Skip to main content

Fingerprint Image Quality

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Biometrics

Synonyms

Fingerprint Image Quality Measure; Fingerprint Image Quality Assessment

Definition

The intrinsic characteristic of a biometric signal may be used to determine its suitability for further processing by the biometric system or assess its conformance to preestablished standards. The quality of a biometric signal is a numerical value (or a vector) that measures this intrinsic attribute. Quality score is a quantitative expression of the utility, or predicted performance of a biometric sample in a comparison environment. This means that finger image quality scores should correlate to the observed false match and false nonmatch rates of the samples.

Introduction

With an increase in the need for reliable identity authentication, biometric recognition systems have been increasingly deployed in several different applications: government applications such as national ID card, border control, and commercial applications, such as physical access control, e-commerce, or mobile phone. Among...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 899.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. D. Maltoni, D. Maio, A.K. Jain, S. Prabhakar, Handbook of Fingerprint Recognition (Springer, New York, 2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. P. Grother et al., MINEX: performance and interoperability of the INCITS 378 fingerprint template. National Institute of Standards and Technology, NISTIR 7296 edn. (2005), http://fingerprint.nist.gov/minex04

  3. E. Tabassi, C. Wilson, C. Watson, Fingerprint image quality, NFIQ. National Institute of Standards and Technology, NISTIR 7151 edn. (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. E. Tabassi, C.L. Wilson, A novel approach to fingerprint image quality, in ICIP, Genoa, 2005, vol. 2, pp. 37–40

    Google Scholar 

  5. C. Tilton et al., The BioAPI Specification (American National Standards Institute, New York, 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  6. D. Benini et al., ISO/IEC 29794–1 biometric sample quality standard: framework. JTC1/SC37/Working Group 3 (2008), http://isotc.iso.org/isotcportal

  7. F. Alonso-Fernandez, J. Fierrez, J. Ortega-Garcia, J. Gonzalez-Rodriguez, H. Fronthaler, K. Kollreider, J. Bigun, A Comparative study of fingerprint image-quality estimation methods. IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2, 734-743 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. E. Lim, X. Jiang, W. Yau, Fingerprint image quality and validity analysis, in IEEE proceedings of International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), New York, 2002, pp. 469–472

    Google Scholar 

  9. Y. Chen, S.C. Dass, A.K. Jain, Fingerprint quality indices for predicting authentication performance, in AVBPA, Rye Brook, 2005, pp. 160–170

    Google Scholar 

  10. L. Shen, A.C. Kot, W.M. Koo, Quality measures of fingerprint images, in AVBPA, Halmstad, 2001, pp. 266–271

    Google Scholar 

  11. N. Ratha, R. Bolle, Automatic Fingerprint Recognition Systems (Springer, New York, 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  12. E. Lim, K.A. Toh, P.N. Saganthan, X. Jiang, W.Y. Yau, Fingerprint image quality analysis, in ICIP, Singapore, 2004, pp. 1241–1244

    Google Scholar 

  13. T.P. Chen, X. Jiang, W.Y. Yau, Fingerprint image quality analysis, in ICIP, Singapore, 2004, pp. 1253–1256

    Google Scholar 

  14. R. Bolle et al., System and methods for determining the quality of fingerprint images. U.S. Patent 596,356, 1999

    Google Scholar 

  15. L. Hong, Y. Wan, A.K. Jain, Fingerprint image enhancement: algorithm and performance evaluation. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 20(8), 777–789 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  16. N. Nill, B.H. Bouzas, Objective image quality measure derived from digital image power spectra. Opt. Eng. 31(4), 813–825 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  17. National Institute of Standards and Technology, NIST biometric image software (NBIS) (2008), http://www.itl.nist.gov/iad/894.03/nigos/nbis.html

  18. T. Ko, R. Krishnan, Monitoring and reporting of fingerprint image quality and match accuracy for a large user application, in Proceedings of the 33rd Applied Image Pattern Recognition Workshop, Washington, D.C. (IEEE Computer Society, 2004), pp. 159–164

    Google Scholar 

  19. E. Tabassi, P. Grother, Quality summarization: recommendations on enterprise-wide biometric quality summarization. National Institute of Standards and Technology, NISTIR 7244 edn. (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  20. L.M. Wein, M. Baveja, Using fingerprint image quality to improve the identification performance of the U.S. visit program, in Proceedings of the National Academy of sciences, Stuttgart, 2005, www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.0407496102

  21. J. Fierrez-Aguilar, J. Ortega-Garcia, J. Gonzalez-Rodriguez, J. Bigun, Discriminative multimodal biometric authentication based on quality measures. Pattern Recognit. 38(5), 777–779 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  22. E. Tabassi, G.W. Quinn, P. Grother, When to fuse two biometrics, in IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition CVPR-06, New York, 2006. Biometric Workshop

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this entry

Cite this entry

Tabassi, E., Grother, P. (2015). Fingerprint Image Quality. In: Li, S.Z., Jain, A.K. (eds) Encyclopedia of Biometrics. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7488-4_52

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics