Abstract
In receptor–ligand interactions, dissociation constants provide a key parameter for characterizing binding. Here, we describe filter-based radioligand binding assays at equilibrium, either varying ligand concentrations up to receptor saturation or outcompeting ligand from its receptor with increasing concentrations of ligand analogue. Using the auxin coreceptor system, we illustrate how to use a saturation binding assay to determine the apparent dissociation constant (K ′D ) for the formation of a ternary TIR1–auxin–AUX/IAA complex. Also, we show how to determine the inhibitory constant (K i) for auxin binding by the coreceptor complex via a competition binding assay. These assays can be applied broadly to characterize a one-site binding reaction of a hormone to its receptor.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
de Jong LAA, Uges DRA, Franke JP, Bischoff R (2005) Receptor–ligand binding assays: technologies and applications. J Chromatogr B 829:1–25
Nguyen H, Park J, Kang S, Kim M (2015) Surface plasmon resonance: a versatile technique for biosensor applications. Sensors 15:10481–10510
Velazquez-Campoy A, Freire E (2006) Isothermal titration calorimetry to determine association constants for high-affinity ligands. Nat Protoc 1:186–191
Rossi AM, Taylor CW (2011) Analysis of protein-ligand interactions by fluorescence polarization. Nat Protoc 6:365–387
Jerabek-Willemsen M, André T, Wanner R, Roth HM, Duhr S, Baaske P, Breitsprecher D (2014) Microscale thermophoresis: interaction analysis and beyond. J Mol Struct 1077:101–113
Cheng Y, Prusoff WH (1973) Relationship between the inhibition constant (K1) and the concentration of inhibitor which causes 50 per cent inhibition (I50) of an enzymatic reaction. Biochem Pharmacol 22:3099–3108
Bigott-Hennkens HM, Dannoon S, Lewis MR, Jurisson SS (2008) In vitro receptor binding assays: general methods and considerations. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 52:245–253
Bylund DB, Toews ML (1993) Radioligand binding methods: practical guide and tips. Am J Physiol 265:L421–L429
Carter CM, Leighton-Davies JR, Charlton SJ (2007) Miniaturized receptor binding assays: complications arising from ligand depletion. J Biomol Screen 12:255–266
Hulme EC, Trevethick MA (2010) Ligand binding assays at equilibrium: validation and interpretation. Br J Pharmacol 161:1219–1237
Maguire JJ, Kuc RE, Davenport AP (2012) Radioligand binding assays and their analysis. Methods Mol Biol 897:31–77
Motulsky HJ, Neubig RR (2010) Analyzing binding data. Curr Protoc Neurosci Chapter 7: Unit 7.5
Calderón Villalobos LI, Lee S, De Oliveira C, Ivetac A, Brandt W, Armitage L, Sheard LB, Tan X, Parry G, Mao H et al (2012) A combinatorial TIR1/AFB-Aux/IAA co-receptor system for differential sensing of auxin. Nat Chem Biol 8:477–485
Wang ZY, Seto H, Fujioka S, Yoshida S, Chory J (2001) BRI1 is a critical component of a plasma-membrane receptor for plant steroids. Nature 410:380–383
Cano-Delgado A, Yin Y, Yu C, Vafeados D, Mora-Garcia S, Cheng JC, Nam KH, Li J, Chory J (2004) BRL1 and BRL3 are novel brassinosteroid receptors that function in vascular differentiation in Arabidopsis. Development 131:5341–5351
Sheard LB, Tan X, Mao H, Withers J, Ben-Nissan G, Hinds TR, Kobayashi Y, Hsu FF, Sharon M, Browse J et al (2010) Jasmonate perception by inositol-phosphate-potentiated COI1-JAZ co-receptor. Nature 468:400–405
Slaymaker DH, Navarre DA, Clark D, del Pozo O, Martin GB, Klessig DF (2002) The tobacco salicylic acid-binding protein 3 (SABP3) is the chloroplast carbonic anhydrase, which exhibits antioxidant activity and plays a role in the hypersensitive defense response. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:11640–11645
Fu ZQ, Yan S, Saleh A, Wang W, Ruble J, Oka N, Mohan R, Spoel SH, Tada Y, Zheng N, Dong X (2012) NPR3 and NPR4 are receptors for the immune signal salicylic acid in plants. Nature 486:228–232
Ueguchi-Tanaka M, Ashikari M, Nakajima M, Itoh H, Katoh E, Kobayashi M, Chow TY, Hsing YI, Kitano H, Yamaguchi I, Matsuoka M (2005) GIBBERELLIN INSENSITIVE DWARF1 encodes a soluble receptor for gibberellin. Nature 437:693–698
Soon FF, Suino-Powell KM, Li J, Yong EL, Xu HE, Melcher K (2012) Abscisic acid signaling: thermal stability shift assays as tool to analyze hormone perception and signal transduction. PLoS One 7:e47857
Calderón Villalobos LI, Tan X, Zheng N, Estelle M (2010) Auxin perception-structural insights. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2:a005546
Dharmasiri N, Dharmasiri S, Estelle M (2005) The F-box protein TIR1 is an auxin receptor. Nature 435:441–445
Kepinski S, Leyser O (2005) The Arabidopsis F-box protein TIR1 is an auxin receptor. Nature 435:446–451
Chapman EJ, Estelle M (2009) Mechanism of auxin-regulated gene expression in plants. Annu Rev Genet 43:265–285
Tan X, Calderón Villalobos LI, Sharon M, Zheng C, Robinson CV, Estelle M, Zheng N (2007) Mechanism of auxin perception by the TIR1 ubiquitin ligase. Nature 446:640–645
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the IPB core funding from the Leibniz Association and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) through the research grant CA716/2-1 to L.I.A.C.V.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Hellmuth, A., Calderón Villalobos, L.I.A. (2016). Radioligand Binding Assays for Determining Dissociation Constants of Phytohormone Receptors. In: Lois, L., Matthiesen, R. (eds) Plant Proteostasis. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1450. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3759-2_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3759-2_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-3757-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-3759-2
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols