Skip to main content

Impairment, Disability, and Return to Work

  • Chapter
Handbook of Return to Work

Abstract

The relationship among impairment, disability, and return to work plays a critical role in both research and practice. However, the relationship issues, controversies, and conceptual and definitional quagmires have adversely hindered the establishment of effective research and clinical methodology. Our chapter intends to both address these difficulties and propose an effective solution, that is, the inclusion of an integrated biopsychosocial model to determine occupational disability.

We will present a theoretical framework overview and define impairment, disability, and return to work in the first sections, examining legal and administration, clinical, and scholarly research and systems perspectives. Discussion extends to a brief review of current conceptual models of the relationship between impairment, disability, and return to work. The multiplicity of factors affecting work disability, determination and prediction of work disability, and knowledge mobilization to clinical practice is identified. Finally, we will address and clarify research and practice related to the relationship among impairment, work disability, and return to work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adams, H., Ellis, T., Stanish, W. D., & Sullivan, M. J. L. (2007). Psychosocial factors related to return to work following rehabilitation of whiplash injuries. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 17(2), 305–315.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Altman, B. (2001). Disability definitions, models, classification schemes, and applications. In G. L. Albrecht, K. D. Seelman, & M. Bury (Eds.), Handbook of disability studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C.A. § 12101 et seq. (West 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • American Medical Association (AMA). (1993). Guides to the evaluation of permanent impairment (4th ed.). Chicago, IL: AMA Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amick, B. C., Habeck, R. V., Hunt, A., Fossel, A. H., Chapin, A., Keller, R. B., et al. (2000). Measuring the impact of organizational behaviors on work disability prevention and management. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 10(1), 21–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendy, G., & Karwowski, W. (2007). A systematic-structural theory of activity: applications to human performance and work design. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellamy, N., & Campbell, J. (2009). A selective critical but constructive desktop appraisal of the American Medical Association Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (AMA 6). International Journal of Disability Management Research, 4(2), 27–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergner, M., Bobbitt, R. A., Carter, W. B., & Gilson, B. S. (1981). The sickness impact profile: development and final revision of a health status measure. Medical Care, 19, 787–805.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bickenbach, J. E., Chatterji, S., Badley, E. M., & Ustin, T. B. (1999). Models of disablement, universalism and the international classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps. Social Science and Medicine, 48, 1173–1187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandt, E. M., & Pope, A. M. (Eds.). (1997). Enabling America: Accessing the role of rehabilitation science and engineering. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brede, E., Ikram, F., Howard, K., Asih, S., Knauf, M. T., & Polatin, P. B. (2015). Measurement of return to work an stay at work outcomes. In I. Z. Schultz & R. J. Gatchel (Eds.), Handbook of return to work: From research to practice. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brouwer, S., Franche, R., Hogg-Johnson, S., Lee, H., Krause, N., & Shaw, W. (2011). Return-to-work self-efficacy: Development and validation of a scale in claimants with musculoskeletal disorders. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 21(2), 244–259.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J. J. (2007). Functional capacity and disability. The Iowa Orthopaedic Journal, 27, 121–127.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cocchiarella, L., & Andersson, G. B. J. (Eds.). (2000). Guides to the evaluation of permanent impairment (5th ed.). Chicago, IL: American Medical Association Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, D. C., Mondloch, M. V., & Group EPM. (2002). Listening to workers: how recovery expectations predict outcomes. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 166, 749–754.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crook, J., Milner, R., Schultz, I. Z., & Stringer, B. (2002). Determinants of occupational disability following a low back injury: A critical review of the literature. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 12(4), 277–295.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Costa-Black, K. M., Loisel, P., Anema, J. A., & Pransky, G. (2010). Back pain and work. Best Practice & Research. Clinical Rheumatology, 24, 227–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, T. (2002). International classification of functioning, disability and health: An introduction and discussion of its potential impact on rehabilitation services and research. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 34, 201–204.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Rijk, A., Janssen, N., Van Lierop, B., Alexanderson, K., & Nijhuis, F. (2009). A behavioral approach to RTW after sickness absence: The development of instruments for the assessment of motivational determinants, motivation and key actors’ attitudes. Work, 33(3), 273–285.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dersh, J., Polatin, P., Leeman, G., & Gatchel, R. (2005). Secondary gains and losses in the medicolegal setting. In I. Z. Schultz & R. J. Gatchel (Eds.), Handbook of complex occupational disability claims (pp. 421–443). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, D. S., & Dougherty, S. B. (2005). Prospects for a positive psychology of rehabilitation. Rehabilitation Psychology, 50(3), 305–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elfering, A. (2006). Work-related outcome assessment instruments. European Journal of Spine, 15, S32–S43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elfering, A., & Mannion, A. F. (2008). Epidemiology and risk factors of spinal disorders. In N. Boos & M. Aebi (Eds.), Spinal disorders—fundamentals of diagnosis and treatment (pp. 153–173). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, T. R., Kurylo, M., & Rivera, P. (2005). Positive growth following acquired physical disability. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 687–699). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Escorpizo, R., Finger, M. E., Glassel, A., Gradinger, F., Luckenkemper, M., & Cieza, A. (2011a). A systematic review of functioning in vocational rehabilitation using the international classification of functioning, disability and health. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 21(2), 134–146.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Escorpizo, R., Finger, M. E., & Reneman, M. F. (2015). Integration and application of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) in return-to-work. In I. Z. Schultz & R. J. Gatchel (Eds.), Handbook of return to work: From research to practice. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Escorpizo, R., Reneman, M. F., Ekholm, J., Fritz, J., Krupa, T., Marnetoft, S. U., et al. (2011b). A conceptual definition of vocational rehabilitation based on the ICF: Building a shared global model. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 21(2), 126–133.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Federici, S., & Meloni, F. (2013). WHODAS II: disability self-evaluation in the ICF conceptual frame. In J. H. Stone & M. Blouin (Eds.), International encyclopedia of rehabilitation. Retrieved from Centre for International Rehabilitation Research and Information Exchange website: http://cirrie.buffalo.edu/encyclopedia/en/article/299/.

  • Fishbain, D. A., Cutler, R., Rosomoff, H. L., & Rosomoff, R. S. (2003). Chronic pain disability exaggeration/malingering and submaximal effort research. In I. Z. Schultz & D. O. Brady (Eds.), Psychological injuries at trial. Chicago, IL: American Bar Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forst, L., Friedman, L., & Chukwu, A. (2010). Reliability of the AMA guides to the evaluation of permanent impairment. Journal of Environmental Medicine, 52(12), 1201–1203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fougeyrollas, P., & Beauregard, L. (2001). An interactive person-environment social creation. In G. L. Albrecht, K. D. Seelman, & M. Bury (Eds.), Handbook of disability studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franche, R.-L., & Krause, N. (2002). Readiness for return to work following injury or illness: Conceptualizing the interpersonal impact of health care, workplace and insurance factors. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 12, 233–256.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Franche, R.-L., Cullen, K., Clarke, J., Irvin, E., Sinclair, S., Frank, J., et al. (2005). Workplace-based return-to-work interventions: A systematic review of the quantitative literature. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 15(4), 607–631.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Furlan, A. D., Gnam, W. H., Carnide, N., Irvin, E., Amick, B. C., DeRango, K., et al. (2012). Systematic review of intervention practices for depression in the workplace. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 22, 312–321.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Garin, O., Ayuso-Mateos, J. L., Almansa, J., Neito, M., Chatterji, S., Vilgut, G., et al. (2010). Validation of “World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule, WHODAS-2” in patients with chronic diseases. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 8(51).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gatchel, R. J., Kishino, N. D., & Schultz, I. Z. (2013). Early intervention to prevent the development of chronic musculoskeletal pain disorders and disability. In R. J. Gatchel & I. Z. Schultz (Eds.), Handbook of musculoskeletal pain and disability disorders in the workplace (pp. 379–393). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilson, B. S., Gilson, J. S., Bergner, M., Bobbitt, R. A., Kressel, S., Pollard, W. E., et al. (1975). The Sickness Impact Profile: Development of an outcome measure of health care. American Journal of Public Health, 65, 1304–1310.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gnam, W. H. (2005). The prediction of occupational disability related to depressive and anxiety disorders. In I. Z. Schultz & R. J. Gatchel (Eds.), Handbook of complex occupational disability claims: Early risk identification, intervention, and prevention (pp. 371–384). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, D. P., & Battié, M. C. (2004). The prognostic value of functional capacity evaluation in patients with chronic low back pain: Part 2: Sustained recovery. Spine, 29(8), 920–924.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, D. P., & Battié, M. C. (2005). Factors influencing results of functional capacity evaluations in workers’ compensation claimants with low back pain. Physical Therapy, 85(4), 315–322.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hees, H. L., Nieuwenhuijsen, K., Koeter, M. W., Bultmann, U., & Schene, A. H. (2012). Towards a new definition of return to work outcomes in common mental disorders from a multi-stakeholder perspective. PLoS ONE, 7(6), e39947.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heymans, M. W., van Buuren, S., Knol, D. L., Anema, J. R., van Mechelen, W., & de Vet, H. C. W. (2010). The prognosis of chronic lower back pain is determined by changes in pain and disability in the initial period. The Spinal Journal, 10, 847–856.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, H. A., Habeck, R. V., VanTol, B., & Scully, S. (1993). Disability prevention among Michigan employers (Upjohn Institute Technical Report No. 93-004). Kalamazoo, MI: W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iles, R. A., Davidson, M., & Taylor, N. F. (2008). Psychosocial predictors of failure to return to work in non-chronic non-specific low back pain: A systematic review. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 65, 507–517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ilmarinen, J. (2009). Work ability-a comprehensive concept for occupational health research and prevention. Scandinavian Journal of Work and Environmental Health, 35(1), 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imrie, R. (2004). Demystifying disability: A review of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Sociology of Health & Illness, 26, 287–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Infante-Rivard, C., & Lortie, M. (1996). Prognostic factors for return to work after a first compensated episode of back pain. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 53, 499–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, N., van den Heuvel, W. P., Beurskens, A. J., Nijhuis, F. J., Schröer, C. A., & van Eijk, J. T. (2003). The Demand–Control–Support model as a predictor to work. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 26(1), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J. V., & Hall, E. M. (1988). Job strain, work place social support, and cardiovascular disease: A cross-sectional study of a random sample of the Swedish working population. American Journal of PublicHealth, 78(10), 1336–1342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, L. M., Zautra, A. J., & Davis, M. C. (2006). The role of illness uncertainty on coping with fibromyalgia symptoms. Health Psychology, 25(6), 696–703.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanfer, R. (1990). Motivation theory in industrial/organizational psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 1). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, R. C., Barber, C., Beck, A., Berglund, P., Cleary, P., McKenas, D., et al. (2003). The World Health Organization Health and Work Performance Questionnaire (HPQ). Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 45, 156–174.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Karasek, R., & Theorell, T. (1990). Healthy work—stress, productivity and the reconstruction of working life. New York, NY: Basic Books Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krause, N., Dasinger, L. K., Deegan, L. J., Rudolph, L., & Brand, R. J. (2001a). Psychosocial job factors and return-to-work after compensated low back injury: A disability phase-specific analysis. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 40, 374–392.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krause, N., Frank, J. W., Sullivan, T. J., Dasinger, L. K., & Sinclair, S. J. (2001b). Determinants of duration of disability and return to work after work-related injury and illness: Challenges for future research [Invited paper for special issue]. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 40, 464–484.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koopman, C., Pelletier, K. R., Murray, J. F., Sharda, C. E., Berger, M. L., Turpin, R. S., et al. (2002). Stanford Presenteeism Scale: Health status and employee productivity. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 44(1), 14–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kulnik, S. T., & Nikoletou, D. (2013). WHODAS 2.0 in community rehabilitation: A qualitative investigation into the validity of a generic patient-reported measure of disability. Disability & Rehabilitation, Early Online, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwan, H. C. (2013). Developing trust and balancing control: social interactions in work accommodations. Master’s thesis. Available from https://circle.ubc.ca/bitstream/handle/2429/45397/ubc_2013_fall_kwan_hanah.pdf?sequence=5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwan, H. C., & Schultz, I. Z. (2014). Work accommodation in musculoskeletal disorders: Current challenges and future directions in research and practice. In R. J. Gatchel & I. Z. Schultz (Eds.), Handbook of musculoskeletal pain and disability disorders in the workplace (pp. 417–430). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lam, R., Michalak, E., & Yatham, L. (2009). A new clinical rating scale for work absence and productivity: Validation in patients with major depressive disorder. BMC Psychiatry, 9(1), 78.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Latham, G. P., & Pinder, C. C. (2005). Work motivation theory and research at the dawn of the twenty-first century. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 485–516.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leeuw, M., Goossens, M. E. J. B., Linton, S. J., Crombez, G., Boersma, K., & Vlaeyen, J. W. S. (2007). The fear-avoidance model of musculoskeletal pain: Current state of scientific evidence. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 30(1), 77–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, D., Amick, B., Rogers, W., Malspeis, S., Bungay, K., & Cynn, D. (2001). The Work Limitations Questionnaire. Medical Care, 39, 72–85.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leyshon, R., & Shaw, L. (2012). Using multiple stakeholders to define a successful return to work: A concept mapping approach. WORK, 41, 397–408.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Linton, S. J. (2000). A review of psychological risk factors in back and neck pain. Spine, 25, 1148–1156.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Linton, S. J., Gross, D., Schultz, I. Z., Main, C. J., Côté, P., Pransky, G., et al. (2005). Prognosis and the identification of workers risking disability: Research issues and directions for future research. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 15, 459–474.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, E. A. (1999). The motivation to work: What we know. In P. Pintrich & M. Maehr (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 10). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutz, B. J., & Bowers, B. J. (2007). Understanding how disability is defined and conceptualized in the literature. In A. E. Dell Orto & P. W. Power (Eds.), The psychological and social impact of illness and disability (5th ed., pp. 11–21). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Main, C. J., & Shaw, W. S. (2015). Conceptual, methodological and measurement challenges in addressing return to work in workers with musculoskeletal disorders. In I. Z. Schultz & R. J. Gatchel (Eds.), Handbook of return to work: From research to practice. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel, J. (1976). Physical disability and human behavior. New York, NY: Pergamon Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melloh, M., Elfering, A., Presland, C. E., Röder, C., Hendrick, P., Darlow, B., et al. (2011). Predicting the transition from acute to persistent low back pain. Occupational Medicine, 61, 127–131.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Melloh, M., Elfering, A., Egli Presland, C., Roeder, C., Barz, T., Rolli Salathé, C., et al. (2009). Identification of prognostic factors for chronicity in patients with low back pain: A review of screening instruments. International Orthopaedics, 33, 301–313.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moss, R., McFarland, D., Mohin, C. J. & Haynes, B. (2012). Impact on impairment ratings from switching to the American Medical Association’s sixth edition of the Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment. Retrieved from NCCI Workers Compensation Legislative Research website: https://www.ncci.com/documents/Impact_of_AMA_Guides.pdf.

  • Nagi, S. Z. (1965). Some conceptual issues in disability and rehabilitation. In M. Sussman (Ed.), Sociology and rehabilitation. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagi, S. Z. (1977). The disabled and rehabilitation services: A national overview. American Rehabilitation, 2(5), 26–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagi, S. Z. (1991). Disability concepts revisited: Implications for prevention. In A. M. Pope & A. R. Tarlov (Eds.), Disability in America: Towards a national agenda for prevention. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, T. H., Randolph, D. C., Talmage, J., Succop, P., & Travis, R. (2011). Long-term outcomes of lumbar fusion among workers’ compensation subjects. Spine, 36, 320–331.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholas, M. K., Watson, P. J., Linton, S. J., & Main, C. J. (2011). The identification and management of psychosocial risk factors (yellow flags) in patients with low back pain. Physical Therapy, 91, 737–753.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, D. B. & Threats, T. (in press). The World Health Organization’s model of health: What evidence is needed? In K. Olson, R. Young, & I. Z. Schultz (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research for evidence-based practice. New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinder, C. C. (2000). Work motivation theory at the start of the new millennium. Presented to American Board of Vocational Experts, Vancouver, BC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinder, C. C. (1998). Work motivation in organizational behavior. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinder, C. C. (1984). Work motivation: Theory, issues, and applications. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foreman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pope, A. M., & Tarlov, A. R. (1991). Disability in America: Toward a national agenda for prevention. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pransky, G. S., & Dempsey, P. G. (2004). Practical aspects of functional capacity evaluations. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 14(3), 217–229.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pransky, G., Gatchel, R. J., Linton, S. J., & Loisel, P. (2005). Improving return to work research. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 15, 453–457.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prkachin, K. M., Schultz, I. Z., & Hughes, E. (2007). Pain behavior and the development of pain-related disability: The importance of guarding. Clinical Journal of Pain, 23(3), 270–277.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prochaska, J. O., Velicer, W. F., Rossi, J. S., Goldstein, M. G., Marcus, B. H., Rakowski, W., Fiore, C., Harlow, L. L., Redding, C. A., et al. (1994). Stages of change and decisional balance for 12 problem behaviors.Health Psychology, 13 (1), 39–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roessler, R. T. (1988). A conceptual basis for return to work interventions. Rehabilitation Counselling Bulletin, 32, 99–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rondinelli, R. D. (Ed.). (2009). Guides to the evaluation of permanent impairment (6th ed. revised). Chicago, IL: American Medical Association Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rondinelli, R. D. (2010). Commentary on reliability of AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment. Journal of Environmental Medicine, 52(12), 1204–1205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rondinelli, R. D., & Eskay-Auerbach, M. (2009). Transition to the AMA Guides Sixth: Guides to the evaluation of permanent impairment (6th ed.). Chicago, IL: AMA Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salathé, R. C., Melloh, M., Mannion, A. F. et al. (in press). Low back pain-related work absenteeism in Switzerland: A test of prognostic factors from work and other life domains. Journal of Occupational Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, I. Z. (2000). Translating psychological impairment into occupational disability (Research report). Vancouver, BC: Workers’ Compensation Board of British Columbia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, I. Z. (2003). The relationship between psychological impairment and occupational disability. In I. Z. Schultz & D. O. Brady (Eds.), Psychological injuries at trial. Chicago, IL: American Bar Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, I. Z. (2005). Impairment and occupational disability in research and practice. In I. Z. Schultz & R. J. Gatchel (Eds.), Handbook of complex occupational disability claims: Early risk identification, intervention and prevention (pp. 25–41). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, I. Z. (2008). Disentangling the disability quagmire in psychological injury: Part 1–disability and return to work: Theories, methods, and applications. Psychological Injury and Law, 1, 94–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, I. Z. (2009). Determining disability: New advances in conceptualization and research. Psychological Injury and Law, 2(3-4), 199–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, I. Z., & Brady, D. O. (2003). Psychological injuries at trial. Chicago, IL: American Bar Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, I. Z., & Chlebak, C. M. (2014). Disability & impairment in medico-legal settings: Pain disability controversies. In R. J. Gatchel & I. Z. Schultz (Eds.), Handbook of musculoskeletal disorders in the workplace. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, I. Z., Chlebak, C. M., & Law, A. K. (2015). Bridging the gap: Evidence-informed best practices for injured workers in critical musculoskeletal and mental health disabilities. In R. J. Gatchel & I. Z. Schultz (Eds.), Handbook of return to work: From research to practice. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, I. Z., Crook, J. M., Berkowitz, J., Meloche, G. R., Milner, R., Zuberbier, O. A., et al. (2002a). Biopsychosocial multivariate predictive model of occupational low back disability. Spine, 27(23), 2720–2725.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, I. Z., Crook, J., Fraser, K., & Joy, P. W. (2000). Models of diagnosis and rehabilitation in musculoskeletal pain-related occupational disability. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 10(4), 271–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, I. Z., Crook, J., Meloche, G. R., Berkowitz, J., Milner, R., Zuberbier, O. A., et al. (2004). Psychosocial factors predictive of occupational low back disability: Towards development of a return to work model. Pain, 107, 77–85.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, I., Crook, J., Milner, R., Berkowitz, J., & Meloche, G. (2002b). Use of administrative databases for the multivariate prediction of occupational disability: A feasibility assessment. The Journal of Workers Compensation, 12(1), 43–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, I. Z., & Gatchel, R. J. (2005). Research and practice directions in risk for disability prediction and early intervention. In I. Z. Schultz & R. J. Gatchel (Eds.), Handbook of complex occupational disability claims: Early risk identification, intervention and prevention (pp. 523–540). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, I. Z., & Stewart, A. M. (2008). Disentangling the disability quagmire in psychological injury: Part 2–evolution of disability models: Conceptual, methodological and forensic practice issues. Psychological Injury and Law, 1, 103–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, I. Z., Stowell, A. W., Feuerstein, M., & Gatchel, R. J. (2007). Models of return to work for musculoskeletal disorders. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 17, 327–352.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, I. Z., Krupa, T., & Rogers, E. (2011a). Best practices in accommodating and retaining persons with mental health disabilities at work: Answered and unanswered questions. In I. Z. Schultz & E. Rogers (Eds.), Work accommodation and retention in mental health (pp. 445–465). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, I. Z., Winter, A., & Wald, J. (2011b). Evidentiary support for best practices in job accommodation in mental health: Employer level interventions. In I. Z. Schultz & E. S. Rogers (Eds.), Work accommodation and retention in mental health (pp. 409–425). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seo, M.-G., Bartunek, J. M., & Barrett, L. F. (2009). The role of affective experience in work motivation: test of a conceptual model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 951–968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, L. (2015). Working with stakeholders in the return to work process: Multisystem interaction. In R. J. Gatchel & I. Z. Schultz (Eds.), Handbook of return to work: From research to practice. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, W. S., Main, C. J., & Johnston, V. (2011). Addressing occupational factors in the management of lower back pain: Implications for physical therapist practice. Physical Therapy, 91(5), 777–789.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, W. S., van der Windt, D. A. W., Main, C. J., Loisel, P., & Linton, S. J. (2009). “Now tell me about your work”: The feasibility of early screening and intervention to address occupational factors (“Blue Flags”) in back disability. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 19, 64–80.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Siegert, R. J., & Taylor, W. J. (2004). Theoretical aspects of goal-setting and motivation in rehabilitation. Disability Rehabilitation, 26(1), 1–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smart, J. F. (2009). Disability, society, and the individual. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snekkevik, H., Eriksen, H. R., Tangen, T., Chalder, T., & Reme, S. E. (2014). Fatigue and depression in sick-listed chronic low back pain patients. Pain Medicine, 15, 1163–1170.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Soucy, I., Truchon, M., & Côté, D. (2006). Work-related factors contributing to chronic disability in low back pain. Work, 26, 313–326.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Steenstra, I. A., Verbeek, J. H. A. M., Heymans, M. W., & Bongers, P. M. (2005). Prognostic factors for return to work in patients sick listed with acute low back pain, a systematic review of the literature. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 62, 851–860.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, W. A., Ryser, L., Huber, E., Uebelhart, D., Aeschlimann, A., & Stucki, G. (2002). Use of the ICF model as a clinical problem-solving tool in physical therapy and rehabilitation medicine. Physical Therapy, 82(11), 1098–1107.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, A. M., Polak, E., Young, R., & Schultz, I. Z. (2012). Injured workers’ construction of expectations of return to work with sub-acute back pain: The role of perceived uncertainty. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 22, 1–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stowell, A. M., & McGeary, D. D. (2005). Musculoskeletal injury: A three-stage continuum from cause to disability to decision. In I. Z. Schultz & R. J. Gatchel (Eds.), Handbook of complex occupational disability claims: Early risk identification, intervention and prevention (pp. 117–139). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, M. J. L. (2015). Cognitive-behavioral approaches to return to work. In R. J. Gatchel & I. Z. Schultz (Eds.), Handbook of return to work: From research to practice. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, M. J. L., & Adams, H. (2010). Psychosocial techniques to augment the impact of physical therapy interventions for low back pain. Physiotherapy Canada, 62(3), 180–189.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, M. J. L., Adams, H., Rhodenizer, T., & Stanish, W. D. (2006). A psychosocial risk factor-targeted intervention for the prevention of chronic pain and disability following whiplash injury. Physical Therapy, 86(1), 8–18.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, M. J. L., Feuerstein, M., Gatchel, R. J., Linton, S. J., & Pransky, G. (2005). Integrating psychological and behavioral interventions to achieve optimal rehabilitation outcomes. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 15, 475–489.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, M. J. L., Stanish, W., Waite, H., Sullivan, M., & Tripp, D. A. (1998). Catastrophizing, pain, and disability in patients with soft-tissue injuries. Pain, 77, 253–260.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Turk, D. C. (2002). A diathesis-stress model of chronic pain and disability following traumatic injury. Pain Research Management, 7, 9–19.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J., Franklin, G., Fulton-Kehoe, D., Sheppard, L., Wickizer, T., Wu, R., et al. (2006). Worker recovery expectations and fear-avoidance predict work disability in a population-based workers’ compensation back pain sample. Spine, 31(6), 682–689.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Ploeg, H. P., van der Beek, A. J., van der Woude, L. H., & van Mechelen, W. (2004). Physical activity for people with a disability: A conceptual model. Sports Medicine, 34(10), 639–649.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Verbrugge, L. M., & Jette, A. M. (1994). The disablement process. Social Science and Medicine, 38, 1–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Waddell, G., Burton, A. K., & Main, C. J. (2003). Screening to identify people at risk of long-term incapacity for work: A conceptual and scientific review. London, UK: Royal Society of Medicine Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. K. (2008). Spine update: The biospsychosocial model and spine care. Spine, 33(2), 219–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittink, H. (2005). Functional capacity testing in patients with chronic pain. Clinical Journal of Pain, 3, 197–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, A. J., Smith, A. L., Gundy, J. A., Sautter, T., & DeBerard, S. (2013). Predicting back pain treatment outcomes among workers’ compensation patients: Important information for clinical neuropsychologists. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 27(1), 49–59.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • White, M., Wagner, S., Schultz, I. Z., Murray, E., Bradley, S. M., Hsu, V., et al. (2013). Modifiable workplace risk factors contributing to workplace absence across health conditions: A stakeholder-centered best-evidence synthesis of systematic reviews. Work, 45, 475–492.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • White, M. I., Wagner, S. I., Williams-Whitt, K., Koehn, C. V., Kube, D., Cornacchia, M., et al. (2015). Workplace intervention research: Disability prevention, disability management, and work productivity. In R. J. Gatchel & I. Z. Schultz (Eds.), Handbook of return to work: From research to practice. New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (WHO). (1980). International classification of impairments, disabilities, and handicaps: A manual of classification relating to the consequences of disease. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization (WHO).

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (WHO). (2001). ICF: the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization (WHO).

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (WHO). (2011). World report on disability 2011. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization (WHO).

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (WHO). (2013). WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0). Retrieved from: http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/whodasii/en/index.html.

  • Worzer, W. E., Kishino, N. D., & Gatchel, R. J. (2009). Primary, secondary, and tertiary losses in chronic pain patients. Psychological Injury and Law, 2, 215–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, A. E., Roessler, R. T., Wasiak, R., McPherson, K. M., van Poppel, M. N. M., & Anema, J. R. (2005a). A developmental conceptualization of return to work. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 15, 557–568.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Young, A. E., Wasiak, R., Roessler, R. T., McPherson, K. M., Anema, J. R., & van Poppel, N. M. (2005b). Return-to-work outcomes following work disability: Stakeholder motivations, interests and concerns. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 15, 543–556.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zuberbier, O. A., Hunt, D. G., Kozlowski, A., Berkowitz, J., Schultz, I. Z., Crook, J. M., et al. (2001). Commentary on the AMA guides lumbar impairment validity checks. Spine, 26(24), 2735–2737.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Izabela Z. Schultz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schultz, I.Z., Chlebak, C.M., Stewart, A.M. (2016). Impairment, Disability, and Return to Work. In: Schultz, I., Gatchel, R. (eds) Handbook of Return to Work. Handbooks in Health, Work, and Disability, vol 1. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7627-7_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics