Skip to main content

Motion Planning for Nonholonomic Dynamic Systems

  • Chapter
Nonholonomic Motion Planning

Abstract

The problem of motion planning for nonholonomic dynamic systems is studied. A model for nonholonomic dynamic systems is first presented in terms of differential- algebraic equations defined on a phase space. A nonlinear control system in a normal form is introduced to completely describe the dynamics. The assumptions guarantee that the resulting normal form equations necessarily contain a nontrival drift vector field. We show that the linearized control system always has uncontrollable eigenvalues at the origin. However, any equilibrium is shown to be strongly accessible and small time locally controllable. A motion planning approach using holonomy is developed for nonholonomic Caplygin dynamical systems, i.e. nonholonomic systems with certain symmetry properties which can be expressed by the fact that the constraints are cyclic in certain of the variables. The theoretical development is applied to physical examples of systems that we have studied in detail elsewhere: the control of motion of a knife edge moving on a plane surface and the control of motion of a wheel rolling without slipping on a plane surface. The results of the paper are also applied to the control of motion of a planar multibody system using angular momentum preserving joint torques. Results of simulations are included to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed motion planning approach.

Supported by in part by NSF Grant DMS-9002136 and NSF PYI Grant DMS-9157556

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. V.I. Arnold, Dynamical Systems III, Vol.3, Springer-Verlag, 1988.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. A.M. Bloch and N.H. McClamroch,“Control of Mechanical Systems with Classical Nonholonomic Constraints,” Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, 1989, Tampa, Fla., 201–205.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. A.M. Bloch, N.H. McClamroch and M. Reyhanoglu,“Controllability and Stabilizability Properties of a Nonholonomic Control System,” Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, 1990, Honolulu, Hawaii, 1312–1314.

    Google Scholar 

  4. A.M. Bloch, M. Reyhanoglu and N.H.McClamroch,“Control and Stabilization of Nonholonomic Dynamic Systems,” Submitted to IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A.M. Bloch, M. Reyhanoglu and N.H.McClamroch,“Control and Stabilization of Nonholonomic Caplygin Dynamic Systems,” Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, 1991, Brighton, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  6. R.W. Brockett, “Control Theory and Singular Riemannian Geometry”, in New Directions in Applied Mathematics, ed. P.J. Hilton and G.S. Young, Springer-Verlag, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  7. P.S. Krishnaprasad,“Eulerian Many-Body Problems,” in Dynamics and Control of Multibody Systems, eds. J.E. Marsden, P.S. Krishnaprasad and J. Simo, Contemporary Math. Vol.97, AMS, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  8. P.S. Krishnaprasad,“Geometric Phases and Optimal Reconfiguration for Multibody Systems,” Proceedings of American Control Conference, 1990, San Diego, 2440–2444

    Google Scholar 

  9. G. Laffarriere and H.J. Sussmann,“Motion Planning for Completely Controllable Systems Without Drift,” Proceedings of Conference on Robotics and Automation, 1991, Sacramento, California, 1148–1153.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Z. Li and J. Canny,“Motion of Two Rigid Bodies with Rolling Constraint,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, Vol. 6, No. 1, 1990, 62–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Z. Li and R. Montgomery,“Dynamics and Optimal Control of a Legged Robot in Flight Phase,” Proceedings of Conference on Robotics and Automation, 1990, Cincinnati, Ohio, 1816–1821.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. J. Marsden, R. Montgomery and T. Ratiu, Reduction, Symmetry and Berry’s Phase in Mechanics, Memoirs of the A.M.S., 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. Montgomery,“Isoholonomic Problems and Some Applications,” Communications in Mathematical Physics, Vol. 128, 1990, 565–592.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. R. Murray and S. Sastry,“Steering Nonholonomic Systems Using Sinusoids,” Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Desicion and Control, 1990, Honolulu, Hawai, 2097–2101.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ju. I. Neimark and F.A. Fufaev, Dynamics of Nonholonomic Systems, Vol. 33, A.M.S. Translations of Mathematical Monographs, A.M.S., 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  16. M. Reyhanoglu and N. H. McClamroch,“Controllability and Stabilizability of Planar Multibody Systems with Angular Momentum Preserving Control Torques,” 1991 American Control Conference, Boston, 1102–1107.

    Google Scholar 

  17. M. Reyhanoglu and N. H. McClamroch, “Reorientation of Space Multibody Systems Maintaining Zero Angular Momentum,” 1991 AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference, New Orleans, 1330–1340.

    Google Scholar 

  18. A. Shapere and F. Wilczek, Geometric Phases in Physics, Wold Scientific, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  19. N. Sreenath,“Nonlinear Control of Multibody Systems in Shape Space,” Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Robotics and Automation, 1990, Cincinnati, Ohio, 1776–1781.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. H.J. Sussmann,“A General Theorem on Local Controllability,” SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, Vol. 25, No. 1, 1987, 158–194.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. H.J. Sussmann and V. Jurdjevic, “Controllability of Nonlinear Systems,” J. Differential Equations, 12, 1972, 95–116.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. A. M. Vershik and V. Ya. Gershkovich,“ Nonholonomic Problems and the Theory of Distributions,” Acta Applicandae Mathematicae, 12, 1988, 181–209.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Reyhanoglu, M., McClamroch, N.H., Bloch, A.M. (1993). Motion Planning for Nonholonomic Dynamic Systems. In: Li, Z., Canny, J.F. (eds) Nonholonomic Motion Planning. The Springer International Series in Engineering and Computer Science, vol 192. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-3176-0_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-3176-0_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-6392-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-3176-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics