Skip to main content

Experimental In Vivo Sepsis Models to Monitor Immune Cell Apoptosis and Survival in Laboratory Mice

  • Protocol
  • First Online:
Programmed Cell Death

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Biology ((MIMB,volume 1419))

Abstract

Sepsis is amongst the world’s biggest public health problems with more than 20 million cases worldwide and a high morbidity rate of up to 50 %. Despite advances in modern medicine in the past few decades, incidence is expected to further increase due to an aging population and accompanying comorbidities such as cancer and diabetes. Due to the complexity of the disease, available treatment options are limited. Growing evidence links apoptotic cell death of lymphocytes and concomitant immune suppression to overall patient survival. In order to establish novel therapeutic approaches targeting this life threatening immune paralysis, researchers rely heavily on animal models to decipher the molecular mechanisms underlying this high impact disease. Here we describe variations of in vivo mouse models that can be used to study inflammation, cellular apoptosis, and survival in mice subjected to experimental polymicrobial sepsis and to a secondary infection during the immune suppressive secondary stage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Protocol
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Angus DC, Linde-Zwirble WT, Lidicker J, Clermont G, Carcillo J, Pinsky MR (2001) Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States: analysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of care. Crit Care Med 29(7):1303–1310

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hotchkiss RS, Coopersmith CM, McDunn JE, Ferguson TA (2009) The sepsis seesaw: tilting toward immunosuppression. Nat Med 15(5):496–497

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Cohen J (2002) The immunopathogenesis of sepsis. Nature 420(6917):885–891

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Schefold JC, Hasper D, Reinke P, Monneret G, Volk HD (2008) Consider delayed immunosuppression into the concept of sepsis. Crit Care Med 36(11):3118

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hotchkiss RS, Coopersmith CM, Karl IE (2005) Prevention of lymphocyte apoptosis—a potential treatment of sepsis? Clin Infect Dis 41(Suppl 7):S465–S469

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hotchkiss RS, Nicholson DW (2006) Apoptosis and caspases regulate death and inflammation in sepsis. Nat Rev Immunol 6(11):813–822

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Drewry AM, Samra N, Skrupky LP, Fuller BM, Compton SM, Hotchkiss RS (2014) Persistent lymphopenia after diagnosis of sepsis predicts mortality. Shock 42(5):383–391

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Nemzek JA, Hugunin KM, Opp MR (2008) Modeling sepsis in the laboratory: merging sound science with animal well-being. Comp Med 58(2):120–128

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Muenzer JT, Davis CG, Chang K, Schmidt RE, Dunne WM, Coopersmith CM, Hotchkiss RS (2010) Characterization and Modulation of the Immunosuppressive Phase of Sepsis. Infect Immun 78(4):1582–1592

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Shrum B, Anantha RV, Xu SX, Donnelly M, Haeryfar SM, McCormick JK, Mele T (2014) A robust scoring system to evaluate sepsis severity in an animal model. BMC Res Notes 7:233

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Wichterman KA, Baue AE, Chaudry IH (1980) Sepsis and septic shock--a review of laboratory models and a proposal. J Surg Res 29(2):189–201

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Baker CC, Chaudry IH, Gaines HO, Baue AE (1983) Evaluation of factors affecting mortality rate after sepsis in a murine cecal ligation and puncture model. Surgery 94(2):331–335

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dejager L, Pinheiro I, Dejonckheere E, Libert C (2011) Cecal ligation and puncture: the gold standard model for polymicrobial sepsis? Trends Microbiol 19(4):198–208. doi:10.1016/j.tim.2011.01.001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Chang KC, Unsinger J, Davis CG, Schwulst SJ, Muenzer JT, Strasser A, Hotchkiss RS (2007) Multiple triggers of cell death in sepsis: death receptor and mitochondrial-mediated apoptosis. FASEB J 21(3):708–719

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hotchkiss RS, Tinsley KW, Swanson PE, Chang KC, Cobb JP, Buchman TG, Korsmeyer SJ, Karl IE (1999) Prevention of lymphocyte cell death in sepsis improves survival in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96(25):14541–14546

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Hotchkiss RS, Dunne WM, Swanson PE, Davis CG, Tinsley KW, Chang KC, Buchman TG, Karl IE (2001) Role of apoptosis in Pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia. Science 294(5548):1783

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Brown RH, Walters DM, Greenberg RS, Mitzner W (1999) A method of endotracheal intubation and pulmonary functional assessment for repeated studies in mice. J Appl Physiol 87(6):2362–2365

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Das S, MacDonald K, Chang HY, Mitzner W (2013) A simple method of mouse lung intubation. J Vis Exp 73:e50318

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Starr ME, Steele AM, Saito M, Hacker BJ, Evers BM, Saito H (2014) A new cecal slurry preparation protocol with improved long-term reproducibility for animal models of sepsis. PLoS One 9(12):e115705

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the Research Grant #1085281 from the National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia and a La Trobe University Postgraduate Research Scholarship to M.D.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hamsa Puthalakath .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this protocol

Cite this protocol

Doerflinger, M., Glab, J., Puthalakath, H. (2016). Experimental In Vivo Sepsis Models to Monitor Immune Cell Apoptosis and Survival in Laboratory Mice. In: Puthalakath, H., Hawkins, C. (eds) Programmed Cell Death. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1419. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3581-9_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3581-9_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-3579-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-3581-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics