Skip to main content

Polymorphism and Divergence in Regions of Low Recombination in Drosophila

  • Chapter
Non-Neutral Evolution

Abstract

Surveys of DNA sequence variation within Drosophila populations were initially aimed at describing standing levels of substitutional and insertion-deletion polymorphism in different regions and in different species. While the general goal was a broad picture of variation, the next goal was to try to infer the mechanisms responsible for patterns of variation. For example, variation at loci on the sex chromosomes was found to be comparable to that at autosomal loci, i. e. no evidence for any reduction of variation was seen. While there is little power in these studies to test the expected 3/4 reduction in heterozygosity expected under pure selective neutrality, they do rule out recessive, mildly deleterious mutations as a major component of DNA sequence polymorphisms. In surveys of restriction-map variation at the white 28 and zeste-tko 1 regions in 64 lines of D. melanogaster, the level of variation attributable to nucleotide substitutions or the estimated heterozygosity per nucleotide (0.009 and 0.004, respectively) was similar to that previously reported for autosomal regions. These estimates provided no support for models that predicted less polymorphism on the X chromosome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. M. Aguadé, N. Miyashita and C. H. Langley. (1989a).Mol. Biol. Evol. 6123–130.

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. Aguadé, N. Miyashita and C. H. Langley. (1989b).Genetics 122607–615.

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. Aguadé, W. Meyers, A. D. Long and C. H. Langley. (1994).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA(in press).

    Google Scholar 

  4. C. F. Aquadro, K. M. Lado and W. A. Noon. (1988).Genetics 119875–888.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. R. N. Beech, and A. J. Leigh-Brown. (1989).Genet.Res.53, 7–15.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. D. J. Begun, and C. F. Aquadro. (1991).Genetics 1291147–58.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. D. J. Begun, and C. F. Aquadro. (1992).Nature(London)356519–520.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. D. J. Begun, and C. F. Aquadro. (1993).Nature(London)365548–550.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. A. J. Berry, J. W. Ajioka and M. Kreitman. (1991).Genetics 1291111–1117.

    Google Scholar 

  10. R. K. Blackman, and M. Meselson. (1986).J. Mol. Biol. 188499–515.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. D. Charlesworth, M. T. Morgan and B. Charlesworth. (1993).Genetics 1341289–1303.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. V. H. Cohn, and G. P. Moore. (1988).Mol. Biol. Evol. 5154–166.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. W. F. Eanes, J. Labate and J. W. Ajioka. (1989).Mol. Biol. Evol. 6492–502.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. R. R. Hudson. (1990). Gene genealogies and the coalescent process.Oxf. Surv. Evol. Biol.7:1–44.

    Google Scholar 

  15. R. R. Hudson, M. Kreitman and M. Aguadé. (1987).Genetics 116153–159.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. R. R. Hudson, and N. L. Kaplan. (1988).Genetics 120831–840.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. T. H. Jukes, and C. R. Cantor. (1969).Evolution of protein moleculespp.21–132 inMammalian Protein Metabolismedited by H. N. Munro. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  18. N. Kaplan, R. R. Hudson, and C. H. Langley. (1989).Genetics 123887–899.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. M. Kimura. (1983).The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution.Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. M. Kreitman, and M. Aguadé. (1986).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA86, 3562–3666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. B. W. Lange, C. H. Langley and W. Stephan. (1990).Genetics126, 921–932.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. C. H. Langley, J. MacDonald, N. Miyashita, N and M. Aguadé. (1993).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 901800–1803.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. D. L. Lindsley, and L. Sandler. (1977).Philos. Trans. Soc. Lond. (Biol.) 277295–312.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. D. L. Lindsley, and G. G. Zimm. (1992).The Genome ofDrosophila melanogaster. Academic Press, San Diego.

    Google Scholar 

  25. J. N. Macpherson, B. S. Weir and A. J. Leigh-Brown. (1990).Genetics 126121–129.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. J. M. Martín-Campos, J. M. Comerón, N. Miyashita, N. and M. Aguadé. (1992).Genetics 130805–816.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. J. Maynard Smith, and J. Haigh. (1974).Genet.Res. 2323–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. N. Miyashita, and C. H. Langley. (1988).Genetics 120199–212.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. N. Miyashita, M. Aguadé, M. and C. H. Langley. (1993).Genet. Res. 62101–109.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. M. Orita, H. Iwahana, K. Kanazawa and T. Sekiya. (1989).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 862766–2770.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. R. K. Saiki, S. Scharf, F.Faloona, G. T. Horn, H. A. Erlich, and N. Arnheim. (1985).Science 2301350–1354.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. F. Tajima. (1989).Genetics 123585–595.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. T. H. E. Wiehe, and W. Stephan. (1993).Mol. Biol. Evol. 10842–854.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Aguadé, M., Langley, C.H. (1994). Polymorphism and Divergence in Regions of Low Recombination in Drosophila . In: Golding, B. (eds) Non-Neutral Evolution. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2383-3_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2383-3_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-412-05391-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-2383-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics