Abstract
The cell cycle is intimately associated with the ability of cells to sense and respond to and repair DNA damage. Understanding how cell cycle progression, particularly DNA replication and cell division, are regulated and how DNA damage can affect these processes has been the subject of intense research. Recent evidence suggests that the repair of DNA damage is regulated by the cell cycle, and that cell cycle factors are closely associated with repair factors and participate in cellular decisions regarding how to respond to and repair damage. Precise regulation of cell cycle progression in the presence of DNA damage is essential to maintain genomic stability and avoid the accumulation of chromosomal aberrations that can promote tumor formation. In this review, we discuss the current understanding of how mammalian cells induce cell cycle checkpoints in response to DNA double-strand breaks. In addition, we discuss how cell cycle factors modulate DNA repair pathways to facilitate proper repair of DNA lesions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Nam EA, Cortez D (2011) ATR signalling: more than meeting at the fork. Biochem J 436(3):527–536
Neal JA, Meek K (2011) Choosing the right path: does DNA-PK help make the decision? Mutat Res 711(1–2):73–86
Shiloh Y, Ziv Y (2013) The ATM protein kinase: regulating the cellular response to genotoxic stress, and more. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 14(4):197–210
Chan EH, Santamaria A, Sillje HH, Nigg EA (2008) Plk1 regulates mitotic Aurora A function through betaTrCP-dependent degradation of hBora. Chromosoma 117(5):457–469
Langerak P, Russell P (2011) Regulatory networks integrating cell cycle control with DNA damage checkpoints and double-strand break repair. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 366(1584):3562–3571
Donjerkovic D, Scott DW (2000) Regulation of the G1 phase of the mammalian cell cycle. Cell Res 10(1):1–16
Satyanarayana A, Kaldis P (2009) Mammalian cell-cycle regulation: several Cdks, numerous cyclins and diverse compensatory mechanisms. Oncogene 28(33):2925–2939
Ray D, Kiyokawa H (2008) CDC25A phosphatase: a rate-limiting oncogene that determines genomic stability. Cancer Res 68(5): 1251–1253
Kristjansdottir K, Rudolph J (2004) Cdc25 phosphatases and cancer. Chem Biol 11(8): 1043–1051
Donzelli M, Draetta GF (2003) Regulating mammalian checkpoints through Cdc25 inactivation. EMBO Rep 4(7):671–677
Sacco E, Hasan MM, Alberghina L, Vanoni M (2012) Comparative analysis of the molecular mechanisms controlling the initiation of chromosomal DNA replication in yeast and in mammalian cells. Biotechnol Adv 30(1): 73–98
Ohi R, Gould KL (1999) Regulating the onset of mitosis. Curr Opin Cell Biol 11(2): 267–273
Abraham RT (2001) Cell cycle checkpoint signaling through the ATM and ATR kinases. Genes Dev 15(17):2177–2196
Falck J, Mailand N, Syljuasen RG, Bartek J, Lukas J (2001) The ATM-Chk2-Cdc25A checkpoint pathway guards against radioresistant DNA synthesis. Nature 410(6830): 842–847
Bartek J, Lukas J (2001) Mammalian G1- and S-phase checkpoints in response to DNA damage. Curr Opin Cell Biol 13(6):738–747
Deckbar D, Jeggo PA, Lobrich M (2011) Understanding the limitations of radiation-induced cell cycle checkpoints. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 46(4):271–283
Brown EJ, Baltimore D (2003) Essential and dispensable roles of ATR in cell cycle arrest and genome maintenance. Genes Dev 17(5): 615–628
Peng CY, Graves PR, Thoma RS, Wu Z, Shaw AS, Piwnica-Worms H (1997) Mitotic and G2 checkpoint control: regulation of 14-3-3 protein binding by phosphorylation of Cdc25C on serine-216. Science 277(5331): 1501–1505
Sanchez Y, Wong C, Thoma RS, Richman R, Wu Z, Piwnica-Worms H, Elledge SJ (1997) Conservation of the Chk1 checkpoint pathway in mammals: linkage of DNA damage to Cdk regulation through Cdc25. Science 277(5331): 1497–1501
Deckbar D, Stiff T, Koch B, Reis C, Lobrich M, Jeggo PA (2010) The limitations of the G1-S checkpoint. Cancer Res 70(11): 4412–4421
Hitomi M, Yang K, Stacey AW, Stacey DW (2008) Phosphorylation of cyclin D1 regulated by ATM or ATR controls cell cycle progression. Mol Cell Biol 28(17):5478–5493
Pontano LL, Aggarwal P, Barbash O, Brown EJ, Bassing CH, Diehl JA (2008) Genotoxic stress-induced cyclin D1 phosphorylation and proteolysis are required for genomic stability. Mol Cell Biol 28(23):7245–7258
Di Leonardo A, Linke SP, Clarkin K, Wahl GM (1994) DNA damage triggers a prolonged p53-dependent G1 arrest and long-term induction of Cip1 in normal human fibroblasts. Genes Dev 8(21):2540–2551
Maya R, Balass M, Kim ST, Shkedy D, Leal JF, Shifman O, Moas M, Buschmann T, Ronai Z, Shiloh Y, Kastan MB, Katzir E, Oren M (2001) ATM-dependent phosphorylation of Mdm2 on serine 395: role in p53 activation by DNA damage. Genes Dev 15(9):1067–1077
Zhang Y, Xiong Y (2001) A p53 amino-terminal nuclear export signal inhibited by DNA damage-induced phosphorylation. Science 292(5523):1910–1915
Chehab NH, Malikzay A, Appel M, Halazonetis TD (2000) Chk2/hCds1 functions as a DNA damage checkpoint in G(1) by stabilizing p53. Genes Dev 14(3):278–288
Hirao A, Kong YY, Matsuoka S, Wakeham A, Ruland J, Yoshida H, Liu D, Elledge SJ, Mak TW (2000) DNA damage-induced activation of p53 by the checkpoint kinase Chk2. Science 287(5459):1824–1827
Shieh SY, Ahn J, Tamai K, Taya Y, Prives C (2000) The human homologs of checkpoint kinases Chk1 and Cds1 (Chk2) phosphorylate p53 at multiple DNA damage-inducible sites. Genes Dev 14(3):289–300
Sherr CJ, Roberts JM (1999) CDK inhibitors: positive and negative regulators of G1-phase progression. Genes Dev 13(12):1501–1512
Agami R, Bernards R (2000) Distinct initiation and maintenance mechanisms cooperate to induce G1 cell cycle arrest in response to DNA damage. Cell 102(1):55–66
Fabbro M, Savage K, Hobson K, Deans AJ, Powell SN, McArthur GA, Khanna KK (2004) BRCA1-BARD1 complexes are required for p53Ser-15 phosphorylation and a G1/S arrest following ionizing radiation-induced DNA damage. J Biol Chem 279(30):31251–31258
Wahl GM, Linke SP, Paulson TG, Huang LC (1997) Maintaining genetic stability through TP53 mediated checkpoint control. Cancer Surv 29:183–219
Yamauchi M, Oka Y, Yamamoto M, Niimura K, Uchida M, Kodama S, Watanabe M, Sekine I, Yamashita S, Suzuki K (2008) Growth of persistent foci of DNA damage checkpoint factors is essential for amplification of G1 checkpoint signaling. DNA Repair (Amst) 7(3):405–417
Stevens C, Smith L, La Thangue NB (2003) Chk2 activates E2F-1 in response to DNA damage. Nat Cell Biol 5(5):401–409
Inoue Y, Kitagawa M, Taya Y (2007) Phosphorylation of pRB at Ser612 by Chk1/2 leads to a complex between pRB and E2F-1 after DNA damage. EMBO J 26(8):2083–2093
Carnevale J, Palander O, Seifried LA, Dick FA (2012) DNA damage signals through differentially modified E2F1 molecules to induce apoptosis. Mol Cell Biol 32(5):900–912
Yoshihara Y, Wu D, Kubo N, Sang M, Nakagawara A, Ozaki T (2012) Inhibitory role of E2F-1 in the regulation of tumor suppressor p53 during DNA damage response. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 421(1):57–63
Cescutti R, Negrini S, Kohzaki M, Halazonetis TD (2010) TopBP1 functions with 53BP1 in the G1 DNA damage checkpoint. EMBO J 29(21):3723–3732
Kumagai A, Lee J, Yoo HY, Dunphy WG (2006) TopBP1 activates the ATR-ATRIP complex. Cell 124(5):943–955
Mordes DA, Glick GG, Zhao R, Cortez D (2008) TopBP1 activates ATR through ATRIP and a PIKK regulatory domain. Genes Dev 22(11):1478–1489
Girard PM, Riballo E, Begg AC, Waugh A, Jeggo PA (2002) Nbs1 promotes ATM dependent phosphorylation events including those required for G1/S arrest. Oncogene 21(27): 4191–4199
Labib K, De Piccoli G (2011) Surviving chromosome replication: the many roles of the S-phase checkpoint pathway. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 366(1584):3554–3561
Grallert B, Boye E (2008) The multiple facets of the intra-S checkpoint. Cell Cycle 7(15): 2315–2320
Rouse J, Jackson SP (2002) Interfaces between the detection, signaling, and repair of DNA damage. Science 297(5581):547–551
Zou L, Elledge SJ (2003) Sensing DNA damage through ATRIP recognition of RPA-ssDNA complexes. Science 300(5625):1542–1548
Namiki Y, Zou L (2006) ATRIP associates with replication protein A-coated ssDNA through multiple interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103(3):580–585
Kondo T, Wakayama T, Naiki T, Matsumoto K, Sugimoto K (2001) Recruitment of Mec1 and Ddc1 checkpoint proteins to double-strand breaks through distinct mechanisms. Science 294(5543):867–870
Melo JA, Cohen J, Toczyski DP (2001) Two checkpoint complexes are independently recruited to sites of DNA damage in vivo. Genes Dev 15(21):2809–2821
Matsuno K, Kumano M, Kubota Y, Hashimoto Y, Takisawa H (2006) The N-terminal noncatalytic region of Xenopus RecQ4 is required for chromatin binding of DNA polymerase alpha in the initiation of DNA replication. Mol Cell Biol 26(13):4843–4852
Liu Q, Guntuku S, Cui XS, Matsuoka S, Cortez D, Tamai K, Luo G, Carattini-Rivera S, DeMayo F, Bradley A, Donehower LA, Elledge SJ (2000) Chk1 is an essential kinase that is regulated by Atr and required for the G(2)/M DNA damage checkpoint. Genes Dev 14(12): 1448–1459
Zhao H, Watkins JL, Piwnica-Worms H (2002) Disruption of the checkpoint kinase 1/cell division cycle 25A pathway abrogates ionizing radiation-induced S and G2 checkpoints. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99(23):14795–14800
Liu H, Takeda S, Kumar R, Westergard TD, Brown EJ, Pandita TK, Cheng EH, Hsieh JJ (2010) Phosphorylation of MLL by ATR is required for execution of mammalian S-phase checkpoint. Nature 467(7313):343–346
Liu H, Cheng EH, Hsieh JJ (2007) Bimodal degradation of MLL by SCFSkp2 and APCCdc20 assures cell cycle execution: a critical regulatory circuit lost in leukemogenic MLL fusions. Genes Dev 21(19):2385–2398
Sorensen CS, Syljuasen RG, Falck J, Schroeder T, Ronnstrand L, Khanna KK, Zhou BB, Bartek J, Lukas J (2003) Chk1 regulates the S phase checkpoint by coupling the physiological turnover and ionizing radiation-induced accelerated proteolysis of Cdc25A. Cancer Cell 3(3):247–258
Liu P, Barkley LR, Day T, Bi X, Slater DM, Alexandrow MG, Nasheuer HP, Vaziri C (2006) The Chk1-mediated S-phase checkpoint targets initiation factor Cdc45 via a Cdc25A/Cdk2-independent mechanism. J Biol Chem 281(41):30631–30644
Deckbar D, Birraux J, Krempler A, Tchouandong L, Beucher A, Walker S, Stiff T, Jeggo P, Lobrich M (2007) Chromosome breakage after G2 checkpoint release. J Cell Biol 176(6):749–755
Trenz K, Errico A, Costanzo V (2008) Plx1 is required for chromosomal DNA replication under stressful conditions. EMBO J 27(6): 876–885
Yoo HY, Shevchenko A, Shevchenko A, Dunphy WG (2004) Mcm2 is a direct substrate of ATM and ATR during DNA damage and DNA replication checkpoint responses. J Biol Chem 279(51):53353–53364
Ge XQ, Blow JJ (2010) Chk1 inhibits replication factory activation but allows dormant origin firing in existing factories. J Cell Biol 191(7):1285–1297
Leman AR, Noguchi C, Lee CY, Noguchi E (2010) Human Timeless and Tipin stabilize replication forks and facilitate sister-chromatid cohesion. J Cell Sci 123(Pt 5):660–670
Nedelcheva MN, Roguev A, Dolapchiev LB, Shevchenko A, Taskov HB, Stewart AF, Stoynov SS (2005) Uncoupling of unwinding from DNA synthesis implies regulation of MCM helicase by Tof1/Mrc1/Csm3 checkpoint complex. J Mol Biol 347(3):509–521
Lobrich M, Jeggo PA (2007) The impact of a negligent G2/M checkpoint on genomic instability and cancer induction. Nat Rev Cancer 7(11):861–869
Errico A, Costanzo V, Hunt T (2007) Tipin is required for stalled replication forks to resume DNA replication after removal of aphidicolin in Xenopus egg extracts. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104(38):14929–14934
Katou Y, Kanoh Y, Bando M, Noguchi H, Tanaka H, Ashikari T, Sugimoto K, Shirahige K (2003) S-phase checkpoint proteins Tof1 and Mrc1 form a stable replication-pausing complex. Nature 424(6952):1078–1083
Smith KD, Fu MA, Brown EJ (2009) Tim-Tipin dysfunction creates an indispensible reliance on the ATR-Chk1 pathway for continued DNA synthesis. J Cell Biol 187(1):15–23
Gambus A, van Deursen F, Polychronopoulos D, Foltman M, Jones RC, Edmondson RD, Calzada A, Labib K (2009) A key role for Ctf4 in coupling the MCM2-7 helicase to DNA polymerase alpha within the eukaryotic replisome. EMBO J 28(19):2992–3004
Leman AR, Noguchi E (2012) Local and global functions of Timeless and Tipin in replication fork protection. Cell Cycle 11(21): 3945–3955
Yao G, Lee TJ, Mori S, Nevins JR, You L (2008) A bistable Rb-E2F switch underlies the restriction point. Nat Cell Biol 10(4):476–482
Shimmoto M, Matsumoto S, Odagiri Y, Noguchi E, Russell P, Masai H (2009) Interactions between Swi1-Swi3, Mrc1 and S phase kinase, Hsk1 may regulate cellular responses to stalled replication forks in fission yeast. Genes Cells 14(6):669–682
Yoshizawa-Sugata N, Masai H (2007) Human Tim/Timeless-interacting protein, Tipin, is required for efficient progression of S phase and DNA replication checkpoint. J Biol Chem 282(4):2729–2740
Szyjka SJ, Viggiani CJ, Aparicio OM (2005) Mrc1 is required for normal progression of replication forks throughout chromatin in S. cerevisiae. Mol Cell 19(5):691–697
Tourriere H, Versini G, Cordon-Preciado V, Alabert C, Pasero P (2005) Mrc1 and Tof1 promote replication fork progression and recovery independently of Rad53. Mol Cell 19(5):699–706
Hodgson B, Calzada A, Labib K (2007) Mrc1 and Tof1 regulate DNA replication forks in different ways during normal S phase. Mol Biol Cell 18(10):3894–3902
Lou H, Komata M, Katou Y, Guan Z, Reis CC, Budd M, Shirahige K, Campbell JL (2008) Mrc1 and DNA polymerase epsilon function together in linking DNA replication and the S phase checkpoint. Mol Cell 32(1):106–117
Chou DM, Elledge SJ (2006) Tipin and Timeless form a mutually protective complex required for genotoxic stress resistance and checkpoint function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103(48):18143–18147
Luke-Glaser S, Luke B, Grossi S, Constantinou A (2010) FANCM regulates DNA chain elongation and is stabilized by S-phase checkpoint signalling. EMBO J 29(4):795–805
Zhang YW, Otterness DM, Chiang GG, Xie W, Liu YC, Mercurio F, Abraham RT (2005) Genotoxic stress targets human Chk1 for degradation by the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. Mol Cell 19(5):607–618
Mailand N, Bekker-Jensen S, Bartek J, Lukas J (2006) Destruction of Claspin by SCFbetaTrCP restrains Chk1 activation and facilitates recovery from genotoxic stress. Mol Cell 23(3): 307–318
Mamely I, van Vugt MA, Smits VA, Semple JI, Lemmens B, Perrakis A, Medema RH, Freire R (2006) Polo-like kinase-1 controls proteasome-dependent degradation of Claspin during checkpoint recovery. Curr Biol 16(19): 1950–1955
Peschiaroli A, Dorrello NV, Guardavaccaro D, Venere M, Halazonetis T, Sherman NE, Pagano M (2006) SCFbetaTrCP-mediated degradation of Claspin regulates recovery from the DNA replication checkpoint response. Mol Cell 23(3):319–329
Kramer A, Mailand N, Lukas C, Syljuasen RG, Wilkinson CJ, Nigg EA, Bartek J, Lukas J (2004) Centrosome-associated Chk1 prevents premature activation of cyclin-B-Cdk1 kinase. Nat Cell Biol 6(9):884–891
Loffler H, Lukas J, Bartek J, Kramer A (2006) Structure meets function–centrosomes, genome maintenance and the DNA damage response. Exp Cell Res 312(14):2633–2640
Bryant HE, Petermann E, Schultz N, Jemth AS, Loseva O, Issaeva N, Johansson F, Fernandez S, McGlynn P, Helleday T (2009) PARP is activated at stalled forks to mediate Mre11-dependent replication restart and recombination. EMBO J 28(17):2601–2615
Hashimoto Y, Ray Chaudhuri A, Lopes M, Costanzo V (2010) Rad51 protects nascent DNA from Mre11-dependent degradation and promotes continuous DNA synthesis. Nat Struct Mol Biol 17(11):1305–1311
Schlacher K, Christ N, Siaud N, Egashira A, Wu H, Jasin M (2011) Double-strand break repair-independent role for BRCA2 in blocking stalled replication fork degradation by MRE11. Cell 145(4):529–542
Lindqvist A, van Zon W, Karlsson Rosenthal C, Wolthuis RM (2007) Cyclin B1-Cdk1 activation continues after centrosome separation to control mitotic progression. PLoS Biol 5(5): e123
Adams KE, Medhurst AL, Dart DA, Lakin ND (2006) Recruitment of ATR to sites of ionising radiation-induced DNA damage requires ATM and components of the MRN protein complex. Oncogene 25(28):3894–3904
Cuadrado M, Martinez-Pastor B, Fernandez-Capetillo O (2006) ATR activation in response to ionizing radiation: still ATM territory. Cell Div 1(1):7
Warmerdam DO, Kanaar R (2010) Dealing with DNA damage: relationships between checkpoint and repair pathways. Mutat Res 704(1–3):2–11
Shiotani B, Zou L (2009) Single-stranded DNA orchestrates an ATM-to-ATR switch at DNA breaks. Mol Cell 33(5):547–558
Jazayeri A, Falck J, Lukas C, Bartek J, Smith GC, Lukas J, Jackson SP (2006) ATM- and cell cycle-dependent regulation of ATR in response to DNA double-strand breaks. Nat Cell Biol 8(1):37–45
Myers JS, Cortez D (2006) Rapid activation of ATR by ionizing radiation requires ATM and Mre11. J Biol Chem 281(14):9346–9350
Taylor WR, Stark GR (2001) Regulation of the G2/M transition by p53. Oncogene 20(15): 1803–1815
Yarden RI, Pardo-Reoyo S, Sgagias M, Cowan KH, Brody LC (2002) BRCA1 regulates the G2/M checkpoint by activating Chk1 kinase upon DNA damage. Nat Genet 30(3): 285–289
Xu B, Kim S, Kastan MB (2001) Involvement of Brca1 in S-phase and G(2)-phase checkpoints after ionizing irradiation. Mol Cell Biol 21(10):3445–3450
Cortez D, Wang Y, Qin J, Elledge SJ (1999) Requirement of ATM-dependent phosphorylation of brca1 in the DNA damage response to double-strand breaks. Science 286(5442): 1162–1166
Pandita TK (2006) Role of mammalian Rad9 in genomic stability and ionizing radiation response. Cell Cycle 5(12):1289–1291
Pandita RK, Sharma GG, Laszlo A, Hopkins KM, Davey S, Chakhparonian M, Gupta A, Wellinger RJ, Zhang J, Powell SN, Roti Roti JL, Lieberman HB, Pandita TK (2006) Mammalian Rad9 plays a role in telomere stability, S- and G2-phase-specific cell survival, and homologous recombinational repair. Mol Cell Biol 26(5):1850–1864
Dalal SN, Schweitzer CM, Gan J, DeCaprio JA (1999) Cytoplasmic localization of human cdc25C during interphase requires an intact 14-3-3 binding site. Mol Cell Biol 19(6): 4465–4479
Takizawa CG, Morgan DO (2000) Control of mitosis by changes in the subcellular location of cyclin-B1-Cdk1 and Cdc25C. Curr Opin Cell Biol 12(6):658–665
Marples B (2004) Is low-dose hyper-radiosensitivity a measure of G2-phase cell radiosensitivity? Cancer Metastasis Rev 23 (3–4):197–207
Marples B, Wouters BG, Collis SJ, Chalmers AJ, Joiner MC (2004) Low-dose hyper-radiosensitivity: a consequence of ineffective cell cycle arrest of radiation-damaged G2-phase cells. Radiat Res 161(3):247–255
Chung JH, Bunz F (2010) Cdk2 is required for p53-independent G2/M checkpoint control. PLoS Genet 6(2):e1000863
Borlado LR, Mendez J (2008) CDC6: from DNA replication to cell cycle checkpoints and oncogenesis. Carcinogenesis 29(2):237–243
Clay-Farrace L, Pelizon C, Santamaria D, Pines J, Laskey RA (2003) Human replication protein Cdc6 prevents mitosis through a checkpoint mechanism that implicates Chk1. EMBO J 22(3):704–712
Lau E, Zhu C, Abraham RT, Jiang W (2006) The functional role of Cdc6 in S-G2/M in mammalian cells. EMBO Rep 7(4): 425–430
Liu L, Choi JH, Yim H, Choi JS, Park BD, Cho SJ, Lee SK (2009) ATR (AT mutated Rad3 related) activity stabilizes Cdc6 and delays G2/M-phase entry during hydroxyurea-induced S-phase arrest of HeLa cells. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 41(6):1410–1420
Oehlmann M, Score AJ, Blow JJ (2004) The role of Cdc6 in ensuring complete genome licensing and S phase checkpoint activation. J Cell Biol 165(2):181–190
Fersht N, Hermand D, Hayles J, Nurse P (2007) Cdc18/CDC6 activates the Rad3-dependent checkpoint in the fission yeast. Nucleic Acids Res 35(16):5323–5337
Shibata A, Barton O, Noon AT, Dahm K, Deckbar D, Goodarzi AA, Lobrich M, Jeggo PA (2010) Role of ATM and the damage response mediator proteins 53BP1 and MDC1 in the maintenance of G(2)/M checkpoint arrest. Mol Cell Biol 30(13): 3371–3383
Yu X, Wu LC, Bowcock AM, Aronheim A, Baer R (1998) The C-terminal (BRCT) domains of BRCA1 interact in vivo with CtIP, a protein implicated in the CtBP pathway of transcriptional repression. J Biol Chem 273(39):25388–25392
Huertas P, Jackson SP (2009) Human CtIP mediates cell cycle control of DNA end resection and double strand break repair. J Biol Chem 284(14):9558–9565
Huertas P, Cortes-Ledesma F, Sartori AA, Aguilera A, Jackson SP (2008) CDK targets Sae2 to control DNA-end resection and homologous recombination. Nature 455 (7213):689–692
Sartori AA, Lukas C, Coates J, Mistrik M, Fu S, Bartek J, Baer R, Lukas J, Jackson SP (2007) Human CtIP promotes DNA end resection. Nature 450(7169):509–514
Chen L, Nievera CJ, Lee AY, Wu X (2008) Cell cycle-dependent complex formation of BRCA1.CtIP.MRN is important for DNA double-strand break repair. J Biol Chem 283(12):7713–7720
Wu-Baer F, Baer R (2001) Effect of DNA damage on a BRCA1 complex. Nature 414(6859):36
Din S, Brill SJ, Fairman MP, Stillman B (1990) Cell-cycle-regulated phosphorylation of DNA replication factor A from human and yeast cells. Genes Dev 4(6):968–977
Anantha RW, Vassin VM, Borowiec JA (2007) Sequential and synergistic modification of human RPA stimulates chromosomal DNA repair. J Biol Chem 282(49):35910–35923
Bahassi EM, Ovesen JL, Riesenberg AL, Bernstein WZ, Hasty PE, Stambrook PJ (2008) The checkpoint kinases Chk1 and Chk2 regulate the functional associations between hBRCA2 and Rad51 in response to DNA damage. Oncogene 27(28): 3977–3985
Esashi F, Christ N, Gannon J, Liu Y, Hunt T, Jasin M, West SC (2005) CDK-dependent phosphorylation of BRCA2 as a regulatory mechanism for recombinational repair. Nature 434(7033):598–604
Wang G, Tong X, Weng S, Zhou H (2012) Multiple phosphorylation of Rad9 by CDK is required for DNA damage checkpoint activation. Cell Cycle 11(20):3792–3800
Acknowledgements
The authors are indebted to Oleg Alekseev for editing and to members of the Clifford and Noguchi laboratories for helpful discussions and to W.W. Smith Foundation and the PA Tobacco Settlement Funds for research support. We apologize to colleagues whose research we have failed to cite due to the breadth of the topics.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Beishline, K., Azizkhan-Clifford, J. (2014). Interplay Between the Cell Cycle and Double-Strand Break Response in Mammalian Cells. In: Noguchi, E., Gadaleta, M. (eds) Cell Cycle Control. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1170. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0888-2_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0888-2_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-0887-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-0888-2
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols