Abstract
Confocal scanning microscopes are particularly attractive by virtue of their enhanced lateral resolution, purely coherent image formation (in reflection) and optical sectioning (Wilson and Sheppard, 1984). It is probably the latter property that is most useful, as it gives rise to the ability to image a thick specimen in three dimensions. This is possible because the optical system detects information only from a thin region in the neighborhood of the focal plane. This permits us to store many image slices in a computer to give a three-dimensional (3D) data set that describes the object. Many sophisticated computer software systems are now available to display these data in various ways. Obvious examples include the extended-focus technique (Wilson and Hamilton, 1982), in which we merely add up (integrate) the images from various depths to provide an image of greatly extended depth of field. We may also produce images in which object height is coded as brightness, or combine the whole data set to provide an isometric view of the object (Fig. 1). It is also possible to use false color to label features of interest or, by simple processing, to obtain stereoscopic pairs (van der Voort, et al., 1985).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Awamura, D., Ode, T., and Tonezawa, M., 1987, Colour laser microscope, SPIED 765:53–60.
Corle, T.R., Chou, C.H., and Kino, G.S., 1986, Depth response of confocal optical microscopes, Opt. Lett. 11:770–772.
Cox, I.J., and Sheppard, C. J.R., 1986, Image capacity and resolution in an optical system, J. Opt. Soc. Am (A) 3:1152–1158.
Egger, M.D., and Petráň, M., 1967, New reflected light microscope for viewing unstained brain and ganglian cells, Science 157:305–308.
Hamilton, D.K., and Wilson, T., 1982a, Surface profile measurement using the confocal microscope, J. Appl. Phys. 53:5320–5322.
Hamilton, D.K., and Wilson, T., 1982b, Three dimensional surface measurement using the confocal scanning microscope, Appl. Phys. B 27:211–213.
Juskaitis, R., and Wilson, T., 1992a, Differential confocal scanning microscope using a two mode fibre, Appl. Opt. 31:898–902.
Juskaitis, R., and Wilson, T., 1992b, Imaging in reciprocal fibre-optic based confocal scanning microscopes, Opt. Commun. 92:315–325.
Juskaitis, R., and Wilson, T., 1992c, Surface profiling with scanning optical microscopes using two-mode optical fibres, Appl. Opt. 31:4569–4574.
Juskaitis, R., Reinholz, F., and Wilson, T., 1992, Fibre-optic based confocal scanning microscopy with semiconductor laser excitation and detection, Electron. Lett. 28:986–987.
Juskaitis, R., Rea, N.P., and Wilson, T., 1993a, Fibre optic based confocal scanning microscopy using laser detection. Opt. Commun. 99:105–113.
Juskaitis, R., Wilson, T. and Reinholtz, F., 1993b, Spatial filtering by laser detection in confocal microscopy, Opt. Lett. 18:1135–1137.
Kimura, S., and Wilson, T., 1991, Confocal scanning optical microscopes using single mode fibre for signal detection, Appl. Opt. 30:2143–2150.
Koester, C.J., 1980, A scanning mirror microscope with optical sectioning characteristics: Applications in ophthalmology, Appl. Opt. 19:1749.
Mathews, H.J., 1987, Confocal microscopy, D.Phil thesis, Oxford University, Oxford.
Schutt, W., 1988, Type III microscopy. In: Proceedings of a Conference on Physical Characterisation of Biological Cells, Rostock, Germany.
Sheppard, C.J.R., and Wilson T., 1981a, The theory of the direct-view confocal microscope, J. Microsc. 124:107–117.
Sheppard, C.J.R., and Wilson, T., 1981b, Effects of high angles of convergence on V(z) in the scanning acoustic microscope, Appl. Phys. Lett. 38:858–859.
van der Voort, H.T.M., Brakenhoff, G. J., Valkenburg, J.A.C., and Nanninga, N., 1985, Design and use of a computer controlled confocal microscope, Scanning 7:66–78.
Wilson, T., 1989, Optical sectioning in confocal fluorescent microscopes, J. Microsc. 154:143–156.
Wilson, T., 1993a, Image formation in two-mode fibre based confocal microscopy, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 10:1535–1543.
Wilson, T., 1993b, Fluorescence imaging modes in fibre-optic based confocal scanning microscopes, Opt. Commun. 96:133–141.
Wilson, T., and Carlini, A.R., 1987, Size of the detector in confocal imaging systems, Opt. Lett. 12:227–229.
Wilson, T., and Carlini, A.R., 1988, Three dimensional imaging in confocal imaging systems with finite-sized detectors, J. Microsc. 149:51–66.
Wilson, T., and Carlini, A.R., 1989, The effect of aberrations on the axial response of confocal imaging-systems, J. Microsc. 154:243–256.
Wilson, T., and Hamilton, D.K., 1982, Dynamic focussing in the scanning microscope, J. Microsc. 128:139–143.
Wilson, T., and Hamilton, D.K., 1984, Differential confocal scanning micros copy, Opt. Acta 31:453–465.
Wilson, T., and Hewlett, S. J., 1991, Optical sectioning strength of the direct-view microscope employing finite-sized pin-hole arrays, J. Microsc. 163:131–150.
Wilson, T., and Sheppard, C.J.R., 1984, Theory and Practice of Scanning Optical Microscopy, Academic Press, London.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wilson, T. (1995). The Role of the Pinhole in Confocal Imaging System. In: Pawley, J.B. (eds) Handbook of Biological Confocal Microscopy. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5348-6_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5348-6_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-5350-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-5348-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive