Skip to main content

Milk production: Factors affecting milk composition

  • Chapter
Milk Quality

Abstract

Through genetic selection, improvements in nutrition and management, and advances in milking technology, the mammary gland of the dairy cow yields far more milk nutrients and volume than the calf can consume. Selection of cows for greater production, and the stresses associated with nutrition, reproduction, and the environment may affect milk yield as well as composition. The quantity and quality of milk are highly dependent upon the amount of mammary tissue available to produce milk, secretory cell efficiency in synthesizing milk components, and the availability of suitable nutrients from which the cow manufactures milk. The purpose of this chapter is to provide a basic knowledge of the factors that affect milk yield and composition, which should aid in the development of procedures to efficiently harvest large volumes of a high-quality product. Before such factors can be considered, a basic understanding of mammary gland anatomy, milk storage, and the physiology of milk component biosynthesis and let-down is presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References and further reading

  • Brandsma, S. (1978) The relation between milking residual milk and milk yield. In Proc. Symp. on Machine Milking 17th Ann. Meeting. National Mastitis Council, Inc., Arlington VA, USA, p. 47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmerson, M.A. (1941) Studies on the macroscopic anatomy of the bovine udder and teat Vet. Ext. Quart., 41, 80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gifford, W. (1936) The butterfat records of cows possessing supernumeraries compared with cows having the normal number of teats. Mo. Agric. Exper. Sta. Bull, 370, 42–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, J. (1927) The Physiology of Reproduction in the Cow. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, B.L. (1985) Lactation. The Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, B.L. and Smith, V.R. (1974). Lactation: A Comprehensive Treatise (Vol. III: Nutrition and Biochemistry of Milk/Maintenance). Academic Press, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linzell, J.L. (1955) Some observations on the contractile tissue of the mammary glands. J. Physiol, 130, 257–267.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McDowell, R. (1981) Effect of Environment on Nutrient Requirements of Domestic Animals (79). National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mein, G.A., Clough, P.A., Westgarth, D.R. and Thiel, C.C. (1970) A comparison of the milking characteristics of transparent and conventional teatcup liners. J. Dairy Res., 37, 535–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, J.M. (1959). The effect of certain mild stresses on the bovine teat canal on infection with Streptococcus agalactiae. Cornell Vet., 49, 411–421.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Noorlander, D.O. (1960) Milking Machines and Mastitis. Californian Compton Press, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reitsma, S.Y., Cant, E.J., Grindal, R.J., Westgarth, D.R. and Bramley, A.J. (1981) Effect of duration of teatcup liner closure per pulsation cycle on bovine mastitis. J. Dairy Sci., 64, 2240–2245.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rolleri, G.D., Larson, B.L. and Touchberry, R.W. (1956) Protein production in the bovine breed and individual variations in the specific protein constituents of milk. J. Dairy Sci., 39, 1683.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, V.R. (1964) Anatomy of the udder. In Physiology of Lactation. The Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA, USA, pp. 16–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swett, W.W. (1942) Arrangement of the tissues by which the cow’s udder is suspended. J. Agric. Res., 65, 19–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, S.W. (1981) Harvesting your Milk Crop. Babson Bros., Dairy Research and Educational Service, Oak Brooks, IL, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Horn, H.H. and Wilcox, C.J. (1992) Large Dairy Herd Management. ADSA, Champaign, IL, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittemore, C.T. (1980) Lactation of the Dairy Cow. Longman Group Ltd, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox, C.J. (1992) Genetics: Basic concept. Large Dairy Herd Management (eds VanHorn, H.H. and Wilcox, C.J.). ADSA, Champaign, IL, USA, pp. 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, D.M., Mein, G.A. and Brown, M.R. (1981) Biological responses of the bovine teat to milking: Information from measurements of milk flow rate within individual pulsation cycles. J. Dairy Res., 48, 7–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nickerson, S.C. (1995). Milk production: Factors affecting milk composition. In: Harding, F. (eds) Milk Quality. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2195-2_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2195-2_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5920-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-2195-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics