Skip to main content

The Pitch Set as a Level of Description for Studying Musical Pitch Perception

  • Chapter
Music, Mind, and Brain

Abstract

How shall we define the musical stimulus? Traditionally, music theorists interested in pitch phenomena have sought the definition in terms of ratios of whole numbers. Such ratios can provide a description of most, if not all, of the musical intervals in use today, and can be translated readily into ratios of physically realizable tone frequencies. Psychoacousticians, following the dictates of reductionism, have sought a finer grain of analysis than this, pointing out that the essential constituent of an interval is a tone, and that the study of music perception must ultimately refer to the perception of single tones and their frequency components. Accordingly, a great deal of scientific effort has gone into studying the perception of isolated tones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Attneave, F., and Olson, R.K., 1971, Pitch as a medium: A new approach to psychophysical scaling. Am. J. Psychol., 84:147–166.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Babbitt, M., 1972, The structure and function of musical theory, in “Perspectives on Contemporary Music Theory,” B. Boretz and E.T. Cone, eds., Norton, New York. (Reprinted from College Music Symposium, 1965(5).)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachem, A., 1950, Tone height and tone chroma as two different pitch qualities. Acta Psychologica, 7:80–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balzano, G.J., 1977a, “Chronometrie Studies of the Musical Interval Sense,” Doctoral diss., “Dissertation Abstracts International”, Stanford Universityxx, 38, 2898B (Univ. Microfilms, No. 77–25, 643).

    Google Scholar 

  • Balzano, G. J., 1977b, On the bases of similarity of musical intervals, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 61-S51(Abs.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Balzano, G.J., 1978, The structural uniqueness of the diatonic order, in “Cognitive Structure of Musical Pitch,” R.N. Shepard (Chair), Symposium presented at the meeting of the Western Psychological Association, San Francisco, April 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balzano, G.J., in press, The group-theoretfc description of twelve-fold and microtonal pitch systems. Comp. Mus. J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, J.C., and Dowling, W.J., 1980, Recognition of transposed melodies: A key-distance effect in developmental perspective, J. Exp. Psychol./Human Perc. Perf. 6:501–515.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Benade, A.H., 1960, “Horns, Strings and Harmony,” Doubleday, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boretz, B., 1970, The construction of musical syntax. I, Persp. New Mus., 9(l):23–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boynton, R., 1975, The visual system: Environmental information, in “Handbook of Perception” Vol. 3, E.C. Carterette and M.P. Friedman, eds.. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budden, F.J., 1972, “The Fascination of Groups,” Cambridge University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassirer, E., The concept of group and the theory of perception, Philos. Phenonnenolog. Res., 5:1–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavanaugh, J.P., 1972, Relation between the immediate memory span and the memory search rate, Psychol. Rev., 79:525–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers, J.H., Jr, 1975, Cyclic scales, Xenharmonikon

    Google Scholar 

  • Clifton, C., Jr, and Cruse, D., 1977, Time to recognize tones: Memory scanning or memory strength? Quart. J. Exp. Psychol., 29:709–726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A.J., 1975, “Perception of Tone Sequences from the Western-European Chromatic Scale: Tonality, Transposition and the Pitch Set,” Doct. diss. Queen’s University at Kingston (Canada), “Dissertation Abstracts International,” 1977, 37:4179B.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A.J., Cuddy, L.L., and Mewhort, D.J.K., 1977, Recognition of transposed tone sequences, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 61:S87-S88 (Abs.)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corso, J.F., 1954, Unison tuning of musical instruments, J. Acoust. Soc. 26:746–750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuddy, L.L., Cohen, A.J., and Miller, J., 1979, Melody recognition: The experimental application of musical rules, Canad. J. Psychol., 33:148–157.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dewar, K.M., 1977, Cues used in recognition memory for tones, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 61: S49(Abs).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowling, W.J., 1978, Scale and contour: Two components of a theory of memory for melodies, Psychol. Rev., 85:341–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forte, A., 1964, A theory of set-complexes for music, J. Mus. Theory, 8:136–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frances, R., 1958, “La Perception de la Musique,” 3. Vrin, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, R., 1975, A structuralist approach to the diatonic scale, J. Mus. Theory, 19:182–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gamer, C., 1967, Some combinational resources of equal-tempered systems, J. Mus. Theory, 11:32–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, N., 1966, “The Structure of Appearance,” (2nd ed.), Bobbs-Merill, Indianapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helmholtz, H. von, 1885, “On the Sensations of Tone as as Physiological Basis for the Theory of Music, “A.J. Ellis, ed. and trans., 1954, Dover, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J. 1972, “Studies in Structure,” Macmillan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Killam, R.N., Lorton, P.V., and Schubert, E.D., 1975, Interval recognition: Identification of harmonic and melodic intervals, J. Mus. Theory, 19:212–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohier, W., 1938, Physical Gestalten, in “A Source Book of Gestalt Psychology,” W.D. Ellis, ed., Routiëdgeóc Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krumhansl, C.L., 1979, The psychological representation of musical pitch in a tonal context, Cog. Psych., 11:346–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krumhansl, C.L., and Shepard, R.N., 1979, Quantification of the hierarchy of tonal functions within a diatonic context, J Exp. PsychoL/Human Perc. Perf., 5:579–594.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kruskal, J.B., 1964a, Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis, Psychometrika, 29:1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruskal, J.B., 1964b, Nonmetric multidimensional scaling: A numerical method, Psychometrika, 29:115–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakner, Y., 1960, A new method of representing tonal relations, J. Mus. Theory

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, D., 1959, Intervallic relations between two collections of notes, J. Mus. Theory, 3:298–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, D., 1960, The intervallic content of a collection of notes, J. Mus. Theory, 4:98–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, D., 1977, Forte’s interval vector, my interval function, and Regener’s common-note function, J. Mus. Theory 21:194–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundin, R.W., 1953, “An Objective Psychology of Music,” Ronald Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connell, W., 1962, Tone spaces, Die Reihe, 8:34–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plomp, R., 1964, The ear as a frequency analyzer, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 36:1628–1636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plomp, R., 1976, “Aspects of Tone Sensation,” Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plomp, R., Wagenaar, W.A., and Mimpen, A.M., 1973, Musical interval recognition with simultaneous tones, Acustica, 29:101–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regener, E., 1973, “Pitch Notation and Equal Temperament: A Formal Study,” University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Revesz, G., 1954, “Introduction to the Psychology of Music,” University of Oklahoma Press, Norman, Oklahoma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothenberg, D., 1978a, A model for pattern perception with musical applications. I, Pitch structures as order-preserving maps. Math. Systems Theory, 11:199–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothenberg, D., 1978b, A model for pattern perception with musical applications. II, The information content of pitch structures. Math. Systems Theory, 11:353–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schenker, H., 1906, “Harmony”, republ. 1973, O. Jonas, ed., E.M. Borgese, trans., MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R.N., 1962a, The analysis of proximities: Multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function, I, Psychometrika, 27:125–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R.N., 1962b, The analysis of proximities: multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function, II, Psychometrika, 27:219–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R.N., 1964, Circularity in judgements of relative pitch, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 36:2346–2353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R.N., in press. Structural representations of musical pitch, in “Psychology of Music,” D. Deutsch, ed.. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, S., 1967, Two operations in character recognition: Some evidence from reaction-time measurements, Perc. & Psychophys., 2:45–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trotter, J.R. 1967, I he psychophysics of melodic interval: Definitions, techniques, theory and problems, Aust. J. Psychol., 19:13–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerkandl, V., 1956, “Sound and Symbol,” Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerkandl, V., 1971, “The Sense of Music,” Princeton University Press, Princeton, rev. ed.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1982 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Balzano, G.J. (1982). The Pitch Set as a Level of Description for Studying Musical Pitch Perception. In: Clynes, M. (eds) Music, Mind, and Brain. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-8917-0_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-8917-0_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-8919-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-8917-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics