Abstract
One reason why it is difficult to approach the study of stigma with much confidence is that there are so many kinds. Consider just a short list: old age, paralysis, cancer, drug addiction, mental illness, shortness, being black, alcoholism, smoking, crime, homosexuality, unemployment, being Jewish, obesity, blindness, epilepsy, receiving welfare, illiteracy, divorce, ugliness, stuttering, being female, poverty, being an amputee, mental retardation, and deafness. One of the few common denominators of these characteristics may be that all of them generate ridicule and scorn. However, there is another, more important reason why the study of stigma must be approached cautiously. Conceptualization and use of the term have been so vague and uncritical that one may reasonably ask: What is a stigma? To many, the answer is simply a “flaw,” “shortcoming,” “blemish,” or “taint,” but that answer does little except to imply that stigmas are opprobrious.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1986 Plenum Press, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Stafford, M.C., Scott, R.R. (1986). Stigma, Deviance, and Social Control. In: Ainlay, S.C., Becker, G., Coleman, L.M. (eds) The Dilemma of Difference. Perspectives in Social Psychology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-7568-5_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-7568-5_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-7570-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-7568-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive