Abstract
Optogenetic techniques enable one to target specific neurons with light-sensitive proteins, e.g., ion channels, ion pumps, or enzymes, and to manipulate their physiological state through illumination. Such artificial interference with selected elements of complex neuronal circuits can help to determine causal relationships between neuronal activity and the effect on the functioning of neuronal circuits controlling animal behavior. The advantages of optogenetics can best be exploited in genetically tractable animals whose nervous systems are, on the one hand, small enough in terms of cell numbers and to a certain degree stereotypically organized, such that distinct and identifiable neurons can be targeted reproducibly. On the other hand, the neuronal circuitry and the behavioral repertoire should be complex enough to enable one to address interesting questions. The fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster is a favorable model organism in this regard. However, the application of optogenetic tools to depolarize or hyperpolarize neurons through light-induced ionic currents has been difficult in adult flies. Only recently, several variants of Channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2) have been introduced that provide sufficient light sensitivity, expression, and stability to depolarize central brain neurons efficiently in adult Drosophila. Here, we focus on the version currently providing highest photostimulation efficiency, ChR2-XXL. We exemplify the use of this optogenetic tool by applying it to a widely used aversive olfactory learning paradigm. Optogenetic activation of a population of dopamine-releasing neurons mimics the reinforcing properties of a punitive electric shock typically used as an unconditioned stimulus. In temporal coincidence with an odor stimulus this artificially induced neuronal activity causes learning of the odor signal, thereby creating a light-induced memory.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Fiala A (2013) Optogenetic approaches in behavioral neuroscience. In: Hegemann P, Sigrist S (eds) Optogenetics. De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston, pp 91–97
Wimmer EA (2003) Innovations: applications of insect transgenesis. Nat Rev Genet 4(3):225–232
Venken KJ, Simpson JH, Bellen HJ (2011) Genetic manipulation of genes and cells in the nervous system of the fruit fly. Neuron 72(2):202–230
Helfrich-Förster C (2005) Neurobiology of the fruit fly’s circadian clock. Genes Brain Behav 4(2):65–76
Behnia R, Desplan C (2015) Visual circuits in flies: beginning to see the whole picture. Curr Opin Neurobiol 34:125–132
Wilson RI (2013) Early olfactory processing in Drosophila: mechanisms and principles. Annu Rev Neurosci 36:217–241
Albert JT, Göpfert MC (2015) Hearing in Drosophila. Curr Opin Neurobiol 34:79–85
Fiala A (2007) Olfaction and olfactory learning in Drosophila: recent progress. Curr Opin Neurobiol 17(6):720–726
Guven-Ozkan T, Davis RL (2014) Functional neuroanatomy of Drosophila olfactory memory formation. Learn Mem 21(10):519–526
Looger LL, Griesbeck O (2012) Genetically encoded neural activity indicators. Curr Opin Neurobiol 22(1):18–23
Riemensperger T, Pech U, Dipt S et al (2012) Optical calcium imaging in the nervous system of Drosophila melanogaster. Biochim Biophys Acta 1820(8):1169–1178
Kitamoto T (2001) Conditional modification of behavior in Drosophila by targeted expression of a temperature-sensitive shibire allele in defined neurons. J Neurobiol 47(2):81–92
Hamada FN, Rosenzweig M, Kang K et al (2008) An internal thermal sensor controlling temperature preference in Drosophila. Nature 454(7201):217–220
Fiala A, Suska A, Schlüter OM (2010) Optogenetic approaches in neuroscience. Curr Biol 20(20):897–903
Nagel G, Szellas T, Huhn W et al (2003) Channelrhodopsin-2, a directly light-gated cation-selective membrane channel. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100(24):13940–13945
Nagel G, Brauner M, Liewald JF et al (2005) Light activation of channelrhodopsin-2 in excitable cells of Caenorhabditis elegans triggers rapid behavioral responses. Curr Biol 15(24):2279–2284
Schroll C, Riemensperger T, Bucher D et al (2006) Light-induced activation of distinct modulatory neurons triggers appetitive or aversive learning in Drosophila. Curr Biol 16(17):1741–1747
Pulver SR, Pashkovski SL, Hornstein NJ et al (2009) Temporal dynamics of neuronal activation by Channelrhodopsin-2 and TRPA1 determine behavioral output in Drosophila larvae. J Neurophysiol 101(6):3075–3088
Hwang RY, Zhong L, Xu Y et al (2007) Nociceptive neurons protect Drosophila larvae from parasitoid wasps. Curr Biol 17(24):2105–2116
Bellmann D, Richardt A, Freyberger R et al (2010) Optogenetically induced olfactory stimulation in Drosophila larvae reveals the neuronal basis of odor-aversion behavior. Front Behav Neurosci 4:27. doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2010.00027
Ljaschenko D, Ehmann N, Kittel RJ (2013) Hebbian plasticity guides maturation of glutamate receptor fields in vivo. Cell Rep 3(5):1407–1413
Ullrich S, Gueta R, Nagel G (2013) Degradation of channelopsin-2 in the absence of retinal and degradation resistance in certain mutants. Biol Chem 394(2):271–280
Suh GS, Ben-Tabou de Leon S, Tanimoto H et al (2007) Light activation of an innate olfactory avoidance response in Drosophila. Curr Biol 17(10):905–908
Lin JY, Knutsen PM, Muller A et al (2013) ReaChR: a red-shifted variant of channelrhodopsin enables deep transcranial optogenetic excitation. Nat Neurosci 16(10):1499–1508
Inagaki HK, Jung Y, Hoopfer ED et al (2014) Optogenetic control of Drosophila using a red-shifted channelrhodopsin reveals experience-dependent influences on courtship. Nat Methods 11(3):325–332
Klapoetke NC, Murata Y, Kim SS et al (2014) Independent optical excitation of distinct neural populations. Nat Methods 11(3):338–346
Dawydow A, Gueta R, Ljaschenko D et al (2014) Channelrhodopsin-2-XXL, a powerful optogenetic tool for low-light applications. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111(38):13972–13977
Tully T, Quinn WG (1985) Classical conditioning and retention in normal and mutant Drosophila melanogaster. J Comp Physiol A 157(2):263–277
Riemensperger T, Völler T, Stock P et al (2005) Punishment prediction by dopaminergic neurons in Drosophila. Curr Biol 15(21):1953–1960
Schwaerzel M, Monastirioti M, Scholz H et al (2003) Dopamine and octopamine differentiate between aversive and appetitive olfactory memories in Drosophila. J Neurosci 23(33):10495–10502
Aso Y, Siwanowicz I, Bräcker L et al (2010) Specific dopaminergic neurons for the formation of labile aversive memory. Curr Biol 20(16):1445–1451
Claridge-Chang A, Roorda RD, Vrontou E et al (2009) Writing memories with light-addressable reinforcement circuitry. Cell 139(2):405–415
Aso Y, Herb A, Ogueta M et al (2012) Three dopamine pathways induce aversive odor memories with different stability. PLoS Genet 8(7):e1002768
Friggi-Grelin F, Coulom H, Meller M et al (2003) Targeted gene expression in Drosophila dopaminergic cells using regulatory sequences from tyrosine hydroxylase. J Neurobiol 54(4):618–627
Brand AH, Perrimon N (1993) Targeted gene expression as a means of altering cell fates and generating dominant phenotypes. Development 118(2):401–415
Acknowledgement
This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (FI 821/3-1 and SFB 889/B4 to A.F., and KI 1460/1-1, SFB 1047/A5, and FOR 2140/TP3 to R.J.K.).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Riemensperger, T., Kittel, R.J., Fiala, A. (2016). Optogenetics in Drosophila Neuroscience. In: Kianianmomeni, A. (eds) Optogenetics. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1408. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3512-3_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3512-3_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-3510-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-3512-3
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols