Skip to main content

Business Cycles and Productivity in Capital Equipment Supply Chains

  • Chapter
Quantitative Models for Supply Chain Management

Abstract

Cyclicality is a commonly observed phenomenon in market economies. Less well understood, however, is the amplification of cyclicality as one progresses up the supply chain from original equipment manufacturer (OEM) to first-, second-, and third-tier suppliers. Recent studies have focused on management techniques to minimize inventory costs when faced with amplification in product distribution chains (Baganha and Cohen 1996; Lee, Padmanabhan, and Whang 1997; Sterman 1989a).2 This paper instead examines long-term supplier productivity as influenced by amplification in capital goods supply chains.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson, Edward G. (1996a). Interview with Roger DePlaunty of Metro Metals Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Edward G. (1996b). Interview with William Colwell of Ford Motor Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Edward G. (1997a). The Effects of Business Cycles upon Capital Supplier Productivity and Technological Capability. Ph.D., Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambrige, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Edward G. (1997b). Interview with Head of Big 3 Purchasing Group. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Edward G. (1997c). Managing Skilled-Employee Productivity in Capital Equipment Supply Chains. Austin, TX: University of Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Edward G., Charles H. Fine, and Geoffrey G. Parker (1996). “Upstream Volatility in the Supply Chain: The Machine Tool Industry as a Case Study.” Paper read at INFORMS MSOM Conference, June, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Edward G., and Nitin R. Joglekar (1994). Visits to Delco and Ford Electronics Division.

    Google Scholar 

  • Association for Manufacturing Technology (1970–94). The Economic Handbook of the Machine Tool Industry. McLean, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Association for Manufacturing Technology (AMT) (1995). “Building Value into Machine Tools.” American Machinist 139 (10):A2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baganha, Manuel P., and Morris A. Cohen (1996). “The Stabilizing Effects of Inventory in Supply Chains.” Paper read at INFORMS MSOM Conference, June 1996, at Dartmouth College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertsekas, Dimitri P. (1987). Dynamic Programming: Deterministic and Stochastic Models. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bitran, Gabriel R. (1993). “Hierarchical Production Planning.” In Logistics of Production and Inventory, edited by S. C. Graves, A. R. Kan and P. Zipkin. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dertouzos, Michael L., Richard K. Lester, and Robert M. Solow (1989). Made in America. New York: Harper Perennial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Economist (1997). “The Heartland’s German Model.” The Economist, February 15, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, Charles H. (1994). Interview at Toshiba Manufacturing Center in Osaka, Japan: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, Charles (1996) “Industry Clockspeed and Competency Chain Design.” Proceedings of the 1996 Manufacturing and Service Operations Management Conference. Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire June 24–25, 1996, pp. 140–143. (Downloadable from http://web.mit.edu/afs/athena/org/c/ctpid/www/people/FinePapers.html%20)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, Charles H. (1998). Clockspeed: Winning Industry Control in the Age of Temporary Advantage. Reading, MA: Perseus Books, Fall 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, Charles H., and Geoffrey G. Parker (1993–1994). Field Visits to Cincinnati Milacron, Eaton, and Cincinnati Milacron/Eaton Meetings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, Charles H., and Daniel Whitney (1995). Is the Make/Buy Decision a Core Competence? Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrester, Jay W. (1958). “Industrial Dynamics: A Major Breakthrough for Decision Makers.” Harvard Business Review 36 (4):37–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graves, Stephen C. (1997). A Single-Item Inventory Model for a Non-Stationary Demand Process. Cambridge, Mass.: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, James D. (1989). “A New Approach to the Economic Analysis of Nonstationary Time Series and the Business Cycle.” Econometrica 57:357–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kallenberg, Robert (1994). Analysis of Business Cycles in the U.S. Machine Tool Industry Using the System Dynamics Method. Masters, heinische-Westfaelische Techische Hochschule Aachen, Aachen, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Hau, P. Padmanabhan, and S. Whang (1997). “Information Distortion in a Supply Chain: The Bullwhip Effect.” Management Science 43 (4): 516–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makridakis, Spyros, C. Chatfield, M. Hibon, M. Lawrence, T. Mills, K. Ord, and L. F. Simmons (1993). “The M2-Competition: A Real-Time Judgmentally Based Forecasting Study.” International Journal of Forecasting 9 (l):5–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, Artemis (1988). The US Machine Tool Industry and its Foreign Competitors,”

    Google Scholar 

  • MIT Commission on Industrial Productivity Working Paper — background for Made In America. Cambridge, MA: MIT Commission on Industrial Productivity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, Charles R., and Charles I. Plosser (1982). “Trends and Random Walks in Macroeconomic Time Series: Some Evidence and Implications.” Journal of Monetary Economics 10: 139–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogata, Katsuhiko (1970). Modern Control Engineering. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papoulis, Athanasios (1991). Probability, Random Variables, and Stochastic Processes. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, Geoffrey G. (1996). Interviews with Cincinnati Milacron. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Technology Supply Chain Research Project.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, M. J. D. (1972). “Problems Related to Unconstrained Optimization.” In Numerical Methods for Unconstrained Optimization, edited by W. Murray. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanmugan, K. Sam, and A. M. Breipohl (1988). Random Signals: Detection, Estimation, and Data Analysis. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterman, John D. (1989a). “Misperceptions of Feedback in Dynamic Decision Making.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 43: 301–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterman, John D. (1989b). “Modeling Managerial Behavior: Misperceptions of Feedback in a Dynamic Decision Making Experiment.” Management Science 35 (3): 321–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Federal Reserve Board (1996). Industrial Production Indices. Washington, DC: http://www.bog.frb.fed.us/commerce.htm.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Anderson, E.G., Fine, C.H. (1999). Business Cycles and Productivity in Capital Equipment Supply Chains. In: Tayur, S., Ganeshan, R., Magazine, M. (eds) Quantitative Models for Supply Chain Management. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 17. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4949-9_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4949-9_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-7246-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-4949-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics