Abstract
To map the terrain of the family as a functioning system is a complex task. Nevertheless, there has been a resurgence of interest in family dynamics, with current advocates espousing a multicausal, multidisciplinary, multieverything approach. The recognition that the family is a complex organization and that it cannot be understood from the conceptualization or methodology of any one discipline may not be new. Nevertheless, it is only recently that the family has been the unit of study for psychologists (e.g., Cochran & Brassard, 1979; Hetherington, 1979; Lamb, 1978; Lewis & Lee-Painter, 1974; Parke & O’Leary, 1975). Recent discoveries of family networks (Cochran & Brassard, 1979; Lewis & Feiring, 1979) and of child effects on the family (Bell & Harper, 1977)—in addition to the traditional studies—are, in my estimation, signs of a rapprochement between the idealized world of the psychologist’s view of human behavior and the realities of family interaction. In spite of this increased convergence between the reality and the idealized image of the social scientist’s conception of the family, there is still a considerable gap between our sophisticated awareness of the complexities and the methodological competence we now have to cope with this complex phenomenon. Consequently, we modify our conceptualization in practice to conform to the practical methods we have for data analysis.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Becker, W. C. Consequences of different kinds of parental discipline. In M. L. Hoffman & L. W. Hoffman (Eds.), Review of child development research (Vol. 1). New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1964.
Bee, H. L., Van Egeren, L. F., Streissguth, A. P., Nyman, B. A., & Leckie, M. S. Social class differences in maternal teaching strategies and speech patterns. Developmental Psychology, 1969, 1 (6), 726–734.
Bell, C. S., Johnson, J. E., McGillicuddy-DeLisi, A. V., & Sigel, I. E. The effects of family constellation and child gender on parental use of evaluative feedback. Child Development, 1981, 53, 701–704.
Bell, R. Q., & Harper, L. V. Child effects on adults. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1977.
Bradfield, R. Hello rock. Racine, Wis.: Whitman, 1965.
Cochran, M. M., & Brassard, J. A. Child development and personal social networks. Child Development, 1979, 50, 601–616.
Croft, R., Stern, S., Siegelbaum, H., & Goodman, D. Manual for description and functionalanalysis of continuous didactic interactions. Rochester, N.Y.: University of Rochester, 1976.
Emmerich, W. The parental role: A functional-cognitive approach. Monographs of theSociety for Research in Child Development, 1969, 34 (8, Serial No. 132).
Freeman, D. A rainbow of my own. New York: Viking Press, 1966.
Gauch, P. L. Christina Katerina and the box. New York: Coward, McCann & Geoghegan, 1971.
Grusec, J. E., & Kuczynski, L. Direction of effect in socialization: A comparison of the parent versus the child’s behavior as determinants of disciplinary techniques. Developmental Psychology, 1980, 16, 1–9.
Helfman, H. Origami. New York: Child Guidance Press, 1960.
Hess, R. D., & Shipman, V. C. Early experience and the socialization of cognitive modes in children. Child Development, 1965, 36, 869–886.
Hetherington, E. M. Divorce: A child’s perspective. American Psychologist, 1979, 34, 851–858.
Hill, R. Modern systems theory and the family: A confrontation. Social Science Information, 1973, 10, 7–26.
Holland, M. A big ball of string. New York: Random House, 1958.
Lamb, M. E. The influence of the child on marital quality and family interaction during prenatal, paranatal and infancy periods. In R. M. Lerner & G. B. Spanier (Eds.) Childinfluences on marital and family interaction. New York: Academic Press, 1978.
Laosa, L. M. Maternal teaching strategies in Chicano and Anglo-American families: The influence of culture and education on maternal behavior. Child Development, 1980, 51, 759–765.(a)
Laosa, L. M. The impact of schooling on interactions between parents and children. Paper presented at the Conference on Changing Families, Educational Testing Service, Princeton, N.J., November 1980. (b)
Lerner, R. M., & Spanier, G. B. A dynamic interactional view of the child and family development. In R. M. Lerner & G. B. Spanier (Eds.), Child influences on marital andfamily interaction. New York: Academic Press, 1978.
Lewin, K. Principles of topological psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1936.
Lewis, M., & Feiring, C. The child’s social network: Social object, social functions, and their relationship. In M. Lewis & L. Rosenblum (Eds.), The child and its family: The genesisof behavior (Vol. 2). New York: Plenum Press, 1979.
Lewis, M., & Lee-Painter, S. An interactional approach to the mother-infant dyad. In M. Lewis & L. A. Rosenblum (Eds.), The effects of the infant on its caregiver. New York: Wiley, 1974.
McGillicuddy-DeLisi, A. V., Sigel, I. E., & Johnson, J. E. The family as a system of mutual influences: Parental beliefs, distancing behaviors, and children’s representational thinking. In M. Lewis & L. A. Rosenblum, The child and its family. New York: Plenum Press, 1979.
Murray, F. B., The acquisition of conservation through social interation. Developmental Psychology, 1972, 6, 1–6.
Parke, R. D., & O’Leary, S. Father-mother-infant interaction in the newborn period: Some findings, some observations, and some unresolved issues. In K. F. Riegel & J. Meacham (Eds.), The developing individual in a changing world (Vol. 2). Social and environmental issues. The Hague: Mouton, 1975.
Peterson, G. W., Hooper, F. H., Wanska, S. K., & DeFrain, J. An investigation of instructionaltransfer effects for conservation, transitive inference and class inclusion reasoning inkindergarten and first grade children. Madison, Wis.: Wisconsin Research and Development Center, 1976.
Piaget, J. The child’s conception of number. New York: Humanities Press, 1952.
Piaget, J. Play, dreams and imitation in childhood. New York: Norton, 1962.
Piaget, J. Biology and knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1971.
Sigel, I. E., Anderson, L. M., & Shapiro, H. Categorization behavior of lower- and middle-class Negro preschool children: Differences in dealing with representation of familiar objects. Journal of Negro Education, 1966, Summer, 218–229.
Sigel, I. E., & Olmsted, P. The development of classification and representational competence. In I. J. Gordon (Ed.), Readings in research in developmental psychology. Glenview, Ill.: Scott, Foresman, 1971.
Sigel, I. E., Flaugher, J., Johnson, J., & Schauer, A. Parent-Child Interactions ObservationSchedule (PCI). Unpublished manual, 1977. (Available from authors, Educational Testing Service, Princeton, N.J. 08541.)
Sigel, I. E., & Saunders, R. An inquiry into inquiry: Question asking as an instructional model. In L. Katz (Ed.), Current topics in early childhood education (Vol. II). Norwood, N.J.: Ablex Publishing Corp., 1979.
Spivak, G., & Shure, M. B. The PIPS Test Manual: A cognitive measure of interpersonalproblem solving ability. Philadelphia; Community Mental Health/Mental Retardation. Center, 1974.
Volpe, J. Children’s concepts of friendship. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C., 1976.
Vygotsky, L. S. Thought and language. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press, 1962.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1982 Plenum Press, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sigel, I.E. (1982). The Relationship between Parental Distancing Strategies and the Child’s Cognitive Behavior. In: Laosa, L.M., Sigel, I.E. (eds) Families as Learning Environments for Children. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-4172-7_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-4172-7_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-4174-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-4172-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive