Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Panel Analysis for Qualitative Variables

  • Chapter
Handbook of Statistical Modeling for the Social and Behavioral Sciences

Abstract

In this chapter we consider models which take the special structure of qualitative panel data into consideration. Models for qualitative dependent variables in cross-section analysis are discussed by Arminger in Chapter 3. Hsiao, in Chapter 7, presents panel models for metric dependent variables. Therefore, these two chapters are closely related to the present one.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abramowitz, M., and Stegun, I. A. (1965). Handbook of Mathematical Functions. New York: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amemiya, T. (1981). “Qualitative Response Models: A Survey.” Journal of Economic Literature, 19, 483–536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amemiya, T. (1985). Advanced Econometrics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, E. B. (1970). “Asymptotic properties of conditional maximum likelihood estimators.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, B32, 283–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, E. B. (1973). Conditional Inference and Models for Measuring. Copenhagen: Mental-hygieniejuisk Forlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, T. W., and Hsiao, C. (1982). “Formulation and estimation of dynamic models using panel data.” Journal of Econometrics, 18, 47–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arminger, G. (1994). “Probit-Models for the Analysis of Non-Metric Panel Data,” Allgemeines Statistisches Archiv, 78, 125–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balestra, P., and Nerlove, M. (1966). “Pooling cross-section and time series data in the estimation of a dynamic model: The demand for natural gas.” Econometrica, 34, 585–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartholomew, D. J. (1982). Stochastic Models for Social Processes. 3rd ed. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkson, J. (1955). “Maximum likelihood and minimum x2 estimates of the logistic function.” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 50, 130–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkson, J. (1980). “Minimum chi square, not maximum likelihood.” Annals of Statis-tics, 8, 457–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Porath, Y. (1973). “Labor force participation rates and the supply of labor.” Journal of Political Economy, 81, 697–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhargava, A., and Sargan, J. D. (1983). “Estimating dynamic random effects models from panel data covering short time periods.” Econometrica, 51, 1635–1659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Börsch-Supan, A., and Hajivassiliou, V. (1993). “Smooth Unbiased Multivariate Probability Simulators for Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Limited Dependent Variable Models.” Journal of Econometrics, 58, 347–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boskin, M. J., and Nold, F. C. (1975). “A Markov model of turnover in Aid to Families with Dependent Children.” Journal of Human Resources, 10, 476–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. S., and Moffitt, R. (1982). “A computationally efficient quadrature procedure for the one-factor multinomial probit model.” Econometrica, 50, 761–764.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burguete, J. F., Gallant, A. R., and Souza, G. (1982). “On unification of the asymptotic theory of nonlinear econometric models.” Econometric Review, 1, 151–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cecchetti, S. (1986). “The frequency of price adjustment: A study of the newsstand prices of magazines.” Journal of Econometrics, 31, 355–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain, G. (1978). “Omitted variable bias in panel data: Estimating the returns to schooling.” Annales de l’INSEE, 30–1, 49–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain, G. (1980). “Analysis of Covariance with Qualitative Data.” Review of Economic Studies, 47, 225–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain, G. (1984). “Panel Data.” In: Z. Griliches, and M. D. Intriligator. Handbook of Econometrics, Vol. 2. Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 1247–1318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commenges, D., Letenneur, L., Jacquin, H., and Dartigues, J. F. (1993). “Test of ho- mogeneity of binary data with explanatory variables.” Biometrics, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corcoran, M. (1982). “The employment, wage and fertility consequences of teenage women’s nonemployment. In: R. B. Freeman and D. A. Wise eds., The Youth Labor Market Problem: Its Nature, Causes, and Consequences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corcoran, M., and Hill, M. (1985). “Reoccurence of unemployment among young adult men.” The Journal of Human Resources, 20, 165–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diggle, P. J., Liang, K. Y., and Zeger, S. L. (1993). Analysis of Longitudinal Data (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahrmeir, L. (1987). “Asymptotic likelihood inference for nonhomogeneous observations.” Statistical Papers, 28, 81–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahrmeir, L. (1990). “Maximum likelihood estimation in misspecified generalized linear models.” Statistics, 21, 487–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahrmeir, L., and Tutz, G. (1994). Multivariate Statistical Modeling based on Generalized Linear Models, New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Feller, W. (1968). Probability Theory and Its Application. Vol. 1, New York: Wiley. Goldberger, A. S. (1964). Econometric Theory. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gourieroux, C., and Monfort, A. (1990). “Simulation based influence: A survey with special reference to panel data models,” Mimeographed. l’INSEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, W. H. (1993). Econometric Analysis, Second edition. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajivassiliou, V. A. (1992). “Simulation estimation methods for limited dependent variable models,” In G. S. Maddala, C. R. Rao, and H. D. Vinod eds., Handbook of Statistics, Vol. 11 ( Econometrics). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajivassiliou, V. A., and McFadden, D. (1990). “The method of simulated scores for the estimation of LDV models,” Cowles Foundation Discussion Paper, No. 967, Yale University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajivassiliou, V., McFadden, D., and Ruud, P. (1992). “Simulation of multivariate normal orthant probabilities: Theoretical and computational results,” mimeographed, Yale University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamerle, A. (1990). “On a Simple Test for Neglected Heterogeneity in Panel Studies.” Biometrics, 46, 193–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hausman, J. A., Hall, B., and Griliches, Z. (1984). “Econometric Models for Count Data with an Application to the Patents–R and D Relationship.” Econometrica, 52, 909–938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckman,J. J. (1981a). “Statistical Models for Discrete Panel Data.” In: C. F. Man-ski, and D. McFadden, eds., Structural Analysis of Discrete Data With Econometric Applications. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 114–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckman,J. J. (1981b). “The Incidental Parameters Problem and the Problem of Initial Con-ditions in Estimating a Discrete Time-Discrete Data Stochastic Process.” In: C. F. Manski, and D. McFadden, eds., Structural Analysis of Discrete Data With Econometric Applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 179–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckman,J. J., and Willis,R. (1976). “Estimation of a Stochastic Model of Reproduction: An Econometric Approach.” In: N. Terleckyj, ed., Household Production and Consumption. New York: National Bureau of Economic Rese

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennevogl, W. (1991). “Schätzung generalisierter Regressions-und Zeitreihenmodelle mit variierenden Parametern,” Ph.D. Thesis, Regensburg University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, R. A. (1971). Dynamic Probabilistic Systems, Vol. 1: Markov Models, New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao, C. (1985). Benefits and Limitations of Panel Data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao, C. (1986). Analysis of Panel Data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, P. (1967). “The Behavior of Maximum Likelihood Estimates Under Nonstandard Conditions,” Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposiums, Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, J. (1990). “On the statistical analysis of ordinal data when extravariation is present,” Applied Statistics, 39, 74–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, N. L., and Kotz, S. (1972). Distributions in Statistics: Continuous Multivariate Distributions. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kritzer, H. M. (1978). “An introductuion to multivariate contingency table analysis,” American Journal of Political Science, 22, 187–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Küsters, U. (1987). Hierarchische Mittel wert-und Kovarianz struktur modelle mit nicht metrischen endogenen Variablen, Heidelberg: Physica Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Li, K. C., and Duan, N. (1989). “Regression analysis under link violation,” The Annals of Statistics, 17, 1009–1052.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang, K. Y., and Zeger, S. L. (1986). “Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models,” Biometrica, 73, 13–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maddala, G. S. (1971). “The Use of Variance Components Models in Pooling Cross Section and Time Series Data.” Econometrica, 39, 341–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maddala, G. S. 1983 ). Limited-dependent and Qualitative Variables. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Maddala, G. S. (1987). “Limited Dependent Variable Models Using Panel Data.” Journal of Human Resources, 22, 307–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCullagh, P. (1980). “Regression models for ordinal data (with discussion),” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, B42, 109–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCullagh, P. (1983). “Quasi-likelihood functions,” Annals of Statistics, 11, 59–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCullagh, P., and Neider, J. A. (1989). Gener alized linear models, 2nd ed., New York: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFadden, D. (1974). “The Measurement of Urban Travel Demand.” Journal of Public Economics, 3, 303–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFadden, D. (1989). “A Method of Simulated Moments for Estimation of Multinomial Probits without Numerical Integration.” Econometrica, 57, 995–1226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neyman, J., and Scott, E. L. (1948). “Consistent estimates based on partially consistent observations,” Econometrica, 16, 1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, R. J. (1978). “Note on the Uniqueness of the Maximum Likelihood Estimator in the Tobit Model.” Econometrica, 46, 1211–1215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orme, C. (1993). “A comment on ‘A simple test for neglected heterogeneity in panel studies’,” Biometrics, 49, 665–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pakes, A., and Pollard, D. (1989). “Simulation and the Asymptotics of Optimization Estimators.” Econometrica, 57, 1027–1057.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ronning, G. (1991). Mikroökonometrie. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schepers, A., and Arminger, G. (1992). MECOSA: A Program for the Analysis of General Mean and Covariance Structures with Non-Metric Variables, User Guide, Frauenfeld, Switzerland: SLI-AG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiess, M. (1993). Parameterschätzung in Regressionsmodellen mit diskreten, korrelierten endogenen Variablen, Dissertation, Konstanz University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiratelli, R., Laird, N., and Ware, J. H. (1984). “Random effects models for serial observations with binary responses,” Biometrics, 40, 961–971.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, J. (1958). “Estimation of Relationships for Limited Dependent Variables.” Econometrica, 26, 24–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toikka, R. S. (1976). “A Markovian model of labor market decisions by workers,” American Economic Review, 66, 821–834.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tutz, G., and Hennevogl, W. (1993). Random effects in ordinal regression models, Preprint, University of Munich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wedderburn, R. W.M. (1974). “Quasi-likelihood functions, generalized linear models and the Gauss-Newton method,”Biometrika, 61, 439–447.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, H. (1982). “Maximum likelihood estimation of misspecified models,” Econometrica, 50, 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winkelmann, R., and K. F. Zimmermann (1991). “Robust Poisson Regression,” in L. Fahrmeir, and B. Francis eds., Advances in GUM. Statistical Modelling. Proceedings of the GLIM 92 Workshop on Statistical Modelling. Munich, 13–17 June 1991. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 201–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, B., and Douglas, G. A. (1976). “Better procedures for sample-free item analysis.” Research Memorandum no. 20, Statistical Laboratory, Dept. of Education, University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeger, S. L., and Karim, M. R. (1991). “Generalized linear models with random effects: a Gibbs sampling approach,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 86, 79–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann, K. F., and Schwalbach, J. (1991). “Determinanten der Patentaktivität.” Ifo-Studien, 37 (1991), 201–227.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Lehrstuhl für Statistik, Universität Regensburg, Universitätsstr. 31, D-93053, Regensburg, Germany

    Alfred Hamerle

  2. Abteilung Statistik und Ökonometrie I, Department of Economics, Eberhard-Karls-Universität, Mohlstr. 36, D-72074, Tübingen, Germany

    Gerd Ronning

Authors
  1. Alfred Hamerle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gerd Ronning
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Economics, Bergische Universität-GH Wuppertal, D-42097, Wuppertal, Germany

    Gerhard Arminger

  2. Department of Sociology and Department of Statistics, Late of Pennsylvania State University, 16802, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA

    Clifford C. Clogg

  3. Department of Sociology, University of Arizona, 85721, Tucson, Arizona, USA

    Michael E. Sobel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hamerle, A., Ronning, G. (1995). Panel Analysis for Qualitative Variables. In: Arminger, G., Clogg, C.C., Sobel, M.E. (eds) Handbook of Statistical Modeling for the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-1292-3_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-1292-3_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-1294-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-1292-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation