Abstract
In recent years the contribution of knowledge and information to the competitiveness of nations was analysed from different perspectives and on different levels1. Hertog and Bilderbeek (1997) argue that knowledge is a key resource in the economy today for two reasons. Firstly, the competitiveness of most industries depends on the innovative knowledge creation and transforming process, and secondly, knowledge-intensive industries contribute to the economic growth and competitiveness of countries. Guinet (1997, pp.173–174) summarises first results of a project on “Knowledge Flows in National Innovation Systems” currently undertaken by the OECD (selection):
-
(1)
There is a clear trend towards higher knowledge intensity in all economic sectors, and there are indicators that higher knowledge intensity leads to better performance at the firm, sectoral and aggregate level.
-
(2)
Flows of tacit knowledge have an important positive effect on innovation performance, and particularly on the ability of firms to detect, adapt, and use new knowledge and technologies.
-
(3)
In most countries ‘clusters’ exist, in which firms interact through closely linked knowledge networks and which show above-average performance in terms of international competitiveness, growth and employment. These clusters are not necessarily high-technology or R&D-intensive, but they are — without exception — knowledgeintensive, when one takes into account the intensity of knowledge interactions among sectors.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alvesson, M. ‘Organizations as Rhetoric: Knowledge-Intensive Firms and the Struggle with Ambiguity’, Journal of Management Studies, 1993; Vol. 30, No. 6, November, pp.997–1015.
Barras, R. ‘Towards a Theory of Innovation in Services’,Research Policy, 1986; Vol. 15, No. 4, pp.161–173.
David, P.A. and Foray, D. ‘Accessing and Expanding the Science and Technology Knowledge Base’, STI Review, 1995; No. 16, Paris: OECD, pp.13–68.
Franke, D-P. Dienstleistungsinnovationen: eine prozessorientierte Analysedienstleistungsbezogener Neuerungen auf der Grundlage des ‘Integrationsansatzes’, Bergisch Gladbach; Köln: Eul, 1991.
Gallouj and Gallouj, No titel, SI4S Internal Working Paper, IFRESI-CNRS, 1997.
Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P. and Trow, M. New Production of Knowledge: Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies, London: Sage, 1994.
Grupp, H. ‘External Effects as a Microeconomic Determinant of Innovation Efficiency’, Internationaljournal of the Economics of Business, 1997; Vol. 4, No. 2, July, pp. 173–187.
Guinet, J. ‘Knowledge Flows in National Innovation Systsms’, Jndustrial Competitiveness in the Knowledge-Based Economy — The New Role of Governments, Paris: OECD, 1997, pp.173–178.
Hammerer, G. ‘Intangible Investments in Austria’, OECD Workshop on New S&T Indicators for a Knowledge-based Economy, 19–21 June 1996, Paris, DSTI/STP/NESTI/GSS/TIP(96)4.
Hanusch H. and Canter, U. ‘Neuere Ansätze in der Innovationstheorie und der Theorie des technischen Wandels — Konsequenzen für eine Industrie-und Technologiepolitik’ in Meyer-Krahmer (Hrsg.), Innovationsökonomie und Technologiepolitik. Forschungsansätze und politische Konsequenzen, Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag, 1993, pp.11–46.
Hauknes, J. and Miles, I. ‘Services in European Innovation Systems — A Review of Issues’, Step report, Oslo: Step Group, 1996.
Hertog, P. den and Bilderbeek, R. ‘The New Knowledge Infrastructure: The Role of Knowledge-Intensive Business in National Innovation Systems’, TNO-report, STB/97/21, Apeldoorn: TNO, 1997.
Hippel, E. von. The Sources of Innovation, New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988.
Jacobs, D. ‘Wissensintensive Innovation: Das Potential des Cluster-Ansatzes’, The IPTS Report, 1997, No 16, Juiy,pp.24–31.
König, H., Kukuk, M. and Licht, G. ‘Kooperationsverhalten von Unternehmen des Dienstleistungssektors’ in Helmstädter, E., Poser, G. and Ramser H.J. (eds.), Beiträge zur angewandten Wirtschaftsforschung, Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1996, pp.217–243.
Leonard-Barton, D. Wellsprings of Knowledge. Building and Sustaining the Sources of Innovation, Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press, 1995.
Licht, G., Hipp, C., Kukuk, M. and Münt, G. Results of the German Service-Sector Innovation Survey 1995, Mannheim and Karlsruhe: ZEW, ISI, 1997.
Licht, G. and Stahl, H. ‘Entreprise Panels Based on Credit Rating Data’ in Eurostat (ed.), Techniques and Uses of Entreprise Panels, Proceedings of the First Eurostat International Workshop on Techniques of Enterprise Panels, Luxembourg, 1995, pp. 163–177.
Machlup, F. The Production and Distribution of Knowledge in the United States, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1962.
Miles, I. et al. Knowledge-Intensive Business Services: Their Roles as Users, Carriers and Sources of Innovation, Manchester: PREST, 1994.
Miles, I. Innovation in Services: Services in Innovation, Working Paper: University of Manchester, 1996.
Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi, H. The Knowledge-Creating Company, Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.
Moulaert, F., Martinelli, F. and Djellal, F. ‘The Functional and Spatial Division of Labour in Information Technology Consultancy Firms in Western Europe” in Daniels, P.W. and Moulaert, F., The Changing Geography of Advanced Producer Services: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives, London, 199
Pavitt, K. ‘Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change: Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory’, Research Policy, 1984; Vol. 13, No. 6, pp.343–373.
Polanyi, M. The Tacit Dimension, Gloucester (Mass.): Peter Smith, 1966, reprinted 1983.
Roelandt, T.J.A. and Hertog, P. den. ‘Assessing the Knowledge Distribution Power of National Innovation Systems’, OECD workshop on New S&T Indicators for a Knowledge-based Economy, 19–21 June 1996, Paris, DSTI/STP/NESTI/GSS/TIP(96)4.
Scherer, F.M. ‘Inter-Industry Technology Flows in the United States’, Research Policy, 1982; Vol. 13, No. 4, pp.343–373.
Smith, K. ‘Interactions in Knowledge Systems: Foundations, Policy Implications and Empirical Methods’ in OECD, STI Review, 1995; No. 16, pp.69–102.
Soete, L. and Miozzo, M. ‘Trade and Development in Services: A Technological Perspective’, MERIT, 1989, No. 89-031, Maastricht: MERIT.
Strambach, S. ‘Knowledge-Intensive Business Services in the Rhine-Neckar Area’ Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 1994; Vol. 85, No. 4, pp.354–365.
Strambach, S. ‘Wissensintensive unternehmensorientierte Dienstleistungen — ihre Bedeutung für die Innovations-und Wettbewerbsfähigkeit Deutschlands’, Vierteljahreshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung, 1997; DIW, 66. Jg., Heft 2, pp.230–242.
Teece, D.J. ‘Technological Change and the Nature of the Firm’ in Dosi, G. et al (eds.),Technical Change and Economic Theory, London: Pinter Publishers, 1988.
Utterback, J.M. and Abernathy, W.J. ‘A Dynamic Model of Product and Process Innovation’, Omega, 1975; Vol. 3, No. 6, pp.639–656.
Utterback, J.M. Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation, Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1994, paperback, 1996.
Wood, P. ‘The Strategic Role of Knowledge-Intensive Services for the Transmission and Application of Technical Change and Management Innovation’, Fourth Framework Programme, Targeted Socio-Economic Research, Area 1, INTERIM Report 1, Department of Geography, University College London, 1996.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hipp, C. (2000). Information Flows and Knowledge Creation in Knowledge-Intensive Business Services: Scheme for a Conceptualization. In: Metcalfe, J.S., Miles, I. (eds) Innovation Systems in the Service Economy. Economics of Science, Technology and Innovation, vol 18. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4425-8_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4425-8_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-6992-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-4425-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive