Skip to main content

Abstract

As witnessed by this volume, there is growing attention to the construct of commitment by both theorists and researchers. Having come to appreciate the substantial role that commitment plays in understanding relationship stability and quality, our goal is to present ideas on the cognitive implications of commitment for both understanding and changing couple dynamics. In particular, we focus on some ways in which commitment theory can aid in the practice of marital therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Acker, M., & Davis, M. H. (1992). Intimacy, passion and commitment in adult romantic relationships: A test of the triangular theory of love. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 9, 21–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beach, S. R. H., & Broderick, J. E. (1983). Commitment: A variable in women’s response to marital therapy. American Journal of Family Therapy, 11, 16–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P., & Kellner, H. (1964). Marriage and the construction of reality. Diogenes, 46, 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, K. S., & Emerson, R. M. (1978). Power, equity and commitment in exchange networks. American Sociological Review, 43, 721–739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dean, D. G., & Spanier, G. B. (1974). Commitment: An overlooked variable in marital adjustment? Sociological Focus, 7, 113–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickson, F. C. (1995). The best is yet to be: Research on longlasting relationships. In J. T. Wood & S. Duck (Eds.), Under-studied relationships: Off the beaten track (pp. 22–50). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, N., & Eidelson, R. J. (1981). Unrealistic beliefs of clinical couples: Their relationship to expectations, goals and satisfaction. American Journal of Family Therapy, 9, 13–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jemmott, J. B., Ashby, K. L., & Lindenfeld, K. (1989). Romantic commitment and the perceived availability of opposite-sex persons: On loving the one you’re with. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 19, 1198–1211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. J., & Rusbult, C. E. (1989). Resisting temptation: Devaluation of alternative partners as a means of maintaining commitment in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 967–980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. P. (1973). Commitment: A conceptual structure and empirical application. Sociological Quarterly, 14, 395–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. P. (1978). Personal and structural commitment: Sources of consistency in the development of relationships. Paper presented at the Theory Construction and Research Methodology Workshop, National Council on Family Relations annual meetings, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. P. (1982). The social and cognitive features of the dissolution of commitment to relationships. In S. Duck (Ed.), Personal relationships: Dissolving personal relationships. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. P. (1985). Commitment, cohesion, investment, barriers, alternatives, constraint: Why do people stay together when they really don’t want to? Paper presented at the Theory and Research Methodology Workshop, National Council on Family Relations annual meetings, Dallas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. P., & Shuman, S. (1983). Courtship as the development of commitment to a relationship. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council of Family Relations, St. Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederer, W. J., & Jackson, D. D. (1962). Mirages of marriage. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leik, R. K., & Leik, S. A. (1977). Transition to interpersonal commitment. In R. L. Hamblin & J. H. Kunkel (Eds.), Behavioral theory in sociology. New Brunswick: Transaction Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinger, G. (1965). Marital cohesiveness and dissolution: An integrative review. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 27, 19–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinger, G. (1979). A social exchange view on the dissolution of pair relationships. In R. L. Burgess & T. L. Huston (Eds.), Social exchange in developing relationships. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinger, G. (1980). Toward the analysis of close relationships. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 510–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, H. J., & Wallace, K. M. (1959). Short marital adjustment and prediction tests: Their reliability and validity. Marriage and Family Living, 21, 251–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lund, M. (1985). The development of investment and commitment scales for predicting continuity of personal relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 2, 3–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markman, H. J., Stanley, S. M., & Blumberg, S. L. (1994) Fighting for your marriage: Positive steps for a loving and lasting relationship. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, G. W. (1981). Structural exchange and marital interaction. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 43, 825–839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murstein, B. I., & MacDonald, M. G. (1983). The relationship of “exchangeorientation” and “commitment” scales to marriage adjustment. International Journal of Psychology, 18, 297–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nisbett, R., & Ross, L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenblatt, P. C. (1977). Needed research on commitment in marriage. In G. Levinger & H. L. Raush (Eds.), Close relationships: Perspectives on the meaning of intimacy. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80 (Whole No. 609).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rusbult, C. E. (1980). Commitment and satisfaction in romantic associations: A test of the investment model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 172–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rusbult, C. E. (1983). A longitudinal test of the investment model: The development (and deterioration) of satisfaction and commitment in heterosexual involvements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 101–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rusbult, C. E., & Buunk, B. P. (1993) Commitment processes in close relationships: An interdependence analysis. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, 175–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rusbult, C. E., Johnson, D. J., & Morrow, G. D. (1986). Determinants and consequences of exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect: Responses to dissatisfaction in adult romantic involvements. Human Relations, 39, 45–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rusbult, C. E., Verette, J., Whitney, G. A., Slovik, L. F., et al. (1991). Accommodation processes in close relationships: Theory and preliminary empirical evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 53–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rusbult, C. E., Zembrodt, I. M., & Gunn, L. K. (1982). Exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect: Responses to dissatisfaction in romantic involvement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 1230–1242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, S. M. (1998). The heart of commitment. Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, S. M., & Markman, H. J. (1992). Assessing commitment in personal relationships. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 595–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, S. M., & Markman, H. J. (1997). Marriage in the 90s: A nationwide random phone survey. Denver, CO: PREP, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, S. M., Markman, H. J., & Lobitz, W. C. (1995, November). Commitment: A powerful model for understanding key relationship dynamics. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Advancement of Behavior Therapy, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thibaut, J. W., & Kelly, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Udry, R. J. (1981). Marital alternatives and marital disruption. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 43, 889–897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stanley, S.M., Lobitz, W.C., Dickson, F.C. (1999). Using What We Know. In: Adams, J.M., Jones, W.H. (eds) Handbook of Interpersonal Commitment and Relationship Stability. Perspectives on Individual Differences. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4773-0_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4773-0_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-7161-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-4773-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics