Skip to main content

Heterochrony in Rodents

  • Chapter
Heterochrony in Evolution

Part of the book series: Topics in Geobiology ((TGBI,volume 7))

Abstract

The mammalian order Rodentia is by far the largest order of mammals (approximately 1700 species), and rodents show ranges in body size, body plan, and ecological diversity that far exceed those seen in any other group of mammals, including bats and cetaceans. Living rodents inhabit all continents except Antarctica, and they are found in nearly every terrestrial habitat throughout their geographic range. Rodents usually play integral roles in the terrestrial ecosystems they inhabit, and they are often the most abundant and diverse of all vertebrates in a terrestrial community.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alberch, P., 1980, Ontogenesis and morphological diversification, Am. Zool. 20: 653–667.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alberch, P., Gould, S. J., Oster, G. F., and Wake, D. B., 1979, Size and shape in ontogeny and phylogeny, Paleobiology 5: 296–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atchley, W. R., 1987, Developmental quantitative genetics and the evolution of ontogenies, Evolution 41: 316–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartholomew, G. A., Jr., and Caswell, H. H., Jr., 1951, Locomotion in kangaroo rats and its adaptive significance, J. Mammal. 32: 155–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brookfield, J. F. Y., 1982, Adaptation and functional explanation in biology, Evol. Theor. 5: 281–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butterworth, B. B., 1960, A comparative study of sexual behavior and reproduction in the kangaroo rats Dipodomys deserti Stephens and D. merriama Mearns, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Southern California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butterworth, B. B., 1961, A comparative study of growth and development of the kangaroo rats, Dipodomys deserti Stephens and Dipodomys merriami Mearns, Growth 25: 127–139.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chew, R. M., and Butterworth, B. B., 1959, Growth and development of Merriam’s kangaroo rat, Dipodomys merriami, Growth 23: 75–95.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Creighton, G. K., and Strauss, R. E., 1986, Comparative patterns of growth and development in cricetine rodents and the evolution of ontogeny, Evolution 40: 94–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darlington, P. J., 1957, Zoogeography: The Geographical Distribution of Animals, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Beer, G. R., 1930, Embryology and Evolution, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Beer, G. R., 1958, Embryos and Ancestors, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • DuBrul, E. L., and Laskin, D. M., 1961, Preadaptive potentialities of the mammalian skull: An experiment in growth and form, Am. J. Anat. 109: 117–132.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Egoscue, H. J., Bittmenn, J. G., and Petrovich, J. A., 1970, Some fecundity and longevity records for captive small mammals, J. Mammal. 51: 622–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, J. F., 1975, The behavior patterns of desert rodents, in: Rodents in Desert Environments (I. Prakash and P. K. Ghosh, eds.), pp. 189–224, Junk, The Hague.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, J. F., 1981, The Mammalian Radiations, An Analysis of Trends in Evolution, Adaptation, and Behavior, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, J. F., and Isaac, D. E., 1963, The reproduction of heteromyid rodents in captivity, J. Mammal. 44: 61–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fink, W. L., 1982, The conceptual relationship between ontogeny and phylogeny, Paleobiology 8: 254–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, T. H., 1977, Growth and development of two species of tropical heteromyid rodents, Am. Midl. Nat. 98: 109–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldschmidt, R., 1940, The Material Basis of Evolution, Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S. J., 1977, Ontogeny and Phylogeny, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S. J., 1980, The Panda’s Thumb, Norton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S. J., and Lewontin, R. C., 1979, The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: A critique of the adaptationist programme, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 205:581–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S. J., and Vrba, E. S., 1982, Exaptation—A missing term in the science of form, Paleobiology 8: 4–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hafner, J. C., 1978, Evolutionary relationships of kangaroo mice, genus Microdipodops, J. Mammal. 59: 354–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hafner, J. C., 1988, Macroevolutionary diversification in heteromyid rodents: Heterochrony and adaptation in phylogeny, in: Biology of the Family Heteromyidae (H. H. Genoways and J. H. Brown, eds.), American Society of Mammalogists (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hafner, J. C., and Hafner, M. S., 1983, Evolutionary relationships of heteromyid rodents, Great Basin Nat. Mem. 7: 3–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hafner, M. S., and Hafner, J. C., 1984, Brain size, adaptation and heterochrony in geomyoid rodents, Evolution 38: 1088–1098.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, E. R., 1941, Revision of the rodent genus Microdipodops, Field Mus. Nat. Hist. Zool. Ser. 27: 233–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, E. R., 1946, Mammals of Nevada, University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, E. R., and Linsdale, J. M., 1929, Notes on the life history of the kangaroo mouse (Microdipodops), J. Mammal. 10: 298–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatt, R. T., 1932, The vertebral columns of richochetal rodents, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 63: 599–738.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayden, P., and Gambino, J. J., 1966, Growth and development of the little pocket mouse, Perognathus longimembris, Growth 30: 187–197.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, J. E., 1937, Morphology of the pocket gopher mammalian genus Thomomys, Univ. Calif. Puhl. Zool. 42: 81–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell, A. B., 1932, The saltatorial rodent Dipodomys: The functional and comparative anatomy of its muscular and osseous systems, Proc. Am. Acad. Arts Sci. 67: 377–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keast, A., 1972, Comparisons of contemporary mammal faunas of southern continents, in: Evolution, Mammals, and Southern Continents (A. Keast, F. C. Erk, and B. Gloss, eds.), State University of New York Press, Albany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirmiz, J. P., 1962, Adaptation of Desert Environment, Butterworth, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotier, B. P., 1985, Owl predation on desert rodents which differ in morphology and behavior, J. Mammal. 66: 824–828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lackey, J. A., 1967, Growth and development of Dipodomys stephensi, J. Mammal. 48: 624–632.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lay, D. M., 1988, Anatomy of the heteromyid ear, in: Biology of the Family Heteromyidae (H. H. Genoways and J. H. Brown, eds.), American Society of Mammalogists (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, C. A., 1976, Evolution of mammalian cheek pouches and a possibly discontinuous origin of a higher taxon (Geomyoidea), Am. Nat. 110: 1093–1097.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Løvtrup, S., 1981a, Introduction to evolutionary epigenetics, in: Evolution Today (G. G. E. Scudder and J. L. Reveal, eds.), pp. 139–144, Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation, Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Løvtrup, S., 1981b, The epigenetic utilization of the genomic message, in: Evolution Today (G. G. E. Scudder and J. L. Reveal, eds.), pp. 145–161, Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation, Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mares, M. A., 1983, Desert rodent adaptation and community structure, Great Basin Nat. Mem. 7: 30–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith, J., Burian, R., Kauffman, S., Alberch, P., Campbell, J., Goodwin, B., Lande, R., Raup, D., and Wolpert, L., 1985, Developmental constraints and evolution, Q. Rev. Biol. 60: 265–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E., 1983, How to carry out the adaptationist program?, Am. Nat. 12: 324–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKinney, M. L., 1984, Allometry and heterochrony in an Eocene echinoid lineage: Morphological change as a by-product of size selection, Paleobiology 10: 407–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNamara, K. J., 1986, A guide to a nomenclature of heterochrony, J. Paleontol. 60: 4–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, C. H., 1891, Description of a new genus and species dwarf kangaroo rat from Nevada (Microdipodops magacephalus), N. Am. Fauna 5: 115–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nowak, R. M., and Paradiso, J. L., 1983, Walker’s Mammals of the World, 4th ed., Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Farrell, M. J., and Blaustein, A. R., 1974, Microdipodops magacephalus, Mamm. Species 46: 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rachootin, S. P., and Thomson, K. S., 1981, Epigenetics, paleontology, and evolution, in: Evolution Today (G. G. E. Scudder and J. L. Reveal, eds.), pp. 181–193, Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation, Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romer, A. S., 1966, Vertebrate Paleontology, 3rd ed., University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutledge, J. J., Eisen, E. J., and Legates, J. E., 1975, Correlated response in skeletal traits and replicate variation in selected lines of mice, Theor. Appl. Genet. 46:26–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, J. M., 1986, Comparative morphology and evolution of cheek pouches in rodents, J. Morphol. 190: 27–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, G. G., 1944, Tempo and Mode in Evolution, Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, G. G., 1953, The Major Features of Evolution, Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van De Graaff, K. M., 1973, Comparative development osteology in three species of desert rodents, Peromyscus eremicus, Perognathus intermedius, and Dipodomys merriami, J. Mammal. 54: 729–741.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Waddington, C. H., 1957, The Strategy of the Genes, Allen and Unwin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddington, C. H., 1962, New Patterns in Genetics and Development, Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, D. B., and Webster, M., 1975, Auditory systems of Heteromyidae: Functional morphology and evolution of the middle ear, J. Morphol. 146: 343–376.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, A. E., 1935, Evolution and relationship of the heteromyid rodents with new forms from the territory of western Northern America, Ann. Carnegie Mus. 24: 73–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wootton, J. T., 1987, The effects of body mass, phylogeny, habitat, and trophic level on mammalian age at first reproduction, Evolution 41: 732–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zakrzewski, R. J., 1981, Kangaroo rats from the Borchers Local Fauna, Blancan, Meade County, Kansas, Trans. Kansas Acad. Sci. 84: 78–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hafner, J.C., Hafner, M.S. (1988). Heterochrony in Rodents. In: McKinney, M.L. (eds) Heterochrony in Evolution. Topics in Geobiology, vol 7. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0795-0_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0795-0_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-0797-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-0795-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics