Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Ethics of Visibility: Archaeology, Conservation and Memories of Settler Colonialism

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Ethics of Cultural Heritage

Part of the book series: Ethical Archaeologies: The Politics of Social Justice ((ETHARCHAEOL,volume 4))

Abstract

The visibility created by archaeology and heritage conservation brings ethical responsibilities derived from how visibility provides the ‘condition of possibility’ for strategies of power and control. But through their material endurance, heritage places also provide opportunities for strategies of resistance and for individuals and groups to seek ethical experiences of reconciliation, recognition and respect in terms of their own particular social justice concerns and identity politics. In settler societies, colonial archaeological remains can be approached as ‘imperial debris’—locations where we can examine the ‘the longevity of structures of dominance and the uneven pace with which people can extricate themselves from the colonial order of things’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Beaudry, M. (2009). Ethical issues in historical archaeology. In D. Gaimster & T. Majewski (Eds.), International handbook of historical archaeology (pp. 17–29). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bedford, S. (1996). Post-contact Maori: The ignored component in New Zealand archaeology. The Journal of the Polynesian Society, 105(4), 411–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair, C., Dickinson, G., & Ott, B. L. (2010). Introduction: Rhetoric/memory/place. In G. Dickinson, C. Blair, & B. L. Ott (Eds.), Places of public memory The rhetoric of museums and memorials (pp. 1–54). Tuscaloosa: The University of Alabama Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, D. (1996). Deep nation: Australia’s acquisition of an indigenous past. Aboriginal History, 20, 82–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, D. (2003). Nervous landscapes: Race and space in Australia. Journal of Social Archaeology, 3(2), 169–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, D. (2009). A critique of unfeeling heritage. In L. Smith & N. Akagawa (Eds.), Intangible heritage (pp. 229–252). London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, E. (2008). Indigenous spectrality and the politics of postcolonial ghost stories. Cultural Geographies, 15, 383–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carman, J. (2011). Stories we tell: Myths at the heart of ‘community archaeology’. Archaeologies, 7(3), 490–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colley, S., & Bickford, A. (1996). ‘Real’ aborigines and ‘Real’ Archaeology: Aboriginal places and Australian historical archaeology. World Archaeological Bulletin, 7, 5–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawdy, S. L. (2009). Millennial archaeology. Locating the discipline in the age of insecurity. Archaeological Dialogues, 16(2), 131–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawdy, S. L. (2010). Clockpunk anthropology and the ruins of modernity. Current Anthropology, 51(6), 761–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Certeau, M. (1984). The practice of everyday life (S. Rendall, Trans). Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edensor, T. (2008). Mundane hauntings: Commuting through the phantasmagoric working-class spaces of Manchester, England. Cultural Geographies, 15, 313–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmonds, P. (2010). Unpacking settler colonialism’s urban strategies: Indigenous peoples in Victoria, British Columbia, and the transition to a settler-colonial city. Urban History Review, 38(2), 4–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1986). Kant on revolution and enlightenment. Economy and Society, 15(1), 88–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelder, K., & Jacobs, J. (1998). Uncanny Australia: Sacredness and identity in a postcolonial nation. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glassie, H. (1977). Archaeology and folklore: Common anxieties, common hopes. In L. Ferguson (Ed.), Archaeology and the importance of material things (pp. 23–35). Society for Historical Archaeology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, N. (2002). On visibility and power: An Arendtian corrective of foucault. Human Studies, 25, 125–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, B., & Howard, P. (Eds.). (2008). The Ashgate research companion to heritage and identity. Farnham, Surrey, England: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, M. (2006). Identity, memory and counter memory: The archaeology of an urban landscape. Journal of Material Culture, 11(1/2), 189–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilakis, Y. (2007). The nation and its ruins: Antiquity, archaeology, and national imagination in Greece. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilakis, Y. (2011). Archaeological ethnography: a multitemporal meeting ground for archaeology and anthropology. Annual Review of Anthropology, 40, 399–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, R. (2013). Forgetting to remember, remembering to forget: late modern heritage practices, sustainability, and the ‘crisis’ of accumulation of the past’. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 19(6), 579–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herzfeld, M. (2006). Spatial cleansing: Monumental vacuity and the idea of the West. Journal of Material Culture, 11(1/2), 127–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hetherington, K. (2010). The ruin revisited. In G. Pye & S. Schroth (Eds.), Trash culture: Objects and obsolescence in cultural perspective (pp. 27–49). Oxford, New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ireland, T. (2002). Giving value to the Australian historic past: Archaeology, heritage and nationalism. Australasian Historical Archaeology, 20, 15–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ireland, T. (2012a). Excavating globalisation from the ruins of colonialism: Archaeological heritage management responses to cultural change. In E. Negussie (Ed.), Changing world, changing views of heritage: The impact of global change on cultural heritage. Proceedings of the ICOMOS Scientific Symposium 2010 (pp. 18–29). Paris: ICOMOS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ireland, T. (2012b). Grounding identity: Exploring perceptions of urban archaeological sites in Australia and New Zealand. Historic Environment, 24(3), 19–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ireland, T. (2012c). ‘I felt connected to a past world’: A survey of visitors to colonial archaeological sites conserved in situ in Australia and New Zealand. Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites, 14(1–4), 458–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ireland, T. (2014). Archaeological traces and memory places. In P. Ashton & J. Z. Wilson (Eds.), Silent system: Forgotten Australians and the institutionalization of women and children (pp. 89–102). Melbourne: Australian Scholarly Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeppson, P. (2006). Which Benjamin Franklin: Yours or mine? Examining responses to a new story from the historical archaeology site of Franklin court. Archaeologies, 2(2), 24–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeppson, P. (2011). The dynamics of inclusion at the dynamics of inclusion in public archaeology workshop public event. Archaeologies, 7(3), 635–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. (1999). Rethinking historical archaeology. In P. Paulo, A. Funari, M. Hall & S. Jones (Eds.), Historical archaeology: Back from the edge (pp. 23–36). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jokilehto, J. (2009). Conservation principles in the international context. In A. Richmond & A. Bracker (Eds.), Conservation principles, dilemmas and uncomfortable truths (pp. 73–83). London: Butterworth-Heinemann & Victoria and Albert Museum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyce, R. (2006). The monumental and the trace: Archaeological conservation and the materiality of the past. In N. Agnew & J. Bridgland (Eds.), Of the past, for the future: Integrating archaeology and conservation: Proceedings of the conservation theme at the 5th World Archaeological Congress, Washington, DC, 22–26 June 2003 (pp. 13–18). Los Angeles: Getty Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karskens, G. (2009). The colony: A history of early Sydney. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keily, J. (2008). Taking the site to the people: Displays of archaeological material in non-museum locations. Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites, 10(1), 30–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Roche, C. & M. Blakey (1997). Seizing intellectual power: The dialogue at the New York African burial ground. Historical Archaeology, 31(3), 84–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leone, M. (1973). Archaeology as the science of technology: Mormon town plans and fences. In C. Redman (Ed.), Research and theory in current archaeology (pp. 125–150). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leone, M. (2010). Critical historical archaeology. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leone, M., & Potter, P. (Eds.). (1999). Historical archaeologies of capitalism. Contributions to global historical archaeology. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, J. (2011). Activism leads to excavation: The power of place and the power of the people at the president’s house in Philadelphia. Archaeologies, 7(3), 596–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little, B. (1994). People with history: An update on historical archaeology in the United States. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 1(1), 5–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lydon, J. (2005). Driving by: Visiting Australian colonial monuments. Journal of Social Archaeology, 5(1), 108–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lydon, J. (2009). Fantastic dreaming: The archaeology of an aboriginal mission. Lanham: Altamira.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lydon, J. (2012). The flash of recognition: Photography and the emergence of indigenous rights. Sydney: New South.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lydon, J., & Rivzi, U. Z. (2010). Handbook of postcolonial archaeology. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyon, J. (2007). The Temple of Mithras: Changing heritage values in the city of London 1954-2006. Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites, 9(1), 5–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matero, F. (2000). The conservation of an excavated past. In I. Hodder (Ed.), Towards reflexive method in archaeology: the example of Catalhöyük (BIAA Monograph No. 28, pp. 71–88). Ankara: British Institute of Archaeology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matero, F. (2006). Making archaeological sites: Conservation as interpretation of an excavated past. In N. Agnew & J. Bridgland (Eds.), Of the past, for the future: integrating archaeology and conservation: Proceedings of the conservation theme at the 5th World Archaeological Congress, Washington, DC, 22–26 June 2003 (pp. 55–63). Los Angeles, CA: Getty Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, C. (2006). The idea of the site: History, heritage, and locality in community archaeology. In L. Lozny (Ed.), Landscapes under pressure: History, heritage and locality in community archaeology (pp. 75–91). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mulvaney, J. (1991). The heritage value of historical relics: a plea for romantic intellectualism. In Prehistory and heritage. The writings of John Mulvaney (pp. 266–271). Canberra: The Australian National University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, T. (1996). Creating a post-Mabo archaeology of Australia. In B. Attwood (Ed.), In the age of Mabo (pp. 73–86). Sydney: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nixon, T. (2004). Preserving archaeological remains in situ? Proceedings of the 2nd conference, 12–14 September 2001. London: Museum of London Archaeology Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olivier, L. (2004). The past of the present. Archaeological memory and time. Archaeological Dialogues, 10(2), 204–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orser, C. (1996). An historical archaeology of the modern world. New York: Plenum Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Otero Pailos, J. (2004). Now is the future anterior for advancing historic preservation scholarship. Future Anterior, I(1), 6–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otero Pailos, Jorge (2007b). Preservation’s anonymous lament. Future Anterior, IV(2):iii-vii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otero-Pailos, J. (2007a). Conservation cleaning/cleaning conservation. Future Anterior, IV(1), iii–viii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otero-Pailos, J., Gaiger, J., & West, S. (2010). Heritage values. In S. West (Ed.), Understanding heritage in practice (pp. 47–87). Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paterson, A. (2010). The archaeology of historical indigenous Australia. In J. Lydon & U. Rizvi (Eds.), Handbook of postcolonial archaeology (pp. 165–184). Walnut Creek California: Left Coast Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, C. (2000). Post-contact landscapes of change in Hauriki, New Zealand. In R. Torrence & A. Clarke (Eds.), The archaeology of difference: Negotiating cross-cultural engagements in Oceania (pp. 79–103). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, G., & Tolia-Kelly, D. (2012). Visuality/materiality: Introducing a manifesto for practice. In G. Rose & D. P. Tolia-Kelly (Eds.), Visuality/materiality images, objects and practices (pp. 1–11). Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubertone, P. (2008). Engaging monuments, memories, and archaeology. In P. Rubertone (Ed.), Archaeologies of placemaking: Monuments, memories, and engagement in native North America (pp. 13–33). Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, I. (2012). Towards an ethic of oblivion and forgetting. The parallax view. Heritage and Society, 5(2), 249–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silliman, S. (2010). Indigenous traces in colonial spaces: Archaeologies of ambiguity, origin, and practice. Journal of Social Archaeology, 10(1), 28–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L. (2006a). Uses of heritage. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L. (2006b). Doing archaeology: Cultural heritage management and its role in identifying the link between archaeological practice and theory. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 6(4), 309–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L., & Waterton, E. (2009). Heritage, communities and archaeology. London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoler, A. L. (2008). Imperial debris: Reflections on ruins and ruination. Cultural Anthropology, 23(2), 191–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verdesio, G. (2010). Invisible at a glance: Indigenous cultures of the past, ruins, archaeological sites, and our regimes of visibility. In J. Hell & A. Schönle (Eds.), Ruins of modernity (pp. 339–353). Durham: Duke University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Waterton, E., & Smith, L. (2009). Taking archaeology out of heritage. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waterton, E., & Watson, S. (2010). Introduction: A visual heritage. In E. Waterton & S. Watson (Eds.), Culture, heritage and representation: Perspectives on visuality and the past (pp. 1–19). Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, K. (2007). The material and visual cultures of cities. Space and Culture, 10(2), 136–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willems, W. (2008). Archaeological resource management and preservation. Geoarchaeological and Bioarchaeological Studies, 10, 283–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, L., Vitelli, K., & Hollowell-Zimmer, J. (2003). Ethical issues in archaeology. Walnut Creek: Altamira Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Arts and Design, University of Canberra, Bruce, ACT, 2601, Australia

    Tracy Ireland

Authors
  1. Tracy Ireland
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tracy Ireland .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Canberra, BRUCE, Aust Capital Terr, Australia

    Tracy Ireland

  2. Department of Archaeology, University of York, York, United Kingdom

    John Schofield

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ireland, T. (2015). The Ethics of Visibility: Archaeology, Conservation and Memories of Settler Colonialism. In: Ireland, T., Schofield, J. (eds) The Ethics of Cultural Heritage. Ethical Archaeologies: The Politics of Social Justice, vol 4. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1649-8_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation