Abstract
The recent surge of research on ELF electromagnetic radiation has devoted much concern to behavioral effects on animals. Frequently, the rationale for this research has been to reveal effects of ELF fields on physiological substrates manifested by the measured behavior. While this goal is laudable, such an approach often ignores the rich but orderly fabric of the primary dependent variable — behavior. The physiological bases of all but the simplest behaviors are, at best, obscure and likely to remain so in the absence of careful specification of the environmental variables of which behavior is a function. Thus analyses of the effects of ELF electromagnetic radiation (as well as other agents) on behavior should be pursued in its own right without the necessity to physiologize. Appropriately identified behavioral effects of ELF fields might prove of enormous significance. For example, Marr, Rivers, & Burns (1973) noted: “Considering the ubiquity of ELF electromagnetic fields of low intensity it is of considerable biological interest to determine whether they are detectable by organisms. If a species of organism could detect the presence of such fields, it might imply that natural fields play a role in controlling significant behaviors of the species.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
ALTMANN, G., Die physiologische Wirkung elektrischer Felder auf Organismen. Avohiv. fuer Meteorologie, Geophysik und Bioklimatologie, 1969, 17, 269–290.
AUTOR, S.M., The strength of conditioned reinforcers as a function of frequency and probability of reinforcement. In: D.P. Hendry (Ed.), Conditioned reinforcement. Homewood, I11: Dorsey Press, 1969. Pp. 127–162.
BARNOTHY, M. (Ed.), Biological effects of magnetic fields. New York: Plenum Press, 1964, 1969. 2 vols.
CATANIA, A.C., Concurrent operants. In: Werner K. Honig (Ed.), Operant behavior: Areas of research and opplication. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1966. Pp. 213–270.
CATANIA, A.C., Reinforcement schedules and psychophysical judgments: A study of some temporal properties of behavior. In: W.N. Schoenfeld (Ed.), The theory of reinforcement schedules. New York: Appleton- Century-Crof ts, 1970. Pp. 1–42.
DE LORGE, J., Operant behavior of rhesus monkeys in the presence of extremely low frequency-low intensity magnetic and electric fields: Experiment 1. NAMRL-1155. Pensacola, Florida: Naval Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory, 1972.
DE LORGE, J., Operant behavior of rhesus monkeys in the presence of extremely low frequency — low intensity magnetic and electric fields: Experiment 2. NAMRL-1179. Pensacola, Florida: Naval Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory, 1973, in press, (a)
DE LORGE, J., Operant behavior of rhesus monkeys in the presence of extremely low frequency — low intensity magnetic and electric fields. Experiment 3. Pensacola, Florida: Naval Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory, 1973, in preparation, (b)
DEWS, P.B., Psychopharmacology. In: A.J. Bachrach (Ed.) Experimental foundations of otiniodl psychology. New York: Basic Books, Inc., 1962. Pp. 423–441.
DEWS, P.B., The theory of fixed-interval responding. In: W.N. Schoenfeld (Ed.), The theory of reinforcement schedules. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1970. Pp. 43–61.
ESTES, W.K., & SKINNER, B.F., Some quantitative properties of anxiety. Journal of Experimental Fsyohologyy 1941, 29, 390–400.
FERSTER, C.B., & SKINNER, B.F., Schedules of reinforcement. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1957.
FRAENKEL, G.S., & GUNN, D.L., The orientation of animals. New York: Dover Publications, Inc., 1961.
FRIEDMAN, H., BECKER, R.O., & BACHMAN, C.H., Effect of magnetic fields on reaction time performance. Nature, 1967, 213, 949–956.
GAVALAS, R.J., WALTER, D.O., HAMER, J., & ADEY, W.R., Effect of low-level low-frequency electric fields on EEG and behavior in Macaca nemestrina. Brain Research. 1970, 18, 491–501.
GRISSETT, J.D., Exposure of squirrel monkeys for long periods to extremely low-frequency magnetic fields: Central- nervous-system effects as measured by reaction time. NAMRL-1146. Pensacola, Florida: Naval Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory, 1971.
GRISSETT, J.D., & DE LORGE, J., Central-nervous-system effects as measured by reaction time in squirrel monkeys exposed for short periods to extremely low- frequency magnetic fields. NAMRL-1137. Pensacola, Florida: Naval Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory, 1971.
HERRNSTEIN, R., Quantitative hedonism. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 1971, 8, 399–412.
HONIG, W.K. (Ed.) Operant behavior: Areas of research and application. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1966.
KELLEHER, R.T., & MORSE, W.H., Determinants of the specificity of behavioral effects of drugs, Ergebnisse Der Physiologie, 1968, 60, 1–56.
KHOLODOV, Y., The effect of electromagnetic and magnetic fields on the central nervous system. Translation: NASATT F465. Washington, D.C.: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1967.
KING, N., JUSTESEN, D., & CLARK, R., Behavioral sensitivity to microwave irradiation.Science, 1971, 172, 398–400.
KÖNIG, H.L., Uber den Einfluss besonders niederfrequenter elektrischer Vorgange in der Atmosphäre auf die Umwelt. Zeitschrift fuer Angewandte Baeder-und Klimaheitkunde, 1962, 9, 481–501.
KRAMER, T., & RILLING, M., Differential reinforcement of low rates: A selective critique. Psychological Bulletin, 1970, 4, 225–254.
LA FORGE, H. Effet d’un champ magnetique de 800 gauss sur un comportement appris, 1973, in preparation. Cited by M.A. Persinger, H.W. Ludwig, & K-P. Ossenkopp. Psychophysiological effects of extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields: A review. Perception and Motor Skills, 1973, 36, 1140.
LEITENBERG, H., Conditioned acceleration and conditioned suppression in pigeons. Journal of the Eo:perimental Analysis of Behavior, 1966,9, 205–209.
LUDWIG, W., & MECKE, R., Wirkung kunstlicher Atmospherics auf Sauger. Archiv fuer Meteorologie, Geophysik und Bioklimatologie, Ser. B., 1968, 16, 251–261.
MARLER, P., & HAMILTON, W.J. III., Mechanisms of animal behavior. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1966.
MARR, M.J., RIVERS, W.K., & BURNS, C.P., The effect of low energy, extremely low frequency (ELF) electromagnetic radiation on operant behavior in the pigeon and the rat. Final Report, February 28, 1973, Georgia Institute of Technology, Contract No. N00014–67-0159–0009, Office of Naval Research.
MOOS, W.S., CLARK, R.K. & KROWN, F., A precision controlled environmental chamber for the study of the effects of electric fields on biological objects. International Journal of Biometeovologyy 1965, 9, 117–126.
MORRIS, D., Thresholds for conditioned suppression using X-rays as the preaversive stimulus.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1966, 9, 29–34.
MORSE, W., Intermittent reinforcement. In: W. Honig (Ed.) Operant behavior: Areas of research and application. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1966. Pp. 52–108.
MORSE, W.H., & KELLEHER, R.T., Schedules as fundamental determinants of behavior. In: W.N. Schoenfeld (Ed.), The theory of reinforcement schedules. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1970. Pp. 139–185.
PERSINGER, M.A., LUDWIG, H.W., & OSSENKOPP, K-P., Psychophysiological effects of extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields: A review. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1973, 36, 1131–1159.
PERSINGER, Michael A., PERSINGER, Milo A., OSSENKOPP, K-P., & GLAVIN, G.B., Behavioral changes in adult rats exposed to ELF magnetic fields. International Journal of Biometeorology, 1972, 16, 155–162.
PRESMAN, A.S., Electromagnetic fields and life. New York: Plenum Press, 1970. Pp. 250–283.
REILLE, A., Essai de mise en evidence d’une sensibilite du pigeon au champ magnetique a I’aide d’un conditionnement nociceptif.Journal of Fhysiology, Fari’s, 1968,30, 85–92.
SCHOENFELD, W.N. (Ed.), The theory of reinforcement schedules. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1970.
SMITH, J., Conditioned suppression as an animal psychophysical technique. In: W.C. Stebbins (Ed.), Animal psychophysics: The design and conduct of sensory experiments. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1970, Pp. 125–159.
SIDMAN, M., Tactics of scientific research. New York: Basic Books, 1960.
SPITTKA, V.O., TAEGE, M., & TENBROCK, G., Experimentelle Untersuchungen zum operanten Trinkverhalten von Ratten im 50-Hz-Hochspannungswechselfeld.Biologisches Zentralhlatt, 1969, 88, 273–282.
STEBBINS, W.C. (Ed.), Animal psychophysics: The design and conduct of sensory experiments. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1970.
STUBBS, A., The discrimination of stimulus duration by pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1968, 11, 223–238.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1974 Plenum Press, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
de Lorge, J., Marr, M.J. (1974). Operant Methods Assessing the Effects of ELF Electromagnetic Fields. In: Persinger, M.A. (eds) ELF and VLF Electromagnetic Field Effects. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-9004-6_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-9004-6_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-9006-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-9004-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive