Skip to main content

Putting Sustainability into Practice in Agricultural Research for Development

  • Chapter
Systems for Sustainability

Abstract

Within scientists’ research practices for improving agricultural resource management, their use of concepts of sustainability remains problematic. Sustainability means different things to different people, and in different contexts; it is ambiguous (Allen, 1993; MacLeod and Taylor, 1993, 1994) and contentious (Ison and Humphreys, 1993; Penman, 1994). Linguistic and communication analyses are providing convincing evidence that meanings of sustainability emerge from within the human communication environment (Penman, 1994; Shulman, 1996a,b). They argue that this environment is dynamic and, to a large extent, indeterminate. Penman (1994, in press) and Shulman (1996a; also, Shulman and Martinek, in press) have taken this further, suggesting that good scientist-constituent communication practices need to acknowledge that, because the situation is unique for each participant in time and space, differences in meanings will be the norm. Good negotiation uses this indeterminacy to open up possibilities for examining the adequacy of specific sustainability concepts in use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, P. (ed.), 1993, Food for the Future. Conditions and Contradictions of Sustainability, Wiley: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alston, J.M., Norton, G.W., and Pardey, P.G., 1995, Science Under Scarcity: Principles and Practice for Agricultural Research Evaluation and Priority Setting, Cornell University Press: Ithaca.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayres, R.U., 1996, Statistical measures of unsustainability, Ecological Economics 16:239–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, V., Payne, R., and Steiner, R. (eds.), 1995, Agricultural Sustainability: Economic, Environmental and Statistical Considerations, Wiley: Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckerman, W, 1995, Small is Stupid. Blowing the Whistle on the Greens, Duckworth: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway, G.R., 1987, The properties of agroecosystems, Agricultural Systems 24:95–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costanza, R., and Patten, B.C., 1995, Defining and predicting sustainability, Ecological Economics 15:193–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, P.G., MacLeod, N.D., Ridge, P.E., and Shulman, A.D., 1996, Reengineering agricultural R, D&E to support management decision-making: problems and prospects, Proc. 8th Aust. Agronomy Conf, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland (30 Jan–2 Feb 1996), Aust. Soc. of Agronomy, Carlton, pp. 168-171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, J.W., 1996, Is agricultural sustainability a useful concept?, Agricultural Systems 50:117–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, L.W., 1992, Measuring sustainability: issues and alternatives, J. for Farming Systems Research-Extension 3(1): 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ison, R., and Humphreys, C., 1993, Evaluation of’ sustainable Beef Productions Systems in Central Queensland’ Project, Dept of Crop Sciences, University of Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelada, J.N., 1996, Integrating Reengineering with Total Quality, ASQC Quality Press: Milwaukee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, T.G., Ryan, J.G., and Patel, B.K., 1995, Applied participatory priority setting in international agricultural research: making trade-offs transparent and explicit, Agricultural Systems 49:177–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kula, E., 1994, Economics of Natural Resources, the Environment and Politics. 2nd ed.: Chapman & Hall, London.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard-Barton, D., 1995, Wellsprings of Knowledge: Building and Sustaining the Sources of Innovation, Harvard Business School Press: Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynam, J.K., and Herdt, R.W., 1988, Sense and sustainability: sustainability as an objective in international agricultural research, Paper for CIP-Rockefeller Foundation Conference on Farmers and Food Systems, Lima, Peru.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLeod, N.D., and Taylor, J.A., 1993, Sustainable grazing practices in Queensland, Australian Farm Manager 3(6):6–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLeod, N.D., and Taylor, J.A., 1994, Perceptions of beef cattle producers and scientists relating to sustainable land use issues and their implications for technology transfer, The Rangeland Journal 16:238–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macleod, N.D., and Shulman, A.D., Bridging the output-outcome gap in sustainability R&D — a fifth generation R&D punctuated arena model, Proc. 5th International UKSS Conference (7–11 July, 1997), United Kingdom Systems Society, Milton Keynes, in press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milon, J.W, and Shogren, J.F. (eds.), 1995, Integrating Economic and Ecological Indicators: Practical Methods for Environmental Policy Analysis, Praeger Press, Westport.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monteith, J.L., 1990, Can sustainability be quantified? Indian Journal of Dryland Agricultural Research and Development 5(1/2): 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norgaard, R.B., 1995, Metaphors we might survive by, Ecological Economics 15:129–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parton, K. A., 1996, Quality, quality assurance and quality improvement in agronomic research, Proc. 8th Aust. Agronomy Conf., University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland (30 Jan — 2 Feb 1996), Aust. Soc. of Agron., Carlton, pp. 43-46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penman, R., 1994, Environmental matters and communication challenges, Aust, J. of Communication 21(3):26–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penman, R., The researcher in communication: the primary research position, in: Context and Communication Behavior (J. Owen, ed.), Context Press, Reno, in press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penn, J., 1990, Towards an ecologically-based society: a Rawlsian perspective, Ecological Economics 2:225–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price, C., 1993, Time, Discounting and Value, Blackwell: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabl, A., 1996, Discounting of long-term costs: What would future generations prefer us to do? Ecological Economics 17:137–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P.M., 1990, The Fifth Discipline: the Art and Practice of the Learning Organization, Doubleday: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, A.D., 1996a, Communicating science: opportunities and constraints for a scientist, in: Science Communication (D. Sless, ed.), pp. 55–68, Communication Research Press, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, A.D., 1996b, Putting group information technology in its place: communication and good work group performance, in: Handbook of Organisation Studies (S.R. Clegg, C. Handy, and W. Nord, eds.), pp. 357–374, Sage Publications, Newbury Park.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, A. D., and Martinek, T., Managing institutional collaboration in catchment systems research, in: Farming Action: Catchment Reaction (J. Williams, ed.), CSIRO, Canberra, in press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, P.B., 1992, The varieties of sustainability, Agric, Human Values 9(3): 11–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dieren, W., 1995, Taking Nature into Account: A Report to the Club of Rome, Springer-Verlag: New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cox, P.G., MacLeod, N.D., Shulman, A.D. (1997). Putting Sustainability into Practice in Agricultural Research for Development. In: Stowell, F.A., Ison, R.L., Armson, R., Holloway, J., Jackson, S., McRobb, S. (eds) Systems for Sustainability. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0265-8_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0265-8_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-0267-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-0265-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics