Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Risk Perception Research

An Introduction

  • Chapter
Cross-Cultural Risk Perception

Part of the book series: Technology, Risk, and Society ((RISKGOSO,volume 13))

Summary

This first chapter provides a brief review of the present knowledge on risk perception and elucidates the psychological and social factors that shape the experience of risk. It aims at integrating the results of psychological, sociological, and cultural studies and presents the major findings of the social sciences as they seem relevant for a deeper understanding of risk and the role of risk perception for risk management. A second objective is to review comparative studies about risk perception in different cultures and nations and the approaches utilized in such research.

After discussing definitions of risk, two sections introduce the methodology of cross-cultural risk research. Two further sections deal with core substantive issues, including heuristics, hazard features, psychological facets of hazard appraisals, pertinent group processes and societal factors determining risk perception. Finally, the relevance and utilization of risk perception research for the public discourse about hazards and implications for managing risks are outlined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alhakami, A. S., Slovic, P. 1994. A psychological study of the inverse relationship between perceived risk and perceived benefit. Risk Analysis, 14, 1085–1096.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, F. W. 1987. Towards a holistic appreciation of risk: the challenge for communicators and policymakers. Science, Technology, and Human Values, 12, 138–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appelbaum, R. P. 1977. The future is made, not predicted: technocratic planners vs. public interests. Society, 5, 49–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arabie, P., Maschmeyer, C. 1988. Some current models for the perception and judgment of risk. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 41, 300–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bastide, S., Moatti, J.-P., Pages, J.-P., Fagnani, F. 1989. Risk perception and social acceptability of technologies: the french case. Risk Analysis, 9, 215–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bechmann, G. (Hg.) 1993. Risiko und Gesellschaft. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. 1992. Risk Society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage. Original: Beck, U.1986. Die Risikogesellschaft: auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellrose, C., Pilisuk, M. 1991. Vocational risk tolerance and perceptions of occupational hazards. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 12, 303–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binswanger, H. C. 1990. Neue Dimensionen des Risikos. Zeitschrift fir Umweltpolitik und Umweltrecht, 13, 103–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borcherding, K., Rohrmann, B., Eppel, T. 1986. A psychological study on the cognitive structure of risk evaluations. In: Brehmer, B., Jungermann, H., Lourens, P., Sevon, G. (Eds.): New directions in research on decision making, Amsterdam: North- Holland, 245–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bostrom, A. 1990. A mental models approach to exploring perceptions of hazardous processes. Diss. Carnegie Mellon University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bostrom, A., Fischhoff, B., Morgan, M. G. 1992. Characterizing mental models of hazardous processes: A methodology and an application to radon. Journal of Social Issues, 48, 85–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury, J. A. 1989. The policy implications of differing concepts of risk. Science, Technology, and Human Values, 14, 380–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brehmer, B. 1987. The psychology of risk. In: Singleton, W. T., Hoyden, J. (Eds.): Risk and decision, New York: Wiley, 25–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brehmer, B. 1994. Some notes on psychological research related to risk. In Brehmer, B., Sahlin, N. E. (Eds.): Future risks and risk management, pp. 79–91. Amsterdam: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brengelmann, J. C. 1991. Die Lust auf Spiel und Risiko. Zürich: Varia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. M. 1988. Psychological aspects of environmental risks from industrial and nuclear power plants. In: Sime, J. D. (Ed.): Safety in built environment, London, New York: E., F.N. Spon, 337–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brun, W. 1992. Cognitive components in risk perception: Natural versus manmade risks. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 5, 117–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, W. J., Clemen, R. T. 1993. Covariance structure models and influence diagrams. Management Science, 39, 816–834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, L. 1989, Acceptable risk: making decisions in a toxic environment. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohrssen, J. J., Covello, V. T. 1989. Risk analysis: a guide to principles and methods for analyzing health and environmental risks. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Council on Environmental Quality.

    Google Scholar 

  • Covello, V. T. 1983, The perception of technological risks: a literature review. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 23, 285–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Covello, V. T., McCallum, D. B., Pavlova, M. 1989. Effective risk communication. The role and responsibility of government and non-government organizations. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Covello, V. T.,, Merkhofer, M. W. 1993. Risk assessment methods: approaches for assessing health and environmental risk. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cvetkovich, G., Earle, T. C. 1991. Risk and culture. Special Issue, Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cvetkovich, G., Earle, T. C. 1992. Environmental hazards and the public. Journal of Social Issues, 48, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daele, W. van den 1993. Backgrounds to the perception of risks in genetic engineering: concepts of nature and the semantics of risk. In: Bayerische-Rueck (Ed.): Risk is a construct, München: Knesebeck, 157–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dake, K. 1991. Orienting dispositions in the perception of risk–An analysis of contemporary worldviews and cultural biases. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 22, 61–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dake, K. 1992. Myths of nature: Culture and the social construction of risk. Journal of Social issues, 48, 21–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M. 1966. Purity and Danger: Concepts of Pollution of Taboo. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M. 1985. Risk acceptability according to the social sciences. Russell Sage Foundation, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M., Wildaysky, A. 1982. Risk and culture: An essay on the selection of technical and environmental dangers. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drottz-Sjöberg, B. 1991. Risk perceptions and definitions of risk. In: Drottz-Sjöberg, B. (Ed.): Perceptions of Risk, Stockholm: Center for Risk Research, 163–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drottz-Sjöberg, B., Sjöberg, L. 1991. Adolescents attitudes to nuclear power and radioactive wastes. In: Drottz-Sjöberg, B. (Ed.): Perception of Risk, Stockholm: Center for Risk Research, 109–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. 1933, The division of labor in society. The Free Press, New York (orig. 1893 ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Earle, T. C., Lindell, M. K. 1984. Public perceptions of industrial risks: A free-response approach. In: Waller, R. A., Covello, V. T. (Eds.): Low-probability/high-consequence risk analysis, New York: Plenum Press, 531–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earle, T. C., Cvetkovich, G. 1988. Plattitudes and comparisons: A critique of current (wrong) directions in risk communication. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Society of Risk Analysis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, W., Winterfeldt, D. v. 1987. Public values in risk debates. Risk Analysis, 7, 141–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eiser, J. R., Hannover, B., Mann, L., Morin, M., Pligt, J. v. d., Webley, P. 1990. Nuclear attitudes after Chernobyl: A cross-national study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 10, 101–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Englander, T., Farago, K., Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B. 1986. A comparative analysis of risk perception in Hungary and the United States. Journal of Social Behavior, 1, 55–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evers, A., Nowotny, H. 1987. Über den Umgang mit Unsicherheit. Die Entdeckung der Gestaltbarkeit von Gesellschaft. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Femers, S. 1993. Information über technische Risiken. Bern: Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. 1957. A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press, Stanford CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiorino, D. J. 1989. Technical and democratic values in risk analysis. Risk Analysis, 9, 293–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, G. W., Morgan, M. G., Fischhoff, B., Nair, I., Lave, L. B. 1991. What risks are people concerned about? Risk Analysis, 11, 303–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff, B. 1989. Risk: a guide to controversy. In: National Research Council: Improving risk communication, Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, Appendix C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff, B. 1994. Acceptable risk: a conceptual proposal. Risk: Health, Safety, Environment, 5, 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff, B. 1996. Risk perception and communication unplugged: twenty years of process. Risk Analysis, 15, 137–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff, B., Slovic, P., Lichtenstein, S., READ, S., COMBS, B. 1978. How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes toward technological risk and benefits. Policy Science, 9, 127–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff, B., Slovic, R., Lichtenstein, S. 1981. Lay foibles and expert fables in judgements about risk. In: O’Riordan, T., Turner, R. K. (Eds.): Progress in resource management and environmental planning, Chichester: Wiley, 161–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff, B. Lichtenstein, S., Slovic, R, Derby, S. L. and Keeney, R. L. 1981. Acceptable risk. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff, B., Watson, S. R., Hope, C. 1984. Defining risk. Policy Sciences, 17, 123–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff, B., Bostrom, A., Quadrel, M. J. 1993. Risk perception and communication. Annual Review of Public Health, 14, 183–203.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Freudenburg, W. R. 1988. Perceived risk, real risk: social science and the art of probabilistic risk assessment. Science, 242, 44–49.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, G. T., Gould, L. C. 1989. Public perceptions of the risk and benefits of technology. Risk Analysis, 9, 2, 225–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goszcynska, M., Tyszka, T., Slovic, R. 1991. Risk perception in Poland: A comparison with three other countries. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 4, 179–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, L.C., Gardner, G.T. De Luca, D. R. Tiemann, A., Doob, L. W,, Stolwjik, J.A.J. 1988. Perceptions of technological risks and benefits. Russel Sage Foundation, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, R., Mendelsohn, R. 1993. Perceived risk, dread and benefits. Risk Analysis, 13, 259–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, R., Lichtenstein, S. 1994. A hint of risk: Tradeoffs between quantitative and qualitative risk factors. Risk Analysis, 14, 199–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerlin, B. 1991. Psychological perspectives on risk perception and response. In: Handmer, J., Dutton, B., Guerin, B., Smithson, M. (Eds.): New perspectives on uncertainty and risk, Canberra: ANU/ CRES, 79–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haller, M. 1990. Risiko-Management and Risiko-Dialog. In: Schuez, M. (Hg.): Risiko and Wagnis. Die Herausforderung der industriellen Welt, Pfullingen: Neske, 229–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handmer, J., Dutton, B., Guerin, B., Smithson, M. 1991. New perspectives on uncertainty and risk. Canberra: ANU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartenian, L. S., Bobko, R., Berger, P. K. 1993. An empirical validation of bipolar risk perception scaling methods. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 335–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heimer, C. A. 1988. Social structure, psychology, and the estimation of risk. Annual Review of Sociology, 14, 491–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillgartner, S. 1992. The social construction of risk objects: Or, how to pry open networks of risk. In: Short, J. F., Clarke, L. (Eds.): Organizations, Uncertainties and Risk, Westview, Boulder, Co., pp. 39–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinman, G. W., Rosa, E. A., Kleinhesselink, R. R., Lowinger, T. C. 1993. Perception of nuclear and other risks in Japan and the United States. Risk Analysis, 13, 449–456.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • HMSO, 1988. The tolerability of risk from nuclear power stations. Health and Safety Executive, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoefer, M. P., Raju, V. R. 1989. Technological risk perception: similarities and dissimilarities in french and american samples. In: Society for Risk Analysis (Ed.): Proceedings, Annual Meeting 1989, 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hohenemser, C., Kates, R. W., Slovic, P. 1983. The nature of technological hazards. Science, 220, 378–384.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Holtgrave, D., Weber, E. U. 1993. Dimensions of risk perception for financial and health risks. Risk Analysis, 13, 553–558.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Horvath, P., Zuckerman, M. 1992. Sensation seeking, risk appraisal and behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 14, 41–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IEC, 1993. Guidelines for risk analysis of technological systems. Report IEC-CD (Sec) 381 issued by the Technical Committee QMS/23. European Community, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jianguang, Z. 1994. Environmental hazards in the Chinese public’s eyes. Risk Analysis, 14, 163–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, B. B. 1987. The environmentalist movement and grip/group analysis: A modest critique. In: Covello, V. T. and Johnson, B. B. (Eds.): The social and cultural construction of risk, Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 147–178.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, B. B., Covello, V. T. (Eds.) 1987. The social and cultural construction of risk. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, E. J., Tversky, A. 1984. Representations and perceptions of risk. Journal of Experimental Psychology (General), 113, 55–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jungermann, H., Schuetz, H., Thuering, M. 1988. Mental models in risk assessment: Informing people about drugs. Risk Analysis, 8, 147–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jungermann, H., Kasperson, R. M., Wiedemann, P. M. (Eds.) 1988. Themes and tasks of risk communication (Proceedings of an International Workshop at the KFA Jülich). Jülich: KFAReport.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jungermann, H., Rohrmann, B., Wiedemann, P. 1991. Risikokontroversen - Konzepte, Konflikte, Kommunikation. Berlin etc.: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jungermann, H., Slovic, P. 1993. Characteristics of individual risk perception. In: BayerischeRueck (Ed.): Risk–a construct. München: Knesebeck, 85–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahnemann, D., Tversky, A. 1979. Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasperson, R. E., Kasperson, J. X. 1983. Determining the acceptability of risk: ethical and policy issues. In: Rogers, J. T. and Bates, D. V. (Eds.): Assessment and perception of risk to human health, Conference Proceedings, Royal Society of Canada, Ottawa, pp. 135–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasperson, R. E., Kasperson, J. X. 1987. Nuclear risk analysis in comparative perspective. Allen and Unwin, Winchester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasperson, R. E., Renn, O., Slovic, P., Brown, H. S. Eemel, J., Goble, R., Kasperson, J. X., Ratick, S. 1988. The social amplification of risk: a conceptual framework. Risk Analysis, 8, 177–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasperson, R. E., Stallen, P. M. (Eds.) 1990. Communicating risks to the public. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, R. 1993. Risk perception: the assessment of risks by experts and by lay people–a rational comparison? In: Bayerische-Rueck (Ed.): Risk–a construct, München: Knesebeck, 103–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keown, C. F. 1989. Risk perception of Hong Kongese versus Americans. Risk Analysis, 9, 401–407.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Klages, H. 1984. Wertorientierungen im Wandel. Rückblick, Gegenwartsanalyse, Prognose. Campus, Frankfurt/Main.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinhesselink, R. R., Rosa, E. A. 1991. Cognitive Representation of Risk Perceptions–A comparison of Japan and the United States. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 22, 11–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolluru, R. V. 1995. Risk assessment and management: a unified approach. In: Kolluru, R., Bartell, S., Pitblado, R. and Stricoff, S. (Eds.): Risk assessment and management handbook for environmental, health, and safety professionals, Mc-Graw-Hill: New York, pp. 1. 3–1. 41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolluru, R. V., Brooks, D. G. 1995. Integrated risk assessment and strategic management. In: Kolluru, R., Bartell, S., Pitblado, R. and Stricoff, S. (Eds.): Risk assessment and management handbook for environmental, health, and safety professionals, Mc-Graw-Hill: New York, pp. 2. 1–2. 23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leiss, W. (Ed.) 1990. Prospects and problems in risk communication. Waterloo: University of Waterloo Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenstein, S., Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., Combs, B. 1978. Judged frequency of lethal events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 551–578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipset, S. M., Schneider, W. 1983. The confidence gap, business, labor, and government in the public mind. The Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopes, L. L. 1983. Some thoughts on the psychological concept of risk. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 137–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopes, L. L. 1992. Risk perception and the perceived public. In: Bromley, D. W., Segerson, K. (Eds.): The social response to environmental risk, Dordrecht: Kluwer, 57–74.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Luce, R. D., Weber, E. U. 1986. An axiomatic theory of conjoint, expected risk. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 30, 188–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. 1973. Vertrauen: Ein Mechanismus der Reduktion sozialer Komplexität. Second Edition, Enke, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. 1980. Trust and power. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. 1986. Ökologische Kommunikation. Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. 1990. Technology, environment, and social risk: a systems perspective. Industrial Crisis Quarterly, 4, 223–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. 1993. Die Moral des Risikos und das Risiko der Moral. In: Bechmann, G. (Hg.): Technik und Gesellschaft, Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macgregor, D. 1991. Worry over technological activities and life concerns. Risk Analysis, 11, 315–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machlis, G., Rosa, E. A. 1990. Desired risk: Broadening the social amplification of risk framework. Risk Analysis, 10, 161–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz, J. 1991. Kommunikation über Risiken: Eine Problemskizze. Manuscript, University of Bielefeld, Bielefeld.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marris, C., Langford, I., O’Riordan, T. 1996. Integrating sociological and psychological approaches to public perceptions on environmental risks: Detailed results from a questionnaire survey. Norwich: University of East Anglia.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDaniels, T. L., Gregory, R. S. 1991. A framework for structuring cross-cultural research in risk and decision making. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 22, 103–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mechitov, A. I., Reblik, S. B. 1990. Studies of risk and safety perception in the USSR. In: Borcherding, K., Larichev, O. J., Mesick, D. M. (Eds.): Contemporary issues in decision making, Amsterdam: North-Holland, 261–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, M. G. 1990. Choosing and managing technology-induced risks. In: Glickman, T. S.,Gough, M. (Eds.), Readings in risk, Resources for the Future, Washington D.C., pp. 5–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullet, E., Duquesnoy, C., Raiff, P., Fahrasmane, R., Namur, E. 1993. The evaluative factor of risk perception. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 1594–1605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council, Committee on the Institutional Means for Assessment of Risks to Public Health 1983. Risk assessment in the Federal Government: managing the process. National Academy of Sciences, National Academy Press, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelkin, D. 1982. Blunders in the business of risk. Nature, 298, 775–776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyland, L. G. 1993. Risk perception in Brazil and Sweden. Stockholm School of Economics: Centre for Risk Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Riordan, T. 1983. The cognitive and political dimensions of risk analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 3, 345–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otway, H., Thomas, K. 1982. Reflections on risk perception and policy. Risk Analysis, 2, 6982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. E. 1960. Pattern variables revisited. American Sociological Review, 25, 467–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perusse, M. 1980. Dimensions of perception and recognition of danger. Birmingham: Diss., Univ. of Aston. (cited from Slovic, P. 1991 )

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, E., Slovic, P. 1996. The role of affect and worldviews as orienting dispositions in the perception and acceptance of nuclear power. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26, 1427 1453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, H. P. 1991: Warner oder Angstmacher? Thema Risikokommunikation. In: K. Mertens; S. J. Schmidt, S. Weischenberg (Hg.) Funkkolleg ‘Medien und Kommunikation’ Konstruktionen von Wirklichkeit. Studienbrief 9. Weinheim, Basel: Beltz, 74–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, H. P. 1999: Das Bedürfnis nach Kontrolle der Gentechnik und das Vertrauen in wissenschaftliche Experten. In: J. Hampel, O. Renn (Hg.): Gentechnik in der Öffentlichkeit. Wahrnehmung und Bewertung einer umstrittenen Technologie. Frankfurt/Main: Campus, 225–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petty, R. E, Cacioppo, E. 1986. The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 123–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pidgeon, N., Hood, C., Jones, D., Turner, B., Gibson, R. 1992. Risk perception. In: The Royal Society: Risk Analysis, perception and management, London, 89–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plough, A., Krimsky, S. 1987. The emergence of risk communication studies in science and political context. Science, Technology and Human Values, 12, 4–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollatsek, A., Tversky, A. 1970. A theory of risk. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 7, 540553.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puy, A., Aragones, J. I. 1994. Risk perception and the management of emergencies (Paper presented at the 23rd International Congress of Applied Psychology). Madrid: Dept. of Psychology, Univ. of Madrid.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, S. 1987. Risk and relativism in science for policy. In: Covello, V. T., Johnson, B. B. (Eds.), The social and cultural construction of risk, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 5–23.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, S. 1992. Cultural theory and risk analysis. In: Krimsky, S., Golding, D. (Eds.): Social theories of risk, Westport: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, S., Cantor, R. 1987. How fair is safe enough? The cultural approach to societal technology choice. Risk Analysis, 7 (1), 3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renn, O. 1983. Technology, risk and public perception. Angewandte Systemanalyse, 4, 50–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renn, O. 1986. Risk perception: a systematic review of concepts and research results. In: Miller,C. T., Kleindorfer, R. P., Munn, R. E. (Eds.): Conceptual trends and implications for risk research, Laxenburg: International Inst. for Applied System Analysis, 257–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renn, O. 1990a. Risk perception and risk management. Part 1: The intuitive mechanism of risk perceptions. Risk Abstracts 7, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renn, O. 1990b. Risk perception and risk management. Part 2: From risk perception to risk management. Risk Abstracts, 8, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renn, O. 1991. Risk communication and the social amplification of risk. In: Kasperson, R. E.,Stallen, R. J. (Eds.): Communicating risk to the public, Dodrecht: Kluwer, pp. 287–324.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Renn, O. 1992a. Concepts of risk: a classification. In: Krimsky, S., Golding, D. (Eds.), Social theories of risk, Praeger, Westport, CT, pp. 53–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renn, O. 1992b. The social arena concept of risk debates. In: Krimsky, S., Golding, D. (Eds.), Social theories of risk, Praeger, Westport, CT, pp. 170–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renn, O. 1992c. Risk communication: towards a rational discourse with the public. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 29, 465–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renn, O. 1993. Technik und gesellschaftliche Akzeptanz: Herausforderungen der Technikfolgenabschaetzung. GAIA, 2, 67–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renn, O. 1995. Style of using scientific expertise: a comparative framework. Science and Public Policy, 22, 147–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renn, O., Swaton, E. 1984. Psychological and sociological approaches to study risk perception. Environment International, 10, 557–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renn, O., Levine, D. 1991. Trust and credibility in risk communication. In: Kasperson, R., Stallen, P. J. (Eds.): Communicating risk to the public, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 175–218.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Renn, O. Burns, W. Kasperson, R. E. Kasperson, J.X, Slovic, P. 1992. The social amplification of risk: theoretical foundations and empirical application. Social Issues, 48, No. 4, Special Issue: Public Responses to Environmental Hazards, 137–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohrmann, B. 1991. Akteure der Risiko-Kommunikation. In: Jungermann, H., Rohrmann, B., Wiedemann, P. M. (Hg.): Risikokontroversen–Konzepte, Konflikte, Kommunikation, Berlin etc.: Springer, 355–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohrmann, B. 1991. Psychologische Risikoforschung. In: Frey, D. (Hg.): Bericht über den 37. Kongress der DGfPs, Göttingen: Hogrefe, 393–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohrmann, B. 1991. Risks and benefits of individual activities and living conditions - a cross-cultural comparison (Research Report). Hamilton/NZ: University of Waikato.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohrmann, B. 1992. The evaluation of risk communication effectiveness. Acta Psychologica, 81, 169–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohrmann, B. 1993. Risk management by setting standards. In: Bayerische-Rueck (Ed.): Risk as a construct, München: Knesebeck, 293–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohrmann, B. 1994. Risk perception of different societal groups: Australian findings and cross-national comparisons. Australian Journal of Psychology, 46, 150–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohrmann, B. 1995. Technological risks: Perception, evaluation, communication. In: Mechlers, R. E., Stewart, M. G. (Eds.): Integrated risk assessment: Current practice and new directions, Rotterdam: Balkema, 7–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohrmann, B. 1998. The risk notion - epistemological and empirical considerations. In Melchers, R. (Ed.): Integrative risk assessment II. Rotterdam: Balkema.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohrmann, B. 1999. Risk perception research: Review and documentation. Update, Studies in Risk Communication vol. 69. Available on the WWW; URL = http://www.kfa-juelich.de/mut/hefte/heft_69.pdf. Juelich: Research Center Juelich.

  • Rohrmann, B., Chen, H. 1999. Risk perception in Australia and China: an exploratory cultural study. Journal of Risk Research 2 (3), 219–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosa, E. A. 1996. Metatheoretical foundations for post-normal risk. Paper presented at the SRAEurope Meeting, Manuscript, University of Surrey, Guildford, June 3–5, 1996 [Department of Sociology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, L.D. 1977. The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: distortions in the attribution process. In: Berkowitz, L. (Ed.): Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 10, Random House, New York, pp. 173–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuez, M. (Hg.) 1990. Risiko and Wagnis. Die Herausforderung der industriellen Welt. Pfullingen: Neske.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuetz, H. in prep. Die Struktur von Risikowahrnehmung - Anwendung von Strukturgleichungsmodellen. Jülich: KFA/MUT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, M., Thompson, M. 1990. Divided we stand: redefining politics, technology, and social choice. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Short, J. F. 1984. The social fabric of risk: toward the social transformation of risk analysisAmerican Sociological Review, 9, 711–725.

    Google Scholar 

  • Short, J. F. 1989. On defining, describing, and explaining elephants (and reactions to them): hazards, disasters, and risk analysis. Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 7, 397–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjöberg, L. (Ed.) 1987. Risk and society. London: Allen, Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjöberg, L. 1995. How cognitive is risk perception? A discussion of the psychometric and cultural theory approaches. Paper presented to the 4th European Congress of Psychology, Athens, 2–7 July, 1995. Center for Risk Research, Stockholm School of Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjöberg, L. 1996. A discussion of the limitations of the psychometric and cultural theory approaches to risk perception. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 68, 219–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sjöberg, L. 1997. Explaining risk perception: An empirical evaluation of cultural theory. Risk Decision and Policy, 2, 113–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P. 1987. Perception of risk. Science, 236, 280–285.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P. 1991. Beyond numbers: A broader perspective on risk perception and risk communication. In: Mayo, D., Hollander, R. D. (Eds.): Acceptable evidence: Science and values in risk management, New York: Oxford University Press, 48–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P. 1992. Perception of risk: Reflections on the psychometric paradigm. In: Golding, D., Krimsky, S. (Eds.): Theories of risk, London: Praeger, 117–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., Lichtenstein, S. 1980. Facts and fears–understanding risk. In: Schwing, R. C., Albers, W. A. (Eds.): Societal risk assessment, New York: Plenum, 181–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P. Fischhoff, B., Lichtenstein, S. 1981. Perceived risk: psychological factors and social implications. In: Royal Society (Ed.): Proceedings of the Royal Society, Report A376, Royal Society, London, pp. 17–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., Lichtenstein, S. 1982. Why study risk perception. Risk Analysis, 2, 83–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., Lichtenstein, S. 1985. Characterizing perceived risk. In: Kates, R. W., Hohenemser, C., Kasperson, J. X. (Eds.): Perilous progress: managing the hazards of technology, Boulder: Westview, 91–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., Lichtenstein, S. 1986. The psychometric study of risk perceptions. In: Covello, V. T., Menkes, J., Mumpower, J. (Eds.): Risk evaluation and management, New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokolowska, J., Tyszka, T. 1995. Perception and acceptance of technological and environmental risks: Why are poor countries less concerned? Risk Analysis, 15, 733–744.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Starr, C. 1969. Social benefit versus technological risk. Science, 165, 1232–1238.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Starr, C., Whipple, C. 1991. The strategic defense initiative and nuclear proliferation from a risk analysis perspective. In: Shubik, M. (Ed.): Risk, organizations, and society, Kluwer: Dordrecht, pp. 49–61.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, P. C., Fineberg, V. 1996. Understanding risk: informed decisions in a democratic society. National Research Council, Committee on Risk Characterization (Ed.), National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swaton, E., Renn, O. 1984. Attitudes towards nuclear power: a comparison between three nations. Laxenburg: Institute for Applied System Analysis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teigen, K. H., Brun, W., Slovic, P. 1988. Societal risks as seen by a Norwegian public. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 1, 111–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, K., Maurer, D. Fishbein, M., Orway, H.J., Hinkle, R., Simpson, D. A. 1980. Comparative study of public beliefs about five energy systems. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Report 80–15, IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, M. 1980. An outline of the cultural theory of risk, Working Paper of the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, WP-80–177, IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, M., Ellis, W., Wildaysky, A. 1990. Cultural theory. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiemann, A. R., Tiemann, J. J. 1985. Cognitive maps of risk and benefit perceptions. In: Whipple, C., Covello, V. T. (Eds.): Risk analysis in the private sector, New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyszka, T., Goszcynska, M. 1993. What verbal reports say about risk perception. Acta Psychologica, 83, 53–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vlek, C. A. J. 1996. A multi-level, multi-stage and multi-attribute perspective on risk assessment, decision-making, and risk control. Risk, Decision, and Policy, 1, 9–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vlek, C., Stallen, P. J. 1980. Rational and personal aspects of risk. Acta Psychologica, 45, 273–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vlek, C. A. J., Stallen, P. J. 1981. Judging risks and benefits in the small and in the large. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 28, 235–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vlek, C., Cvetkovich, G. (Eds.) 1989. Social decision methodology for technological projects. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vlek, C., Keren, G. 1992. Behavioral decision and environmental risk management: Assessment and resolution of four `survival’ dilemmas. Acta Psychologica, 80, 249–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waterstone, M. (Ed.) 1991. Risk and society: The interation of science, technology and public policy. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiedemann, P. M. 1993. Tabu, Sünde, Risiko: Veränderungen der gesellschaftlichen Wahrnehmung von Gefährdungen. In: Bayerische Rückversicherung (Hg.): Risiko ist ein Konstrukt. Wahrnehmungen zur Risikowahrnehmung, München: Knesebeck, pp. 43–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiedemann, P. M., Femers, S., Hennen, L. 1991. Bürgerbeteiligung bei entsorgungswirtschaftlichen Vorhaben. Berlin: Erich Schmidt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiedemann, P. M., Kresser, R. M. 1997. Intuitive Risikobewertung - Strategien der Bewertung von Umweltrisiken. Jülich: Forschungszentrum (MUT-Texte 62 ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildaysky, A. 1988. Searching for safety. New Jersey: Transaction Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildaysky, A. 1993. The comparative study of risk perception: a beginning. In: Bayerische Rueck: Risk–a construct, München: Knesebeck, 179–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildaysky, A., Dake, K. 1990. Theories of risk perception: Who fears what and why? Daedalus, 119, 41–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winterfeldt, D. v., Edwards, W. 1984. Patterns of conflicts about risky technologies. Risk Analysis, 4, 55–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yates, J. F., Stone, E. 1992. The risk construct. In: Yates, J. F. (Ed.): Risk-taking behavior, Chichester: Wiley, 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia

    Bernd Rohrmann

  2. Center of Technology Assessment, Stuttgart, Germany

    Ortwin Renn

Authors
  1. Bernd Rohrmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ortwin Renn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Technology Assessment, Stuttgart, Germany

    Ortwin Renn

  2. University of Melbourne, Australia

    Bernd Rohrmann

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rohrmann, B., Renn, O. (2000). Risk Perception Research. In: Renn, O., Rohrmann, B. (eds) Cross-Cultural Risk Perception. Technology, Risk, and Society, vol 13. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4891-8_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4891-8_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-4961-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-4891-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation