Skip to main content

Abstract

All kinds of microscopy have a common beginning in mankind’s intellectual goal to see better. Visible light was the first medium, and visibility was limited to the unaided eye until the first century a.d., when Seneca discovered(1) that by looking through a clear spherical flask filled with clear water “letters however small and dim are comparatively large and distinct.”(2) This idea led to simple magnifiers, whether a single large lens to accommodate both eyes together or two lenses of a smaller diameter to accommodate each eye separately.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. C. Jacker, Window on the Unknown: A History of the Microscope ( New York: Scribner’s, 1966 ).

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. H. Gage, “Brief History of Lenses and Microscopes,” in The Microscope, 17th ed. ( Ithaca, NY: Comstock, 1947 ).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Milestones in Optical History (Rochester, NY: Bausch and Lomb, 1954).

    Google Scholar 

  4. I. Asimov, Biographical Encyclopedia of Science and Technology ( Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1972 ).

    Google Scholar 

  5. D. J. Hamlin, “What a Spectacle! Eyeglasses and How They Evolved,” Smithsonian 13, 1983, 100–111.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Origin and Development of the Microscope,“ in Catalogue of the Royal Microscopical Society,(Oxford, England: The Royal Microscopical Society, 1928).

    Google Scholar 

  7. a. S. Schulman, “Micromagic,” Technology Review Nov.-Dec. 1989, 11–12.

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. Rooseboom, “The History of the Microscope,” in Proceedings of the Royal Microscopical Society 2 1967, 266–93.

    Google Scholar 

  9. G. L.’E. Turner, The Great Age of the Microscope, Bristol and New York: Adam Hilger, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. Kenseth, ed., The Age of the Marvelous ( Hanover, NH: Hood Museum of Art, Dartmouth College, 1991 ).

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. Hooke, Micrographia (Royal Society of England, 1665, reprinted by Dover: New York, 1961 ).

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. Hogg, The Microscope, Its History, Construction, and Applications ( London: Herbert Ingram, 1856 ), 3–6.

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. van Zuylen, “The Microscopes of Antoni van Leeuwenhoek,” J. of Microscopy 121, part 3 (Mar. 1981), 309–28.

    Google Scholar 

  14. B. J. Ford, “Reappraising the History of Microscopy: Revelation and the Simple Microscope,” Microscopy and Analysis (Sept. 1989), 7–10.

    Google Scholar 

  15. B. J. Ford, “Bacteria and Cells of Human Origin on van Leeuwenhoek’s Sections of 1674,” Transactions of the American Microscopical Society 101 (Jan. 1982), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  16. B. J. Ford, “The van Leeuwenhoek Specimens,” Notes and Records of the Royal Society 36, (1) (Aug. 1981), 37–59.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. B. J. Ford, “Robert Brown, Brownian Movement and Teeth Marks on the Hatbrim,” The Microscope 39 (3d-.4th quarter 1991), “Brownian Movement in Clarkia Pollen: A Reprise of the First Observations,” The Microscope 40 (3d-4th quarter 1992 ).

    Google Scholar 

  18. O. W. Richards, “Microscopy: Yesterday and Tomorrow,” Transactions of the American Microscopical Society 91 (1972) 529–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. S. Bradbury, “The Quality of the Image Produced by the Compound Microscope: 1700–1840,” in Proceedings of the Royal Microscopical Society 2 (1967) 151–74.

    Google Scholar 

  20. S. Bradbury, “Now It Can Be Proved,” The Vickers Magazine (Autumn 1966 ), 13–14.

    Google Scholar 

  21. C. W. Mason, Handbook of Chemical Microscopy, Vol. I, 4th ed. ( New York: Wiley, 1983 ).

    Google Scholar 

  22. D. B. Weiner, Raspail, Scientist and Reformer (New York: Columbia University Press, 1968 ).

    Google Scholar 

  23. D. L. Padgitt, A Short History of the Early American Microscopes ( Chicago: Microscope Publications, 1975 ).

    Google Scholar 

  24. J. G. Delly, Photography through the Microscope ( Rochester, NY: Eastman-Kodak, 1988 ).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Years of the Carl Zeiss Foundation,“ Microscopy and Analysis (Sept. 1989), 48.

    Google Scholar 

  26. ASTM designation E-211, “Specifications and Methods of Test for cover Glasses and Glass Slides for Use in Microscopy” Index to Annual Book of ASTM Standards ( Philadelphia: American Society for Testing and Materials, 1990 ).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Components of Microscopes, Part 2: Dimensions of Microscopes (London: British Standards Institution, 1963).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Index to Annual Book of ASTM Standards (Philadelphia: American Society for Testing and Materials, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  29. R. Vallery-Radot, The Life of Pasteur, trans. R. L. Devonshire ( Garden City, NY: Doubleday, Page, and Co., 1926 ).

    Google Scholar 

  30. T. G. Rochow, “Some Incidental History of Metallography and ASTM Committee E-4,” in ASTM Symposium on “Metallography 75 Years Later,” May 8–10,1991, Atlantic City, NJ, 83–87. Published as ASTM STP1165, ( Philadelphia: ASTM, 1993 ).

    Google Scholar 

  31. D. W. Humphries, “The Contributions of Henry Clifton Sorby to Microscopy,” The Microscope and Crystal Front 15 1967, 351–62.

    Google Scholar 

  32. a. J. Clark, “Milestone in Polarizing Microscopy,” Australian E. M. Newsletter 171988, 7–8.

    Google Scholar 

  33. A. H. Bennett, et al, Phase Microscopy, Principles and Applications (New York: Wiley, 1951), chap. 1, 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  34. W. Krug, et al, Contributions to Interference Microscopy,trans. J. H. Dickson (London: Hilger and Watts, 1964).

    Google Scholar 

  35. ASTM Symposium on Interference Microscopy (abstracts),“ P. H. Bartels, ed., Materials Research and Standards 2 1962, 672.

    Google Scholar 

  36. J. H. Richardson, Handbook for the Light Microscope ( Park Ridge, NJ: Noyes, 1991 ).

    Google Scholar 

  37. M. Locquin and M. Langeron, Handbook of Microscopy (Butterworth, 1983 ).

    Google Scholar 

  38. In Memoriam: Dr. Edwin Herbert Land, May 1, 1909-March 1, 1991,“ Optics and Photonics News (May 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  39. E. H. Land et al,“Color Translating Ultraviolet Microscope,” Science 109 (1949), 371–74.

    Google Scholar 

  40. R. E. Gore, “Infrared Spectrometry of Small Samples with the Reflecting Microscope,” Science 110 (1949), 710–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. J. A. Reffner and W. T. Wihborg, “Microanalysis by Reflectance FT-IR Microscopy,” American Laboratory (April 1990) 26–34.

    Google Scholar 

  42. J. A. Reffner, “The Commercial Development of FT-IR Microspectrometry,” Microscopy Today 93–3, (April 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  43. A. Fisher, “Superscopes,” Popular Science (July 1990), 66–69.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Carl Zeiss, Inc., 1 Zeiss Drive, Thornwood, NY 10594.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Leica, Inc., 24 Link Drive, Rockleigh, NJ 07647.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Nikon, Inc., 1300 Walt Whitman Road, Melville, NY 11747–0299.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Olympus Corp., Precision Instrument Div., 4 Nevada Drive, Lake Success, NY 110421179.

    Google Scholar 

  48. C. E. Hall, Introduction to Electron Microscopy 2d ed. ( Hightstown, NJ: McGraw-Hill, 1966 ).

    Google Scholar 

  49. T. Mulvey, “The History of the Electron Microscope,” in Proceedings of the Royal Microscopical Society 2 1967, 201–27.

    Google Scholar 

  50. E. F. Burton and W. H. Kohl, The Electron Microscope, an Introduction to Its Fundamental Principles and Applications, 2d ed. ( New York: Reinhold, 1946 ).

    Google Scholar 

  51. T. G. Rochow, “Significant Early Days in Industrial Electron Microscopy,” EMSA Bulletin 13, 1 (spring 1983 ).

    Google Scholar 

  52. M. W. Ladd, “Electron Microscopy,” in Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemical Analysis, vol. 1 ( New York: Wiley, 1966 ), 649–685.

    Google Scholar 

  53. M. W. Ladd, The Electron Microscope Handbook (Burlington, VT: Ladd Research Industries, 1973 ).

    Google Scholar 

  54. V. E. Cosslett, “Beyond Optical Limits,” The Vickers Magazine (autumn 1966), 15–16.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Electron Microscope Society of America, Yearbook (1943), now the Microscopy Society of America, Box MSA, Woods Hole, MA 02453.

    Google Scholar 

  56. R. B. Barnes et al, “Electron Microscopical Replica Techniques for the Study of Organic Surfaces, Journal of Applied Physics 16 (1945), 730–39.

    Google Scholar 

  57. J. I. Goldstein and H. Yakowitz, eds., Practical Scanning Electron Microscopy ( New York: Plenum, 1975 ).

    Google Scholar 

  58. J. W. S. Hearle et al, The Use of the Scanning Electron Microscope (Elmsford, NY: Pergamon, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  59. T. T. Tsong, “Atom-Probe Field Ion Microscopy,” Physics Today (May 1993), 24–31.

    Google Scholar 

  60. E. W. Muller, “Field-Ion Microscopy,” Science 149, 3684 (Aug. 1965) 591–601.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Sales literature from Sonoscan®, Inc., 752 Foster Ave., Bensenville, IL 60106 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  62. R. A. Lemons and C. F. Quate, “Acoustic Microscopy: Biomedical Applications,” Science 188 (1975) 905–911.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. A. Fisher, “Seeing,” Popular Science (April 1989) 102, 104–107.

    Google Scholar 

  64. M. C. Botty and F. G. Rowe, U.S. Patent 2,843,751, July 15, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  65. M. C. Botty and E. J. Thomas, “Applications of Microradiography with the EMU-1 Electron Microscope,” paper presented to the Electron Microscope Society of America, Columbus, Ohio, Sept. 9, 1959 (unpublished).

    Google Scholar 

  66. For example, Philips Electronic Instruments, Mount Vernon, NY 10550, Canal Industrial Corp., Bethesda, MD 20014.

    Google Scholar 

  67. T. W. Ford et al,“Improved Imaging of Biological Specimens by Soft X-Ray Contact Microscopy Using Laser-Produced Plasmas as X-Ray Sources,” in EMAG-MICRO 89, vol. 1: Physical P. J. Goodhew and H. Y Elder, eds. (Bristol, London and New York: Institute of Physics, 1990), 527–30.

    Google Scholar 

  68. W. C. McCrone, “INTERMICRO-92,” The Microscope 40, 3 (1992), 175.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rochow, T.G., Tucker, P.A. (1994). A Brief History of Microscopy. In: Introduction to Microscopy by Means of Light, Electrons, X Rays, or Acoustics. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-1513-9_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-1513-9_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-1515-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-1513-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics