Abstract
The German philosopher Hegel told us that one can understand oneself better by understanding others. By seeing what one is not, one sees better what one is. In the stream of discussions at the Copenhagen conference, I gained a new perspective on the challenge of blending evolutionary and strategic theories of the firm: the biggest hurdles are not analytical but philosophical. Evolutionary theorists and business strategists have fundamentally different world views. Although our preconference paper (see Chapter 1) duly noted the different legacies of each tradition, we missed the enormity of the ideology, the deep-seated convictions and ways of seeing that underlie the respective streams of work.
This paper benefited from many conversations with Robert E. Kennedy and Birger Wemerfelt. Elizabeth Wynne Johnson helped to frame the issues from the venerable perspective of the liberal arts. Their insights are gratefully acknowledged
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aeschylus, Prometheus Bound.
Amit, R., and Schoemaker, P.J. 1993. “Strategic assets and organizational rent.” Strategic Management Journal 14: 33–46.
Barney, J. 1991. “Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage.” Journal of Management 17:99–120.
Christiansen, C.R., Andrews, K.R., and Bower, J.L 1978. Business Policy: Text and Cases. Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin, Inc.
Conner, K.R. “A historical comparison of resource-based theory and five schools of thought within industrial organization economics: do we have a new theory of the firm?” Journal of Management 17: 121–154.
Dierickx, I., and Cool, K. 1989. “Asset stock accumulation and sustainable competitive advantage.” Management Science 35: 1504–11.
Dosi, G., Winter, S.G., and Teece, D. 1992. Towards a theory of corporate coherence: preliminary remarks. In G. Dosi, R. Giannetti and P.A. Toninelli (eds.), Technology and enterprise in a historical perspective. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Ghemawat, P. 1991. Commitment. New York: Free Press.
Grant, R.M. 1991. “The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: implications for strategy formulation.” California Management Review 33:114–135.
Hannan, M.T., and Freeman, J. 1977. “The population ecology of organizations.” American Journal of Sociology 82: 929–64.
Keillor, Garrison. “Prairie Home Companion.” National Public Radio.
Leonard-Barton, D. 1992. “Core competencies and core rigidities: a paradox in new product development.” Strategic Management Journal 13: 111–125.
Montgomery, C.A. and Hariharan, S. 1991. “Diversified expansion by large established firms.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization: 71–89.
Nelson, R.R. 1991. “Why do firms differ and how does it matter?” Strategic Management Journal 12: 61–74.
Nelson, R.R. and Winter, S.G. 1982. An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge: Belknap Press.
Peteraf, M.A. 1993. “The cornerstones of competitive advantage: a resource-based view.” Strategic Management Journal 14: 179–91.
Porter, M.E. 1991. “Towards a dynamic theory of strategy.” Strategic Management Journal 12: 95–117.
Prahalad, C.K., and Hamel, G. 1990. “The core competence of the corporation.” Harvard Business Review, May/June: 79–91.
Rumelt, R.P. 1987. Theory, strategy and entrepreneurship. In D. Teece (ed.), The competitive challenge (pp. 137–58). Cambridge: Ballinger.
Schoemaker, P.J. 1990. “Strategy, complexity, and economic rent.” Management Science 36: 1178–1192.
Teece, D., Pisano, G., and Shuen A. 1992. “Dynamic capabilities and strategic management.” Working paper, Consortium on Competitiveness and Cooperation, University of California at Berkeley.
Wernerfelt, B. 1984. “A resource-based view of the firm.” Strategic Management Journal 5: 171–180.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Montgomery, C.A. (1995). Of Diamonds and Rust: A New Look at Resources. In: Montgomery, C.A. (eds) Resource-Based and Evolutionary Theories of the Firm: Towards a Synthesis. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2201-0_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2201-0_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5923-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-2201-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive