Abstract
This paper develops a general approach to risk management in military applications involving uncertainties in information and distributions. The risk of loss, damage, or failure is measured by the Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) measure. Loosely speaking, CVaR with the confidence level α estimates the risk of loss by averaging the possible losses over the (1 - α) · 100% worst cases (e.g., 10%). As a function of decision variables, CVaR is convex and therefore can be efficiently controlled/optimized using convex or (under quite general assumptions) linear programming. The general methodology was tested on two Weapon-Target Assignment (WTA) problems. It is assumed that the distributions of random variables in the WTA formulations are not known with certainty. The total cost of a mission (including weapon attrition) was minimized, while satisfying operational constraints and ensuring destruction of all targets with high probabilities. The risk of failure of the mission (e.g., targets are not destroyed) is controlled by CVaR constraints. The case studies conducted show that there are significant qualitative and quantitative differences in solutions of deterministic WTA and stochastic WTA problems.
This work was partially supported by the Air Force grant F49620-01-1-0338.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
C. Acerbi and D. Tasche, “On the coherence of expected shortfall”, Working paper, download from http://www.gloriamundi.org, 2001.
P. Artzner, F. Delbaen, J.-M. Eber, and D. Heath, “Coherent measures of risk”, Mathematical Finance, 9: 203–228, 1999.
G. G. denBroeger, R. E. Ellison and L. Emerling, “On optimum target assignments”, Operations Research, 7: 322–326, 1959.
A. Golodnikov, P. Knopov, P. Pardalos, and S. Uryasev, “Optimization in the space of distribution functions and applications in the bayesian analysis”, In S. Uryasev, editor, Probabilistic Constrained Optimization: Methodology and Applications, pp. 102–131, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000.
A. S. Manne, “A target assignment problem”, Operations Research, 6: 346–351, 1958.
R. Murphey, “An approximate algorithm for a stochastic weapon target assignment problem”, In P. Pardalos, editor, Approximation and Com-plexity in Numerical Optimization: Continuous and Discrete Problems, 1999.
R. T. Rockafellar and S. Uryasev, “Optimization of Conditional Value-at-Risk”, Journal of Risk, 2: 21–41, 2000.
R. T. Rockafellar and S. Uryasev, “Conditional Value-at-Risk for general loss distributions”, Research Report 2001-5. ISE Dept., Univ. of Florida, 2001.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Krokhmal, P., Murphey, R., Pardalos, P., Uryasev, S., Zrazhevski, G. (2003). Robust Decision Making: Addressing Uncertainties in Distributions. In: Butenko, S., Murphey, R., Pardalos, P.M. (eds) Cooperative Control: Models, Applications and Algorithms. Cooperative Systems, vol 1. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3758-5_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3758-5_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-5241-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-3758-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive