Skip to main content

A Morphogenetic Approach to the Origin and Basic Organization of the Tetrapod Limb

  • Chapter
Evolutionary Biology

Abstract

Two complementary approaches underlie the study of evolutionary morphology—one a direct result of the Darwinian revolution, the other with roots that can be traced back to pre-Darwinian times. The former focuses on the issue of diversity and the origin of adaptation. Morphological change is depicted as a chronological progression of various combinations of adaptations and preadaptations (e.g., Bock, 1977). To define a morphological adaptation one has to focus on the relationships between form and function, i.e., on the selective pressures that fuel evolutionary change. This approach is dominated by an attempt to characterize the organism-environment interrelationship via the concept of natural selection as the driving force for morphological diversification. Conversely, the second approach, adopted in this work, seeks the structural and morphogenetic unity within diverse forms irrespective of the functional or adaptive differences between them. Essentially typological, its method goes back to the ideas of the German Naturphilosophie and French transcendental schools of morphology (Russell, 1916), and it addresses the ordered diversity of forms from the perspective of internal organization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alberch, P., 1983, Morphological variation in the neotropical salamander genus, Bolitoglossa, Evolution 37:906–919.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alberch, P., 1985, Problems in the interpretation of developmental sequences. Syst. Zool. 24:46–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alberch, P., and Alberch, J., 1981, Heterochronic mechanisms of morphological diversification and evolutionary change in the neotropical salamander, Bolitoglossa occidental, J. Morphol. 167:249–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alberch, P., and Gale, E., 1983, Size dependence during the development of the amphibian foot. Colchicine induced digital loss and reduction, J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 16:177–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alberch, P., and Gale, E., 1985, A developmental analysis of an evolutionary trend. Digital reduction in amphibians, Evolution 39:8–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aniken, A. W., 1929, Das morphogene Feld der Knorpelbildung, Arch. Entwicklungsmech. Org. 114:549–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archer, C. W., Rooney, P., and Wolpert, L., 1983, The early growth and morphogenesis of limb cartilage, in: Limb Development and Regeneration (J. F. Fallon and A. Caplan, eds.), Part A, pp. 267–276, A. R. Liss, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, C. W., Cottril, C., and Rooney, P., 1984, Cellular aspects of cartilage differentiation and morphogenesis, in: Matrices and Differentiation (R. Kemp and J. R. Hinchliffe, eds.), pp. 305–322, A. R. Liss, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock, W. J., 1959, Preadaptation and multiple evolutionary pathways, Evolution 13:194–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bock, W., 1977, Foundations and methods of evolutionary classificaion, in: Major Patterns in Vertebrate Evolution (M. Hecht, P. Goody, and B. Hecht, eds.), pp. 851–804, Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock, W. J., and von Wahlert, G., 1965, Adaptation and the form-function complex, Evolution 19:269–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borisey, G. G., and Taylor, W., 1967, The mechanism of action of colchicine. 1. Binding of colchicine-H to cellular protein, J. Cell Biol. 34:525–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braus, H., 1906, Die Entwickelung der Form der Extremitaten und des Extremitatenskelletts, in: Handbuch d. Vergl. u. exp. Entwickelungsllehre der Wirbeltiere (O. Hertwig, ed.), pp. 167–338. G. Fischer, Jena.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broom, R., 1906, On the early development of the appendicular skeleton of the ostrich, with notes on the origin of birds, Trans. S. Afr. Phil. Soc. 16:355–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broom, R., 1913, The origin of the Cheiropterygium, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 32:459–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruhl, C. B., 1876, Zootomie aller Thierklassen, A. Holder, Wien.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, A. C., and Alberch, P., 1985, The development and homologies of the chelonian carpus and tarsus, J. Morphol. 186:119–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calandra, A. J., and MacCabe, J., 1978, The in vitro maintenence of the limb-bud apical ridge by cell free preparations, Dev. Biol. 62:258–269.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, A. I., and Koutroupas, S., 1973, The control of muscle and cartilage development in the chick limb: The role of differential vascularization, J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 29:571–583.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chomiakoff, M., 1894, Die Entwickelung des Tarsus bei Pelobates fuscus, Bull. Soc. Imp. Nat. Sci. Moscow 1894:1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cihak, R., 1972, Ontogenesis of the skeleton and intrinsic muscles of the human hand and foot, Adv. Anat. Embryol. Cell Biol. 46:1–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, W., 1980, Morphology in the evolutionary synthesis, in: The Evolutionary Synthesis (E. Mayr and W. Provine, eds.), Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuvier, G., 1800, Lecons d’Anatomie Comparee, Volume 1, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, D.D., 1955, Comparative anatomy, in: A Century of Progres s on the Natural Sciences (K. P. Schmidt, ed.), pp. 618–622, California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, D. D., 1960, The proper goal of comparative anatomy, in: Proc. Cent. Bicent. Cong. Biol. Singapore (R. D. Purchon, ed.), pp. 44–50, University of Malaya Press, Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, D. D., 1964, The Giant Panda: A morphological study of evolutionary mechanisms, Fieldiana Zool. Mem. 3:1–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Beer, G., 1959, Embryos and Ancestors, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Beer, G., 1971, Homology: An Unsolved Problem, Oxford Biology Readers 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Druzinin, A., 1933, Ahnlichkeit im Bau der Extremitaten der Dipnoi und Quadrepeda, Acad. Sci. URSS Trav. Lab. Morphol. Evol. 1:1–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ede, D. A., 1983, Cell condensations and chondrogenesis, in: Cartilage (B. Hall, ed.), pp. 143–185, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ede, D. A., and Wilby, O. K., 1976, Analysis of cellular activities in the developing limb bud system, in: Automata, Languages, Development (A. Lindenmayer and G. Rozenberg, eds.), pp. 15–24, North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emery, C., 1887, Uber die Beziehungen es Chiropterygiums und Icthyopterygiums, Zool. Anz. 10:185–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emery, C., 1888, Zur Morphologie des Hand- und Fuss-Skelettes, Anat. Anz. 5:283–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emery, C., 1894, Etudes sur la morphologie des membres des amphibiens et sur la phylogenie die cheiropterygium, Arch. Ital. Biol. 22:218–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emery, C., 1897, Die fossilen Reste von Archegosaurus und Eryops und ihre Bedeutung fur die Morphologie des Gliedmassenskeletts, Anat. Anz. 14:201–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fell, H. B., and Canti, R., 1934, Experiments on the development in vitro of the avian knee joint, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 116:316–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gegenbaur, C., 1864, Untersuchungen zur vergleichenden Anatomie der Wirtbeitiere, I. Carpus und Tarsus, Engelmann, Leipzig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire, E., 1818, Philosophic Anatomique, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselin, M. T., 1980, The failure of morphology to assimilate Darwinism, in: The Evolutionary Synthesis (E. Mayr and W. Provine, eds.), pp. 180–183, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldschmidt, R., 1940, The Material Basis of Evolution, Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodrich, E. S., 1901, On the pelvic girdle and fin of Eustnenopteron, Q. J. Micr. Sci. 45:311–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodrich, E. S., 1930, Studies on the Structure and Development of the Vertebrates, Macmillan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, B. C., and Trainor, L., 1983, The ontogeny and phylogeny of the pentadactyl limb, in: Development and Evolution (B. Goodwin, N. Holder, and C. Wylie, eds.), pp. 75–98, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, R., Day, A., and Wolpert, L., 1972, Mesenchymal condensation and cell contact in early morphogenesis of the chick limb bud, Exp. Cell Res. 72:325–336.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gould, R., Selwood, L., Day, A., and Wolpert, L., 1974, The mechanism of cellular orientation during cartilage formation in the chick limb and the regenerating amphibian limb, Exp. Cell Res. 83:287–296.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S. J., 1977, Ontogeny and Phylogeny, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, W. K., 1915, Present status of the problem of the origin of the tetrapoda with special reference to the skull and paired limbs, Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 26:317–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, W. K., 1935a, Further observations on the pectoral girdle and fin of Sauripteris taylori Hall, a crossopterygian fish from the Upper Devonian of Pennsylvania, with special reference to the origin of the pentadactylate extremeties of tetrapods, Proc. Am. Phil. Soc. 75:673–690.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, W. K., 1935b, Williston’s law relating to the evolution of skull bones in vertebrates, Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 20:123–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, W. K., Miner, R. W., and Noble, G. K., 1923, The carpus of Eryops and the structure of the primitive chiropterygium, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 48:279–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, W. K., and Raven, H. C., 1941, Studies on the origin and early evolution of paired fins and limbs, Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 42:273–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanken, J., 1983, High incidence of limb skeleton variants in a peripheral population of the red-backed salamander, Plethodon cinerus (Amphibia: Pletodontidae) from Nova Scotia, Can. J. Zool. 61:1925–1931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanken, J., 1985, Morphological novelty in the limb skeleton accompanies minaturization in salamanders, Science 229:871–874.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hanken, J., and Wassersug, R., 1981, The visible skeleton, Funct. Photo. 16:22–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, R. G., 1921, On relations of symmetry in transplanted limbs, J. Exp. Zool. 32:1–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hecht, M. K., and Edwards, J., 1976, The determination of parallel or monophyletic relationships: The proteid salamanders—A test case, Am. Nat. 110:653–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hertwig, O., 1906, Ueber die Stellung der vergl. Entwicklungslehre zur vergl. Anatomie, zur Systematik und Descendenztheorie, in: Handb. vergl. exp. Entwicklungslehre der Wirbeltiere (O. Hertwig, ed.), Volume 3, pp. 149–180, G. Fischer, Jena.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinchliffe, J. R., 1977, The chondrogenic pattern in chick limb morphogenesis: A problem of development and evolution, in: Vertebrate Limb and Somite Morphogenesis (D. Ede, J. R. Hinchliffe, and M. Balls, eds.), pp. 293–309, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinchliffe, J. R., and Griffiths, P., 1983, The pre-chondrogenic patterns in tetrapod limb development and their phylogenetic significance, in: Development and Evolution (B. Goodwin, N. Holder, and C. Wylie, eds.), pp. 99–121, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinchliffe, J. R., and Hecht, M. K., 1984, Homology of the bird wing skeleton: Embryological versus paleontological evidence, Evol. Biol. 18:21–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinchliffe, J. R., and Johnson, D. R., 1980, The Development of the Vertebrate Limb, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinchliffe, J. R., and Johnson, D. R., 1983, The growth of cartilage, in: Cartilage (B. K. Hall, ed.), Volume 2, pp. 255–295, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holder, N., 1977, An experimental investigation into the early development of the chick elbow joint, J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 39:115–127.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holder, N., 1983, The vertebrate limb: Pattern and constraint in development and evolution, in: Vertebrate Limb and Somite Morphogenesis (D. Ede, J. Hinchliffe, and M. Balls, eds.), pp. 399–425, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmgren, N., 1933, On the origin of the tetrapod limb, Acta Tool. 14:185–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmgren, N., 1939, Contribution on the question of the origin of the tetrapod limb, Acta Zool. 20:89–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmgren, N., 1942, On the tetrapod limb—again, Acta Zool. 30:485–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmgren, N., 1952, An embryological analysis of the mammalian carpus and its bearing on the question of the origin of the tetrapod limb, Acta Zool. 33:1–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmgren, N., 1955, Studies on the phylogeny of birds, Acta Zool. 36:243–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howes, G. B., 1892, On the pedal skeleton of the Dorking Fowl, with remarks on hexadactylism and phalangeal variation, J. Anat. Physiol. 26:395–403.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Howes, G. B., and Ridewood, W., 1888, On the carpus and tarsus of the anura, Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. 1888:141–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howes, G. B., and Swinnerton, H. H., 1901, On the development of the skeleton of the tuatara, Sphenodon punctatus, Trans. Zool. Soc. Lond. 16:1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huxley, J., 1932, The Problems of Relative Growth, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huxley, T., 1876, On Ceratodus fosteri, with observations on the classification of fishes, Proc. R. Soc. 1876:24–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaeckel, O., 1901, Ueber die altesten Gliedmassen von Tetrapoda, Sitzungsber. Ges. Nat. Freunde 10:587–615.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, I., 1888, Die Entwickelung der vorderen Extremitaten der Anuren Batrachier, Dissertation, Leipzig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, S. A., Shymko, R. M., and Trabert, K., 1978, Control of sequential compartment formation in Drosophila, Science 199:259–270.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kukenthal, W., 1893, Zur Entwicklung des Handskelettes des Krokodils, Morphol. Jahrb. 19:42–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leighton, A., 1894, The development of the wing skeleton of Sterna wilsoni, Am. Nat. 28:678–774.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutz, H., 1942, Beitrage zur Stammesgeschichte der Ratiten, Rev. Suisse Zool. 49:299–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathur, J. K., and Goel, S. C., 1976, Patterns of chondrogenesis and calcification in the developing limb of the lizard, Calotes versicolor, J. Morphol. 149:401–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meinhardt, H., 1982, Models of Biological Pattern Formation, Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milaire, J., 1978, Etude morphologique, histochimique et autoradiographique du developpment du squelette des membres chez l’embryon de Souris. 1. Membres anterieurs, Arch. Biol. 89:169–216.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mitrovic, D. R., 1971, Development of the metatarsalphalangeal joint of the chick embryo: Morphological, ultrastructural and histochemical studies, Am. J. Anat. 150:333–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montagna, W., 1945, A re-investigation of the development of the wing of the fowl, J. Morphol. 76:87–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, J., 1981, On pattern formation mechanisms for Iepidopteran wing patterns and mammalian coat markings, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 295:473–496.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, G., 1978, Ontogeny, phylogeny and paleontology and the biogenetic law, Syst. Zool. 27:324–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, S., and Frisch, A., 1979, Dynamics of skeletal pattern formation in the developing chick limb, Science 205:662–668.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Norsa, E., 1895, Recherches sur la morphologie des membres anterieurs des oiseaux, Arch. Ital. Biol. 22:232–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oken, L., 1807, Ueber die Bedeutung der Schadelknochen, Dissertation, Jena.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oster, G., and Alberch, P., 1982, Evolution and bifurcation of developmental programs, Evolution 36:444–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oster, G., Murray, J., and Harris, A., 1893, Mechanical aspects of mesenchymal morphogenesis, J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 78:83–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oster, G., Murray, J., and Miani, M., 1985, A model for chondrogenetic condensations in the developing limb: The role of extracellular matrix and cell tractions, J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol., 89:93–112.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Owen, R., 1848, Report on the Archetype and Homologies of the Vertebrate Skeleton, Van der Hoorst, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, R., 1849, On the Nature of Limbs, Van der Hoorst, London.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Patou, M. P., 1973, Analyse de la morphogenese du pied des Oiseaux a l’aide de melanges cellulaires inter-specifiques. I. Etude morphologique, J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 29:175–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, C., 1982, Morphological characters and homology, in: Problems of Phylogenetic Reconstruction (K. Joysey and A. E. Friday, eds.), pp. 21–74, Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, C., 1983, How does phylogeny differ from ontogeny?, in: Development and Evolution (B. Goodwin, N. Holder, and C. Wylie, eds.), pp. 1–31. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petronievics, B., 1918, The pectoral fin of Eusthenopteron, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. 9:471–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prein, F., 1915, Die Entwicklung des vordern Extremitatenskelettes beim Haushuhn, Anat. Hefte Abt. 51:642–690.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabl, C., 1901, Gedanken und Studien uber den Ursprung der Extremitaten, Z. Wiss. Zool. 70:474–558.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabl, C., 1910, Bausteine zu einer Theorie der Extremitaten der Wirbeltiere, Leipzig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romer, A. S., and Byrne, F., 1931, The pes of Diadectes: Notes on the primitive tetrapod limb, Paleobiologica 4:25–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, D., Forey, P., Gardiner, B., and Patterson, C., 1981, Lungfishes, tetrapods, paleontology, and pleisiomorphy, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 167:163–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, E., 1892, Uber einige Entwicklungsstadien des Handskelettes der Emys lutaria, marshii, Morphol. Jahrb. 18:1–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, L., 1985, On homology, Biol. J. Linn. Soc. Lond. 22:13–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, E., 1916, Form and Function, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • St. Aubain, M. L., 1981, Amphibian limb ontogeny and its bearing on the phylogeny of the group, Z. Zool. Syst. Evolutionsforsch. 19:174–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, J., and Gasseling, M., 1968, Ectodermal-mesenchymal interactions in the origin of limb symmetry, in: Epithelial-Mesenchymal Interactions (R. Fleischmajer and R. F. Billingham, eds.), pp. 78–97, Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaeffer, B., 1941, The morphological and functional evolution of the tarsus in amphibians and reptiles, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 78:395–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schauinsland, H., 1903a, Beitrage zur Entwicklungsgeschichte und Anatomie der Wirbeltiere, Zoologica 16:1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schauinsland, H., 1903b, Weitere Beitrage zur Entwickelungsgeschichte der Hatteria, Arch. Microscop. Anat. 56:747–861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schestocowa, G., 1927, Die Entwickelung des Vogelflugels, Bull. Soc. Nat. Moscow 36:163–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schintz, H., and Zangerl, R., 1937, Beitrage zur Osteogenese des Knochensystems beim Haushuhn, bei der Haustaube und beim Haubensteisfuss, Denkschrifte Schweiz. Naturforsch. Ges. 72:1–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmalhausen, J. J., 1907, Die Entwicklung des Skelettes der vordern Extremitat der anuren Amphibien, Anat. Anz. 31:177–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmalhausen, J. J., 1908, Die Entwickelung des Skelettes der hintern Extremitat der anuren Amphibien, Anat. Anz. 33:337–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmalhausen, J. J., 1910, Die Entwicklung des Extremitatenskelettes von Salamandrella kaiserlingii, Anat. Anz. 37:431–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmalhausen, J. J., 1915, Development of the Extremities of the Amphibia and Their Significance to the Question of the Origins of the Vertebrates, Moscow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmalhausen, J. J., 1917, On the extremities of Ranidens sibricus Kessel, Rev. Zool. Suisse 2:129–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmalhausen, J. J., 1949, Factors of Evolution, Blakiston, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt-Eherenberg, E., 1942, Die Embryogenese des Extremitatenskelettes der Saugetiere, Rev. Suisse Zool. 49:33–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semon, R., 1898, Die Entwickelung der paarigen Flossen des Ceratodus Forsteri, Jen. Denkschrift 4:1–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sewertzoff, A. N., 1908, Studien uber die Entwickelung der Muskeln, Nerven, und der Skeletts der Extremitaten der Niedern Tetrapoden. Beitrage zu einer Theorie des pentadactylen Extremitat der Wirbeltiere, Bull. Soc. Nat. Moscow 21:1–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sewertzoff, A. N., 1931, Morphologische Gesetzmassigkeiten der Evolution, Jena.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shitkov, B., 1899, Uber den Bau und die Entwicklung des Skelettes der freien Gliedmassen des Isodactyum schrenkii, Zool. Anz. 22:246–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sieglbauer, F., 1909, Zur Anatomie der Schildkrotenextremitat, Arch. Anat. Phys. Anat. Abt. 1909:183–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sieglbauer, F., 1911, Zur Entwicklung der Vogelextremitat, Z. Wiss. Zool. 97:262–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sledge, C. B., 1981, The developmental anatomy of joints, in: Diagnosis of Bone and Joint Disorders (D. Resnick and G. Nwayama, eds.), pp. 1–20, Saunders, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B. G., 1912, Development of Cryptobranchus, J. Morphol. 23:455–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, H., 1921, Hand und Fuss der Amphibien, ein Beitrag zur Extremitatenfrage, Anat. Anz. 53:513–542.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, H., 1922, Die ontogenetische und phylogenetische Entwicklung des Vogelflugel-Skelettes, Acta Zool. Stock. 3:307–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, H., 1934, Ueber die embryonale Hand- und Fuss-Skelett Anlage bei den Crocodiliern, sowie uber ihre Beziehungen zur Vogel-Flugelanlage und zur ursprunglichen Tetrapoden-Extremitat, Rev. Suisse Zool. 41:383–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, H., 1935, Beitrage zur Gliedmassentheorie: Die Entwicklung des Chiropterygium aus dem Icthyopterygium, Rev. Suisse Zool. 42:715–729.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, H., 1942, Der Aufbau des Saugetier-Carpus und Tarsus nach neueren embryologischen Untersuchungen, Rev. Suisse Zool. 49:217–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens, T., and MacNulty, P., 1981, Evidence for a metameric pattern in the development of the chick humerus, J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 69:191–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stocum, D., and Fallon, J., 1982, Control of pattern formation in urodele limb ontogeny: A review and hypothesis, J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 69:7–36.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Strasser, H., 1879, Zur Entwickelung des Extremitatenskelettes bei Salamandra und Triton, Morphol. Jahrb. 5:240–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Summerbell, D., 1981, The control of growth and the development of pattern across the anteroposterior axis of the chick limb bud, J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 63:161–180.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tickle, C., Summerbell, D., and Wolpert, L., 1975, Positional signalling and specification of digits in chick limb morphogenesis, Nature 254:199–202.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Toole, B., Jackson, G., and Gross, J., 1972. Hyaluronate in morphogenesis: Inhibition of chondrogenesis in vitro, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 69:1384–1386.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tschernoff, N. D., 1907, Zur Embryonalentwickelung der hinteren Extremitaten des Frosches, Anat. Anz. 24:593–612.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turing, A. M., 1952, The chemical basis of morphogenesis, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 237:37–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Pee, P., 1903, Ueber die Entwickelung der Extremitaten bei Amphiuma und Necturus, Anat. Anz. 23:34–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Pee, P., 1904, Les membres chez Amphiuma, Anat. Anz. 24:476–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Bardeleben, K., 1883, Das Os intermedium tarsi der Saugetiere, Zool. Anz. 6:278–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Bardeleben, K., 1894, Hand und Fuss, Referat. Verhandl. Anat. Ges. 8:257–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddington, C., 1957, The Strategy of the Genes, Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D. M. S., 1913, On the primitive tetrapod limb, Anat. Anz. 44:24–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westoll, T., 1943, The origin of the primitive tetrapod limb, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 131:373–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilby, O., and Ede, D., 1975, A model generating the pattern of cartilage skeletal elements in the embryonic chick, J. Theor. Biol. 52:199–217.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williston, R., 1914, Water Reptiles, Past and Present, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wolpert, L., 1969, Positional information and the spatial pattern of cellular differentiation, J. Theor. Biol. 25:1–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zwick, W., 1898, Beitrage zur Kenntnis des Baues und der Entwickelung der Amphibien-gliedmassen, besonders von Carpus und Tarsus, Z. Wiss. Zool. 63:62–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwilling, E., 1961, Limb morphogenesis, Adv. Morphogen. 1:301–330.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1986 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Shubin, N.H., Alberch, P. (1986). A Morphogenetic Approach to the Origin and Basic Organization of the Tetrapod Limb. In: Hecht, M.K., Wallace, B., Prance, G.T. (eds) Evolutionary Biology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-6983-1_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-6983-1_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4615-6985-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-6983-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics