1038/nature09076
Mizushima N, Yoshimori T, Levine B (2010) Methods in mammalian autophagy research. Cell 140:313–326. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2010.01.028
Mizushima N, Yoshimori T (2007) How to interpret LC3 immunoblotting. Autophagy 3:542–545
Berthois Y, Katzenellenbogen JA, Katzenellenbogen BS (1986) Phenol red in tissue culture media is a weak estrogen: implications concerning the study of estrogen-responsive cells in culture. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 83:2496–2500
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Andrew Young for critical reading. This work was supported by the University of Cambridge, Cancer Research UK, Hutchison Whampoa.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Narita, M., Narita, M. (2017). Autophagy Detection During Oncogene-Induced Senescence Using Fluorescence Microscopy. In: Nikiforov, M. (eds) Oncogene-Induced Senescence. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1534. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-6670-7_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-6670-7_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-6668-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-6670-7
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols