Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Mating Propensity and Its Genetic Basis in Drosophila

  • Chapter
Essays in Evolution and Genetics in Honor of Theodosius Dobzhansky

Abstract

Sexual behavior must have evolved as an efficient mechanism to propagate the species. As a property contributing to Darwinian fitness it must be one of the most critical in the life cycle, because throughout the preadult stages numbers of individuals succumb to the exigencies of their environment so that at the mature stage when reproduction takes place the minimum for the life cycle is attained. A diversity of genotypes acting on the efficiency of sexual behavior at this focal stage will no doubt exert selective differences which have considerable value in perfecting the efficiency of the sexual process. As a result, at least three major phenomena may evolve: (1) increasing fertility, or higher fitness for the population or the species, (2) increasing sexual dimorphism owing to intrasexual competition (Darwin’s sexual selection) and to preferences for mates, and (3) increasing assortative mating leading to sexual isolation and speciation (Bateman, 1948; Smith, 1958a, b; O’Donald, 1962; Manning, 1965; Caspari, 1967, for example).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Barker, J. S. F. 1962. Studies of selective mating using the yellow mutant of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics, 47:623–640.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bastock, M. 1956. A gene mutation that changes a behavior pattern. Evolution, 10:421–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bastock, M.1967. Courtship: an Ethological Study. Chicago, Aldine Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bastock, M. and A. Manning. 1955. The courtship of Drosophila melanogaster. Behaviour, 8:85–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateman, A. J. 1948. Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity, 2:349–368.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bennet-Clark, H. C., and A. W. Ewing. 1968. The wing mechanism involved in the courtship of Drosophila. J. Exp. Biol., 49:117–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bösiger, E. 1962. Sur le degré d’hétérozygotie des populations naturelles de Drosophila melanogaster et son maintien par la sélection sexuelle. Bull. Biologique, 96:3–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bösiger, E. 1967. La signification évolutive de la sélection sexuelle chez les animaux. Scientia, 102:207–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brncic, D., and S. Koref-Santibañez. 1964. Mating activity of homo- and heterokaryotypes in Drosophila pavani. Genetics, 49:585–591.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. G. B. 1964. Courtship behaviour in the Drosophila obscura group. I. Drosophila pseudoobscura. Behaviour, 23:61–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. G. B. 1966. Courtship behaviour in the Drosophila obscura group. Part II. Comparative studies. Behaviour, 25:281–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caspari, E. 1967. Remarks on evolutionary aspects of behavior. In Hirsch, J., ed. Behavior-Genetic Analysis. New York, McGraw-Hill Book Company. pp. 3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, B., and P. O’Donald. 1964. Frequency-dependent selection. Heredity, 19:201–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossley, S. 1963. An experimental study of sexual isolation within a species of Drosophila. Doctor of Philosophy Thesis, University of Oxford, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dethier, V. 1964. Microscopic brains. Science, 143:1138–1145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, Th. 1961. On the dynamics of chromosomal polymorphism in Drosophila. In Kennedy, J. S., ed. Insect Polymorphism. London. Royal Entomological Society. pp. 30–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, Th., and H. Levene. 1955. Genetics of natural populations. XXIV. Developmental homeostasis in natural populations of D. pseudoobscura. Genetics, 40: 797–808.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, Th., R. C. Lewontin, and O. Pavlovsky. 1964. The capacity for increase in chromosomally polymorphic and monomorphic populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Heredity, 19:597–614.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, Th., and B. Spassky. 1962. Selection for geotaxis in monomorphic and polymorphic populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. (U.S.A.), 48:1704–1712.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, Th., and A. H. Sturtevant. 1938. Inversions in the chromosomes of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics, 23:28–64.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrman, L. 1966. Mating success and genotype frequency in Drosophila. Anim. Behav., 14:332–339.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrman, L. 1967. Further studies on genotype frequency and mating success in Drosophila. Amer. Natural., 101:415–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrman, L. 1968. Frequency dependence of mating success in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genet. Res., 11:135–140.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrman, L. 1969. The sensory basis of mate selection in Drosophila. Evolution (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrman, L., and C. Petit. 1968. Genotype frequency and mating success in the willistoni species group of Drosophila. Evolution, 22:649–658.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrman, L., B. Spassky, O. Pavlosky, and Th. Dobzhansky. 1965. Sexual selection, geotaxis, and chromosomal polymorphism in experimental populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Evolution, 19:337–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrman, L., and E. B. Spiess. 1969. Rare type mating advantage in Drosophila. Amer. Natural. (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Elens, A. A. 1957. Importance sélective des différences d’activité entre mâles ebony et sauvage, dans les populations artificielles de Drosophila melanogaster. Experientia, 13:293–294.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Elens, A. A. 1958. Le rôle de l’hétérosis dans la compétition entre ebony et son allèle normal. Experientia, 14:274–276.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Elens, A. A., and J. M. Wattiaux. 1964. Direct observation of sexual isolation. Drosophila Information Service, 39:118–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewing, A. W. 1961. Body size and courtship behaviour in Drosophila melanogaster. Anim. Behav., 9:93–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewing, A. W. 1963. Attempts to select for spontaneous activity in Drosophila melanogaster. Anim. Behav., 11:369–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewing, A. W. 1964. The influence of wing area on the courtship behaviour. Anim. Behav., 12:316–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewing, A. W., and A. Manning. 1963. The effect of exogenous scent on the mating of Drosophila melanogaster. Anim. Behav., 11:596–598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewing, A. W., and A. Manning. 1967. The evolution and genetics of insect behavior. Ann. Rev. Entom., 12:471–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulker, D. W. 1966. Mating speed in male Drosophila melanogaster: A psychogenetic analysis. Science, 153:203–295.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Geer, B. W., and M. M. Green. 1962. Genotype, phenotype, and mating behavior in Drosophila melanogaster. Amer. Natural., 96–175–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossfield, J. 1966. The influence of light on the mating behavior of Drosophila. Studies in Genetics: III. Univ. Texas Publ., 6615:147–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossfield, J. 1968. The relative importance of wing utilization in light dependent courtship in Drosophila. Studies in Genetics: IV. Univ. Texas Publ., 6818:147–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hildreth, P. E. 1962. Quantitative aspects of mating behavior in Drosophila. Behaviour, 19:57–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hildreth, P. E., and G. C. Becker. 1962. Genetic influences on mating behavior in Drosophila melanogaster. Behaviour, 19:219–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoenigsberg, H. F., and S. Koref-Santibañez. 1960. Courtship and sensory preferences in inbred lines of Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution, 14:1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosgood, S. M. W., and P. A. Parsons. 1967. Genetic heterogeneity among the founders of laboratory populations of Drosophila melanogaster. II. Mating behaviour. Aust. J. Biol. Sci., 20:1193–1203.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, M. E. 1960. Influence of light on mating of Drosophila melanogaster. Ecology, 41:182–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, M. E. 1961. The influence of light on gene frequency changes in laboratory populations of ebony. Genetics, 46:1089–1095.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kaul, D., and P. A. Parsons. 1965. The genotypic control of mating speed and duration of copulation in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Heredity, 20:381–392.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kaul, D., and P. A. Parsons. 1966. Competition between males in the determination of mating speed in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Aust. J. Biol. Sci., 19:945–947.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, S. 1966. Selection for and against ethological isolation between Drosophila pseudoobscura and Drosophila persimilis. Evolution, 20:634–645.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaul, D., and P. A. Parsons. 1968. The genetics of Drosophila mating behaviour. I. Organization of mating speed in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Anim. Behav., 16:485–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaul, D., and P. A. Parsons. 1969. The genetics of Drosophila mating behavior. II. The genetic architecture of mating speed in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvelland, I. 1965. Some observations on the mating activity and fertility of D. melanogaster males. Hereditas, 53:281–306.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Langridge, J. 1962. A genetic and molecular basis for heterosis in Arabidopsis and Drosophila. Amer. Natural., 96:5–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R. C. 1958. A general method for investigating the equilibrium of a gene frequency in a population. Genetics, 43:419–434.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R. C. 1965. Selection for colonizing ability. In Baker, H. G., and Stebbins, G. L. eds. The Genetics of Colonizing Species. New York, Academic Press, Inc. pp. 77–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, C. C. 1962. On “reflexive selection.” Science, 136:1055–1056.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li, C. C. 1967. Genetic equilibrium under selection. Biometrics, 23:397–484.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • MacBean, I. T., and P. A. Parsons. 1967. Directional selection for duration of copulation in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics, 56:233–239.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mainardi, D., and M. Mainardi. 1966. Sexual selection in Drosophila melanogaster. The interaction between preferential courtship of males and differential receptivity of females. Atti Soc. Ital. Sci. Nat. Museo Civ. St. Nat. Milano, 105:284–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning, A. 1961. The effects of artificial selection for mating speed in Drosophila melanogaster. Anim. Behav., 9:82–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning, A. 1963. Selection for mating speed in Drosophila melanogaster based on the behaviour of one sex. Anim. Behav., 11:116–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning, A. 1965. Drosophila and the evolution of behaving. In Carthy, J. D., and Duddington, C. L. eds. Viewpoints in Biology. London, Butterworths. pp. 125–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning, A. 1966. Sexual Behavior. In Haskell, P. T., ed. Insect Behaviour. London, Royal Entomological Society, pp. 59–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning, A. 1967a. Genes and the evolution of insect behavior. In Hirsch, J., ed. Behavior-Genetic Analysis. New York, McGraw-Hill Book Company. pp. 44–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning, A. 1967b. An Introduction to Animal Behavior. Reading, Mass., Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning, A. 1967c. Control of sexual receptivity in female Drosophila. Anim. Behav., 15:239–250.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Manning, A. 1967d. Antennae and sexual receptivity in Drosophila melanogaster females. Science, 158:136–137.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Manning, A. 1968. The effects of artificial selection for slow mating in Drosophila simulans. Anim. Behav., 16:108–113.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mather, K. 1949. Biometrical Genetics. London, Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mather, K., and B. J. Harrison. 1949. The manifold effect of selection. Part II. Heredity, 3:131–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrell, D. J. 1949a. Selective mating in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics, 34:370–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrell, D. J. 1949b. Mating between two strains of Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution, 3:266–268.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Merrell, D. J. 1960. Mating preferences in Drosophila. Evolution, 14:525–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrell, D. J., and J. C. Underhill. 1956. Competition between mutants in experimental populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics, 41:469–485.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donald, P. 1962. The theory of sexual selection. Heredity, 17:541–552.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, P. A. 1964. A diallele cross for mating speeds in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetica, 35:141–151.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, P. A. 1965. The determination of mating speeds in Drosophila melanogaster for various combinations of inbred lines. Experientia, 21:478.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, P. A. 1967. The Genetic Basis of Behaviour. London, Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, P. A., S. M. W. Hosgood, and B. T. O. Lee. 1967. Polygenes and polymorphism. Molec. Gener. Genetics, 99:165–170.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, P. A., and D. Kaul. 1966. Mating speed and duration of copulation in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Heredity, 21:219–225.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, P. A., and D. Kaul. 1967. Variability within and between strains for mating behaviour parameters in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Experientia, 23:121–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petit, C. 1951. Le rôle de l’isolement sexuel dans l’évolution des populations de Drosophila melanogaster. Bull. Biologique, 85:392–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petit, C. 1954. L’isolement sexuel chez Drosophila melanogaster. Étude du mutant white et son allélomorphe sauvage. Bull. Biologique, 88:435–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petit, C. 1958. Le déterminisme génétique et psycho-physiologique de la compétition sexuelle chez Drosophila melanogaster. Bull. Biologique, 92:248–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petit, C. 1959. De la nature des stimulations responsables de la sélection sexuelle chez Drosophila melanogaster. C. R. Acad. Sci. (Paris), 248:3484–3485.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Petit, C., and L. Ehrman, 1969. Sexual selection in Drosophila. In Dobzhansky, Th., Hecht, M. K., and Steere, W. C., eds. Evolutionary Biology, Vol. III. New York, Appleton-Century-Crofts (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Prakash, S. 1967a. Chromosome interactions in Drosophila robusta. Genetics, 57:385–400.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Prakash, S. 1967b. Association between mating speed and fertility in Drosophila robusta. Genetics, 57:655–663.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Prakash, S. 1969. Chromosome interaction affecting mating speed in Drosophila robusta. Genetics, 60:589–600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, S. C., and E. W. Reed. 1950. Natural selection in laboratory populations of Drosophila. II. Competition between a white-eye gene and its wild type allele. Evolution, 4: 34–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rendel, J. M. 1945. Genetics and cytology of Drosophila subobscura. II. Normal and selective matings in Drosophila subobscura. J. Genet., 46:287–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rendel, J. M. 1951. Mating of ebony, vestigial, and wild type Drosophila melanogaster in light and dark. Evolution, 5:226–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, F. W. 1963. The ecological genetics of growth in Drosophila. 6. The genetic correlation between the duration of the larval period and body size in relation to larval diet. Genet. Res., 4:74–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rendel, J. M. 1965. The analysis and interpretation of population differences. In Baker, H. G., and Stebbins, G. L., eds. The Genetics of Colonizing Species. pp. 95–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shorey, H. H. 1962. Nature of the sound produced by Drosophila melanogaster during courtship. Science, 137:677–678.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. M. 1956. Fertility, mating behaviour, and sexual selection in Drosophila subobscura. J. Genet. 54:261–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rendel, J. M. 1958a. Sexual selection. In Barnett, S. A., ed., A Century of Darwin. London, Heinemann. pp. 231–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rendel, J. M. 1958b. The Theory of Evolution. Baltimore, Penguin Books, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperlich, D. 1966. Unterschiedliche Paarungsaktivität innerhalb und zwischen verschiedenen geographischen Stämmen von Drosophila subobscura. Z. Verebungsl., 98:10–15.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spiess, E. B. 1967. Temperature sensitivity and heterosis. Amer. Natural., 101:93–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiess, E. B. 1968a. Low frequency advantage in mating of Drosophila pseudoobscura karyotypes. Amer. Natural., 102:363–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiess, E. B. 1968b. Experimental population genetics. Ann. Rev. Genet., 2:165–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiess, E. B. 1968c. Courtship and mating time in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Anim. Behav., 16:470–479.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spiess, E. B., and B. Langer. 1961. Chromosomal adaptive polymorphism in Drosophila persimilis. III. Mating propensity of homokaryotypes. Evolution, 15:535–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiess, E. B., and B. Langer. 1964a. Mating speed control by gene arrangement carriers in Drosophila persimilis. Evolution, 18:430–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiess, E. B., and B. Langer. 1964b. Mating speed control by gene arrangements in Drosophila pseudoobscura homokaryotypes. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. (U. S. A.), 51:1015–1019.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spiess, E. B., B. Langer, and L. D. Spiess. 1966. Mating control by gene arrangements in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics, 54:1139–1149.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spiess, E. B., and L. D. Spiess. 1967. Mating propensity, chromosomal polymorphism, and dependent conditions in Drosophila persimilis. Evolution, 21:672–678.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiess, E. B., and L. D. Spiess. 1966. Selection for rate of development and gene arrangement frequencies in D. persimilis. II. Fitness properties at equilibrium. Genetics, 53:695–708.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spiess, E. B., and L. D. Spiess. 1964. Selections for rate of development and gene arrangement frequencies in D. persimilis. Genetics, 50:863–877.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spiess, L. D., and E. B. Spiess. 1968. Mating frequency and conditions of yeast and water in culture of D. persimilis. Drosophila Inform. Serv., 43:130–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiess, L. D., and E. B. Spiess. 1969. Minority advantage in interpopulational matings of Drosophila persimilis. Amer. Natural., 103:155–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiess, L. D., and E. B. Spiess., and E. B. Spiess. 1969. Mating propensity, chromosomal polymorphism, and dependent conditions in D. persimilis. II. Factors between larvae and between adults. Evolution, 23:225–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spieth, H. T. 1952. Mating behavior within the genus Drosophila (Diptera). Bull. Amer. Mus. Natural. Hist., 99:395–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spieth, H. T. 1968. Evolutionary implications of sexual behavior in Drosophila. Evol. Biol., 2:157–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sturtevant, A. H. 1915. Experiments on sex recognition and the problem of sexual selection in Drosophila. J. Anim. Behav., 5:351–366. In Lewis, E. B., ed. Selected Papers of A. H. Sturtevant: Genetics and Evolution. San Francisco, W. H. Freeman and Co. Publishers. pp. 24–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sturtevant, A. H., and Th. Dobzhansky. 1936. Inversions in the third chromosome of wild races of Drosophila pseudoobscura, and their use in the study of the history of the species. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. (U.S.A.), 22:448–450.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, C. C. 1946. Genetics of sexual isolation between Drosophila pseudoobscura and Drosophila persimilis. Genetics, 31:558–573.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tebb, G., and J. M. Thoday. 1956. Reversal of mating preference by crossing strains of Drosophila melanogaster. Nature (London), 177:707.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van Valen, L. 1967. Heterosis and temperature. Amer. Natural., 101:92–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldron, I. 1964. Courtship sound production in two sympatric sibling Drosophila species. Science, 144:191–193.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, B. 1948. Studies on ‘sex ratio’ in Drosophila pseudoobscura. I. Selection and sex ratio. Evolution, 2:189–217.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, B. 1968. Topics in Population Genetics. New York, W. W. Norton & Company, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wattiaux, J. M. 1968. Cumulative parental age effects in Drosophila subobscura. Evolution, 22:406–421.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biological Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago Circle, Chicago, Illinois, USA

    Eliot B. Spiess

Authors
  1. Eliot B. Spiess
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Queens College, USA

    Max K. Hecht

  2. The New York Botanical Garden, USA

    William C. Steere

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1970 Meredith Corporation

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Spiess, E.B. (1970). Mating Propensity and Its Genetic Basis in Drosophila . In: Hecht, M.K., Steere, W.C. (eds) Essays in Evolution and Genetics in Honor of Theodosius Dobzhansky. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-9585-4_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-9585-4_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4615-9587-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-9585-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation